Mike Keough

Companies that hire well use all three and know when each applies.

• Internal teams handle volume roles with active candidate pools.
• Promotion programs support development by identifying future leaders early, building a bench, and rewarding tenure and performance.
• External search makes sense for roles a company does not hire in volume.
• They distinguish promotion as a retention, pipelining, and development strategy from executive search as a growth strategy, and warn that confusing the two can leave companies understaffed when a growth opportunity appears.

Keough assigns volume hiring to internal teams for project engineers, estimators, project managers, and superintendents.

• They frame search as a fit for accounting, HR, marketing, IT, directors, vice presidents, the C-suite, new geographies, new segments, and very niche skills.
• They sell executive search but value client relationships where they are one part of a broader talent strategy.
• Ask how their search work fits alongside other hiring channels.

Read original

Their premise is that the best PMs already have good jobs, are performing well, earning bonuses, and have multiple options.

• Winning companies also sell the opportunity during the interview.
• When a firm assumes the candidate should simply be grateful to be there, they say, it has probably already lost them.

Keough opens with a first-date comparison: you sit down with someone accomplished and the first thing you say is "So... tell me why you think you're a great fit for me." They say most construction firms approach a PM interview this way, and close on the principle that, like dating, the best relationships start when both sides are trying to impress each other.

Read original

People do not mind hearing no, they say; they mind that their time was not respected, they were not treated with dignity, and they got no closure.

• They count what a candidate invests in a process: time, preparation, emotional energy, paid time off, travel, and hope.
• The cost comes later, when that person has grown into the perfect hire but is now off-limits, along with their network.

Three specific failures: a cookie-cutter rejection email after four interviews; flying someone out of state to interview, then saying the job was never approved; and passing on a candidate at the final stage for something that could have been spotted on their resume.

Read original

A good recruiter knows clients well enough not to regurgitate a job description, understands local leadership teams' reputations, knows who competes with whom for talent, and can explain why someone might leave one company but would never consider another. They also argue that how a company hires signals to candidates how it runs everything else.

Asked why so many UK recruiters call US construction firms, Keough acknowledges the market: a large industry, hard-to-find talent, and a lower-rate service model.

• They say nothing is inherently wrong with that, then stage the exchange they find funny: "It's a great opportunity in Phoenix."
• "Where in Phoenix?"
• "Let me check."
• Their blunt point: relationships are not built across the planet, and urgency does not fix a nine-hour time difference.

Read original

They describe a referral as a credibility transfer earned through the work, because the architecture, engineering, and construction world is small: the same associations, the same events, and sometimes opposite sides of the same contract.

A general contractor client was meeting with its own client when asked whether it knew a good recruiting partner, and made the call. Keough notes that the conversation happened without them, the recommendation was unsolicited, and the client put its own name behind it.

Read original

Multiple forces are converging: founders reaching retirement without clear succession plans, construction becoming attractive to investors, larger projects requiring larger and more sophisticated organizations, recruiting top talent becoming a competitive advantage, and owners seeing several paths to an exit rather than only a sale. No path is inherently right or wrong, but each changes leadership dynamics, decision-making, and hiring strategies.

Keough distinguishes three paths: partnering with private equity to accelerate growth, merging to expand capabilities and geographic reach, and becoming an employee stock ownership plan to reward employees and preserve culture. They say they hear weekly about another acquisition, merger, private equity investment, or contractor becoming an ESOP.

Read original

A career is not defined by a first title, they say, but by what someone consistently does over the next 10, 20, or 30 years. They extend the point to roles that branch off traditional construction management: specialists are not stepping off the leadership track when they step away from project management.

Keough contrasts a construction management degree with starting as a laborer, learning a trade, becoming a foreman, and moving into management.

• They credit complex projects to more than PMs and estimators: schedulers who know the critical path is slipping, procurement professionals who secured switchgear before lead times doubled, and VDC teams who solved clashes before they became field problems.
• Their career-ladder post drew the recurring question "Where does my role fit?", which they answered in a follow-up and continued as a multi-part series.

Read original · Original 2

It answers "what does this person actually argue?" in one readable piece.

Keough opens with a first-date analogy: an attractive, successful person sits down at dinner, and the first thing you say is, "So... tell me why you think you're a great fit for me."

• They say this is how most construction firms interview project managers.
• The post lays out what those interviews miss: discussion of the company, the projects, or why someone would leave a good job to join.
• The premise is that the best PMs already have good jobs, perform well, earn bonuses, and have multiple options.
• The interview, in their framing, is a two-way evaluation, and the companies winning top talent also sell the opportunity.
• They close with the cost of the opposite assumption: the moment you think the other person should be grateful just to be there, you have probably already lost them.

For brands planning a campaign

A session for senior construction leaders can open with the interview as mutual evaluation. It gives executives a recognizable failure mode and sets up a practical discussion about how firms present projects, culture, and opportunity—not just screen candidates.

Rather than discuss hiring in the abstract, they name the moments when a firm loses future candidates—the kind of observation that shows how they would behave as a search partner.

Keough argues that candidates talk about their experience far more than companies realize—not because they were rejected, but because of how they were rejected.

• They give three examples: a cookie-cutter rejection email after four interviews; flying a candidate out of state to interview, then saying the job was never approved; and passing on someone at the final stage for something that could have been spotted on their resume.
• Their point: people do not mind hearing no; they mind that their time was not respected, they were not treated with dignity, and they got no closure.
• They count what a candidate invests—time, preparation, emotional energy, paid time off, travel, hope—and point to the delayed cost: a couple of years later, when requirements change and that person's skills have grown, they may be the perfect match, but they are off limits, along with their network.

For brands planning a campaign

This is ready-made material for a segment on closing the loop with candidates and treating the process as a brand asset. It gives contractors something concrete to audit in their own process and a natural opening for audience questions about their worst rejection stories.

It also shows who they speak to: people who run talent strategy, not people looking for entry-level roles.

Keough argues that a promote-from-within culture and an external search firm are not in conflict, and lays out a three-part model.

• An internal talent acquisition team handles volume roles with active candidate pools—project engineers, estimators, project managers, superintendents.
• A promote-from-within program handles career development: identifying future leaders early, building a bench, rewarding tenure and performance.
• An external search consultant specializing in passive candidates makes sense for roles a company does not hire in volume: accounting, HR, marketing, IT, directors, vice presidents, the C-suite, new geographies, new segments, and very niche skills.
• They say all three need to exist at the same time.
• Promote-from-within is a retention, pipelining, and development strategy; executive search is a growth strategy.
• Confusing the two, they warn, leaves companies understaffed when a growth opportunity arises.

For brands planning a campaign

Use this to position Keough as part of a broader talent strategy, not as a pitch to replace internal recruiting—an important distinction for a webinar aimed at executives with internal teams. It also supplies a ready-made segment: when to call an outside firm and which roles justify it.

It gives a sense of how they would be on stage: opinionated, specific, and comfortable with a blunt line.

Keough answers a question they say they get constantly: why so many UK recruiters call into the US construction industry.

• Their short answer: there is a market for it—US construction is enormous and growing, talent is hard to find, and recruiting from overseas can support a lower-rate service model.
• They say nothing is inherently wrong with that, then turn to what they find funny: selling yourself as a market expert from 5,000 miles away while learning the market through Google Maps.
• They stage the exchange—"It's a great opportunity in Phoenix."
• "Where in Phoenix?"
• "Let me check."—and argue that construction recruiting is both a relationship business and a local knowledge business.
• A good recruiter, they say, knows local leadership teams' reputations, who competes with whom for talent, and why someone would leave one company but never consider another.
• They end from the candidate's point of view: if a company handles hiring this way, how do they do everything else?

For brands planning a campaign

A differentiated angle for contractors: what local market knowledge actually involves and how candidates read a firm's recruiting process as a signal about the whole business. It also sets up a contrast between volume staffing and relationship-based search.

For readers weighing what distinguishes their perspective from that of a general staffing commentator, this post puts them in the boardroom conversation.

Keough describes an ownership transition they see as one of the most significant in construction history, and says they hear weekly about another acquisition, merger, private equity investment, or contractor becoming an employee stock ownership plan.

• They list several conditions unfolding at once: founders reaching retirement without a clear succession plan, construction becoming attractive to investors, larger projects requiring larger and more sophisticated organizations, recruiting top talent becoming one of the biggest competitive advantages, and owners realizing there are multiple paths to an exit beyond selling.
• They distinguish among the paths—partnering with private equity to accelerate growth, merging to expand capabilities and geographic reach, and becoming an employee stock ownership plan to reward employees and preserve culture—and note that each choice changes leadership dynamics, decision-making, and hiring strategies.

For brands planning a campaign

Strong opening context for a session aimed at senior leaders: it frames talent as a consequence of ownership decisions. It suggests a segment on how each exit path affects a company's hiring strategy and leadership bench.

That reaction shows what their audience wants.

Keough describes the most common career progression they see at larger contractors.

• Structures, titles, and layers differ, they say, but the overall concept is consistent.
• Some people start with a construction management degree; others begin as a laborer, learn a trade, become a foreman, and move into management.
• Some spend entire careers in the field; others build expertise in operations or preconstruction.
• The paths vary but can lead to the same destination.
• Construction is one of the few industries where repetition, continuous learning, drive, leadership, and results can create opportunities regardless of where someone started.
• They close with: your career is not defined by your first title, it is defined by what you consistently do over the next 10, 20, or 30 years.
• The post refers to a graphic illustrating the progression; the chart itself is not shown, so ask to see it if its details matter.

For brands planning a campaign

Suggests a visual, slide-friendly format and a development-focused segment for contractors worried about building a bench. The audience response also points to career-path questions as an engagement hook for a live webinar.

It also makes their claim that non-PM roles remain leadership roles explicit.

This follow-up answers the question Keough says they got after sharing the traditional construction management career ladder: "Where does my role fit?"

• They credit the work behind complex projects to more than project managers and estimators, naming schedulers who know the critical path is slipping, procurement professionals who secured switchgear before lead times doubled, and virtual design and construction teams who solved clashes before they became field problems.
• They say these alternative paths branch off from traditional construction management, note that nearly all of them are entered from the same two or three jobs, and make the case that stepping off the project manager track is not stepping off the leadership track.
• They signal a third part on shared services.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful as evidence that they can speak to specialists, not just executives, and as a model for structuring a webinar into a short series of follow-ups. The field examples give a session a concrete anchor for discussing career options beyond the project manager track.

The post gives a concrete account of how business was won and what they believe makes a client relationship real.

Keough tells the story of how their firm won work with a fast-growing data center developer: a general contractor client was in a meeting with their own client, was asked if they knew a good recruiting partner, and made the call.

• Their summary is that the referral came from a conversation they were not in and a recommendation they did not ask for, from someone who decided the work was good enough to put their name on.
• They contrast the referral with the retainer, the bi-weekly dashboard meetings, and the tickets to games and Christmas gifts — all signs, they say, but not the signal.
• They explain why it carries weight in construction specifically: the architecture, engineering, and construction world is small, with the same associations, the same events, and sometimes opposite sides of the same contract, so a referral is a credibility transfer that only happens once a relationship has genuinely earned it.

For brands planning a campaign

Supplies a relationship-and-reputation segment for a senior audience, and positions Keough as someone contractors already vouch for. The specific structure — signs versus the real signal — is an easy framework to build a talk segment or closing takeaway around.

Companies that hire well use all three and know when each applies.

• Internal teams handle volume roles such as project engineers, estimators, project managers, and superintendents.
• Promotion programs build a bench and reward tenure and performance.
• External search makes sense for passive or niche roles such as accounting, HR, marketing, IT, directors, VPs, C-suite hires, new geographies, and new segments.
• The best client relationships, Keough says, are ones where they are one part of a broader talent strategy, not the whole thing.

For brands planning a campaign

A webinar or thought-leadership session can use this as a core frame: contractors should not treat outside search and internal development as an either-or choice. Keough can walk senior leaders through which roles fit each channel and why confusing the two leaves companies understaffed when growth opportunities appear.

Examples: Source 1

The referral—not the retainer, dashboard meetings, game tickets, or gifts—is the clearest signal, they say, that a client relationship has become a partnership. In AEC, a referral transfers credibility because the industry is small: people share associations and events, and sometimes end up on opposite sides of the same contract.

For brands planning a campaign

A brand can use this post as a case-style proof point in content about earning referrals, client relationships, and reputation in construction. It also offers a natural testimonial or partnership angle for a session on relationship-led growth rather than transactional recruiting.

Examples: Source 1

Examples include a cookie-cutter rejection email after four interviews, flying a candidate out of state only to say the job was not approved, and passing on someone at the final stage for something visible on their resume.

• Candidates accept hearing no, Keough says, but mind when their time is not respected, when they lack dignity or closure, and when the process wastes their preparation, travel, PTO, and hope.
• Years later, that person may be the perfect hire but is now off-limits, along with their network.

For brands planning a campaign

This supports practical content for construction leaders on closing the hiring loop: rejection communication, interview logistics, early screening, and treating candidates with respect. A webinar could include a short audit of a contractor's hiring process and the long-term cost of a poor candidate experience.

Examples: Source 1

Most construction firms approach interviews with project managers this way, they say, without discussing the company, projects, or why someone would leave a good job.

• The best PMs already have good jobs, bonuses, and multiple opportunities.
• The interview is a two-way evaluation, and winning companies sell the opportunity instead of assuming the candidate should be grateful to be there.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful for a session on recruiting passive construction project managers: how to pitch the company, projects, and reasons to move without an entitlement mindset. The dating analogy can anchor a plain-language segment on interview technique.

Examples: Source 1

The market exists because US construction is huge, talent is hard to find, and overseas recruiting can support a lower-rate service model.

• But they question selling yourself as a market expert from 5,000 miles away and learning the market through Google Maps.
• Good recruiters know their clients well enough not to regurgitate a job description, understand local leadership reputations, know who competes for talent, and explain why someone might leave one company but not another.
• Relationships are not built across the planet, and urgency does not fix a nine-hour time difference.
• Keough also notes that candidates may read a company's hiring approach as a signal about how it does everything else.

For brands planning a campaign

A brand can evaluate Keough's position on regional expertise and recruiter quality. For a senior construction audience, this can open a segment on when outside sourcing helps and when local relationship knowledge is the real differentiator, including how hiring signals affect employer reputation.

Examples: Source 1

Some people start with a construction management degree; others begin as a laborer, learn a trade, become a foreman, and move into management.

• Some spend their careers in the field; others build expertise in operations or preconstruction.
• In a second post, they map alternative routes branching off traditional construction management, including schedulers, procurement professionals, and VDC teams.
• Nearly all of these roles are entered from the same two or three jobs, Keough notes, and stepping off the project management track is not stepping off the leadership track.

Uses career-ladder graphics and a multi-part series, then asks readers where their own role fits.

For brands planning a campaign

A campaign can adapt this into workforce-development or internal-mobility content: career maps, non-project-management leadership routes, and the supporting roles that make complex projects work. It lends itself to a repeatable series for a contractor audience.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

They list forces happening at once: founders retiring without clear succession plans, construction becoming attractive to investors, larger projects requiring larger organizations, recruiting top talent becoming a competitive advantage, and owners seeing multiple exit paths rather than only a sale. Different paths are not inherently right or wrong, but each changes leadership dynamics, decision-making, and hiring strategies.

For brands planning a campaign

This offers a senior-level topic for a webinar or article: how private equity, mergers, ESOPs, and succession gaps change leadership hiring. A brand can position Keough to discuss the talent implications of ownership events, not just day-to-day recruiting tactics.

Examples: Source 1

They speak directly to construction leaders and professionals about hiring pain points from both the client and candidate sides.

Mixes visual career maps, numbered series, everyday analogies, and direct questions.

One post is only a short question and does not develop an argument, so it shows engagement style more than substantive analysis.

For brands planning a campaign

A brand can test these formats: graphic-led career maps for carousels, multi-part series for newsletters, analogies for talks, and comment prompts for community engagement. Together, they offer a repeatable content toolkit rather than one-off posts.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4

Both make the case that how a company treats candidates during hiring carries long-term cost. They address hiring managers directly, using short, plain posts to argue for giving people a real chance rather than screening them out early.

Hall's posts focus on candidate advocacy and personal accounts of recruiting remotely across many countries; Keough's focus on talent-strategy structure, local market knowledge, and how ownership events change whom contractors hire.

Read original · Original 2

Both argue that companies fail more often on people decisions than on ideas. They write for people who own the hiring process and push for understanding what actually predicts success in a role.

Butler is building an AI hiring company and writes about owning the whole hiring lifecycle and turning each hire into data; Keough works in construction executive search and writes about relationships, referrals, and regional expertise.

Read original · Original 2

Both ask how reputation and visibility shape hiring outcomes that are hard to attribute directly, and frame hiring as a question of trust built before a candidate ever applies.

Katris focuses on measurement and on candidates discovering employers through AI tools; Keough focuses on construction recruiting practice, local reputation, and executive search inside a single industry.

Read original · Original 2

The two posts cover three years with Jobot, recruiting remotely across more than 30 countries with construction recruiting tags, and a direct argument that hiring managers disqualify candidates too early.

• They quote objections as a manager would say them (no builds in this state, job-hopping, salary too high, different project types) and offer the counterarguments a recruiter uses in the room.
• For a contractor audience, that gives hiring managers a rehearsal of the conversations that decide whether a shortlist survives.
• It is narrower and more tactical than Keough's material, but easier for a hiring manager to act on the next morning.

The tradeoff is scope.

• The posts show individual search work and candidate advocacy, not the executive-level strategy needed for a session on ownership transitions, how internal teams, promotion programs, and outside search divide the work, or senior and niche roles.
• Much of the visible material is a personal remote-work narrative, which may land weakly with senior construction leaders.
• Ask the presenter what executive-level examples they can add; both posts focus on a single topic, so a full session would need substantial new material.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts lay out a full lifecycle from identifying the need through succession planning and argue that owning the whole process makes each stage smarter: what predicts success six months after a hire should change how interviews and onboarding are designed, and every hire becomes a data set rather than a closed file. That is a process-level account rather than a market account, and it speaks to contractors who know their hiring is ad hoc but have never built a repeatable method.

The material is inseparable from the company Butler is building.

• The posts read as a case for that product rather than neutral analysis, which can weaken a thought-leadership slot meant to sit apart from any vendor.
• The construction-specific texture Keough supplies — craft roles, project-manager and estimator pipelines, ownership transitions, and the local-knowledge argument about who knows a market — is absent.
• Ask Butler for construction examples to ground the session.
• The two posts offer a narrow base: one career narrative and one service description.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts argue that attribution has become one input rather than the strategy, offer a three-question framework — visibility, reputation, and total outcomes measured by market, function, and role — and contrast how marketing treats the same shift with how talent acquisition still demands proof before investing. A search firm wanting a well-structured measurement session for TA peers gets more usable scaffolding here than from Keough's posts.

The material is industry-agnostic, with no construction examples, craft-role or project-delivery vocabulary, or detail on how a contractor's hiring market behaves.

• Ask for construction examples to make the material relevant to a contractor audience.
• The argument also sits upstream of the hiring decision: it concerns visibility and reputation investment, not whether to build a bench or buy a hire, the decision Keough speaks to directly.
• Both posts address the same attribution theme, making the evidence base focused but narrow.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2