Adam Jay is a co-founder of Revenue Reimagined, where he helps B2B companies diagnose and improve their go-to-market systems. His posts describe work that connects sales, marketing, hiring, customer retention, and revenue operations, then sets priorities before recommending a hire or fractional executive.
Adam Jay is most useful for diagnosing linked B2B go-to-market problems and setting priorities before hiring or reorganizing.
Best for
B2B SaaS company at roughly $10M+ ARR seeking fractional GTM operating partner.
Not for
A vendor seeking sponsored posts, affiliate placement, or a creator rate card.
Key takeaways
A hiring plan for 26 sellers outpaced a pipeline that could support about 12.
Six SDRs booking one or two qualified meetings weekly had two competing CRMs and unreliable data.
Churn is decided upstream, before customer success, through target choice, sales promises, and compensation.
Check first: Confirm pricing, deliverables, turnaround, and audience demographics before committing budget.
Main ideas
Diagnose before you prescribe, and sell the diagnosis first · Sales hiring is a pipeline math problem, not a headcount decision · Churn is decided upstream, before customer success gets involved
Adam Jay is a co-founder of Revenue Reimagined who writes about diagnosing and improving B2B go-to-market systems.
Jay’s central argument is that revenue problems rarely belong to one team: hiring, pipeline, sales practices, customer retention, and operations have to work together.
Follow Jay for concrete cases that challenge quick fixes and show how to decide what a business should address first.
Jay makes the connections behind a revenue problem visible, then turns diagnosis into a practical next step.
In one case, a hiring plan for 26 sellers outpaced a pipeline that could support about 12; Jay points to demand, manager capacity, onboarding, and the sales cycle as linked assumptions, rather than treating the plan as one team’s mistake.
Jay also argues against prescribing a familiar fix before understanding the system.
Six SDRs booking one or two qualified meetings a week looked like a staffing problem, but Jay describes finding two competing CRMs, unreliable data, and incentives that neglected pipeline creation and retention.
See the SDR and CRM example In other posts, Jay describes advising a team to wait before hiring a sales leader and turning down a fractional CRO role when that was not the right solution.
A further theme is that customer retention starts before a customer reaches customer success: Jay links churn to whom a company sells to, what sales promises, and how compensation rewards behavior. Read the retention case Together, these examples are useful to leaders weighing whether to hire, reorganize, or fix the operating system first.
Adam Jay's recurring argument is that revenue problems should be diagnosed before anyone prescribes a hire, a tool, or a fractional executive.
Read more
The sequence Adam Jay repeats is diagnose, prescribe, implement, repeat.
Adam Jay tests sales hiring against pipeline creation, treats churn as an upstream problem in ideal customer profile and sales promises, and argues that a diagnosis should carry a score and a signature.
Adam Jay also favors internal promotion when the evidence supports it, and describes Revenue Reimagined as a response to joining companies that looked healthy but were not.
Diagnose before you prescribe, and sell the diagnosis first
Adam Jay's most repeated argument is that companies often buy fractional revenue leadership before they know what is broken.
Read more
The order matters: diagnose, prescribe, implement, repeat.
Revenue Reimagined now starts every engagement with a fixed-price GTM Growth Plan, then prescribes after evidence is reviewed and aligned.
Adam Jay describes the plan as an audit renamed because, in Adam Jay's words, the only people who should be auditing you are the IRS.
A CEO asked Adam Jay to be fractional CRO, and Adam Jay said no.
The post explains that 'fractional CRO' can cover anything revenue-related, and scope creep and prioritization issues follow.
Saying yes would have meant charging a lot of money for something that was not needed.
In another post, after a GTM Growth Plan readout, Adam Jay told an executive team not to hire a sales leader, not to make Revenue Reimagined the fractional CRO, and not to promote the internal candidate yet.
The next ninety days should go into building the system the sales leader would inherit.
Adam Jay previously said yes to fractional CRO work without blinking.
A two-day session with a coach surfaced that the firm was giving clients advice it was not following.
Revenue Reimagined updated its offers and website, and new prospect calls followed.
Adam Jay credits Kate DiLeo for the brand voice and mentions an upcoming GTM Uncensored episode.
Sales hiring is a pipeline math problem, not a headcount decision
Adam Jay tests hiring plans against the demand engine.
Read more
If the pipeline cannot feed the seats, adding reps or a sales leader makes the problem more expensive. The missing piece is usually an operating conversation across finance, sales, and recruiting about demand generation, manager capacity, onboarding, and the sales cycle.
A CEO budgeted 26 sellers.
Adam Jay's review said the pipeline could feed 12, meaning a dozen people would be fired in a few months.
No one had made a reckless decision; finance, sales, and recruiting had each followed reasonable instructions.
In another client, six SDRs booked one or two qualified meetings a week combined.
The system had HubSpot and Salesforce running side by side, 36,000 contacts marked as SQLs across 11,000 companies, no sales methodology, no RevOps owner at more than $10M ARR, and compensation plans that paid only on closed revenue.
After retiring Salesforce and reducing BDR roles from six to three, ARR grew 28%, expansion ARR grew 52%, and Q3 and Q4 were the two biggest revenue quarters in the company's history.
Churn is decided upstream, before customer success gets involved
Adam Jay argues churn is decided long before the customer success team touches an account: by whom you sell to, what gets promised in the sale, and whether anyone is paid to care after the contract is signed.
Read more
If a churn plan starts and ends with CS, you are asking the last people to touch the customer to clean up a promise someone else made.
A client's NPS was 17.
The compensation plan paid on closed revenue with nothing tied to retention.
The GTM Growth Plan scored strategy, sales, marketing, people, and RevOps, and included 1:1s with GTM leaders and selected individual contributors.
NPS moved to 48, trailing twelve-month logo churn dropped from 1.55% to 1.12%, and expansion ARR grew 52%.
Adam Jay attributes the result to starting with marketing and the ideal customer profile rather than customer success.
Adam Jay treats the GTM Growth Plan readout as the moment a leadership team hears its own data with nothing softened.
Read more
A score makes the problem concrete and comparable. Once the team agrees, Adam Jay says the name is on every finding and owes the work to move each one.
A $10M+ ARR company scored 1.3 out of 4 against an expected band of 2.5 to 2.7 for their stage.
The team nodded because the score matched what they had been feeling for months.
Contract problems turned out to be a symptom of how deals were sold.
By the end of the call, a recap and the first two GTM Sprint plans were built.
Adam Jay's line: 'a diagnosis nobody will sign their name to is a guess with slides.'
Answers why Adam Jay moved into revenue-system diagnosis and what problem Revenue Reimagined was built to prevent.
Read more
Adam Jay describes a CRO job where the product turned out to be a Figma mockup.
Before a demo with a large company, two deal-breaker features did not exist.
The CEO proposed demoing them anyway and telling the prospect they were functional, then building after signing.
Adam Jay objected.
The company later failed after squandering $16M, and Adam Jay and Dale started Revenue Reimagined to diagnose revenue systems before damage is done.
For brands planning a campaign
For a fractional GTM operating partner brief, this is the origin story: it explains the anti-vaporware, evidence-first stance and the emphasis on diagnosing what is real before scaling.
A short post states that a fractional CRO will not solve GTM problems until the problems are understood.
The sequence is diagnose, prescribe, implement, repeat.
It is the clearest compact statement of the method.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful for a campaign angle or brief because it gives a plain-language filter: ask any fractional GTM candidate how they separate diagnosis from prescription.
Answers what a GTM Growth Plan readout actually does and how diagnosis becomes a work plan.
Read more
Adam Jay describes reading out a GTM Growth Plan to an executive team.
Their revenue system scored 1.3 out of 4, below the expected 2.5–2.7 for a $10M+ ARR company.
Contract problems turned out to be a symptom of how deals were sold.
The team agreed in the room, and Adam Jay says their name is on every finding, with a recap and first two GTM Sprint plans built by the end.
For brands planning a campaign
Shows what a diagnostic engagement looks like and why accountability matters. For a fractional GTM operating partner brief, it is evidence of structured scoring, team alignment, and follow-through rather than a slide deck.
Answers why a fractional CRO is not automatically the answer and how Adam Jay scopes work.
Read more
A CEO asked Adam Jay to be fractional CRO, and Adam Jay said no.
The post explains that for years Adam Jay would have said yes, but scope creep and prioritization issues made fractional CRO engagements too broad.
Revenue Reimagined now starts every engagement with a fixed-price GTM Growth Plan, then prescribes after evidence is reviewed and aligned.
Sometimes the prescription is a fractional seat; often it is something else.
For brands planning a campaign
For a fractional GTM operating partner brief, this shows qualification and a willingness to decline work that is not the right fit. It also explains the diagnosis-first commercial model.
Answers when a sales leader hire should wait and what should happen first.
Read more
After a GTM Growth Plan readout, an executive team wanted to know who should run sales.
Adam Jay gave three answers, none a name: do not hire an external sales leader, do not make Revenue Reimagined the fractional CRO, and do not promote the internal candidate yet.
The existing system had signed contracts that never became billable revenue, one rep carrying most of the plan, and reporting nobody trusted.
The next 90 days should go into fixing the system.
For brands planning a campaign
Directly relevant to a brief about scaling sales hiring efficiently. It shows Adam Jay testing whether the underlying system can support a sales leader before adding one.
Answers how to test a sales hiring plan against the demand engine.
Read more
A CEO budgeted 26 sellers, but Adam Jay's review said the pipeline could feed 12.
The spreadsheet had start dates, quotas, ramp assumptions, and contributions, but the weekly pipeline creation could not support 26.
No one had made a reckless decision; finance, sales, and recruiting had each followed reasonable instructions.
The missing piece was an operating conversation across those functions about demand engine, manager capacity, onboarding, and sales cycle.
For brands planning a campaign
Shows how to connect hiring assumptions to pipeline reality. For a fractional GTM operating partner brief, it is a concrete example of slowing a hiring plan before it creates expensive turnover.
Answers what a GTM Growth Plan changes when sales activity looks like a people problem but is really a system problem.
Read more
At a new client, six SDRs booked one or two qualified meetings a week combined.
The obvious read was a people problem, but the GTM Growth Plan found HubSpot and Salesforce running side by side, 36,000 contacts marked as SQLs across 11,000 companies, no sales methodology, no RevOps owner at $10M+ ARR, and comp plans that paid on closed revenue without rewarding pipeline creation or retention.
Salesforce was retired, the team worked from one CRM, and the BDR structure went from six roles to three.
ARR grew 28%, expansion ARR grew 52%, and Q3 and Q4 were the two biggest revenue quarters in the company's history.
For brands planning a campaign
A strong example for a brief on scaling sales hiring efficiently: it shows that adding a sales leader or another SDR would have made a system problem more expensive.
Answers how churn can be traced to sales promises, ICP, and compensation rather than only to customer success.
Read more
A client had an NPS of 17.
Adam Jay argues churn gets decided earlier than customer success: whom you sell to, what gets promised, and whether anyone is paid to care after signing.
The client's comp plan paid on closed revenue with nothing tied to retention.
The GTM Growth Plan scored strategy, sales, marketing, people, and RevOps, and included 1:1s with GTM leaders and selected individual contributors.
NPS moved to 48, trailing twelve-month logo churn dropped from 1.55% to 1.12%, and expansion ARR grew 52%.
For brands planning a campaign
Shows cross-functional diagnosis with retention and expansion metrics. For a fractional GTM operating partner brief, it supports the claim that revenue-system work can change customer outcomes, not just sales activity.
Answers what Adam Jay looks for in sales leadership and why internal development matters.
Read more
Adam Jay says they have hired more than 450 salespeople and promoted 36, and the promotions taught the most.
A hire shows up with a resume and a story; a promotion answers whether someone can handle a job they have never held.
Adam Jay watches how fast people learn, what they do with feedback, and whether the people around them get better.
The best future leaders were already acting like leaders before they had a title.
For brands planning a campaign
For a brief about scaling sales hiring efficiently, this gives a talent-development lens: fill leadership seats internally when the evidence supports it, and be clear about what external hires signal to the team.
Answers how Revenue Reimagined's current offer was shaped and why Adam Jay talks about diagnosis before prescription.
Read more
Adam Jay and Dale spent two days with a coach and concluded their own offer let clients skip diagnosis by asking for a fractional CRO.
They had over-delivered and given clients "everything" rather than scoping specific deliverables in a specific order.
The coach's point reframed the offsite.
They updated their offers and website, and new prospect calls followed.
Adam Jay credits Kate DiLeo for the brand voice and mentions an upcoming GTM Uncensored episode.
For brands planning a campaign
Shows self-correction and a public update to the offer. For a fractional GTM operating partner brief, it explains why the diagnosis-first model is not just marketing language.
Adam Jay's most repeated argument is that companies buy fractional revenue leadership before they know what is broken.
Read more
One post describes turning down a CEO's request for a fractional CRO; another describes telling an executive team not to hire a sales leader and not to make Revenue Reimagined the fractional CRO either, because the system underneath the seat needed ninety days of work first. Revenue Reimagined now starts every engagement with a fixed-price GTM Growth Plan, an audit renamed because, in Adam Jay's words, the only people who should be auditing you are the IRS.
Condenses the sequence into a short mantra — diagnose, prescribe, implement, repeat — so the order is easy to remember and repeat back.
For brands planning a campaign
A brand selling services, software, or fractional talent into revenue teams should expect the first question to be about diagnosis. Messaging that opens with a product recommendation is likely to draw the same pushback Adam Jay applies to premature hiring.
Adam Jay treats sales capacity as a math problem tied to demand generation.
Read more
In one post, a CEO's plan to hire 26 sellers met a pipeline that could support roughly 12, meaning a dozen people would be let go within months.
In another, six SDRs at a new client were booking one or two qualified meetings a week combined.
Adam Jay points to the system rather than the reps: two CRMs running side by side, 36,000 contacts marked as SQLs, no sales methodology, no RevOps owner at a company past $10M ARR, and compensation plans that paid only on closed revenue.
Opens with a stark ratio or count, then walks back through the operating decisions — finance, sales, recruiting — that produced it without anyone acting recklessly.
For brands planning a campaign
For sales hiring, enablement, or RevOps products, the credible angle is pipeline math and sequencing growth the business can absorb, not headcount growth.
Adam Jay argues that churn is decided long before the customer success team touches an account — by whom you sell to, what gets promised in the sale, and whether anyone is paid to care what happens after the contract is signed.
Read more
In one engagement, the client's compensation plan paid on closed revenue with nothing tied to retention. Adam Jay reports NPS moving from 17 to 48, trailing twelve-month logo churn falling from 1.55% to 1.12%, and expansion ARR growing 52%, which he attributes to starting with marketing and the ideal customer profile rather than customer success.
For brands planning a campaign
Retention, customer-success, and marketing pitches meet a framing in which the fix begins upstream at ICP and sales promises, so tooling that only addresses the CS team will look like cleanup rather than a solution.
Adam Jay describes GTM Growth Plan readouts as the ninety minutes where a leadership team hears its own data played back with nothing softened.
Read more
In one example, a $10M+ ARR company scored 1.3 out of 4 against an expected band of 2.5 to 2.7, and the team recognized the number as matching what they had been feeling for months. Adam Jay notes that once a leadership team agrees with the plan in front of each other, the name on every finding is his, and that a diagnosis nobody will sign their name to is a guess with slides.
Uses a scored scale with a benchmark band, which makes a diagnosis concrete, comparable, and hard to wave away.
For brands planning a campaign
Data products that produce a defensible score or benchmark fit how Adam Jay presents findings. Auditable output matches the stated standard better than a qualitative assessment.
Adam Jay writes openly about a gap between the advice Revenue Reimagined gave clients and the firm's own offer: years of telling clients to diagnose first while still letting a client skip straight to a fractional CRO engagement.
Read more
A two-day session with a coach surfaced it, and the firm came out with sharper offers and updated website copy. Adam Jay credits earlier brand voice work by Kate DiLeo as the reason the voice has held together over the years, and mentions an upcoming appearance on GTM Uncensored.
Uses the firm's own misstep as the example, which gives the argument credibility without positioning Adam Jay as the only expert in the room.
For brands planning a campaign
Coaching, positioning, and brand-voice providers have an unusual opening: this is one of the few places the posts name outside providers and describe paying for and benefiting from their work.
Adam Jay says they have hired more than 450 salespeople, and that the 36 promoted taught the most.
Read more
A hire arrives with a resume and a story, and salespeople are usually good at selling themselves.
A promotion answers a harder question: can this person handle a job they have never held.
The signals Adam Jay watches are how fast someone learns, what they do with feedback, and whether the people around them get better.
The closing argument is that every leadership seat filled from outside tells the team what development really means at that company.
For brands planning a campaign
Talent assessment, development, and internal mobility products align with this argument. Recruiting-led messaging runs against the stated preference for growing people who have already earned trust.
Adam Jay traces Revenue Reimagined's founding to a pattern of joining companies that looked healthy and were not.
Read more
The sharpest example is a CEO who, during demo prep, instructed Adam Jay to tell a prospect that two nonexistent features were functional and build them after signing.
Adam Jay describes showing up expecting to scale something and spending the first six months working out what was real.
A year after that demo, the company was out of business having spent $16M of investor money.
Adam Jay and Dale started the firm to show up before the damage is done.
For brands planning a campaign
Founder-story and mission-based partnership messaging has a ready theme here. The origin narrative is vivid and specific, which makes it usable in co-marketing or podcast formats.
One describes a 15-year-old's night out and Adam Jay's decision not to punish him for telling the truth about it, closing with a line from a colleague's wife: discernment is a skill that never goes away, and not fitting in is sometimes an asset. The lesson is about protecting honesty over enforcing rules.
This is the one post in the reviewed material with no revenue-system content, and it uses a family story rather than a client engagement.
For brands planning a campaign
Leadership and culture brands get a softer, personal register here. A human-interest angle belongs in this territory, not a revenue-system one.
Adam Jay's posts describe one business he owns: Revenue Reimagined, the go-to-market firm he co-founded with a partner named Dale, which sells a diagnostic product called the GTM Growth Plan and fractional CRO engagements.
Read more
The posts also describe client engagements, but the companies are not named, so they cannot be listed as brand relationships.
The only other named commercial connection is Kate DiLeo, credited with writing and updating Revenue Reimagined's brand voice.
No sponsorships, affiliate arrangements, or investments appear in the reviewed posts.
Revenue Reimagined
Owned business
Adam Jay says he and a partner named Dale started Revenue Reimagined to diagnose what is broken in a company's revenue system and then rebuild it.
Read more
The posts present the GTM Growth Plan, fractional CRO seats, and GTM Sprint plans as the firm's own offers, and describe client work under that banner.
Adam Jay's LinkedIn posts are a practical place to explore revenue system diagnosis before hiring.
Read more
Start with posts that explain diagnose-before-prescribe and the GTM Growth Plan, then read client examples about pipeline math, churn upstream, and sales leadership development. For adjacent perspectives, Tabitha Cavanagh writes about sales leadership development and resume benchmarking, Aaron McCann writes satirically about recruiting and agency competition, and Grace Woods writes about building talent acquisition departments in SaaS companies.
Both write about sales leadership development and how to assess leaders.
Read more
Tabitha Cavanagh's posts examine the path into sales leadership and how to benchmark a leadership resume; Adam Jay's posts describe promoting from within and watching how fast people learn and what they do with feedback.
Tabitha Cavanagh writes from a recruiting and coaching perspective, focusing on resume evidence and leadership behaviors. Adam Jay writes from a revenue-system diagnostic perspective, tying leadership readiness to pipeline math and operating capacity.
Both write about sales hiring and recruiting dynamics.
Read more
Aaron McCann uses humor to describe recruiting as dating and the problems of competing agencies; Adam Jay writes about hiring plans that outrun the pipeline and the cost of adding reps or leaders to a broken system.
Aaron McCann's tone is satirical and focuses on recruiter experience and agency competition. Adam Jay's tone is case-based and focuses on revenue system diagnosis and operating sequencing.
Both treat hiring as a system that needs strategy, data, and preparation.
Read more
Grace Woods outlines building a talent acquisition department with hiring strategy, candidate experience, and metrics; Adam Jay argues hiring decisions should follow demand generation, manager capacity, and onboarding capacity.
Grace Woods writes about internal talent acquisition functions and candidate experience in scaling SaaS companies. Adam Jay writes about revenue system diagnosis and sales capacity from a GTM operating partner perspective.
For a fractional GTM operating partner brief, treat Adam Jay as a broad LinkedIn reach option whose content speaks to B2B revenue and sales operators, not as a verified match against a target job-title, seniority, or geography list.
Read more
The account had 31,489 LinkedIn followers when observed on 2026-10-08, which shows scale.
The posts discuss sales leadership, sales-hiring plans against pipeline, SDR productivity, churn and NPS, and when a fractional CRO is the wrong answer; that content is likely to appeal to people responsible for GTM systems and sales execution.
The packet does not measure who follows or engages: no job titles, seniority, company size, employer, geography, or engagement data are supplied.
Follower count and post topics therefore cannot establish that the audience contains fractional-engagement buyers or matches a specific account list.
Next step: request recent audience survey results or a platform demographic export for role, seniority, geography, and company size, plus engagement results for comparable posts on GTM diagnosis and sales-hiring efficiency.
Without that, use the profile for broad reach testing rather than targeted account-based placement.
LinkedIn followers
31489
LinkedIn account metadata for linkedin.com/in/adambjay · 2026-10-08
Adam Jay's reviewed posts describe paid client work rather than sponsored or creator-partnership formats: no sponsored posts, brand collaborations, affiliate arrangements, or media-kit terms appear in the material reviewed.
Read more
The commercial route his posts actually show runs through Revenue Reimagined, the firm he co-founded with Dale, and it starts with a fixed-price GTM Growth Plan.
He has said every engagement now begins there, with the prescription written only after the evidence is reviewed and the plan is agreed, rather than a client buying a fractional executive seat up front.
A fractional CRO or operating-partner seat is one possible outcome of that diagnosis, and his posts show him turning one down when the underlying system could not support it, so a buyer should not assume a retained seat is what he will propose.
He also describes follow-on work such as GTM Sprints after a readout, and states that he puts his name on each finding and owes the client the work to move it.
No pricing, deliverable list, turnaround time, or official inquiry page for any of this was included in the reviewed material, so a brand planning around him needs those details directly from him or Revenue Reimagined before committing budget.
Strong fit on method and evidence, with one scoping condition. Adam Jay's reviewed work is almost entirely this problem, and the recommended way to start is a fixed-price GTM Growth Plan rather than a retained fractional seat.
Read more
Brief
A B2B SaaS company at roughly $10M+ ARR wants a fractional GTM operating partner to make sales hiring more efficient — adding sellers only as fast as the demand engine, manager capacity, and onboarding can carry them, and deciding whether to hire, promote, or wait on a sales leader.
Reasons
The central argument in the reviewed posts is that companies buy fractional revenue leadership before they know what is broken. One post states the sequence plainly: diagnose, prescribe, implement, repeat, and says a fractional CRO will not solve GTM problems until those problems are understood. Another describes turning down a CEO's request for a fractional CRO seat.
Sales hiring is treated as a math problem tied to demand. In one example, a CEO budgeted 26 sellers while the pipeline could feed about 12 — a plan that would have meant firing a dozen people within months. Finance, sales, and recruiting had each followed reasonable instructions; the missing piece was an operating conversation across those functions about demand engine, manager capacity, onboarding, and sales cycle.
A second example shows the same diagnosis on activity numbers: six SDRs booking one or two qualified meetings a week combined, with two CRMs running side by side, 36,000 contacts marked as SQLs across 11,000 companies, no sales methodology, no RevOps owner past $10M ARR, and compensation paying only on closed revenue. Reported results after consolidating to one CRM and cutting the BDR structure from six roles to three were 28% ARR growth, 52% expansion ARR growth, and the two biggest revenue quarters in the company's history.
The hiring decision is separated from the system decision. After a GTM Growth Plan readout, an executive team asked who should run sales and got three answers, none of them a name: do not hire an external leader, do not make Revenue Reimagined the fractional CRO, and do not promote the internal candidate yet. The stated reason was that a new leader would inherit signed contracts that never became billable revenue, one rep carrying most of the plan, and reporting nobody trusted — so the next ninety days should go into fixing the system first.
Internal development is part of the fit story. Adam Jay says they have hired more than 450 salespeople and promoted 36, and that the promotions taught the most, because a promotion answers whether someone can handle a job they have never held. The signals described are how fast someone learns, what they do with feedback, and whether the people around them get better.
The readout format suits a buyer who wants a defensible starting point. One post describes scoring a $10M+ ARR company's revenue system at 1.3 out of 4 against an expected band of 2.5 to 2.7, with the team agreeing in the room, Adam Jay's name on every finding, and a recap plus the first two GTM Sprint plans built by the end of the day.
Conditions
Expect the engagement to begin with a paid, fixed-price GTM Growth Plan. The posts say every engagement now starts there and the prescription is written only after the evidence is reviewed and aligned, so a retained operating-partner seat is an outcome rather than the entry product.
No pricing, deliverable list, turnaround time, or official inquiry page appears in the reviewed material. A brand needs those terms directly from Adam Jay or Revenue Reimagined before committing budget.
The audience evidence is scale only. The account had 31,489 LinkedIn followers when observed on 2026-10-08, with no job titles, seniority, company size, employer, geography, or engagement data supplied. Follower count does not establish that the audience contains a specific buyer list.
When to choose a specialist
Poor fit as briefed. The reviewed material shows a consulting commercial route, not a creator-partnership one.
Read more
Brief
A B2B sales-engagement software vendor wants a paid sponsored post series and affiliate placement with a B2B sales audience: a rate card, usage and exclusivity terms, a trackable sign-up link, and a defined number of posts over a quarter.
Reasons
No sponsored posts, brand collaborations, affiliate arrangements, or media-kit terms appear across the eleven posts reviewed. The commercial path the posts actually describe runs through Revenue Reimagined, the firm Adam Jay co-founded with Dale, and starts with a fixed-price GTM Growth Plan. That absence reflects only what was reviewed; it is not a claim that no sponsorship offer exists. A vendor should ask directly before ruling the format in or out.
Large follower count is not audience evidence for this brief. The account had 31,489 LinkedIn followers when observed on 2026-10-08, but no role, seniority, geography, company size, or engagement data were supplied, so there is no basis for saying the audience matches a software vendor's target accounts.
A second pattern also fails: a brand that wants to buy a fractional CRO or operating-partner seat up front, without a diagnostic phase, is buying the thing Adam Jay publicly declines. One post describes saying no to exactly that request, on the grounds that fractional engagements become unbounded scope and that the prescription should follow the evidence. A brief written around an immediate retained seat, or around headcount-growth messaging, runs against the stated position that a new sales leader hired into a broken system just buys a more expensive version of the same quarter.
A worked campaign example
Angle
Hiring only as fast as the pipeline can feed
Deliverables to ask for
A scored readout of the revenue system with named findings and a benchmark band, following the format described in the 1.3-out-of-4 readout, so the leadership team hears its own data played back and agrees in the room.
A recap plus the first GTM Sprint plans, which the posts say were built the same day as the readout.
A clear statement after the diagnostic of whether the prescription is a fractional seat or something else, since the posts state that a fractional seat is often not the answer.
First ninety days
Build the hiring plan beside weekly pipeline creation. Take each budgeted seat with its start date, quota, and ramp assumption and test it against demand actually being generated. The 26-seat plan that a pipeline could only feed for 12 is the reference case for this step.
Fix the data foundation before adding people. In one client, HubSpot and Salesforce ran side by side with 36,000 contacts marked as SQLs across 11,000 companies. Consolidating to one CRM and one source of truth preceded any headcount change.
Rewrite compensation so pipeline creation and retention are paid, not just closed revenue. The churn case turned on a comp plan that paid on closed revenue with nothing tied to retention; the SDR case turned on plans that did not reward pipeline creation.
Prove the first group can ramp before hiring the next. This is the sequencing argument behind slowing the 26-rep plan to roughly 12.
Decide on sales leadership last. Once the system is worth running, choose between an external hire, a fractional seat, and an internal promotion, and be explicit about what an outside hire signals to the team. The promotion lens here is how fast someone learns, what they do with feedback, and whether the people around them get better.
Opening message
Lead with a diagnosis question, not a product or a seat. Something like: before we discuss whether you need a fractional operator, a sales leader, or more reps, let's put your hiring plan next to the pipeline you actually create each week and see how many seats the demand engine, manager capacity, and onboarding can carry. That framing matches how Adam Jay opens nearly every example in the reviewed posts and avoids the pushback he applies to premature hiring.
Proof points to cite
Reported client results from the reviewed posts: NPS from 17 to 48, trailing twelve-month logo churn from 1.55% to 1.12%, expansion ARR growth of 52%, ARR growth of 28%, and a BDR structure reduced from six roles to three. These are figures Adam Jay reports from engagements, not independently verified outcomes.
The signed-diagnosis standard: once a leadership team agrees with the plan in front of each other, Adam Jay says his name is on every finding and he owes the client the work to move each one.
What to verify before launching
Commercial terms: pricing, deliverable list, turnaround time, and how to inquire, none of which appear in the reviewed material.
Whether Adam Jay will work in the format the brand wants, since only the GTM Growth Plan and GTM Sprint route is documented.
Audience composition against the target account list, using an audience export or survey rather than follower count.
Choose Tabitha Cavanagh when the bottleneck is leadership capability rather than demand.
Read more
The two reviewed posts are both about how people end up running sales teams without being prepared for it.
One describes the two common paths into sales leadership — a strong seller promoted without training in coaching, motivating, or holding a team accountable, or a leader hired in who has never carried a quota — and says neither path on its own prepares someone to lead.
The other argues that most sales leadership resumes restate the job description instead of showing what measurably changed, and lists the benchmarks that would: quota attainment, forecast accuracy, sales cycle length, average deal size, and whether first-time managers became successful leaders.
If the brief is to build a leadership development path, or to judge candidates for a sales leadership seat on demonstrated results, that is the subject she covers.
The reviewed posts do not examine whether the hiring plan can be fed.
There is nothing on pipeline creation, manager capacity, CRM consolidation, compensation design, or RevOps ownership.
Choosing her answers "how do we develop and select the leaders we have," not "should we be adding leaders or reps at all."
For a company at roughly $10M+ ARR whose plan is ahead of its pipeline, the earlier question has to be settled first, and that is where Adam Jay's diagnostic work sits.
Choose Aaron McCann when the hiring decision is already made and the task is filling sales seats.
Read more
Both reviewed posts are about recruiting as a practice: one compares recruiting in 2026 to online dating, where candidates with many options go quiet for two weeks and hiring managers return from holiday asking why the seat is still open; the other argues that running several agencies on one search produces a poor candidate experience, cheapens the talent brand, and encourages early-career recruiters to leave. If the brief is sourcing and placing salespeople in a competitive market, or fixing how a search is run, that is the ground covered.
A recruiter fills the seat you have already decided on.
The reviewed posts do not test whether the seat should exist, whether the demand engine can produce enough opportunities for it, or whether onboarding and manager capacity can absorb it.
Adam Jay's 26-seat example — a hiring plan the pipeline could feed for about 12 — is the kind of check that sits upstream of a search.
If that check has not been done, the recruiting work starts too late.
Choose Grace Woods when the company is building a talent acquisition function inside a scaling SaaS business.
Read more
The January 2025 post sets out a start-from-scratch sequence: build the hiring strategy so its quarterly targets link to the annual ones, define the candidate experience (clear feedback, fast response, transparency), track quality of hire, time to fill, and cost per hire, train interviewers because interviewing is a skill rather than a natural ability, and mine the prior year's recruitment data for patterns. The second post reframes hiring as fuelling growth rather than filling gaps, and warns that job descriptions written around an ideal candidate, short-term hiring thinking, and teams left out of the process all create expensive problems later.
That is an inside-the-company build, and it assumes the hiring plan is sound.
The reviewed posts do not address pipeline capacity, compensation, CRM or RevOps problems, or the revenue-system diagnosis that decides how many hires the business can carry.
The material is also the oldest reviewed for this section, published in early January 2025, so it reflects that period rather than current conditions.
Pairing it with a diagnostic first, then building the TA function against a validated plan, is the sequence the evidence supports.
This profile draws on the full text of 11 LinkedIn posts from Adam Jay's account and on the account metadata, which records 31,489 followers observed 8 October 2026.
Six posts from three other creators were read for the similar-creator comparisons.
Most of the posts carry no publication date in the material reviewed, so no timeline of change over time could be built.
No signature book, show, or earlier body of work was documented, and career history before Revenue Reimagined appears only inside anecdotes.
No articles, videos, transcripts, interviews, media kit, pricing, or audience demographics were supplied, so audience notes rest on follower count alone and the commercial formats described reflect only what the posts themselves say.
Recent engagement
Across their last 9 LinkedIn posts, the median post got 21 reactions and 16 comments. Checked 2026-11-02.
