Tom Shivers works on SEO and ecommerce growth, diagnosing problems such as technical issues, mismatched content, and weak conversion paths. Shivers's posts also explain how ecommerce businesses can prepare for AI-led shopping.
Tom Shivers is most useful for explaining ecommerce SEO fixes and AI shopping protocols to practitioner audiences.
Best for
A B2B ecommerce software brand wanting a sponsored explainer or webinar on agentic commerce.
Not for
A consumer brand or DTC apparel company seeking high-reach short-form video product promotion.
Key takeaways
A B2B ecommerce turnaround lifted revenue from $3.1 million to $7.5 million.
Google's protocol moves the storefront into the feed; poor data means no recommendation.
OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol lets AI agents shop.
Check first: Confirm recent post reach, engagement, and audience job titles on comparable agentic commerce topics.
Main ideas
Stalled growth usually reflects a cluster of misdiagnosed problems, not one big failure · The same five blockers recur across industries · Agentic commerce arrived before most retailers noticed—and extends the stack rather than replacing it
Tom Shivers writes about SEO and ecommerce growth, focusing on why businesses stall and what to fix first.
Their LinkedIn posts also explain how AI-led shopping protocols could change product discovery and checkout.
The examples show them moving between practical business diagnosis and explanations of emerging commerce standards.
Shivers connects growth results to several interacting causes rather than treating any single channel or tactic as the answer.
In one B2B ecommerce case, they describe stalled organic rankings, technical SEO problems, content that missed high-intent demand, weak conversion paths and overreliance on paid search.
They report that addressing the problems lifted revenue from $3.1 million to $7.5 million.
In posts about OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol and Google's Universal Commerce Protocol, they explain technical changes for retailers, showing how product data, checkout and merchant control fit into AI shopping.
Their work also includes a free ROI forecast calculator, a practical tool alongside posts and case examples.
Marketers interested in applied ecommerce growth analysis or accessible explanations of AI commerce can use these examples to assess whether their approach fits their needs.
Tom Shivers writes about ecommerce growth and how AI agents are changing the shopping journey.
Read more
Two themes run through the posts.
First, stalled growth usually stems from several misdiagnosed problems, not one big failure, so the fix is a sequence rather than a single lever.
Channel hype can also divert resources from parts of the system that are already working.
Second, agents can now compare products, build carts, and complete checkout, making structured product data, consistent pricing and inventory, and machine-readable policies essential to getting a brand recommended.
Shivers also builds tools, including a free ROI forecast calculator.
Stalled growth usually reflects a cluster of misdiagnosed problems, not one big failure
Tom Shivers argues that when an ecommerce business stops growing, the cause is rarely a single failure.
Read more
Several problems reinforce one another: weak rankings, technical issues that suppress visibility, content that misses high-intent demand, thin conversion paths, and paid traffic carrying more of the load than it should.
Because these problems interact, the order of repairs matters.
Fixing the right things in the right order unlocks the channel; fixing the loudest thing first does not.
A mid-sized B2B ecommerce company was stuck at $3.1M in annual revenue, spending heavily on high-CPC Google Ads keywords as organic performance plateaued. After addressing the diagnosed problems in sequence, Tom Shivers reports a 54% lift in organic conversions, a 33% increase in average order value, and 140% ecommerce revenue growth, taking revenue from $3.1M to $7.5M.
Drawing on work across B2B, B2C, SaaS, ecommerce, automotive, healthcare, home services, and food and beverage, Tom Shivers names five recurring blockers: misdiagnosed SEO issues; channel hype that creates a resource imbalance and starves parts of the system that are working; wasted ad spend; content that misses intent; and teams stretched too thin to fix root causes.
Read more
The post argues that symptoms vary by industry, but the underlying mechanics do not, so the same diagnosis keeps applying. It promises to break down the blockers one at a time, starting with SEO misdiagnosis.
The resource-imbalance blocker is explained as a mechanism, not a slogan: chasing a hyped channel shifts budget and attention away from a working part of the system, degrading it while the team figures out the new channel.
The post takes the diagnostic pattern from a single-company case and turns it into a named, ordered list of causes Shivers says recur across sectors.
Agentic commerce arrived before most retailers noticed—and extends the stack rather than replacing it
Tom Shivers argues that OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP) quietly bridged retailers and AI agents months before Google formalized its own approach.
Read more
Inside ChatGPT, ACP enables AI-driven product discovery and comparison, conversational shopping, cart building, checkout through delegated payments, and post-purchase handling by the retailer.
The retailer remains the merchant of record, answering the post's central question: how can an AI agent shop without becoming a marketplace?
The open-source protocol is designed to be interoperable, allowing any agent, payment processor, or retailer to adopt it.
ACP extends an existing ecommerce stack to AI agents rather than replacing it.
The adoption list is specific: provide a structured product feed to OpenAI, implement ACP checkout endpoints, support delegated payments, keep pricing, inventory, and fulfillment logic clean and consistent, and retain control over merchandising, policies, and customer communication.
Google's protocol moves the storefront into the feed; poor data means no recommendation
Tom Shivers describes Google's Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) as enabling AI agents to compare products, check inventory, build carts, and complete checkout without visiting the retailer's website.
Read more
Unlike marketplaces such as Amazon or Walmart, the merchant retains the transaction, post-purchase experience, and customer relationship.
The post reframes the buyer path in three lines: the structured feed is the new homepage, the product graph is the new search results page, and the AI agent is the new buyer journey.
Incomplete, inconsistent, or poorly structured data means a product will not be recommended.
Merchant Center Next feeds, local inventory feeds, and structured data determine whether a retailer appears in AI Mode or qualifies for agent-led checkout.
The four recommended actions are to fix product feeds, strengthen the brand entity with schema, publish authoritative content AI can cite and track citation share, and make payment, fulfillment, and policies machine-readable.
The post offers a feed-readiness checklist for auditing ecommerce brands.
The post leads with a three-part reframing: when a retailer asks where its storefront went, the answer is that the product feed now does the job the homepage used to do.
While the ACP post explains what agents can already do, this post frames the same shift as an urgent data-preparation project and offers a short list of fixes.
A clear starting point for anyone who has heard the phrase "agentic commerce" and wants to know what it does inside a chat assistant.
Read more
It explains what ACP is, who built it, and why it arrived before Google's competing standard.
Tom Shivers explains that the Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP), built by OpenAI and Stripe, has quietly connected retailers and AI agents for months, predating Google's Universal Commerce Protocol.
The post walks through what ACP enables inside ChatGPT: AI-driven product discovery and comparison, conversational shopping, cart building, checkout through delegated payments, and retailer-managed fulfillment and post-purchase service.
The retailer remains the merchant of record, so the AI does not become a marketplace.
Shivers notes that the protocol is open-source and designed to be interoperable, allowing any agent, payment processor, or retailer to adopt it.
The practical section lists what retailers must supply: a structured product feed to OpenAI, ACP checkout endpoints, delegated payment support, clean pricing and inventory data, and continued control over merchandising and customer communication.
ACP extends an existing ecommerce stack into AI agents rather than replacing it.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful for a sponsor selling ecommerce infrastructure and looking to show retailers how to appear in AI shopping assistants through an explainer, webinar, or article.
It shows how Google's version of agent-led shopping changes the path from discovery to purchase, then offers a short list of concrete preparation steps.
Read more
Tom Shivers describes Google's Universal Commerce Protocol as a standard that lets AI agents compare products, check inventory, build carts, and complete checkout without visiting a retailer's website.
Unlike Amazon or Walmart, UCP keeps the customer relationship, transaction, and post-purchase experience with the merchant.
Shivers says this reshapes the path from discovery to purchase: the structured feed becomes the new homepage, the product graph becomes the new search results page, and the AI agent becomes the new buyer journey.
Incomplete, inconsistent, or poorly structured data can keep a product from being recommended.
Merchant Center Next feeds, local inventory feeds, and schema determine whether a retailer appears in AI Mode or qualifies for agent-led checkout.
Shivers lists four actions: fix product feeds, strengthen the brand entity and schema, publish authoritative content that AI can cite, and make payment, fulfillment, and policies machine-readable through Merchant Center Next.
The post offers a feed-readiness checklist for auditing ecommerce brands.
For brands planning a campaign
A natural hook for a sponsored checklist, audit offer, or article aimed at ecommerce brands preparing product data for AI-led sales.
The clearest before-and-after example of how Tom Shivers diagnoses a stalled ecommerce business and the order of fixes that produced the result.
Read more
Tom Shivers describes a mid-sized B2B ecommerce company stuck at $3.1M in annual revenue, carrying most of its traffic through costly high-intent Google Ads keywords while organic performance had plateaued.
The diagnosis listed stalled organic rankings, technical SEO problems limiting visibility, content that did not match high-intent demand, weak conversion paths, and paid traffic carrying too much of the load.
Shivers says fixing the right problems in the right order unlocked the channel, and reports a 54% lift in organic conversions, a 33% increase in average order value, and 140% ecommerce revenue growth, taking the business from $3.1M to $7.5M.
The closing point is that growth usually stalls from a cluster of misdiagnosed problems rather than one large issue.
For brands planning a campaign
A centerpiece case study for a sponsor seeking proof that SEO and conversion work can turn around a B2B ecommerce account.
A compact statement of Tom Shivers's recurring thesis that helps place the rest of the work.
Read more
Tom Shivers says the same five blockers appear across B2B, B2C, SaaS, ecommerce, automotive, healthcare, home services, and food and beverage: misdiagnosed SEO issues; channel hype that creates a resource imbalance and starves working parts of the system; wasted ad spend; content that does not match intent; and teams stretched too thin to fix root causes.
The post argues that symptoms vary by industry but the underlying mechanics do not.
It says each blocker will be broken down in turn, starting with the most common SEO misdiagnosis.
For brands planning a campaign
A concise statement of themes a sponsor can build a series around, especially for marketers comparing channel investments.
It shows that Tom Shivers builds usable tools, not just commentary, and gives audiences a quick way to try a practical resource.
Read more
Tom Shivers announces a free ecommerce ROI forecast calculator that estimates how much revenue a business could gain by optimizing its strategy. A few inputs produce a personalized ROI projection; the post invites people to try it and share their results in the comments.
For brands planning a campaign
A template for a co-branded calculator, assessment, or interactive resource that gives a sponsor a lead-generating asset rather than a written piece.
Tom Shivers's two most detailed posts explain the standards that let AI agents shop.
Read more
The first covers OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP), which they describe as arriving before Google's Universal Commerce Protocol and as the bridge that let ChatGPT compare products, build carts, and complete checkout through delegated payments while the retailer stays merchant of record.
The second covers Google's Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP), which lets agents compare products, check inventory, build carts, and finish checkout without visiting the retailer's site, while the merchant keeps the transaction, post-purchase experience, and customer relationship.
Both posts frame the shift in the same terms: the structured feed replaces the homepage, the product graph replaces the search results page, and the AI agent becomes the buyer journey.
Each post sets up a contrast—ACP versus UCP, or agent-led checkout versus marketplace—and lists concrete retailer actions.
For brands planning a campaign
A B2B ecommerce software company can sponsor a side-by-side explainer or webinar showing buyers what ACP and UCP each require and where they overlap. The posts offer a ready structure: protocol origin, what the agent can do, who owns the customer, and retailer setup steps.
Both agentic commerce posts tell retailers what to fix before agents will recommend them.
Read more
The steps include providing a structured product feed, implementing checkout endpoints, supporting delegated payments, and keeping pricing, inventory, and fulfillment logic consistent.
The UCP post adds strengthening the brand entity with schema, publishing authoritative content that AI can cite, tracking citation share, and making payment, fulfillment, and policies machine-readable through Merchant Center Next.
Tom Shivers states the consequence directly: incomplete or inconsistent data means the product will not be recommended.
Turns a platform change into an ordered preparation list for retailers.
For brands planning a campaign
This is the most sponsor-ready topic for a feed-readiness or data-quality product. A brand can fund a checklist, audit template, or working session built around these steps, using the checklist as a lead magnet and the software as a follow-on.
Ecommerce growth diagnosis and the order of repairs
A case post describes a mid-sized B2B ecommerce company stuck at $3.1M in annual revenue, spending heavily on high-CPC keywords while organic performance had plateaued.
Read more
The diagnosis lists stalled organic rankings, technical SEO problems suppressing visibility, content that did not match high-intent demand, weak conversion paths, and paid traffic carrying too much of the load. After the problems were fixed in what Tom Shivers calls the right order, they report a 54% lift in organic conversions, a 33% increase in average order value, 140% ecommerce revenue growth, and revenue moving from $3.1M to $7.5M.
Sequence matters: diagnose a cluster of problems, fix them in order, then report channel and revenue results together.
For brands planning a campaign
Suitable for a sponsored case study, teardown webinar, or diagnostic workshop aimed at B2B ecommerce teams. The before-and-after numbers and ordered repair list give a brand concrete hooks; confirm the underlying data before reusing the figures.
A post surveys Tom Shivers's work across B2B, B2C, SaaS, ecommerce, automotive, healthcare, home services, and food and beverage, and names five blockers that recur regardless of sector: misdiagnosed SEO issues, channel hype that starves parts of the system already working, wasted ad spend, content that does not match intent, and teams too stretched to fix root causes.
Read more
The argument is that symptoms differ by industry but the underlying mechanics do not. The post announces that each blocker will be broken down separately, starting with SEO misdiagnosis.
Generalizes from a list of industries to a short, named set of causes, then commits to a sequential series.
For brands planning a campaign
A foundation for a sponsored series or one-per-blocker content program rather than a single asset. A platform selling SEO, paid media, or content tooling can attach to the specific blocker it addresses.
One post announces a free eCommerce ROI forecast calculator that produces a personalized revenue projection from a few inputs.
Read more
The post is short and promotional: it states that businesses lack tools to forecast ROI, offers the calculator, and asks readers to share results in the comments.
Ask for the calculator's inputs, methodology, and output format before assessing its capabilities.
For brands planning a campaign
Evidence that Tom Shivers builds and promotes practical, interactive lead tools, supporting a sponsored calculator, benchmark, or forecast tool as a collaboration format. Test the existing calculator before proposing a replacement or co-branded version.
Tom Shivers's posts do not name any brand relationship.
Read more
They describe an unnamed mid-sized B2B ecommerce company that grew from $3.1M to $7.5M in annual revenue after SEO, content, and conversion problems were fixed, but do not name the company or state the engagement terms.
Shivers also offers a free ecommerce ROI forecast calculator through a shortened link that names no host or partner.
Posts explaining Google's Universal Commerce Protocol, OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol, ChatGPT, and Merchant Center Next analyze how agentic shopping works and what retailers should do about it; they do not present the platforms as sponsors or clients.
Ask for the company name and engagement terms before treating the result as a case study.
Tom Shivers writes about ecommerce growth and what happens when AI agents do the shopping.
Read more
New readers can take the posts in either order.
For the agentic commerce thread, start with the two protocol explainers: one covers OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol and what it already lets ChatGPT do — compare products, build carts, complete checkout through delegated payments — and the other covers Google's Universal Commerce Protocol, where the retailer keeps the transaction and customer relationship but only appears if its feeds, schema, and policies are machine-readable.
For the performance thread, start with the case write-up of a mid-sized B2B ecommerce company that went from $3.1M to $7.5M in revenue, then the short post naming five growth blockers that recur across industries.
A third thread is tools: Shivers offers a free ROI forecast calculator and asks readers to try it.
The through-line is diagnostic — find the cluster of causes, fix them in order, then make the product data readable to whichever system is doing the buying.
Covers the same shift as Tom Shivers: whether AI agents can find, compare, and recommend products, and what merchants must do to their product content and infrastructure to be included.
Read more
Both treat agentic commerce as a readiness problem with concrete gaps to close, not a forecast.
The posts come from inside a commerce platform vendor and rely on its own scans and launch announcements, so the argument runs through a product being sold. Tom Shivers explains open protocols and retailer preparation without a platform behind the explanation, keeping agent-side mechanics separate from any offering.
Works the same practical seam: making a store legible to AI systems, explaining what those systems read (product titles, collection structure, PDP copy, schema, feeds, reviews, policies), and turning it into a numbered audit list an ecommerce team can run.
Read more
The focus is narrower and storefront-level — Shopify theme data, Meta tracking quality, consent and event matching for DTC brands — while Tom Shivers works at the protocol layer and diagnoses stalled growth across B2B, SaaS, and services businesses.
Explains agentic commerce in layers, including emerging agent payment protocols, and traces how the shopping flow has moved from listings and marketplaces to AI agents acting for the buyer.
Read more
It covers the same subject and aims to give readers a map rather than a headline.
The treatment is trend-led and consumer-facing, opening with shoppers asking a chatbot for product advice and walking through payment standards from Google, Mastercard, Visa, and PayPal. Tom Shivers stays closer to two named protocols and the retailer setup steps behind them, while adding ecommerce growth diagnosis that has no counterpart in these posts.
For a B2B ecommerce software sponsor considering Tom Shivers for an expert explainer on agentic commerce protocols, the strongest audience signal is topical rather than demographic.
Read more
Recent posts explain OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol and Google's Universal Commerce Protocol, covering retailer feeds, checkout endpoints, delegated payments, and product discovery inside AI agents.
That directly matches ecommerce and commerce-technology practitioners who need to understand how AI agents buy.
The only measured audience figure available is a LinkedIn following of 1,854, observed 2026-10-08.
If reach or verified buyer composition matters, ask Tom Shivers for recent post reach and engagement on comparable agentic-commerce topics, plus any audience survey or LinkedIn analytics showing job titles and company types.
Tom Shivers has no documented partnership formats in these posts.
Read more
Across five posts, none discloses a sponsorship, names a paying brand partner, or describes a format a brand could buy, such as a sponsored explainer, a paid webinar, or a newsletter placement.
The two items closest to an offer are self-published resources—a free ecommerce ROI forecast calculator and a promised feed-readiness checklist—and neither carries a sponsor or a price.
Their independent, diagnostic voice may suit a brand seeking an agentic-commerce explainer, but collaboration terms would need to be agreed directly.
The LinkedIn profile is the only visible contact surface; there is no media kit, rate card, or partnership intake page.
A B2B ecommerce software company wants to sponsor an expert explainer on agentic commerce protocols, with a follow-on webinar or article, for retail and ecommerce practitioners.
Reasons
Tom Shivers has published full explainers on two standards that let AI agents shop: OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol and Google's Universal Commerce Protocol. They cover who built each one, what an agent can do with it, who keeps the customer relationship, and what retailers must supply.
The posts provide the working detail a sponsored explainer needs: a structured product feed to OpenAI, ACP checkout endpoints, delegated payment support, consistent pricing and inventory data, brand entity and schema work, and machine-readable payment, fulfillment, and policy data in Merchant Center Next.
The framing is sponsor-friendly and repeatable: the structured feed is the new homepage, the product graph is the new search results page, and the AI agent is the new buyer journey. That gives an article or webinar a clear spine.
Tom Shivers has already signaled a follow-on asset on this topic. The Universal Commerce Protocol post closes with an offer of a feed-readiness checklist for auditing ecommerce brands, a natural co-branded lead magnet for a software sponsor.
The ecommerce turnaround case and five-blockers post show a diagnostic style and before-and-after numbers: 54% organic conversion lift, 33% average order value increase, 140% revenue growth, and $3.1M to $7.5M. A sponsor could use that approach for a teardown or audit segment alongside the protocol explainer.
The topics map cleanly to a software buyer's questions. An ecommerce platform or feed-management vendor can connect its product to the feed and data-quality steps without turning the explainer into a product pitch.
Tradeoffs
The measured audience is a LinkedIn following of 1,854, observed 2026-10-08. Topical fit is clear, but reach is unproven. If the sponsor wants impressions rather than qualified ecommerce practitioners, this is a mismatch.
No engagement, reach, geography, job-title, or seniority data is available. Before committing to a paid placement, ask for recent post reach and engagement on comparable agentic-commerce posts.
No sponsorship, rate card, media kit, or partnership intake is published. Agree on terms directly.
Tom Shivers's posts do not include video or transcripts, so a webinar proposal rests on written explainer ability, not demonstrated on-camera or live-audience performance. Test that ability before booking a live format.
When to choose a specialist
Poor fit for the available posts.
Read more
Brief
A consumer brand or DTC apparel company wants a high-reach short-form video promotion to drive direct product sales and awareness at scale.
Reasons
The available posts are text explainers, case write-ups, and a tool announcement on LinkedIn. They include no video or transcripts, so on-camera or short-form performance cannot be judged.
The content is consultative and diagnostic: it diagnoses stalled organic performance, orders repairs, and lists preparation steps. It speaks to people who run ecommerce and search programs, not consumers making purchase decisions.
The only measured audience figure is 1,854 LinkedIn followers. There is no reach, engagement, or demographic evidence for a consumer audience, or evidence of a channel where a consumer product promotion would run.
No sponsorship formats are published, so a consumer brand would be proposing a format with no track record in the available posts.
The ecommerce examples are B2B: a mid-sized B2B ecommerce company, high-intent high-CPC keywords, average order value, and organic conversion metrics. None demonstrates consumer brand storytelling or product-led creative.
Test before reconsidering
Ask for any video or short-form work outside LinkedIn and its recent performance.
Ask for audience composition data: job titles, company types, geography, and engagement rates on the LinkedIn channel.
Ask directly whether consumer-brand promotions or product-review formats are available.
A worked campaign example
Angle
The article and webinar answer one question: what must be true about a retailer's product data before an AI agent can recommend and sell its products? Tom Shivers frames the shift through the two protocol posts, then walks readers through the preparation steps in sequence: structured feed, checkout endpoints, delegated payments, clean pricing and inventory, brand entity and schema, authoritative citable content, and machine-readable payment, fulfillment, and policies.
Format
A sponsored explainer article on the software sponsor's site or a co-published hub, followed by a 45-minute webinar, with a co-branded feed-readiness checklist as the registration hook.
Headline
Note
Placeholder removed below in final field set.
Section outline
Why the path from discovery to purchase changed: ACP and UCP, and who keeps the customer relationship.
What an agent can and cannot do within each protocol: discovery, comparison, cart building, delegated payment checkout and retailer-side fulfillment.
The data test: why incomplete, inconsistent or poorly structured product data keeps a product out of recommendations.
The ordered fix list, with the sponsor's tooling applied to the feed and data-quality steps.
A worked audit: run the feed-readiness checklist against an anonymized sample catalog on screen.
Close with the checklist and a self-audit path viewers can follow without the sponsor.
Sponsor role
Provide audit tooling, a benchmark dataset or feed-scoring methodology; host registration and follow-up.
Tradeoffs and reasons
This angle draws on the strongest support in the posts here—the two protocol explainers and the promised checklist—and keeps the sponsor attached to the preparation steps rather than the conclusion. The tradeoff: it sells software by demonstration, not by reach. The sponsor should measure registrations from ecommerce, retail and search roles, along with checklist completions, not impressions. No reach or engagement data appears in the posts here, so treat the first run as a pilot and price it accordingly. If the sponsor needs video, test a shorter recorded walkthrough first; the posts here include no video.
Choose Amelia Van Camp when the sponsor wants the enterprise-market and infrastructure story rather than a protocol walkthrough.
Read more
The two posts are vendor launch and joint-research announcements: Mirakl Agentic Activation, with Agentic Product Enrichment and Agentic Channels connecting merchants to large language model platforms starting with Microsoft Copilot, and a Mirakl and Merkle readiness playbook presented with market figures — fewer than 1% of scanned product pages scoring above the threshold where AI agents reliably surface products, $67 billion of Cyber Week 2025 sales influenced by AI agents, 393% year-over-year growth in AI-referred traffic to U.S. retail sites, and a projection that 55% of U.S. ecommerce spending will soon be agent-assisted. That suits a sponsor that wants benchmark numbers and a marketplace-infrastructure framing, and it shows a comparator already speaking to enterprise buyers through a named research partnership.
The posts promote an employer's product launch and argue that businesses need to get ready; they don't explain how the Agentic Commerce Protocol or the Universal Commerce Protocol works.
They offer no step-by-step implementation sequence, ordered fix list or before-and-after campaign result.
Sponsors seeking an independent explainer of how the protocols work, what a retailer must supply and in what order should ask Tom Shivers for more measured detail.
Those looking for vendor-style market framing and launch news will find that here, in exchange for less instructional depth.
Choose Abdo Mazloum when the campaign needs a platform-level implementation checklist rather than a cross-protocol explainer.
Read more
The posts are concrete about platform changes and what to do about them.
One audits what businesses send to Meta as the company broadens use of shared activity beyond ads, listing five checks before a July rollout: pixel and Conversions API deduplication, purchase values and currencies matching store revenue, event coverage at the right stage, consistent event matching parameters, and documented consent and governance.
The other works through Shopify's May 2026 announcement that merchants can customise /agents.md, /llms.txt and /llms-full.txt, then lists what to audit so AI systems can understand a store: product titles, collection structure, product page copy, schema and structured data, Merchant Center feeds, reviews and product context, shipping and return clarity, and AI-readable theme data.
If the sponsor's readers run Shopify or Meta and want configuration-level steps, this is closer to their working day than a protocol overview.
The scope is narrower: tracking quality and storefront readability on two specific platforms.
The posts don't cover delegated payments or checkout endpoints, or compare the two agentic commerce standards—topics central to a sponsor's standards explainer.
They react to platform announcements, offering audit lists rather than a demonstrated method and measured outcome.
Sponsors needing a retailer data-preparation spine across feeds, payments, fulfilment and policies should ask Tom Shivers for more breadth; those seeking checklist content for a named platform can trade breadth for specificity.
Choose Sharon Gai when a sponsored piece should focus on payments and checkout, or on the consumer-side shift driving agent-led buying.
Read more
One post maps four agentic payment protocols side by side: Google's Agent Payments Protocol, Mastercard's Agent Pay, Visa's Trusted Agent Protocol and PayPal's Agentic Commerce Platform, including which card networks and payment companies back each.
The other traces agentic commerce through eBay, Amazon, social commerce and short video, then uses the 'ChatGPT GlowUp' example of shoppers asking a chatbot for skincare advice.
It also notes that traffic from answer engines is already around 10% for some sites.
Together, the posts offer a useful spine for a webinar on how agent-driven transactions get authorised, who is competing for the payment rail and how shopping behaviour is changing.
The posts list protocols and trends rather than show how a retailer implements them.
They don't detail product feeds, schema, Merchant Center or checkout endpoints, or provide a before-and-after result for a sponsor's audit segment.
The consumer-trend framing also sits further from a B2B ecommerce practitioner audience than Tom Shivers's two protocol explainers and promised feed-readiness checklist.
Sponsors deciding what a brand's data must look like before an agent will recommend it should ask for that implementation detail; those focused on payments and shopper behaviour can trade implementation depth for a wider, more consumer-facing view.
The five LinkedIn posts by Tom Shivers cover two agentic commerce protocols (OpenAI and Stripe's Agentic Commerce Protocol and Google's Universal Commerce Protocol), one mid-sized B2B ecommerce turnaround case, one post naming five recurring growth blockers across industries, and one announcement of a free ROI forecast calculator.
The LinkedIn account had 1,854 followers on October 8, 2026; the posts do not say when they were published, so they cannot be placed in a firm chronological order and change over time can only be read from what the posts themselves argue.
These five posts do not include a signature book, show, or earlier body of work.
No sponsorship formats, rate card, media kit, video, transcript, or reach and engagement data are published in the posts here.
The posts do not cover work outside this set, so those areas remain open gaps rather than settled facts.
Similar-creator comparisons draw on two posts each from three other creators, used only to explain how their coverage differs.