Pamela Feld develops and delivers training on practical AI use, responsible AI, and cybersecurity policy. Feld's work includes training business teams on AI workflows and ethics, and a DEF CON course on cybersecurity and AI policy basics. Feld describes herself as a certified AI ethics specialist and offers AI training, policy development, and AI agent development.
Practical AI and cybersecurity policy training for business teams and governance-focused organizations.
Best for
Technology consulting firms needing scoped paid AI governance and cyber policy training or workshops.
Not for
Mass-reach consumer or event brands wanting sponsored keynotes with guaranteed audience size and a published rate card.
Key takeaways
Fear of AI is a bad reason to wait.
Responsible AI is a governance problem, not a productivity add-on.
Training should end with something people can use the next day.
Check first: Confirm whether they taught the RFP session or had a commercial relationship with the utility mentioned.
Main ideas
Fear of AI is a bad reason to wait · Responsible AI is a governance problem, not a productivity add-on · Training should end with something people can use the next day
Pamela Feld develops and teaches practical AI and cybersecurity policy training.
Their work spans two audiences: business teams learning to use AI in everyday workflows, and organizations considering governance, risk, ethics, and policy.
A DEF CON course co-presented with Greg Goldberg, “Cyber & AI Policy Basics: What Every Organization Needs in Place,” is a notable example of their work.
Their posts also describe training trainers on AI Workforce Essentials for business productivity, with attention to privacy and ethical use.
Feld connects practical AI adoption with the policies and safeguards that should accompany it.
In a post about the DEF CON course, they describe an interactive class covering cybersecurity practices, AI policy and ethics, governance, and risk.
In a separate post about AI Workforce Essentials, they apply the subject to daily workflows and prompt writing for business teams.
This range gives readers a reason to follow their work for both practical ways to introduce AI and a view of the organizational questions its use raises.
The available posts also show them participating in small-business support and procurement learning; ask whether they taught the RFP session or had a commercial relationship with the utility mentioned.
Feld argues that businesses should adopt AI rather than wait out the headlines, pairing adoption with explicit decisions on ethics, privacy, and policy.
Read more
They teach this material, usually to small businesses or non-specialist teams, and build sessions around frameworks, prompts, and governance language participants can use right away. A second priority runs alongside the AI message: security and technology decisions belong to everyone in an organization, not only technical specialists.
Fear of AI is a bad reason to wait
Feld argues that alarming headlines about AI should not stop ordinary businesses from using it.
Read more
While large technology companies work through the biggest open questions, smaller organizations can put proven uses to work — market research, business development, and everyday workflows — thoughtfully, transparently, and responsibly. Feld frames AI as a way to level the playing field for businesses without large in-house resources.
In the AI Workforce Essentials post, Feld writes that "fear shouldn't prevent businesses from using technology that can help level the playing field," contrasting "unsettling headlines" with practical uses such as market research, business development, and more efficient daily workflows.
Responsible AI is a governance problem, not a productivity add-on
Feld argues that adoption should be steered by ethics, privacy, governance, risk, policy, and legal and compliance considerations — not treated as a tooling question alone.
Read more
They help organizations look beyond productivity to those areas, and the security-conference course focuses on policy basics rather than product demonstrations.
The DEF CON course Feld co-developed and co-taught, "Cyber & AI Policy Basics: What Every Organization Needs in Place," covered cybersecurity best practices, AI policy and ethics, governance, and AI risk.
Greg Goldberg of Barta | Goldberg was the co-presenter, and Jovany Gallardy was the teaching assistant.
Feld names Billy Spears as a continuing source of guidance on the material and credits Women in CyberSecurity (WiCyS) with the opportunity to develop the course.
Training should end with something people can use the next day
Feld pitches their sessions as practical and interactive — with questions, discussion, real examples, and frameworks — rather than lectures.
Read more
Their train-the-trainer sessions are designed to help participants pass the material along. The stated outcome is a set of tools attendees can apply inside their organization, whether in a classroom or small-business setting.
Feld promises DEF CON attendees "practical frameworks, real world examples, and actionable strategies you can immediately apply within your organization," and the wrap-up describes an interactive group from many countries trading questions and perspectives — Feld calls the day a think tank rather than a lecture. The SBDC session was explicitly a "train the trainers" format on AI workforce essentials, covering prompt writing and workflow use for business productivity.
Small businesses and supplier programs are a priority audience
Feld's work targets organizations without deep in-house expertise, and the business-development needs of that audience matter too: how a small company positions itself for larger contracts and which buyer programs can open that door.
Read more
This is a recurring concern, not a one-off event.
At a PG&E session on navigating the RFP process, Feld attended as a participant.
The procurement guidance in that post is attributed to session leaders such as Marianne Ellis of CEO Success Community and to PG&E staff, not to Feld.
The recap highlights advice on "how to position ourselves for success."
Feld describes the SBDC team as a long-standing advocate and Cheryl Brown as a valued mentor.
Security is everyone's job, including the smallest team
Feld's Cybersecurity Awareness Month message makes the case that protecting a business, its team, and its data is a shared responsibility rather than a specialist function, and that simple steps are worth taking.
Read more
It is the broadest and least technical of these posts — an awareness message rather than teaching material — so it should be read as a stated priority, not as a claim of deep technical security work.
Feld wishes readers a safe Cybersecurity Awareness Month and urges them to "stay alert, stay informed, and take simple steps to protect your business, your team, and your data."
This is the clearest account of what Feld taught and to whom, written right after the class finished.
Read more
Start here to see the subject matter, audience, and classroom format before reading the promotional post about the same course.
Feld writes that this was their first time as a DEF CON Trainer and that the course, "Cyber & AI Policy Basics: What Every Organization Needs in Place," was co-presented with Greg Goldberg of Barta | Goldberg, with teaching assistant Jovany Gallardy supporting the day.
They credit the DEF CON Training team and say the course was developed with Women in CyberSecurity (WiCyS).
The post lists what the room worked through: cybersecurity best practices, AI policy and ethics, governance, AI risk, and responsible technology use.
They describe students from many countries and call the day an interactive, discussion-heavy session rather than a lecture.
They also state that Billy Spears was a source of guidance on the material.
For brands planning a campaign
For a consulting firm seeking someone to lead an AI and cyber policy session for security practitioners, this shows delivery at a practitioner-heavy conference, with governance and risk framing rather than tool demonstrations. The co-presenter and named institutional backing give a brand a way to check the course’s provenance before a booking conversation.
The same course as the wrap-up, pitched before it ran.
Read more
Read it for the promise Feld makes about the class: its format, intended attendee, and promised outputs.
Feld announces their selection as a trainer for DEF CON Training in Las Vegas and names the same course and co-trainer, Greg Goldberg.
The class covers practical approaches to cyber and AI governance and AI policy development.
They say attendees will leave with frameworks, real-world examples, and strategies they can apply inside their organization, and that registration includes a DEF CON human badge.
The post gives a course date of Friday, August 7, 2026, at the Las Vegas Convention Center, and directs readers to register.
For brands planning a campaign
The promise here—frameworks, examples, immediately applicable strategies—is language a firm can reuse when scoping a workshop. It also shows Feld promoting a paid, ticketed class, offering evidence of the commercial model, not a brand partnership.
This is the small-business side of Feld’s work, away from the security conference.
Read more
Read it to see how the AI training is framed for everyday business audiences and what they say about ethics, privacy, and governance.
Feld describes being invited by Cheryl Brown to "train the trainers" on AI Workforce Essentials, covering practical AI use for daily workflows, ethical and privacy concerns, and prompt writing for business productivity.
They call the SBDC team a long-standing advocate for the company, single out Brown as a mentor, and thank them for repeated support.
The post says Feld helps organizations with responsible AI use, governance, risk, policy development, and legal and compliance considerations, and states that they are a certified AI ethics specialist.
It ends with an invitation to reach out about AI training, policy development, or AI agents.
Hashtags include SBA, SBDC, IEEE, WBENC, and WBE.
For brands planning a campaign
For a firm weighing Feld for a small-business or workforce AI program, this shows an existing train-the-trainer format and a stated ethics and policy angle rather than pure productivity tips. Ask for confirmation of the credentials and affiliations before repeating them.
A different mode from the teaching posts: here Feld is a participant in a supplier-diversity and procurement learning session.
Read more
Read it to see the small-business and supplier-diversity network they move in and how they talk about buying processes.
Feld describes a day in the Bay Area learning about the RFP process from Pacific Gas and Electric Company staff and Marianne Ellis of CEO Success Community, and thanks named panelists from several supplier companies.
They say the session gave small businesses guidance on positioning themselves for contracts and credit Ellis for practical takeaways.
The post is a thank-you and a recap of what they learned; it does not describe them delivering the session or holding a contract with the utility.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful background on the audience Feld serves—small businesses pursuing enterprise and utility contracts—and the procurement language that audience responds to. The post does not establish a commercial relationship with PG&E or that Feld teaches procurement.
Small-business supplier diversity and RFP navigation1
Practical AI training for business teams
Pamela Feld's AI Workforce Essentials session with the SBDC focused on using AI to improve daily workflows, navigating ethical and privacy concerns, and building stronger prompts for business productivity.
Read more
They also list AI training, policy development, and AI agent development as services. The post is a first-person account of training other trainers, showing both the subject matter and the delivery format.
A technology consulting firm can evaluate Pamela Feld for an AI enablement workshop or a train-the-trainer program that equips internal teams to use AI tools responsibly. Ask for a practical curriculum with workflow examples, prompt exercises, and a privacy and ethics component rather than a broad AI trends keynote.
Pamela Feld co-developed and co-delivered a DEF CON Training course titled "Cyber & AI Policy Basics: What Every Organization Needs in Place" with Greg Goldberg.
Read more
The course description promises practical approaches to cyber and AI governance, AI policy development, frameworks, real-world examples, and actionable strategies. A separate post says they helped develop the course through Women in CyberSecurity (WiCyS) and describes the class as highly interactive.
Live classroom training with a co-presenter; frameworks; real-world examples; interactive discussion.
For brands planning a campaign
Pamela Feld's posts are the strongest evidence of expertise in AI and cyber policy.
A consulting firm could ask them to adapt the course into a client-facing policy workshop, executive briefing, or webinar.
Clarify the scope if the campaign requires technical penetration testing or incident-response work.
Pamela Feld marked Cybersecurity Awareness Month with a post reminding readers that cybersecurity is everyone's responsibility and urging simple steps to protect a business, team, and data.
Read more
The post does not establish technical depth; it is a short awareness message.
For brands planning a campaign
Pamela Feld fits an awareness campaign aimed at small businesses, nontechnical teams, or employees who need basic cyber hygiene. For deep technical security content, pair this topic with a technical practitioner or ask them for a more specialized session.
Small-business supplier diversity and RFP navigation
Pamela Feld attended a PG&E-led learning event about navigating the RFP process and supporting small businesses.
Read more
The post thanks PG&E, event leaders, and panelists, and connects the event to supplier diversity, small-business growth, and WBE-related community involvement.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this topic for a small-business, supplier-diversity, or WBE-focused brief where the goal is credibility with that audience. For AI or cyber policy training, use the AI and DEF CON posts instead.
Across the DEF CON posts, Pamela Feld describes teaching with a co-presenter, taking questions from an international group, and offering participants practical frameworks and strategies they can apply.
Read more
The AI Workforce Essentials post similarly emphasizes practical use, prompt development, and responsible adoption. The through-line is applied training rather than abstract commentary.
For brands planning a campaign
Brands can evaluate Pamela Feld for workshops, cohort training, or interactive sessions where participants leave with frameworks and next steps. Ask for an outline showing exercises, examples, and takeaway materials; a keynote-only format may not draw on the strongest part of the offering.
Feld's posts describe training engagements rather than sponsorships.
Read more
They were selected as a DEF CON Training instructor and co-presented a cybersecurity and AI policy course developed with Women in CyberSecurity (WiCyS), and separately trained SBDC advisers on AI workforce essentials.
The posts also name IEEE AI ethics certification and carry the hashtags of women's business enterprise certification programs.
No paid sponsorship, affiliate deal, investment, or named owned business appears in their posts; they refer to "our company" without naming it.
DEF CON Training
Disclosed partnership
Feld was selected as a trainer for DEF CON Training in Las Vegas and co-presented "Cyber & AI Policy Basics: What Every Organization Needs in Place."
Read more
The class is described as running Friday, August 7, 2026, and as their first time as a DEF CON trainer. Ask about payment terms and whether the contract continues.
Feld was invited by Cheryl Brown to "train the trainers" on AI Workforce Essentials for the SBDC team, covering practical AI workflows, ethics and privacy, and prompt writing.
Read more
They also describe the SBDC team as a long-running advocate for "our company."
Barta | Goldberg appears in Feld's post as the firm of co-presenter Greg Goldberg, who shared the DEF CON Training classroom and is credited with contributing legal and policy insight to the class discussions.
Feld attended a PG&E-hosted workshop in the Bay Area on navigating the RFP process for small businesses and thanked the PG&E team and panelists for the session.
Read more
The post documents attendance and public thanks, not a working or sponsored relationship; the individual panelists' employers named there are not listed as separate relationships.
Feld's posts about their company carry the #WBENC, #WBEC-West, and #WBE hashtags attached to certified women's business enterprises, including on a supplier-diversity post.
Read more
The hashtags indicate an affiliation with these certification programs.
Pamela Feld's work splits into two related threads: putting AI to use inside ordinary businesses, and making the policy, ethics, and governance decisions that should come with it.
Read more
The clearest starting point is the AI Workforce Essentials session with an SBDC team, which covers putting AI to use, prompt writing, and privacy and ethics questions in a train-the-trainer format.
From there, the DEF CON Training course "Cyber & AI Policy Basics: What Every Organization Needs in Place" goes deeper into governance—cyber and AI policy fundamentals, frameworks, and real examples—and the course wrap-up shows how the classroom ran, with questions and discussion from an international group.
A short Cybersecurity Awareness Month post is the broadest and least technical item.
Read the training and policy material together: they consistently treat adoption and responsibility as one subject.
Readers who want to keep exploring can follow the AI governance and ethics thread into regulation and standards, or follow the small-business thread into supplier diversity and RFP navigation, which appears in the PG&E event recap.
Writes about AI governance, responsible AI, data protection, and cybersecurity, framing governance as a matter of trust, privacy, and security rather than compliance paperwork alone—the same link Feld draws between AI adoption and ethics.
Read more
Demirci comments analytically on conference sessions and frameworks and points readers to standards such as ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act; Feld delivers hands-on training and course material to business audiences.
Presents academic work on AI ethics in high-stakes settings, including cybersecurity and leadership, and argues that moral responsibility must stay with a human decision-maker—a position close to Feld's view that ethics and policy should steer how AI is used.
Read more
Vincenti presents scholarly papers on ethical frameworks as university faculty; Feld teaches practical policy, prompt-writing, and putting AI to work in sessions for organizations and small businesses.
Works on AI governance, data governance, GDPR, and digital policy, and asks how organizations can move from principles and regulation to practical implementation—the same bridge Feld builds between AI policy and everyday workflows.
Read more
Garcia is building expertise through a European law, data and AI master's program, conferences, and summer schools, and writes about that learning journey; Feld runs training and course delivery for organizations.
For a technology consulting firm weighing Pamela Feld for AI and cyber policy work, the only measured audience number is a LinkedIn following of 1,452, observed 7 October 2026.
Read more
That is a professional-scale audience rather than a mass channel.
Its composition — geography, age, job role and seniority — is not established, and the posts do not report how many people saw or responded to individual posts.
The posts show the audiences they appear in front of, which is different from their following.
The DEF CON course description points to an international training room of cyber and AI practitioners; an SBDC session put them in front of small-business advisers in a "train the trainers" role; a Pacific Gas and Electric small-business event drew supplier-diversity and RFP-focused attendees; and the Cybersecurity Month post is general awareness content aimed at business owners rather than a defined professional segment.
These named, firsthand audiences are relevant to AI and cyber policy work.
Practical read: a LinkedIn following of 1,452 supports niche professional reach — useful for credibility, education and lead-generation content aimed at small-business and cyber/AI policy audiences — rather than broad awareness.
Before committing, ask for attendance or enrollment figures from the DEF CON and SBDC sessions, recent reach and engagement for comparable AI-policy and cyber-policy posts, and an audience survey or documented source covering job role, seniority and geography.
A follower count alone cannot confirm that the audience matches a consulting firm's buyer.
LinkedIn followers
1,452
LinkedIn profile record for Pamela Feld · 2026-10-07
Feld's posts describe paid services, not a media or sponsorship program.
Read more
They offer AI training—including sessions that teach advisors and business teams to use AI in daily workflows—along with cyber and AI policy development and AI agent development, and invite organizations to start a conversation.
A DEF CON Training course shows the work in practice: a full-day class co-taught with a second presenter and supported by a teaching assistant, covering cybersecurity and AI governance, policy, and responsible technology use.
For a technology consulting firm, the realistic route is a scoped paid engagement in training or policy work, rather than a sponsored placement.
Agree on scope, price, and format directly.
AI workforce training and train-the-trainer sessions
Buyer requirement
The buyer identifies the audience, meeting format, and work context.
Feld describes an SBDC session on practical AI use in daily work, prompt development, and ethical and privacy concerns, framed around what participants can apply immediately.
Session length, class size, delivery mode, and price are not published; settle those details in the conversation.
Co-taught cyber and AI policy course
Buyer requirement
Plan for two presenters plus support.
The DEF CON course was developed and delivered with a co-presenter and a teaching assistant over a single day to an international group of students.
Buyers seeking a similar course should agree on the syllabus, co-presenter arrangement, and logistics.
The conference set registration, dates, and pricing for that session, not Feld.
AI policy, governance and risk development
Buyer requirement
Describe the organization's regulatory context and internal constraints.
Feld says they help organizations move beyond productivity to governance, risk, policy development, and the legal and compliance considerations that shape AI adoption.
They work in this area as a certified AI ethics specialist.
Their posts do not specify deliverable scope or duration; ask for both.
AI agent development
Buyer requirement
Feld's posts mention this as an inquiry topic but provide no details. Treat it as unassessed and define the requirements in writing before committing.
A technology consulting firm needs a named practitioner to design and deliver AI governance and cyber policy sessions for its own clients, as a scoped paid engagement rather than a sponsored placement.
Read more
Pamela Feld is a strong candidate because the posts show both the subject matter and delivery format.
The DEF CON 34 Training course "Cyber & AI Policy Basics: What Every Organization Needs in Place" is the clearest example: they co-developed and co-presented it with Greg Goldberg, with a teaching assistant supporting the day.
The wrap-up post names what the room worked through — cybersecurity best practices, AI policy and ethics, governance, AI risk, and responsible technology use — with students from many countries in an interactive, discussion-heavy format.
The course announcement for the same session promises frameworks, real-world examples, and strategies attendees can apply inside their organization, language a consulting firm can reuse when scoping a client workshop or executive briefing.
A second audience appears in the SBDC AI Workforce Essentials session, where Feld trained advisers to use AI in daily workflows, build stronger prompts, and handle ethical and privacy concerns.
The post also sets out governance, risk, policy development, and legal and compliance considerations as part of the offer.
Taken together, these examples show a practitioner who teaches policy and governance to cyber professionals and small-business advisers, not a commentator.
Before booking, ask for session length, class size, price, a written outline, a reference from DEF CON co-presenter Greg Goldberg, and confirmation of the WiCyS course-development credit.
The "certified AI ethics specialist" credential and IEEE, WBENC, and WiCyS affiliations are Feld's own statements and were not independently verified in the posts.
The LinkedIn following of 1,452, observed 7 October 2026, is professional-scale; build this engagement around delivery and credibility, not reach.
When to choose a specialist
A mass-reach consumer or event brand wants a sponsored keynote with guaranteed audience size, a published rate card, and stated editorial-separation terms.
Read more
The posts do not support this sponsored-keynote need.
No sponsorship menu, rate card, media kit, booking page, audience guarantee, or disclosed paid brand partnership appears in Pamela Feld's posts.
The documented offers are scoped service work — training, policy and governance development, and an inquiry route for AI agent development.
The only measured audience figure is a LinkedIn following of 1,452, observed 7 October 2026.
With no platform demographics, audience survey, per-post reach, or engagement counts, there is no basis for guaranteeing impressions or projecting reach.
The posts show named rooms Feld has taught in, but no attendance or enrollment numbers.
A technical security or engineering engagement involving hands-on work also fits poorly.
The Cybersecurity Awareness Month post is a short reminder that security is everyone's responsibility; it contains no architecture, penetration testing, or incident-response detail.
AI agent development is listed as an inquiry topic but described in no detail — no scope, specification, deliverable list, or timeline — so treat it as untested and carve it out or scope it separately rather than assume it is included.
A worked campaign example
Campaign angle: "Policy first, tools second" — a Cyber & AI Policy Readiness Program for the consulting firm's mid-market clients, built from the formats Pamela Feld has already delivered.
Shape of the program: (1) a one-day co-taught workshop adapted from the DEF CON curriculum, covering AI governance, AI policy development, AI risk, and responsible use, aimed at the client's security, risk, and compliance staff; (2) a half-day train-the-trainer session for the firm's own advisers, following the SBDC model — practical AI use in daily workflows, prompt writing, and ethical and privacy handling — so the firm can repeat the material across accounts; (3) an optional executive briefing that reframes the same content as a governance and risk decision for leadership.
Why this angle: the two described delivery formats map directly onto it.
The DEF CON course supplies practitioner-facing content and a co-presenter model the firm can replicate for its own staff; the SBDC session supplies the trainer-enablement layer and everyday-business framing.
The angle also draws on the strongest promise in the posts — participants leave with frameworks, examples, and strategies they can apply — rather than audience size, which the posts do not establish.
Before contracting, settle session length, class size, delivery mode, price, and a written syllabus.
Ask for the DEF CON course outline, attendance figures from that session, a reference from co-presenter Greg Goldberg, and confirmation of the WiCyS course-development credit.
Keep AI agent development out of the first scope or quote it separately; the posts provide no deliverable details.
Next step: turn the angle into a short campaign plan naming the client audience, the regulatory context they operate under, the deliverable for each session, the dates, and the reference checks above.
Then open a conversation through the inquiry route Feld states in the AI Workforce Essentials post.
This is the best-supported use of the formats they describe.
Choose Filiz Demirci when the client's problem is the framework itself: mapping ISO 42001 or the EU AI Act onto existing processes, or building an internal data and AI governance position the client can point to.
Read more
Demirci's posts show a technology-consulting voice on those questions: a Future AI Summit London recap that examines ethical-AI design, sustained ethical ecosystems, and where organisations get GenAI wrong; and a post that treats ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act as practical tools for governing data and images.
Pamela Feld's posts focus on running the room — co-developing a DEF CON course and training SBDC advisers.
If the firm's deliverable is a framework-to-process mapping rather than a taught session, Demirci is the closer match.
Filiz Demirci's posts focus on industry commentary and awareness writing, not a curriculum, course outline, or paid client sessions.
A firm seeking a named trainer with a ready-to-use course will find less evidence here.
Before treating Demirci as interchangeable with the DEF CON and SBDC teaching Pamela Feld describes, ask about delivery experience and course materials.
Michele Vincenti, Ph.D, MBA, MA, CM, CPHR, SHRM-SCP
Choose Michele Vincenti when the engagement needs an academic spine and a named ethical framework.
Read more
Vincenti's posts describe presentations of "The Inviolability of the Innocent in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Thomistic Insights for Leadership, Cybersecurity, and Military Ethics" at the FIDMA conference on fairness in digital markets and AI in Lund, Sweden, co-authored with Pierluigi Testa, both faculty at University Canada West.
The Ethico-Prudential Matrix described there is the kind of framework a university, defence, or regulated client may want cited in an executive briefing.
The military-ethics and cybersecurity angle also reaches audiences Pamela Feld's posts do not address.
The posts describe a conference presentation, not training delivery.
A consulting firm seeking a repeatable workshop would be buying a subject-matter authority whose material may need a co-trainer and a curriculum built around it.
Choose Nataly Garcia when the need is European regulatory awareness for a legal or compliance audience, or when the budget suits a guest contributor rather than a lead trainer.
Read more
Garcia's posts describe a European Master in Law, Data and Artificial Intelligence at Dublin City University; work on data governance, GDPR, AI regulation, and trustworthy AI; and a summer at FutureLaw in Tallinn, the Computers, Privacy and Data Protection conference in Brussels, an EMILDAI summer school on building public AI in Europe in Avignon, and a summer school on AI governance and comparative law in Warsaw.
A recurring question is how to move from principles and regulation to practical implementation.
That framing sits close to Pamela Feld's policy-first pitch and can carry the European compliance segment of a programme.
Garcia's posts describe study, conferences, and summer schools, not the design or delivery of paid client training. For a firm contracting a named lead practitioner with a documented classroom record, ask about teaching experience, rates, and references before proceeding.
This profile rests on five LinkedIn posts by Pamela Feld, read in full: a DEF CON Training course announcement naming a class dated August 7, 2026, the course wrap-up, a train-the-trainer session on AI Workforce Essentials delivered for an SBDC team, a Pacific Gas and Electric supplier-diversity and RFP session recap, and a short Cybersecurity Awareness Month note.
Most of the posts carry no explicit date.
The posts are short-form social content, so they show stated subjects, formats, and audiences rather than sustained argument; no transcripts, course outlines, attendance or enrollment figures, or engagement data are mentioned in the posts, and credential and affiliation statements such as IEEE AI ethics certification and WBENC and WiCyS tags come from Feld's own posts without independent confirmation.
Similar-creator comparisons draw on two posts each from three other profiles.
The descriptions of Feld's work are limited to what these posts state.
Feld's posts do not mention signature books, shows, named businesses, or earlier career, so those topics remain unaddressed.