Tom Miller teaches charter school leaders practical board governance and staffing systems through recurring training and conference sessions.
Best for
Charter school leadership consultancies needing governance and staffing experts for webinar series.
Not for
Not for national HR technology vendors selling onboarding software to mid-market corporate employers wanting high-reach awareness.
Key takeaways
A recruiting problem is usually a development problem.
Boards should recruit for needs three years ahead, not the seat that just opened.
Culture is designed through named systems, not left to chance.
Check first: Confirm official inquiry route and recent audience analytics before reaching out.
Main ideas
A recruiting problem is usually a development problem · Boards should recruit for what they will need in three years, not for the seat that just opened · Culture is designed through named systems, not left to chance
Tom Miller works with charter school leaders on board governance, staffing, and the systems that help school teams grow and perform.
Their posts make these topics practical: boards should recruit for the expertise they will need in three years, and schools should build hiring, onboarding, and development systems rather than simply fill vacancies.
They also present at charter-school conferences and promote recurring governance training.
To assess broader name searches, ask for targeted identity research on signature books, shows, businesses, or earlier work.
These posts connect leadership problems to repeatable systems.
For staffing, the advice moves from proactive recruiting to structured onboarding, values-based hiring, and staff development.
For boards, it turns succession from a response to a resignation into planning for future needs.
The practical teaching style is consistent: identify a common mistake, offer a concrete alternative, and leave readers with a question or action.
A post about leadership reading departs from the direct-advice format, interpreting others’ ideas about influence, growth, and execution rather than presenting a standalone framework.
Follow Tom Miller for applied perspectives on charter-school governance and people systems.
To assess their signature work, ask for examples beyond these posts.
Tom Miller's public writing returns to one argument: problems school leaders describe as leadership or recruiting problems are usually systems problems.
Read more
Schools lose staff because nobody built a system to equip them; boards struggle because they fill seats reactively instead of planning for what the organization will need; and culture drifts because it was left to chance rather than designed.
A second thread runs alongside it: they read and cite other leadership writers closely (DuFour and Fullan, Anthony Muhammad), then translate their points into Monday-morning practice, ranking influence, daily growth, and execution above title or intention.
Behind both threads is a preference for formats and partners tested in the field: conference sessions, recurring training, and vendors whose work they have personally seen.
A recruiting problem is usually a development problem
Tom Miller argues that leaders who believe they have a hiring problem often have a development problem instead.
Read more
When new staff are not equipped, they either leave because they feel overwhelmed or stay without performing at the level the school needs.
Either way, the school pays for the same position twice.
The hiring strategy follows from this: one that looks like everyone else's produces average results.
The best candidates are not sitting on job boards — they are already employed, being recruited, and weighing culture, leadership, flexibility, mission, and growth.
A short video post states the argument plainly — "Most leaders think they have a recruiting problem.
Often, they have a development problem" — and closes with a diagnostic question: "What system do we have in place to intentionally equip every new team member?"
A recap of the FuturePROOF Leadership Summit hiring session lists the takeaways: behavioral-based interview questions, 30-60-90 day onboarding plans, values-based hiring, culture alignment, proactive recruiting pipelines, and creative staffing strategies.
The session centered on a line Tom Miller says stopped school leaders in their tracks: "The person you are looking to hire… is probably not looking to work for you."
Boards should recruit for what they will need in three years, not for the seat that just opened
Tom Miller says boards repeatedly make the mistake of recruiting only when someone resigns.
Read more
The healthiest boards think ahead and recruit for tomorrow's challenges rather than today's opening, because each new board member changes the organization's future capacity.
The advice is to plan deliberately, not fill seats for convenience.
They apply the same logic to leadership strain: many challenges that look like leadership problems are actually governance problems, making board-leader alignment the fix rather than extra effort from the leader.
The governance post contrasts reactive recruitment with boards that plan ahead, then asks a question a board can answer together: "What expertise will your board need three years from now?"
It promotes a recurring training, Effective Governance Quarterly, and is signed Dr.
Tom Miller.
A conference breakout session, "Why School Leaders Burn Out — And How Better Governance Changes Everything," argues that many leadership challenges are governance problems and promises practical tools to strengthen board-leader alignment.
Culture is designed through named systems, not left to chance
Tom Miller treats culture as the product of specific systems, not a school's personality.
Read more
Without design, culture will not produce alignment, accountability, trust, or high performance on its own. Retention and performance are also framed as system questions: the systems that help people succeed after they arrive determine whether good hires stay and deliver.
One conference session is described as "School Culture by Design: 11 Cultural Systems That Drive High-Performing Charter Schools," with the summary line "Culture doesn't happen by accident" and the listed outcomes of alignment, accountability, trust, and exceptional performance. A separate post ties the same idea to staffing: high-performing schools do not just hire great people, they build systems that help people succeed once they arrive.
Influence and execution do more than title or intention
Reading a leadership book's introduction, Tom Miller endorses the point that ordering people to change does not work, and neither does leaving them alone.
Read more
Influence, not position, moves people — a term they credit to a named author.
Leaders who mistake their title for a movement for change get nowhere.
They add that growth is not automatic: it takes intentional daily action, treated as a core value across the whole school community.
A leader who will not demand execution turns vision into a suggestion.
The "Leaders Read!" post works through four opening statements from a book.
Two are attributed to other authors: DuFour and Fullan on why ordering people to change fails, and Dr.
Anthony Muhammad on using the word "influence" rather than authority.
Tom Miller's commentary supplies the concrete comparisons — most schools' water and sewer line item is ten times their professional development budget, and "a goal without a strategy is just a wish" — followed by prioritizing, praising, and course-correcting as daily work.
The post ends by asking readers what they are reading.
Prefer what has already been tested — sessions in the field and partners they have seen work
Tom Miller's posts favor practical, field-tested material over theory: live sessions with named takeaways, recurring training formats, and a short list of vendors they say they have personally worked with and can recommend.
Read more
Their account ties credibility to having used a tool or worked with an organization, rather than to directory listings.
One conference announcement lists three breakout sessions with descriptions, a Monday-evening networking event for charter school leaders at Boxcar Arcade, and eight named vendor partners Tom Miller says they have personally worked with and confidently recommends.
They offer to send a proven-vendor list to anyone who comments or messages.
Another post promotes seven-day replay access to a seven-topic summit covering hiring, AI-powered leadership, enrollment and marketing, emotional intelligence, governance and boards, financial sustainability, and school systems.
The vendor event and replay hub are recent additions to a format otherwise made up of advice and training posts, showing the audience work expanding from writing into convening.
Rather than present original frameworks, they read leadership literature closely and translate it into what a school leader should do on Monday. For a sense of whether the commentary is substantive or promotional, this is the clearest test.
Miller works through the introduction of a leadership book and reacts to four statements from it.
Two are quoted with attribution — DuFour and Fullan on why ordering people to change does not work, and Anthony Muhammad on "influence" as the thing that moves people rather than a job title.
Miller's own additions are the more telling part: schools spend ten times more on water and sewer lines than on professional development, and "a goal without a strategy is just a wish," with leaders expected to prioritize, praise, and course-correct daily.
Miller closes by inviting readers to say what they are reading.
For brands planning a campaign
A ready-made webinar or newsletter format: reacting to a set text, then inviting the audience to discuss it. The post also shows the authors Miller draws on, positioning them alongside established leadership voices rather than as a lone practitioner.
In under 150 words, Miller explains what they do for boards, in their own words.
Read more
The single idea is concrete, checkable, and useful to anyone who has served on a nonprofit or school board.
This is the sharpest governance piece in the set.
The mistake: recruiting board members only when someone resigns.
Miller contrasts that with boards that recruit for tomorrow’s challenges, not today’s opening, and argues that every new board member changes the organization’s future capacity.
The advice: recruit intentionally, not conveniently.
The post ends with the question, “What expertise will your board need three years from now?”
It is signed “Dr.
Tom Miller” and promotes a recurring training called Effective Governance Quarterly.
For brands planning a campaign
Board governance gives this session a distinct focus from staffing and culture.
The closing question works as an audience poll or discussion prompt.
Effective Governance Quarterly also shows Miller runs a recurring training format—the same shape as a webinar series.
This is the most complete picture of what Miller presents and to whom: three session titles, three descriptions, and one audience—North Carolina charter school leaders—with co-presenters and partners named.
Read more
It shows the practical shape of their work, not just their opinions.
A conference announcement that doubles as a session catalogue.
Miller and Lauren Watters list three breakout sessions: Recruiting and Retaining High-Quality Staff, framed around building People Systems so hiring is not luck; School Culture by Design, built around eleven cultural systems; and Why School Leaders Burn Out, which reframes many leadership problems as governance problems and promises tools for board-leader alignment.
The post also promotes a Monday-evening networking event for charter school leaders at Boxcar Arcade and names eight vendor partners Miller says they have personally worked with and recommend.
They offer to send a proven-vendor list to anyone who comments or messages.
For brands planning a campaign
Three conference-tested session titles could become three webinar episodes with minimal rewriting.
The post also shows Miller co-presents and convenes partner groups, useful if the series is meant to include third-party voices.
The vendor-list offer is a direct lead-capture mechanic worth studying.
This post shows what a Miller session contains: the bullet list is the curriculum.
Read more
It also shows they have run a multi-session virtual event with a replay hub, the closest example in this material to the proposed webinar series.
A recap of a virtual summit session built around one line Miller says stopped school leaders in their tracks: “The person you are looking to hire… is probably not looking to work for you.”
Miller argues that the best candidates are already employed and being recruited, so a hiring strategy identical to everyone else’s produces average results.
The takeaways are concrete: behavioural-based interview questions, 30-60-90 day onboarding plans, values-based hiring, culture alignment, proactive recruiting pipelines, and creative staffing.
The post notes seven-day replay access to the full summit, which also covered AI-powered leadership, enrollment and marketing, emotional intelligence, governance and boards, financial sustainability, and school systems.
For brands planning a campaign
The seven-topic summit map offers a template for series structure and shows which subjects Miller will and will not cover personally. The statement that candidates are not looking for you is a strong positioning line for promotion.
This is Miller’s clearest short statement on staffing: retention and performance are systems problems, not hiring problems.
Read more
A short post summarising a video reel.
The argument: most leaders think they have a recruiting problem when they have a development problem.
When people are not equipped, they either leave because they feel overwhelmed or stay and underperform, so the same seat gets filled twice.
Miller’s line—that high-performing schools do not just hire great people, they build systems that help people succeed once they arrive—leads to one question for readers: what system exists to equip every new team member?
Review the original reel before using its video content.
For brands planning a campaign
A natural session hook on onboarding and retention, and a strong social clip. Review the original reel before using its video content.
Tom Miller argues that many leaders think they have a recruiting problem when they often have a development problem.
Read more
In one reel, the consequence is blunt: people either leave because they feel overwhelmed or stay but never perform at the level the organization needs, so the same seat gets filled twice. A summit recap lists the practical tools discussed: behavioral-based interview questions, 30-60-90 day onboarding plans, values-based hiring, culture alignment, proactive recruiting pipelines, and creative staffing strategies.
Frames hiring, onboarding, and equipping as one people system, then gives leaders a diagnostic question: what system is in place to intentionally equip every new team member?
For brands planning a campaign
A partner can build a webinar or resource around staffing as one continuous system: hire well, onboard with structure, and equip people to improve retention and performance. The strongest session angle is the handoff from hiring to development, not recruitment alone.
Tom Miller highlights a recurring board mistake: recruiting only when someone resigns.
Read more
They argue that the healthiest boards think ahead and recruit for tomorrow's challenges rather than today's opening. A conference session titled “Why School Leaders Burn Out—And How Better Governance Changes Everything” makes a related claim: many leadership challenges are not leadership problems but governance problems, and the session promises practical tools to strengthen board-leader alignment.
Uses a direct question and a recurring training series to turn governance from a compliance topic into a planning discipline.
For brands planning a campaign
Position Tom Miller in governance content that treats board composition and board-leader alignment as leadership-capacity issues. A webinar series can use the forward-looking recruitment question to move boards beyond reactive seat-filling.
One breakout session is described as “School Culture by Design: 11 Cultural Systems That Drive High-Performing Charter Schools.”
Read more
The post says culture does not happen by accident and lists alignment, accountability, trust, and exceptional performance as outcomes of those systems. A separate reel ties culture to the systems that help people succeed once they arrive.
For brands planning a campaign
An editorial or webinar series can have Tom Miller walk through named culture systems and show how they shape hiring, onboarding, and retention decisions. This gives a brand concrete, teachable material rather than general culture language.
Leadership development through reading and reflection
In a “Leaders Read!” post, Tom Miller shares opening statements from a book introduction and reflects on human resources as vital assets, the limits of ordering people to change, the difference between title and influence, and execution as the test of vision.
Read more
The post names Dr. Anthony Muhammad and DuFour & Fullan, and ends by asking leaders what they are reading.
Close reading of a leadership text with practical commentary and a community question.
For brands planning a campaign
A book-club or reading-guide partnership can use Tom Miller's annotated leadership-notes format: close reading of a text, practical commentary tied to daily action, and a discussion prompt for a leadership community.
Convening charter leaders through practical sessions
Tom Miller's posts show a format built on live events and short practical sessions.
Read more
One post announces three conference breakout sessions and a vendor networking event; another promotes a summit replay with additional expert trainings on AI-powered leadership, enrollment and marketing, emotional intelligence, governance, financial sustainability, and school systems. The vendor event is framed around organizations they have personally worked with and recommend.
Ask for attendance figures and independent feedback before assessing event reach or outcomes.
For brands planning a campaign
A brand can co-present or sponsor a practical session and pair it with a follow-up resource. The event model suits a clear session outline, live Q&A, and a replay or toolkit that extends the conversation.
Miller's posts point to governance and school-leadership programs and vendor relationships.
Read more
The clearest items are training programs they promote and a list of vendor partners they say they have personally worked with and recommend. Ask whether those relationships involve sponsorship, employment or ownership.
Effective Governance Quarterly™
Disclosed partnership
Miller promotes the Effective Governance Quarterly training for governing boards and signs the post as Dr.
Read more
Tom Miller.
The post invites readers to join the next session.
Ask Miller to clarify their formal relationship to the program.
Original disclosure
Join us for the next Effective Governance Quarterly™ as we help governing boards build the systems, practices, and leadership capacity to govern with confidence.
Miller promotes the FuturePROOF Leadership Summit and its replay hub, describing sessions on hiring, AI-powered leadership, enrollment, governance, and school systems.
Read more
Ask Miller to clarify their ownership or employment relationship to the summit.
Original disclosure
Replay access to the full FuturePROOF Summit is available for 7 days.
Miller lists the organizations as vendor partners for the Charter Vendors You Can Trust networking event in Raleigh and says they have personally worked with and confidently recommend them.
Read more
Original disclosure
An opportunity for charter school leaders to relax, connect with colleagues, and meet organizations we've personally worked with and confidently recommend.
Miller lists the organizations as vendor partners for the Charter Vendors You Can Trust networking event in Raleigh and says they have personally worked with and confidently recommend them.
Read more
Original disclosure
An opportunity for charter school leaders to relax, connect with colleagues, and meet organizations we've personally worked with and confidently recommend.
Miller lists the organizations as vendor partners for the Charter Vendors You Can Trust networking event in Raleigh and says they have personally worked with and confidently recommend them.
Read more
Original disclosure
An opportunity for charter school leaders to relax, connect with colleagues, and meet organizations we've personally worked with and confidently recommend.
Miller lists the organizations as vendor partners for the Charter Vendors You Can Trust networking event in Raleigh and says they have personally worked with and confidently recommend them.
Read more
Original disclosure
An opportunity for charter school leaders to relax, connect with colleagues, and meet organizations we've personally worked with and confidently recommend.
Miller lists the organizations as vendor partners for the Charter Vendors You Can Trust networking event in Raleigh and says they have personally worked with and confidently recommend them.
Read more
Original disclosure
An opportunity for charter school leaders to relax, connect with colleagues, and meet organizations we've personally worked with and confidently recommend.
Miller lists the organizations as vendor partners for the Charter Vendors You Can Trust networking event in Raleigh and says they have personally worked with and confidently recommend them.
Read more
Original disclosure
An opportunity for charter school leaders to relax, connect with colleagues, and meet organizations we've personally worked with and confidently recommend.
Miller lists the organizations as vendor partners for the Charter Vendors You Can Trust networking event in Raleigh and says they have personally worked with and confidently recommend them.
Read more
Original disclosure
An opportunity for charter school leaders to relax, connect with colleagues, and meet organizations we've personally worked with and confidently recommend.
Miller lists the organizations as vendor partners for the Charter Vendors You Can Trust networking event in Raleigh and says they have personally worked with and confidently recommend them.
Read more
Original disclosure
An opportunity for charter school leaders to relax, connect with colleagues, and meet organizations we've personally worked with and confidently recommend.
Tom Miller's writing is a practical reference for charter school leaders, board members, and people who hire and develop school staff.
Read more
To get the most from it, follow the thread across several posts rather than reading one in isolation: staffing posts argue that a recruiting problem is usually a development problem; governance posts push boards to recruit for the expertise they will need in three years rather than the seat that just opened; and culture posts treat alignment and accountability as outputs of named systems.
Conference and summit recaps are the fastest way to see the takeaway lists—behavioral-based interview questions, 30-60-90 day onboarding plans, values-based hiring, and proactive recruiting pipelines—while book-notes posts show how they read other leadership writers and translate their ideas into daily practice.
If those subjects are what you want, the three creators below cover adjacent ground: movement-based classroom learning and enrollment marketing, teacher evaluation and incentive systems, and corporate culture in a different sector.
Alton Delane writes for K-12 school leaders about what makes a school distinct and why families choose it.
Read more
The posts argue that classroom energy and visible student engagement drive enrollment, and that what families notice on a tour is students moving, thinking, and collaborating. That overlaps with Tom Miller's emphasis on culture and systems that shape how a school feels to the people inside it.
Alton Delane's argument runs through classroom instruction and a mixed-reality learning environment, aimed at private and independent school enrollment and marketing. Tom Miller stays on the staffing and governance side of the same audience: hiring, onboarding, equipping, and board composition, almost always framed for charter schools.
Shannon Terry, Ed.D., works on the same people-system problem Tom Miller describes from a different angle: how schools judge, support, and keep good teachers.
Read more
Both treat retention as a systems question rather than a matter of individual effort, and warn that the machinery around teachers determines whether improvement happens.
Shannon Terry, Ed.D., focuses on teacher evaluation—the variability between appraisers, the evidence behind a rating, and how defensible that evidence is in incentive programs—and writes partly from a role on an education technology advisory board. Tom Miller's posts sit earlier in the employee lifecycle, covering recruiting, onboarding, and board-level governance.
Stephen Tweed writes about corporate culture and shifting an organization to put employees ahead of customers, arguing that a great place to work produces people who take care of the customer.
Read more
Tom Miller applies the same reasoning to schools, arguing that culture must be designed and equipping staff protects retention and performance. Stephen Tweed also writes from a teaching role, running a graduate course on the subject.
Stephen Tweed's examples come from home care and interviews with founders and CEOs in that industry, with the culture question tied to caregiver shortages and business growth. Tom Miller's field is charter school leadership and board governance, with conference sessions and training series rather than industry interviews.
For a webinar aimed at governance and staffing experts, Tom Miller's LinkedIn profile offers a narrow but clear audience signal: it had 2,114 followers on October 9, 2026, and the five posts shown here target charter-school leaders, board members, and people responsible for school staffing and culture.
Read more
The content is aimed at school decision-makers, not a general B2B audience.
The posts don't show how many followers are charter-school leaders, their roles or locations, or how often they engage.
To assess audience relevance, ask for recent LinkedIn analytics or an audience survey showing job titles, organization type, geography, and engagement on governance or people-systems posts.
LinkedIn followers
2,114
LinkedIn profile audience count recorded in the research · 2026-10-09
The posts document collaboration activity rather than a published partnership programme.
Read more
They don't confirm an official inquiry route, so a brand currently has to make contact by commenting on or messaging Tom Miller's LinkedIn account.
The collaborations take two forms: sessions delivered inside existing charter-school events, often with a co-presenter, and a curated group of vendors introduced to school leaders at a networking evening they host.
Both are relationship-based and invitation-led rather than advertised packages, so a brand should expect to build a working relationship before discussing placement.
Governance, staffing, and school-culture content is where a brand would be attaching itself.
Curated vendor introductions and a networking evening
Buyer requirement
Tom Miller presents this as a list of organisations they have personally worked with and can confidently recommend.
The Monday-evening networking event at Boxcar Arcade in Raleigh drew from the same group, with each vendor partner named and asked to be followed.
A brand would need an existing working relationship with them to appear in the list or at the event.
The posts offer no open application; ask about selection criteria and cost.
Treat this as an approach-and-build route rather than a purchasable placement.
The audience is charter school leaders attending a conference in the same city.
Sessions inside charter-school conferences and summits
Buyer requirement
These run within someone else's event rather than as standalone bookings.
Tom Miller led three breakout sessions at the NC Association for Public Charter Schools Conference in Raleigh alongside Lauren Watters.
They also appeared in the FuturePROOF Leadership Summit, whose sessions were made available for seven days afterwards through a replay hub.
A brand attaching to a session has to fit an existing programme, date, and access window, and align with subject matter they already teach: recruiting and retaining staff, culture systems, board governance, and equipping new team members.
A recurring governance training, the Effective Governance Quarterly, is promoted with a separate registration link; that is where a governance-focused brand would most plausibly sit.
A charter-school leadership consultancy seeking a governance and staffing expert for a webinar series is a strong match.
Read more
The campaign needs someone who can deliver a recurring teaching format on people systems and board governance, and Miller's posts show all three parts.
First, the session material transfers straight into a webinar.
Miller and Lauren Watters ran three breakout sessions at the NC Association for Public Charter Schools Conference in Raleigh: Recruiting and Retaining High-Quality Staff, framed as building People Systems so hiring is not luck; School Culture by Design, built around eleven named cultural systems; and Why School Leaders Burn Out, which reframes many leadership problems as governance problems and promises practical tools for board-leader alignment.
Those titles map onto a series agenda with almost no rewriting.
Second, the recurring format is already in place.
Effective Governance Quarterly is a governance training promoted with its own registration link, and the FuturePROOF Leadership Summit shows the multi-session version, including seven-day replay access—the closest example in the posts of a series with on-demand follow-up.
Third, the teaching is concrete enough to shape a session outline.
A summit recap lists behavioural-based interview questions, 30-60-90 day onboarding plans, values-based hiring, culture alignment, proactive recruiting pipelines and creative staffing.
The governance post offers a sharp idea and a ready-made audience poll: what expertise will your board need three years from now?
The staffing reel supplies a diagnostic question for participants: what system exists to equip every new team member?
Fourth, the audience fits.
The posts address charter-school leaders, board members and people responsible for school staffing and culture—the consultancy's target audience.
Miller also convenes other organisations: a Monday-evening networking event at Boxcar Arcade with eight named vendor partners, and an offer to send a proven-vendor list to anyone who comments or messages.
Before setting a registration target, ask for recent LinkedIn analytics and attendance numbers from previous sessions.
The account had 2,114 followers on 9 October 2026, but the posts don't identify how many are charter-school leaders, their roles or how they engage.
No partnership page or confirmed inquiry route appears in the posts, so arrange direct contact before discussing placement.
When to choose a specialist
A national HR-technology vendor selling onboarding software to mid-market corporate employers and seeking a high-reach awareness campaign with large webinar registration numbers is a poor match.
Read more
The audience is wrong.
Every post addresses charter-school leaders, school boards and school staffing teams.
The vocabulary is school-specific: charter schools, boards, students, and professional development budgets compared with water and sewer line items.
The account had 2,114 followers on 9 October 2026, but the posts don't say how many are decision-makers the vendor wants or where they work.
They also don't identify attendance figures, engagement rates or independent feedback for the advertised conference, virtual summit with a seven-day replay, or recurring governance training.
A vendor seeking forecastable reach should ask for recent performance data before proceeding.
There is no purchasable placement described.
Miller delivers sessions inside other organisations' events and introduces school leaders at an evening event to a curated vendor group drawn from organisations they have personally worked with and recommend.
The post naming eight vendor partners gives no application process, criteria or cost.
A sponsor would need to build a working relationship first, which doesn't fit a campaign that needs to book and launch on a fixed schedule.
The subject matter is staffing, culture and governance in schools, not onboarding software.
Connecting a product to that content would shift the discussion toward board recruitment or the cost of filling the same seat twice—and school leadership capacity, rather than a software purchase.
If the vendor wants charter-school buyers, assess that as a separate campaign need.
A worked campaign example
Worked campaign angle: a four-episode webinar series for a charter-school leadership consultancy, built around an argument Miller makes repeatedly: school leaders often think they have a recruiting problem when they have a development problem. The series follows that claim from hiring to governance.
Promotion hook, drawn from the summit recap: “the person you are looking to hire is probably not looking to work for you.” It reframes the problem before the first session.
Episode 1, Recruiting and retaining high-quality staff.
Open with the summit argument that the best candidates are already employed and already being recruited, so a hiring strategy identical to everyone else's produces average results.
Cover the session's tools: behavioural-based interview questions, values-based hiring, proactive recruiting pipelines and creative staffing.
Close with the staffing reel's pre-work question: “what system do we have in place to intentionally equip every new team member?”
Use participants' answers to set up Episode 2.
Episode 2, Paying for the same position twice.
The reel argues that people who are not equipped either leave feeling overwhelmed or stay and underperform, so the same seat gets filled twice.
Cover 30-60-90 day onboarding plans, culture alignment at the point of arrival and structured onboarding.
Check the original video before using the reel as a social clip to drive registration.
Episode 3, School Culture by Design.
Build on the conference session's eleven cultural systems and their stated outcomes: alignment, accountability, trust and exceptional performance.
Miller can walk through the named systems and show where each appears in a hiring, onboarding or retention decision, turning general culture language into practical action for schools.
Episode 4, Why school leaders burn out, and what better governance does about it.
The central claim: many leadership challenges are governance problems, not leadership problems.
Cover board-leader alignment and the mistake of recruiting board members only when someone resigns, contrasted with recruiting for tomorrow's challenges.
Close with the post's live poll or discussion prompt: “what expertise will your board need three years from now?”
Companion asset: a short reading-club episode or newsletter using the Leaders Read format, where Miller works through a leadership text in public, quotes the authors and adds practical commentary. The post attributes ideas to DuFour and Fullan and to Anthony Muhammad, placing Miller in an established leadership conversation rather than presenting them as a lone practitioner.
Recurring cadence: use Effective Governance Quarterly as the model for the governance track; it already runs as a repeating registration-based training.
Follow-up mechanic: the vendor-networking post shows Miller gathering and recommending a curated list of organisations and offering it as a lead-capture asset. The consultancy could adapt the mechanic by co-branding a practical resource for participants at the end of the series.
Before launch, agree terms through direct contact and ask for past session attendance and recent account analytics before setting registration targets.
The posts give no rate card, media kit, confirmed inquiry page, attendance figures or engagement data.
Check the original video before using the reel as a clip.
Alton Delane is the stronger pick when the consultancy widens the series from staffing and governance to enrollment and how a school presents itself to families, and wants to reach private and independent school leaders rather than charter boards.
Read more
Two posts make that case directly.
One links movement-based classroom learning to achievement and enrollment, citing Arizona State University figures for embodied learning and describing students learning through motion and collaboration in a mixed-reality environment.
The other focuses on what parents notice on a school tour: whether students are engaged, whether the room feels energetic or passive, and whether students collaborate or work alone.
For a consultancy selling enrollment marketing or classroom differentiation alongside its leadership offer, that’s a session topic ready to go.
Choosing Alton Delane means giving up the governance and people-systems core of a campaign focused on board recruitment, board-leader alignment, hiring systems, onboarding or staff retention.
Neither post covers those topics, the focus of the webinar series.
Both posts are also built around a product, SMALLab, so sessions would carry a vendor narrative and demonstration rather than a systems discussion.
Ask directly about audience size, past-session attendance and commercial terms before scoping a partnership.
Shannon Terry is the better choice when the series turns to teacher evaluation and the audience is public school districts rather than charter boards.
Read more
The two posts go further into evaluation mechanics than anything in Tom Miller’s posts.
One opens with two principals rating the same lesson differently and locates the problem in interpretation, not intent.
It then traces the consequences for compensation, TIA designations and eroding trust, and asks how confident a district is in the basis for its ratings.
The other discusses the gap between policy requirements and classroom reality, notes that margins for error in TIA-aligned models can be as narrow as 0.2%, and argues that software alone doesn’t make scores defensible across campuses.
For a consultancy seeking a session on evaluation consistency, ratings and teacher retention, this is the closer match.
The subject shifts from hiring, culture and governance to evaluation workflow and defensibility.
The posts don’t cover board recruitment, staffing pipelines or culture by design, so the consultancy would lose the people-systems thread that ran through the rest of the series.
They also sit within a named advisory role and promote an interview and a product, so a webinar would likely function partly as vendor promotion rather than independent teaching.
The audience is district leadership rather than charter school boards.
Ask directly about attendance, engagement and pricing before scoping a partnership.
Stephen Tweed is the better choice when the series widens beyond schools to employee-first culture, and the consultancy wants the argument supported by examples from outside education.
Read more
The posts describe months of interviews with founders and CEOs of home care companies about strategic planning, leadership and board retreats, and culture-building.
They report a deliberate shift from a customer-first to a caregiver-first culture, based on the reasoning that well-treated caregivers take better care of clients.
The second post describes a graduate corporate culture course at High Point University, where students research a prospective employer’s culture and interview an employee before deciding on fit.
For a series on why recruitment and retention are culture problems, this is a developed cross-industry frame with teaching content a session can borrow.
The industry is home care, not schools.
The two posts don’t address charter governance, board recruitment, school staffing or school culture, so the consultancy would have to translate the caregiver-first argument into a school setting and supply the school-specific detail itself.
The audience is home care CEOs and graduate students, not school leaders, and the posts frame their ideas as questions for that audience rather than practical tools.
Ask directly about audience reach and availability; follower counts, attendance data and commercial terms aren’t provided.
Five LinkedIn posts by Tom Miller cover a leadership reading reflection, a board recruitment post tied to a recurring governance training, a conference announcement with three session descriptions and a vendor networking event, a summit recap, and a short post summarising a video reel on equipping new staff.
The referenced reel and any event recordings are not available; the posts provide written descriptions only.
The posts do not include publication dates, and they do not identify signature books, shows, businesses, or earlier career work.
Three adjacent creators are represented by two posts each.