Ontshiametse Blessing Mlambo shares practical ideas on digital marketing, UGC-style ad creative, creative testing, and marketing measurement. Their posts focus on testing distinct hooks and concepts, matching videos to stages of the buying journey, and improving tracking with server-side GA4.
Most “ad fatigue” is a creative-refresh problem, not an audience problem · One product brief should become a set of videos, each doing a different job · AI can make more UGC directions, but people still decide what feels believable
Ontshiametse Blessing Mlambo writes about digital marketing, with a particular focus on UGC-style advertising, creative testing, and measurement. Their posts show a practical interest in how teams can test distinct creative ideas, match videos to different stages of a buyer’s journey, and judge performance using data.
Mlambo connects creative decisions to how they will be tested and measured.
Rather than treating a fading ad as a cue to make more versions of the same idea, they recommend testing different problems, proof points, objections, and product moments.
Their posts distinguish the role of each video across the funnel and caution that creative volume cannot fix a weak offer.
On AI-assisted UGC, they emphasize that believable details and demonstrable claims still need judgment.
A separate post on server-side GA4 tracking extends that measurement focus from ad tests to conversion data.
Marketers interested in practical thinking about creative variation and performance measurement will find these posts useful.
Mlambo’s posts circle one argument: performance problems are usually creative problems, solved by producing genuinely different ideas rather than more versions of one.
Read more
That runs from ad fatigue—a refresh problem, not an audience problem—through funnel structure and AI-assisted variation.
A separate thread treats measurement as the foundation, arguing that creative decisions based on incomplete conversion data are unreliable.
Four UGC posts follow a recognisable shape: name a specific problem, explain the practice, then present MotionSeed as the production aid.
The principles and the tool pitch are worth reading separately.
Two further posts mark HubSpot and Canva marketing certifications, showing priorities around formal frameworks and visual craft rather than a distinct argument.
Most “ad fatigue” is a creative-refresh problem, not an audience problem
When a winning ad starts to fade, the common assumption is that the audience is tired of it.
Read more
Mlambo argues that the likelier cause is a team reissuing the same idea.
Real variation happens at the concept level: a different pain point, proof point, objection or product moment.
Five edits to the same opening line don’t go far enough.
They break testing into parts, asking which hook, opening shot and proof point keeps people watching—not whether the ad is good.
Creative volume won’t rescue a weak offer, but it can reveal faster whether the problem lies with the offer, hook or execution.
The testing post contrasts a concept that looks promising in review with its performance in paid traffic, and warns against rewriting a whole campaign before testing more variations. The refresh post asks what a team should do first when a winning ad fades: find a new angle, not just rewrite the opening line.
One product brief should become a set of videos, each doing a different job
Mlambo argues that creator-style video is moving beyond the single ad set.
Read more
Strong DTC teams use a problem-led hook for prospecting, a product demo for consideration and proof from real use cases for retargeting.
The same product does different work at each stage, changing what a brief asks for: not one UGC ad, but a set of videos, each answering the next question in a buyer’s head.
The advantage isn’t more video for its own sake, but giving each funnel stage a better reason to keep watching.
The funnel post lays out three jobs: a prospecting hook, a consideration demo and retargeting proof. This structure means a team can stop booking a separate shoot for every variation.
AI can make more UGC directions, but people still decide what feels believable
Mlambo separates AI’s output from the judgment of it.
Read more
AI can produce more UGC-style options, shifting the constraint from quantity to choice.
What makes an ad feel real—a specific product problem, a claim someone can actually demonstrate and a creator-style delivery that doesn’t sound like a brand deck—still requires human judgment.
In this account, the best AI-assisted ads don’t hide the process; they test more genuine angles and keep the ones that earn attention without losing trust.
The post answers its opening question: AI can help you make more UGC creative, but it can’t decide what makes it believable. It closes by asking readers what authenticity check they make before a concept goes into paid traffic.
Creative decisions are only as good as the conversion data underneath them
A technical post argues that ad blockers, browser privacy rules and iOS restrictions remove conversion data before it reaches reporting, estimating the loss at up to roughly 30%.
Read more
The proposed fix is to move processing from the user’s device to a server container configured through Google Tag Manager, either on Google Cloud Platform or Stape.
The sequence: set up the cloud server container, define schemas to standardise incoming event streams, then validate server events against browser hits before routing them to GA4.
The post claims a much higher transaction match rate, cleaner consent handling because the container anonymises data before it leaves, and lighter scripts that help page speed.
The post lists the implementation steps in order and cites its own figures, including a near-perfect transaction match rate and a largely compliant user environment, to show the difference between browser-side and server-side setup.
The UGC advice is consistently framed around MotionSeed
Four UGC posts name a problem, explain the practice, then present MotionSeed as the tool for turning one product brief into multiple UGC-style directions without another shoot.
Read more
The testing principles can be applied without the tool. The posts don’t describe the terms of that relationship, so readers should treat the advice and product pitch as separate claims.
The creative-testing, funnel and AI posts each close with a reader question and a MotionSeed line. One asks what authenticity check should come before a UGC concept enters paid traffic.
A useful starting point for understanding Mlambo’s approach to UGC creative.
Read more
It answers a question performance teams often ask — why did a winning ad stop working? — with a concrete answer rather than a generic one.
Mlambo reframes a familiar complaint: when performance slips, teams often assume the audience is tired of the ad.
The post argues the real gap is usually creative, and the fix is not another version of the same opening line.
What’s needed is a new angle: a different pain point, proof point, objection, or product moment.
Testing systems that produce five edits of one concept never deliver that variation, because edits don’t change the underlying idea.
For brands planning a campaign
For a UGC variation brief, ask for concept-level differences — distinct pains, proofs, and objections — rather than multiple cuts of one script. Audit past test batches to see how many were genuinely different ideas.
This is the testing mindset behind Mlambo’s writing about UGC.
Read more
It explains what to measure during a creative test and why a promising concept can still fail in paid traffic.
A single UGC concept can look strong in review and still lose in market.
Mlambo shifts the question from “is this good?” to “which hook, opening shot, and proof point keeps people watching?”
That directs testing at specific elements rather than whole ads.
The advice is to test more variations before rewriting an entire campaign.
Creative volume won’t rescue a weak offer, but it can quickly show whether the problem lies with the offer, the hook, or the execution.
For brands planning a campaign
Build testing briefs around hook, opening shot, and proof point as separate variables, so a failed test tells you which element to change. Check the offer before spending on more variations.
A clear explanation of how to structure a set of UGC assets instead of treating creator video as a single ad.
Read more
It outlines what a full-funnel library should contain and how that changes a campaign’s needs.
Mlambo describes creator-style video working across the funnel: a problem-led hook for prospecting, a product demo for consideration, and proof from real use cases for retargeting.
The same product serves a different purpose at each stage, shifting the campaign need from “we need a UGC ad” to a set of videos that answer the next question in a buyer’s mind.
The goal isn’t more videos for their own sake, but giving each stage a reason to keep watching.
For brands planning a campaign
Write briefs stage by stage — prospecting, consideration, retargeting — with the specific question each video answers. Track performance by funnel role rather than pooling all creator videos into one result.
A concise statement of where AI fits in Mlambo’s production thinking.
Read more
Read it if you’re weighing AI-assisted variation for UGC and want to know which decisions still need a human.
Mlambo separates volume from believability.
AI can produce more UGC-style options, but people still choose what makes an ad feel real: a specific product problem, a claim someone can demonstrate, and creator-style delivery that doesn’t sound like a brand deck.
In this account, the best AI-assisted ads use the process to test more genuine angles and keep the ones that earn attention without losing trust.
For brands planning a campaign
Use AI for more directions, not for final judgment. Add an explicit authenticity check — specific problem, demonstrable claim, delivery that sounds like a person — before any concept goes into paid traffic.
Read it if you’re making creative decisions on dashboard numbers that may be incomplete and want to see how Mlambo frames the fix.
Mlambo argues that ad blockers, browser privacy rules, and iOS restrictions quietly remove conversion data before it reaches reporting — in the post’s own estimate, up to roughly 30%.
The proposed fix is to move processing from the user’s device to a server container set up through Google Tag Manager on Google Cloud Platform or Stape.
The post lays out a sequence: configure the cloud server container, define schemas to standardise incoming event streams, then validate server events against browser hits before routing them to GA4.
Claimed gains include a much higher transaction match rate, cleaner consent handling because the container anonymises data before it leaves, and lighter scripts on the page.
For brands planning a campaign
Before trusting a creative test result, check whether measurement is complete enough to interpret. If server-side tracking isn’t in place, treat reported numbers as directional and fix tracking before scaling creative spend.
UGC creative testing built around hooks and concepts, not edits2
Formal marketing certifications as framework-building2
Matching UGC videos to funnel stages1
AI-assisted UGC with an authenticity check1
Measurement as a first-party data discipline1
UGC creative testing built around hooks and concepts, not edits
Mlambo argues that most performance problems that look like ad fatigue are actually creative-refresh problems.
Read more
The useful test is not another version of the same opening line but a new angle: a different pain point, proof point, objection, or product moment. Posts describe turning one product brief into multiple UGC-style directions so testing happens at concept level rather than across five edits of one ad.
Map each test to a distinct concept—pain point, proof point, objection, or product moment—rather than another opening-line edit.
A new concept will not rescue a weak offer; extra volume mainly helps diagnose where the problem sits.
For brands planning a campaign
For a DTC agency creating UGC-style variations, Mlambo's approach supports a test matrix built on distinct concepts—pain-point hook, proof-led demo, objection-handling—before producing polished edits. It also sets the expectation that volume alone will not fix a weak offer; the system should diagnose whether the offer, hook, or execution is failing.
In the most developed funnel post, Mlambo says creator-style video is moving beyond the ad set.
Read more
Strong DTC teams use a problem-led hook for prospecting, a product demo for consideration, and proof from real use cases for retargeting. The same product does a different job at each stage, shifting the campaign plan from one UGC ad to a set of videos that answer the buyer's next question.
Write the campaign plan as a set of funnel-stage jobs: prospect hook, consideration demo, retargeting proof.
For brands planning a campaign
A UGC production brief can be structured by funnel job rather than as a generic ad request. An agency should ask for stage-specific directions: a prospect-facing problem hook, a consideration demo, and a retargeting proof clip, then evaluate each against the question that stage must answer.
Mlambo distinguishes AI's ability to produce more UGC creative from the judgment needed to make it feel believable.
Read more
Believability comes from a specific product problem, a claim someone can demonstrate, and creator-style delivery that does not sound like a brand deck. AI-assisted ads work when they test more real angles and keep the ones that earn attention without losing trust.
Run an authenticity checklist before paid traffic: specific problem, demonstrable claim, creator-style delivery.
For brands planning a campaign
Before paid traffic, agencies can check whether the concept names a specific problem, demonstrates a claim, and sounds like a creator rather than a brand script. AI can expand angles, but it should not hide the process or mass-produce generic creative.
A separate technical post covers server-side GA4 tracking.
Read more
Mlambo describes browser-based tracking as vulnerable to ad blockers, privacy policies, and iOS restrictions, and presents server-side tagging as an accuracy and privacy upgrade: a cloud server container intercepts web events, data schemas standardize event streams, and preview tools validate browser hits against server payloads. The post also ties server-side deployment to lighter scripts, faster page speed, and consent governance.
Implementation sequence: configure a GTM cloud server container, define event schemas, validate browser hits against server payloads before routing to GA4.
For brands planning a campaign
For agencies running performance campaigns, this is a reminder that creative testing depends on trustworthy conversion data.
Mlambo can speak to measurement architecture—GTM server containers, event validation, consent-aware data flows—as part of a performance engagement, not just ad creative.
This offers a technical angle for clients losing conversion signal to browser restrictions.
Formal marketing certifications as framework-building
Two posts mark HubSpot digital marketing and Canva marketing certifications.
Read more
Mlambo frames the coursework around inbound methodology, SEO, paid amplification, analytics, visual content strategy, brand identity, and design workflows. The posts present certifications as adding formal frameworks to ground-level community and content experience.
Certifications offer less evidence of campaign fit than the testing and measurement posts.
For brands planning a campaign
These posts show an interest in structured marketing frameworks and visual production workflows, alongside UGC testing and measurement. Together, they support a generalist digital marketing profile spanning strategy, content, and design.
Several UGC and creative-testing posts explicitly promote MotionSeed as a way for performance teams to turn a product brief into varied UGC-style creative directions.
Read more
The posts discuss the problem first—authenticity, creative refresh, funnel stage—then position MotionSeed as a production or testing aid.
Ask for the commercial terms of the MotionSeed relationship.
For brands planning a campaign
A brand evaluating Mlambo should read the UGC material in the context of an existing MotionSeed promotion.
The ideas are portable, but the posts often end in a product-assisted workflow.
Separate the testing principles from the tool pitch and assess whether a competitive or complementary relationship matters.
The clearest commercial relationship described here is with MotionSeed, a UGC-style ad creative service promoted across four posts.
Read more
Written in the company’s voice, the posts sell its service but don’t specify whether Mlambo works for, owns or partners with the business.
Ask what the connection is before treating it as a partnership.
Two other posts name certification providers — HubSpot Academy and the Canva Design School — as credentials rather than commercial partners.
MotionSeed
Disclosed partnership
Four posts promote MotionSeed, a service that turns product information into varied UGC-style ad creative for performance teams.
Read more
Written as company messaging — “MotionSeed helps performance teams turn product information into those varied UGC-style directions” — they carry the #MotionSeed tag. Ask whether Mlambo owns the business, works for it or partners with it; the posts don’t specify.
Mlambo announced completing the Marketing with Canva certification through the Canva Design School and described using the Canva ecosystem for visual assets and content marketing campaigns.
Mlambo's work is on LinkedIn, where the run of posts on UGC-style ad creative is the quickest way in.
Read more
The creative-testing posts argue that slumping performance is usually a creative-refresh problem, best addressed with a genuinely different angle rather than another edit of the same opening line.
The funnel post shows how one product brief becomes separate videos for prospecting, consideration, and retargeting.
The AI post sets human judgment about believability against the volume AI can produce.
The server-side GA4 post argues that conversion data must be trustworthy before teams can read creative results properly.
Several posts close with a MotionSeed product line; read the testing principles and the tool pitch as separate claims.
The HubSpot and Canva certification posts are the lightest material, showing an interest in formal marketing frameworks and visual craft.
Posts cover making ads without a creator or camera, using AI avatars, scripts, voiceovers, product demos, and multiple ad variations for testing. They also point readers to a fuller guide on choosing AI UGC tools and building a process from idea through testing and optimisation.
Eva focuses on production processes and tooling: what teams can generate, which AI UGC tools are worth using, and how to build a repeatable workflow. Mlambo's posts focus on creative judgment, from concept-level variation and the different jobs video does at each funnel stage to the measurement layer beneath it.
Toschi connects content and creative decisions to performance measurement.
Read more
They trace a path from writing content for fast-ranking directory sites through webmaster and tracking work into paid media and full-funnel performance marketing. They argue that knowing GA4, GTM, data layers, and UTM structures lets a team distinguish a content problem from a measurement problem.
Toschi focuses on content strategy and SEO within a full-stack performance role, with writing as one part of the job. Mlambo focuses on UGC-style ad creative: hooks, concepts, funnel-stage video, and the testing loop that determines which creative survives paid traffic.
Mursalat also works on UGC-style ad creative built around hook-level testing with AI.
Read more
Posts detail a faceless AI UGC pipeline: script first, AI product visuals, natural-sounding AI voiceover, feed-native editing, then one script turned into five variants so only the opening is tested.
Mursalat frames the work as a freelance service, including a Fiverr gig audit and requests for direct messages, and focuses on running a faceless pipeline end to end. Mlambo addresses team-level creative testing and pairs creative advice with measurement architecture, without describing a similar service arrangement.
Placement decision first: the only measured audience figure available is a LinkedIn following of 206 accounts (observed 9 October 2026).
Read more
That is a small, professional-scope following.
It fits a placement where the value is a practitioner's perspective or a content review, not one that needs paid reach — for a DTC agency planning UGC-style ad variations, distribution is unproven on this evidence.
What the posts suggest about appeal: the content is written for performance marketers and UGC/creative-testing practitioners — creative refresh rather than ad fatigue, funnel-stage video, hook and proof-point testing, and server-side GA4 measurement.
That is a credible signal of who the work is aimed at, but it is content appeal, not measured audience composition.
What is not measured: no geography, age, gender, employer, occupation, or seniority data is available for this following.
A LinkedIn follower total does not verify job titles or seniority levels; those attributes would need audience survey results or another documented source.
No post-level engagement counts (reactions, comments, impressions) and no video performance data were provided, so no format or topic comparison can be made from this evidence, and no range should be inferred.
Next step: before committing budget, ask for recent audience demographics for the LinkedIn following (country, age band, and seniority if tracked) and post-level engagement or client results on comparable UGC creative-testing work.
No official sponsorship policy, media kit, rate card, or partnership inquiry route appears in Ontshiametse Blessing Mlambo’s seven LinkedIn posts.
Read more
Much of the material promotes MotionSeed and its UGC-style creative testing for performance teams, but repeated company mentions are not a disclosed sponsorship offer: the posts state no terms, formats, pricing, deliverables, or route for approaching them about paid work. Brands should contact them directly on LinkedIn and ask about UGC creative direction, hooks, and creative testing scope before assuming a standard package exists.
Yes—for a DTC performance marketing agency that needs a creative-testing system, not a spokesperson.
Read more
Mlambo’s posts read like working notes on that problem: a fading winner is usually a creative-refresh problem rather than ad fatigue, and the fix is a new angle—a different pain point, proof point, objection or product moment—not five edits of one opening line.
The funnel post gives an agency a usable brief structure: a problem-led hook for prospecting, a product demo for consideration, and proof from real use cases for retargeting.
Each video answers the buyer’s next question instead of repeating the same pitch.
The AI post sets out a review gate for scaling output: a specific product problem, a demonstrable claim and delivery that does not sound like a brand deck.
The server-side GA4 post also matters: an agency selling creative testing needs a reliable read on results, and they treat incomplete measurement as a reason to distrust the numbers before increasing spend.
The fit is as strategist or creative director of the testing system, not as a distribution channel.
The posts show a 206-follower LinkedIn account (observed 9 October 2026), no post-level engagement counts, and no client results or finished creative samples.
MotionSeed appears throughout the UGC posts as the product being promoted; clarify whether the relationship is employment, partnership or promotion before briefing.
Fit is strongest when the agency wants concept-level thinking and a testing framework it can run itself.
When to choose a specialist
A paid on-camera sponsorship with guaranteed reach, or a campaign whose success depends on audience scale, is a poor fit.
Read more
The only measured audience figure in Mlambo’s posts is 206 LinkedIn followers; they provide no engagement counts, impressions or video performance data to support a distribution or viewership-range promise.
The posts offer commentary on practice and testing, but no example of them appearing in a video or producing finished ad creative.
A campaign requiring a creator to star in the spots would therefore rest on an unverified assumption.
They also publish no sponsorship policy, rate card or inquiry route.
Ask directly about deliverables, terms and on-camera experience before considering a paid package.
A campaign requiring provable past ad performance is also a poor fit—for example, selecting them to reproduce a specific winning UGC format with a tracked client result behind it.
Their posts argue for a method but report no campaign outcomes.
The MotionSeed promotion running through the UGC posts also warrants clarification before treating their advice as neutral, particularly for a client whose workflow overlaps with that product.
A worked campaign example
Worked angle: turning a decayed winner into a testable concept set.
Take a hypothetical brief from a DTC supplement brand whose single best creator-style ad has lost performance over about two months. The agency’s job is not to produce more cuts of that ad.
1. Check measurement before reading the decline as fatigue. Confirm how much conversion data reaches GA4. If browser-side tracking is still the only source, part of the reported drop may be a data problem rather than an audience problem. Server-side tagging through a GTM cloud container—configure the container, define event schemas, and validate browser hits against server payloads before routing—is the fix Mlambo describes. It determines whether the test read-out can be trusted.
2. Treat it as a creative-refresh problem. Build the test at concept level: four angle families—a specific problem the product solves, a demonstrable proof point, an objection the buyer raises before purchase, and an everyday product moment. Develop two or three distinct ideas per family, not script variants of one ad.
3. Write the brief by funnel stage. Prospecting gets the problem-led hook; consideration gets a short demo that shows the claim; retargeting gets proof from a real use case. Each video answers the next question instead of repeating the pitch.
4. Gate every direction before paid traffic. Does it name a specific product problem? Is the claim demonstrable on camera? Does the delivery sound like a person rather than a brand deck? Rewrite or drop directions that fail the gate; do not scale them with more budget.
5. Read results by funnel role rather than as one pooled average, and treat creative volume as a diagnostic: if nothing moves across genuinely different concepts, the offer is the likelier problem.
Illustrative sample directions: “the ingredient I avoided until a friend pushed me to try it” (problem plus objection); “watch how it mixes in ten seconds” (demonstrable proof); “three weeks in, here is what actually changed” (retargeting proof). Mlambo’s role in this engagement would be direction and system design—angle families, brief structure and authenticity criteria—plus the measurement prerequisite. Confirm commercial terms directly before discussing the campaign.
Choose Grace Eva when the bottleneck is production volume for AI-generated, faceless UGC rather than the strategy behind the test.
Read more
The posts walk through making a first AI UGC ad without a creator or camera and catalogue the tool categories involved: AI avatars, natural-sounding scripts, AI voiceovers, product demos and B-roll, captions, and multiple ad variations, plus a workflow from idea to script to video to testing to optimization. That is more concrete production guidance than Mlambo's posts offer: they argue about authenticity and measurement but do not name tools or show a build.
The posts are largely guide and tool promotion, including a promoted product and links to a fuller article, so some useful detail sits outside them.
They address speed of production, not what makes a concept worth testing or how to read a test result: there is no measurement layer or reported campaign outcome.
Mlambo's concept-level angle families and server-side tracking argument remain the stronger starting point for a defensible read-out; Grace Eva is the better pick once the agency knows the angles and needs variants quickly.
Ask for a sample test read-out before relying on the posts for measurement guidance.
Choose Tarsis Toschi when the agency's problem sits wider than UGC: writing content that converts, fixing slow pages, connecting copy to a conversion path, and separating a content problem from a measurement problem.
Read more
The posts describe a full-stack path through directory content at scale, webmaster and tracking work, paid media, then multi-channel full-funnel performance marketing, with GA4, GTM, data layers, and UTM structures named as working knowledge. The stated position is strategy before output and quality signals over volume signals.
The posts do not show UGC-style creative direction, hook-level testing, or a faceless video pipeline, so a campaign needing UGC ad variations needs a different specialist for the creative itself.
The background claims, including managed ad spend in the millions per year, are self-reported.
Before hiring, ask for client results, campaign data, or engagement figures to verify them.
Use Toschi to set the content and measurement foundation; keep Mlambo or a producer for the creative testing work.
Choose Khandoker Mursalat when the agency wants a hands-on faceless AI UGC producer and is prepared to contract through a freelance channel.
Read more
The posts give a five-step pipeline — script first around problem, failed alternatives, proof and call to action; AI product visuals and B-roll; AI voiceover paced like a real user; feed edits with captions and a cut every one-and-a-half to three seconds; one script turned into five variants that test the hook — plus a gig audit showing how the offer is written and packaged on a marketplace. That pipeline is more directly executable than Mlambo's authenticity gate, which says what to check but not how to build the ad.
The posts double as commercial outreach, with a direct message call to action, and one is essentially listing advice for a freelance marketplace, so the agency is weighing a sales-led pitch against Mlambo's commentary.
They offer no campaign results, follower figures, or engagement counts, and discuss no tracking setup or test read-out.
Ask for those before relying on the posts to assess measurement capability.
They cover pipeline mechanics, not the concept families or structure for campaigns at different funnel stages that Mlambo's material supplies.
This profile draws on seven LinkedIn posts published by Ontshiametse Blessing Mlambo.
Five carry the substance: a run of posts on UGC-style ad creative and creative testing, one on using one product brief to make separate videos for prospecting, consideration, and retargeting, one on where AI helps and where human judgment on believability still decides, and one on server-side GA4 tracking through a Google Tag Manager cloud container.
Two further posts announce HubSpot Academy and Canva Design School marketing certifications and show interests rather than arguments.
The posts do not give publication dates, so they are not placed in sequence, and nothing here describes how the work changed over time.
On 9 October 2026, the account showed 206 followers.
For context on where this creator sits, the similar-creator notes compare posts from three other accounts published between May and September 2026.
Gaps worth knowing before relying on the page: no video, podcast, or transcript material was available for any account examined, so nothing describes spoken or on-camera delivery; no engagement, impression, or client-result data was provided; no finished ad samples or campaign outcomes appear in the posts; and no sponsorship terms, rates, or inquiry route are documented.
MotionSeed is promoted across four of the UGC posts, but the posts do not say whether Mlambo owns, works for, or partners with that business, so the relationship remains an open question.
Statements in the page come from the text of these posts, and claims the posts make about their own figures are reported as the posts' claims.