Jamal Hirani

If a purchase event has the wrong ID, fires on the wrong page or fires twice because both a tag-manager tag and the platform’s integration are active, the platform credits conversions that did not happen, decides that audience converts and buys more of it.

• Cost per acquisition rises and returns fall, with no visible cause in Ads Manager.
• Hirani says catching it requires pulling raw API data and comparing it with real site activity—something a pixel helper or preview check won’t show.

Hirani reports that, among more than 200 Meta and Google accounts diagnosed in a year, 72% had at least one conversion event firing incorrectly. The dashboard still displayed conversions because the faulty event kept firing.

Read original

An agency managing 30 to 50 accounts tends to apply one uniform process and optimise within the platform’s reporting, leaving no one to read raw API data or check what happens after the click.

• The riskiest position, they argue, is not having no agency but having one that creates confidence without visibility.
• They frame their diagnosis as a second opinion on data an agency may not see, not a replacement for it.

Across the same 200-plus accounts, agency-managed ones showed 2.3 times more misfiring conversion events, 1.8 times more landing-page issues, higher average CPMs from unchecked audience overlap, and more campaigns running than the task required.

Read original

The tell is whether the account has a spend ceiling.

• Without one, waste is invisible because nothing forces a comparison with what the same money would return elsewhere.
• In the brands they examine, the discipline shows up in daily spend caps and bid strategy, not interview answers.

Form, the UK plant-protein brand founded in 2017, is described as capping daily Meta spend and stopping paid social at the point where wholesale margin delivers better contribution per pound.

• The founder, Damian Soong, is quoted on the Future Commerce podcast saying, "I wouldn't allow our business to become dependent on one channel."
• Separately, Liquid Death's chief media officer Benoit Vatere told AdExchanger that platform ROAS "doesn't tell me anything," and the brand runs an incrementality method against actual store sales instead — with roughly $2m of paid spend behind around 30 billion earned impressions.

Read original · Original 2

Sending paid traffic to a tool that captures customer data before showing a price produces owned data; sending it to a product page produces a bounce and borrowed targeting. They extend the approach to product launches: the same funnel can serve a second product instead of restarting acquisition from zero.

Butternut Box, the dog food subscription founded in 2016, is described as reaching £126.7m revenue in 2023, up 82%, with no retail.

• Paid traffic goes through a pet profile quiz—breed, age, weight, activity and dietary needs—before pricing appears.
• Its sister cat brand, Marro, launched on the same subscription and quiz engine.

Read original

Most small brands scale paid social first, then try to manufacture credibility with that spend—a costly approach that rarely compounds. The alternative they highlight is to win retail placement and press coverage first, then use paid social to defend ground already taken, sizing the ad budget to money actually raised rather than an imagined future round.

Founded in 2020, Faace built Harrods, Selfridges, Urban Outfitters and QVC distribution and press coverage before scaling paid social. It raised roughly £450k of external capital, including a £60k Dragons' Den round, and recorded first-year revenue of £278k.

Read original

Brands without a genuine founder presence spend heavily to manufacture authority through paid creators, and that spend rarely compounds like authentic founder content. Hirani’s test is whether the founder still genuinely runs the creative: the claim rests on that, not follower count.

Charlotte Tilbury is described as reaching £487.3m revenue in 2024, roughly five times its 2018 figure.

• After Puig's 2020 acquisition, the founder continued as chairman, president and chief creative officer; Puig raised its stake to 78.5% in July 2024.
• Ninety percent of the brand's social posts are video, with a billion views over twelve months.
• Skincare has a separate Instagram account, so it does not compete with the main feed's makeup positioning.

Read original

The founder’s question is not whether to add wholesale, but what a strategic buyer will pay for the direct-to-consumer relationship itself. They also read the filing shape rather than smooth it out: in the deal they examine, revenue is growing while operating profit falls, pointing to an exit on revenue strength, not margin strength.

Protein Works sold to Lactalis on £55.1m revenue, with 83% still direct-to-consumer.

• Turnover was up 8.5%, operating profit down almost 19%, and net profit down £1.2m.
• Lactalis already supplies whey and casein through its ingredients arm.
• Its separately stated press figure of around €65m sat slightly above the filed accounts.
• The private-equity backer disclosed a 10.8x cash multiple on a 2019 entry, when revenue was around £13m.

Read original

Figures are attributed to filings, disclosed funding rounds, sponsor multiples or named on-record quotes; the interpretation is presented as their own reading. Readers can check the sourced facts against their own data.

The Butternut Box and Charlotte Tilbury posts anchor their claims in Companies House or disclosed funding figures; the Liquid Death and Form posts quote Vatere and Soong on the record. Each closes with an aphorism, such as “An undefined ceiling is the most expensive thing an account can spend up to.”

Hirani’s two first-person diagnosis posts focus on measuring what an account is actually doing; the six brand teardowns examine the larger strategic questions of channel choice and funnel design. The pattern across the teardowns is consistent: paid media amplifies something that already works, and its value depends on whether the account can tell what it is really buying.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3 · Original 4 · Original 5 · Original 6 · Original 7 · Original 8

Start here to understand the recurring finding behind the rest of the work.

Of more than 200 Meta and Google ad accounts diagnosed this year, 72% had at least one conversion event firing incorrectly — a wrong event ID, a trigger on the wrong page, or double-counting when a tag-manager tag and the platform's own integration are both live.

• The dashboard still shows conversions, so the algorithm optimises toward people who never converted and cost per acquisition climbs while nothing looks broken inside Ads Manager.
• The post says the problem only becomes visible by pulling raw API data and comparing it with real site activity.
• It closes with an offer of a free 30-minute account diagnosis with no sales pitch.

For brands planning a campaign

For a measurement pitch, lead with a specific, checkable failure mode: an audit that reconciles platform-reported events with on-site activity, scoped as a short paid diagnostic rather than an ongoing retainer.

The finding comes with numbers, not a generic critique of agencies.

Across the same 200-plus diagnosed accounts, agency-managed accounts performed worse on average than self-managed ones: 2.3 times more misfiring conversion events, 1.8 times more landing-page issues, higher average CPMs from unchecked audience overlap, and more campaigns running than necessary.

• The post frames this as a structural problem, not a failure of care: an agency handling 30 to 50 accounts applies one uniform process, reports on platform metrics, and does not pull API data or check what happens after the click.
• The risk is an agency relationship that creates confidence without visibility.
• The post positions an independent diagnosis as a second opinion on data the agency may not see.

For brands planning a campaign

Pitch the audit as additive to an existing agency relationship, not a replacement. The deliverable is visibility into data beyond the standard weekly report.

Butternut Box, the UK fresh dog food subscription brand founded by Kevin Glynn and David Nolan in 2016, is described as reaching £126.7m revenue in 2023, up 82% year on year, with no retail presence, over £380m raised in total, and £280m from General Atlantic and L Catterton in April 2024.

• The post's central point: paid traffic lands on a pet-profiling quiz that captures breed, age, weight, activity and dietary needs before showing any pricing.
• The author treats this as owned data, not borrowed targeting.
• Sister cat brand Marro launched in 2024 on the same subscription engine and quiz architecture.

For brands planning a campaign

For lifecycle work on a subscription or repeat-purchase brand, make the case for investing in profiling and data upstream of pricing. Treat a reusable funnel across adjacent products as a retention asset, not a launch cost.

The post describes Liquid Death at roughly $333m revenue in 2024 and a $1.4bn valuation after its March 2024 Series E, with 14 million Instagram and TikTok followers and a five-person in-house creative team.

• It reports 30 billion earned impressions against under $2m of paid spend, and quotes the brand's Chief Media Officer saying platform ROAS "doesn't tell me anything," with measurement instead run through an incrementality method called LiveLift against actual store sales.
• It also notes the founding sequence: a mock-up was advertised on Facebook in early 2019, before any product existed, to test demand and capture intent ahead of manufacturing.

For brands planning a campaign

Make the case for incrementality measurement against a sales baseline instead of accepting platform-attributed ROAS. The pattern depends on an unusually strong organic and PR engine, so it is not a template for every account.

Form, the UK plant-protein and nootropics brand founded in 2017 by Damian Soong, Natalia Bojanic and Peter O'Donoghue, is B-Corp certified and DTC-led, with retail and wholesale layered on.

• The post quotes Soong on the Future Commerce podcast: "I wouldn't allow our business to become dependent on one channel" — and argues that the principle shows up in account size, daily spend caps and bid strategy, not just interviews.
• Wholesale runs through Healf, independent retailers, Amazon and marketplaces without, the post says, cannibalising DTC margin.
• Meta spend stops where retail margin delivers better contribution per pound spent.

For brands planning a campaign

A contribution-margin or spend-ceiling review — identifying where paid spend falls below the margin a retail channel delivers — is a defensible, bounded offer for founder-led brands already selling through several channels.

Charlotte Tilbury is described as reaching £487.3m revenue in 2024, roughly five times its £100.9m in 2018.

• Puig acquired the brand in 2020 at around a £1.2bn valuation, raised its stake to 78.5% in July 2024 and plans full ownership by 2031.
• Charlotte Tilbury continued as Chairman, President and Chief Creative Officer.
• The post notes that 90% of the brand's social posts are video, with one billion views over twelve months, and that a separate Instagram account for skincare keeps that content from competing with the main feed's makeup positioning.

For brands planning a campaign

For a founder-led consumer brand, treat founder content as the asset paid amplification extends, rather than replacing it with manufactured creator content. Consider splitting a brand's feeds by product line to keep the main narrative intact.

The faulty event keeps firing, so the platform keeps crediting conversions, the algorithm keeps buying the audience it believes converted, and CPA rises with no visible cause in Ads Manager.

Check event configuration against raw platform API data and what actually happened on the site, rather than relying on a pixel helper or GTM preview—the checks most teams already run.

The problem is invisible, not rare. It does not show up in Ads Manager, budget pacing or weekly agency reports; the dashboard still shows conversions even when the underlying signal is wrong.

For brands planning a campaign

For a founder-led brand referred for measurement work, the strongest opening is a tracking-integrity audit: a specific, checkable defect directly linked to wasted spend. It positions the engagement as finding what current reporting misses, not as a generic account takeover.

Examples: Source 1

Hirani attributes this to the structure of agency operations—30 to 50 accounts each, one uniform process, optimisation within the platform's own reporting—not to a lack of effort or care.

The diagnosis explicitly rejects an anti-agency reading: the finding concerns process and tooling, and the recommended action is a second opinion on raw data, not replacing the agency.

For brands planning a campaign

Positioning the diagnosis as additive to an existing agency relationship lowers defensiveness and suits brands that already pay for management but have never had anyone read the raw data. The offer is a second opinion, not a rip-and-replace.

Examples: Source 1

Form Nutrition's founder says on record that the business would not be allowed to depend on one channel, and Hirani points to daily Meta spend caps as evidence that the principle is policy, not PR. Liquid Death's chief media officer publicly ignores platform-reported ROAS and measures spend against actual store sales instead.

Look for evidence in the budget line and bid strategy—an observable spend ceiling—rather than relying on the principle stated in an interview.

Liquid Death is the counter-case: the discipline does not mean spending less, but measuring differently. Roughly $2m of paid support sat alongside about 30 billion earned impressions and around $333m of 2024 revenue, while the team declined to trust the platform metric.

For brands planning a campaign

For brands deciding whether to increase Meta budgets, the useful angle is a spend-ceiling and incrementality review: establish the channel's role before scaling it. This suits a referral seeking measurement discipline rather than more creative production.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Hirani contrasts this with brands buying manufactured authority through paid creators, arguing that the spend rarely compounds like genuine founder content.

The separate skincare account provides the structural detail behind the numbers: segmenting skincare content keeps it from competing with the makeup narrative in the main feed, unlike brands that dilute both by keeping everything on one account.

For brands planning a campaign

Founder-led brands can be pitched on amplifying an organic asset rather than substituting for it, an argument that carries directly into a creator or founder-partnership brief. Before recommending it, check whether the founder genuinely still runs creative; the case rests on that, not follower count.

Examples: Source 1

It did so on roughly £450k of external capital, including a £60k Dragons' Den round. Hirani presents it as a small-brand counterexample to the usual order of operations: scaling Meta first and trying to buy credibility afterwards.

Capital efficiency is framed against first-year revenue of £278k, with the Meta budget tied to money actually raised rather than an imagined growth curve.

For brands planning a campaign

For a smaller brand, the recommendation is to sequence investment: win retail and press credibility first, then use paid social to defend ground already taken. A referral brief can test whether the brand has something worth amplifying before it spends to create demand.

Examples: Source 1

The quiz captures breed, age, weight, activity and dietary needs before showing pricing.

• Hirani argues that owned data, not creative, determines who keeps subscribing, and that the £280m from General Atlantic and L Catterton was priced against that architecture.
• The sister cat brand Marro then launched on the same subscription and quiz engine.

For brands planning a campaign

For a lifecycle or measurement referral, the opportunity is upstream: fix what the funnel captures before spending more to fill it, and build architecture that transfers across products and SKUs instead of restarting acquisition from zero with each launch.

Examples: Source 1

Hirani reads the deal as the acquirer buying a DTC channel it could not build internally: Lactalis already supplies whey and casein. They also note the sponsor's disclosed 10.8x cash multiple on a 2019 entry, when revenue was around £13m.

Filed Companies House accounts are set against the acquirer's separately stated press figure of around €65m and the sponsor's disclosed cash multiple.

The filings show revenue growing as operating profit falls and net profit drops £1.2m: an exit on revenue strength, not margin strength.

For brands planning a campaign

For brands weighing wholesale, this revenue band raises a sharper question: what would a strategic buyer pay for the DTC channel itself? It gives a referral a credible exit lens, not an at-all-costs growth pitch.

Examples: Source 1

Two further posts report first-person diagnosis findings across a large account sample. Figures are attributed to named sources: Companies House accounts, disclosed funding rounds, sponsor multiples, and on-record operator quotes from Damian Soong on channel dependency and Benoit Vatere on platform-reported ROAS.

Every figure in the posts traces to a filing, a press figure or a named on-record quote; the interpretation is Hirani's own.

For brands planning a campaign

A brand can expect the same structure applied to its own account: one headline number, a short set of checkable claims and a clear conclusion. That makes the format easy to test against a client's data before committing to a referral.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4 · Source 5 · Source 6 · Source 7 · Source 8

The same subscription and quiz architecture carried over to the Marro cat food launch. The post cites £126.7m of 2023 revenue, 82% year-on-year growth and £280m raised from General Atlantic and L Catterton.

View example

Roughly 90% of its social posts are video, and it runs a separate skincare account. The post cites £487.3m of 2024 revenue and a 2020 acquisition at around £1.2bn.

View example

They argue the acquisition was priced around that DTC channel rather than the product.

View example

They argue the brand built credibility before scaling paid social.

View example

They argue Form's Meta spend caps reflect that as policy rather than messaging.

View example

They also described Liquid Death's early demand-test ads for a product that did not yet exist.

View example

Her Charlotte Tilbury post covers the same brand Hirani writes about, tracing the roughly £1M start, the 20 years of backstage work before launch, and the path to a $1.3B valuation.

• Her post on Alex Cooper's Unwell Hydration argues that a large audience creates trial far more easily than repeat purchase.
• That shares Hirani's interest in why a brand with demand still fails on the second purchase; both write for people weighing consumer-brand growth decisions.

Valeva's posts are founder narratives: they follow a person's career, credibility and network to explain why a brand worked.

• Hirani's are account and channel diagnoses, opening with a filing or funding figure and ending with what an operator should check in their own paid media.
• Where Valeva asks what made the founder's position valuable, Hirani asks whether the budget line and tracking behind the brand hold up.
• Valeva's pieces are longer and story-led, rather than built from numbered points.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3

The predictive-LTV post argues that rapidly scaling brands make their biggest mistake by assuming early cohort retention will hold, and lists the customer attributes that carry predictive power.

• The Sleep Number post lays out revenue of $1.89B in 2023 falling to $1.40B in 2025, roughly $672M of debt entering bankruptcy, and a $701M sale price at about 0.5x sales.
• Both writers treat the numbers behind a consumer brand as the explanation, not the backdrop.

Drew F.'s centre of gravity is retention modelling and the tooling around it.

• Their LTV post ends by inviting a direct message rather than stating a conclusion the reader can act on.
• Hirani focuses on paid media and channel choice, citing filings and named operator quotes in their teardowns.
• Drew F.'s Sleep Number post is a deal report — bid, price, store count — while Hirani's equivalent posts pair a deal figure with an argument about what the acquirer was actually buying.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3

His argument that Amazon has imposed a $100B-plus tax on US e-commerce walks through the stacked costs a seller pays — commissions, advertising, FBA fees, and now delivery fees for faster shipping — and asks what those costs leave for product quality and price. Hirani makes the parallel argument about paid social platforms: what the platform reports and charges shapes what a brand can afford to do.

Drecksler writes a recurring news roundup of funding rounds, acquisitions and bankruptcies, alongside commentary aimed squarely at Amazon sellers.

• His posts combine aggregation with opinion on platform policy.
• Hirani takes one brand at a time and builds a structured teardown around a paid-media question.
• Drecksler's unit is the deal list or the platform-wide complaint; Hirani's is the single company's channel and tracking decisions.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3 · Original 4

The two posts read founder-led consumer businesses through narrative and economics.

• One traces Charlotte Tilbury's twenty years backstage before launching at 40, roughly £1M to start, a reported $1.3B majority acquisition by Puig, and the discipline of expanding a winning product into a franchise rather than replacing it with the next launch.
• The other sets Alex Cooper's $500M media valuation beside a drinks line reportedly winding down.
• It argues that a large audience creates trial but not habit; the second purchase competes with existing flavours, prices and routines, not other creators; and widening into hydration, protein and energy adds complexity before the first product has earned a place in anyone's week.
• For a founder-led brand whose stated problem is 'we get trial but not repeat', this is the closer comparative read: it addresses retention through positioning and product-line focus, not measurement infrastructure.

These two posts offer case analysis and strategic commentary, not account-level diagnosis.

• Neither addresses the central, checkable claim: conversion events firing incorrectly across most diagnosed accounts, with agency-managed accounts showing more misfiring events, more landing-page issues and higher CPMs from audience overlap.
• They also offer no spend-ceiling or incrementality method.
• If the first deliverable is proving that reported conversions correspond to actual orders, this comparator does not provide it; the agency would still need a diagnostic route.
• Ask for the scope, pricing and availability of a specific engagement: neither post documents them.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The post on scaling mistakes argues that the earliest customers have the most intense need, making them cheaper to acquire and stickier, and that a common error is assuming early retention holds or trusting a simple decay model.

• It lists attributes with predictive power over customer value: geography, type of credit card used, shopping patterns at other brands, whether the customer arrived on a discount, seasonality and products purchased.
• That answers a question subscription and repeat-purchase brands face once paid acquisition stops being cheap: which characteristics of incoming customers predict whether they stay.
• The second post covers the downside case — Sleep Number's Chapter 11 filing and $701M asset sale to Sleep Country Canada six weeks later, including revenue falling from $1.89B in 2023 to $1.40B in 2025, about $672M of debt entering bankruptcy, a valuation near 0.5x sales and 9x adjusted EBITDA, and a buyer adding roughly 450 US doors to reach 800-plus locations.
• For a brand weighing an exit, a distressed buyer or category consolidation, this comparator covers relevant ground beyond the central claim about fit.

The posts contain no tracking-integrity or event-configuration audit, the strongest and most specific claim about fit, so they cannot substitute for the diagnosis task.

• The predictive-LTV post ends by inviting a direct message rather than laying out a method, and refers to an internal platform name; the approach is described in outline and cannot be reproduced from the post alone.
• The other post is deal reporting, not a method.
• Before buying, ask for the predictive-LTV method, deliverable format, service terms and turnaround.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

One post is a dated deal roundup for 6 April 2026: Allbirds selling its assets for $39M to American Exchange Group, Bed Bath & Beyond agreeing to acquire The Container Store for $150M in stock and convertible notes, OpenAI's funding round, SpaceX's confidential IPO filing, and a long list of similar funding and acquisition items.

• The other argues Amazon has built what it calls a $100B+ tax on US e-commerce, stacking seller costs — sales commissions, advertising to be discovered, FBA fees to qualify for Prime, and now additional delivery fees to be eligible for faster shipping.
• It says products need roughly 90% margins to survive, leaving poor quality, shrinkflation, higher consumer prices or all three, while opting out means ignoring about half the US e-commerce market.
• For a brand weighing how far to depend on Amazon, or asking how its category is consolidating and at what multiples, this is the closer comparator.

Neither post offers account-level diagnosis or lifecycle execution.

• One is aggregation and the other opinion; both describe a market rather than a method a brand could apply to its own funnel.
• The deal roundup covers a single week, so its specifics date quickly and work best as a snapshot.
• Against the measurable claim about misfiring conversion events, this comparator offers context, not a deliverable.
• Ask for the account-level measurement method and scope before commissioning work.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2