Search creators⌘K
  1. Home
  2. Creators
  3. MG Gurbaxani

MG Gurbaxani

MG Gurbaxani is the founder of Cuvama, writing about value selling and enterprise deal strategy, including how teams build CFO-ready business cases and handle pricing pressure.

AI value toolsBased on 14 posts · latest Sep 2026
LinkedIn

At a glance

MG Gurbaxani is useful for B2B revenue teams needing CFO-ready value cases and pricing discipline.

Best for

A B2B SaaS company selling into enterprise accounts for value selling and pricing discipline.

Not for

Consumer or broad small-business campaigns needing high-volume short-form video and lead metrics.

Key takeaways

  • A business case works when the customer can defend it.
  • More research does not replace a clear reason to buy.
  • Hold the price, but find out what the buyer is really asking for.

Check first: Ask for documented audience survey results or another source covering professional attributes.

Main ideas
A business case works when the customer can defend it · More research does not replace a clear reason to buy · Hold the price, but find out what the buyer is really asking for
Read first
The pricing consultant who met their own framework at quarter end
Sources for this section

What they are known for

MG Gurbaxani is the founder of Cuvama, writing about value selling and enterprise deal strategy.

  • A recurring idea in their posts is that research and AI tools do not make a deal persuasive on their own: sellers need a clear value case that a customer’s champion can understand and defend.
  • Their work is useful to B2B revenue teams thinking through pricing pressure, buyer decisions and how to make business cases hold up beyond a sales call.

Gurbaxani makes commercial advice concrete by testing it against the pressures of real deals.

  • In a story about a quarter-end pricing negotiation, they revisit former advice against discounting from the seller’s side: the buyer’s problem was payment timing, so they changed the start date and split the first payment while keeping the price.
  • They argue that a business case is stronger when the customer’s champion can understand and defend its assumptions, rather than simply receive a finished vendor presentation (“we’ve got our own business case”).
  • They bring the same practical lens to AI: a fast value case is only useful if its numbers are grounded and it can serve the customer beyond the initial deal (AI and the value case; when to build a value tool).
  • A personal story about negotiating night feedings also showcases their dialogue and self-deprecating humor ([East vs.
  • West](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mg-gurbaxani_east-vs-west-babies-vs-boardrooms-and-activity-7379876881279655936-hFhb)).
Sources for this section

Ideas and priorities

MG Gurbaxani returns to a practical question: what makes an enterprise buying decision hold up when the seller is not in the room?

Read more

The answer in these posts is more than research or a polished deck.

  • A champion needs a clear value argument they can defend, grounded in assumptions they understand.
  • The examples also show a shift from teaching pricing discipline as a consultant to facing quarter-end pressure as a founder and seller.

A business case works when the customer can defend it

A vendor-built case may look complete but leave the internal champion unable to explain or defend its assumptions.

Read more

MG argues for involving the customer in the numbers so the case becomes their own value story, not just a vendor document.

In one post, a buyer says IT is building its own business case. MG says the key question is whether the champion can understand the bottom-up assumptions and benchmarks, share them with stakeholders, and defend them to the CFO.

Read original

More research does not replace a clear reason to buy

Call recordings, company news, and account research can inform the seller without giving the champion a persuasive point of view.

Read more

MG focuses on turning discovery into an argument that answers the buyer’s question about value and helps move a deal beyond no-decision.

Gurbaxani describes a deal 60 days in, where the seller had research but the champion was still improvising an answer to “What’s the actual value here for us?”

  • The deal ended in no-decision.
  • In another post, a CRO asks for one line on why a customer will buy, but the details are scattered across reports, emails, and recordings.

Read original · Original 2

Hold the price, but find out what the buyer is really asking for

MG’s pricing story is not simply about refusing discounts.

Read more

It shows the value of investigating the reason behind a procurement request and considering terms beyond price. It also marks a change in perspective: the pricing consultant who taught discount discipline later faced the pressure of carrying a forecast personally.

When procurement asks for flexibility near quarter end, MG drafts a discount, then calls the buyer.

  • They learn the issue is budget timing, not budget size.
  • They move the start date and split the first payment; the price holds, and the deal signs four days after quarter end.

MG contrasts their 2019 self as a pricing consultant, teaching a framework from outside the deal, with their later experience as a founder facing the uncertainty of a live negotiation.

Read original

Choose a value tool by who will maintain it

MG distinguishes a quick AI prompt, a configured agent system, and owned software by what the organization must keep running.

Read more

A prompt may be enough for a one-off business case. More durable work—such as carrying a value story through the customer-success handoff or learning from one deal for the next—requires maintained infrastructure and governed data.

Gurbaxani lays out three paths: write an agent and keep a prompt; build agents on an MCP layer and keep a configuration; or write software and maintain its repository, deployment pipeline, security, and staffing. The closing question is who will carry the choice in year three.

Read original

Sources for this section

Start with their work

The pricing consultant who met their own framework at quarter end

Start here to see what MG Gurbaxani actually sells as a speaker: pricing discipline, taught by someone who describes how they once taught it badly.

Read more

The specific story answers the question, 'Is this just another framework person?'

MG Gurbaxani introduces the 2019 version of themselves as a pricing consultant who flew in, ran two-day workshops, left a 94-slide deck and a discount-governance framework, and was gone before anyone had to use it.

  • The line quoted from that period is the one sellers remember: 'Discounting at quarter end trains your buyers to wait for quarter end.' They then flip the story.
  • Four years later, they are the seller, in the last week of the quarter, at 4:52pm on a Thursday, with a champion who has gone quiet and procurement asking about flexibility on price.
  • They draft 15% off in exchange for a video case study, change it to 10% 'because 10% felt more principled,' and then do not send it.
  • On the phone, they learn the real ask is budget timing, not budget size: the start date moves, the first payment splits, the price holds, and the deal signs the following Tuesday, four days after quarter end.
  • They name the part the framework never covered: holding the line with nothing signed and not knowing whether they were disciplined or just stubborn.

For brands planning a campaign

A natural opening for a talk or workshop on holding price under quarter-end pressure. It gives sellers a concrete counterexample to discount-governance slides and connects the value narrative to what procurement is actually asking for.

Why a vendor-built business case gives your champion nothing to defend

A short, pointed argument about who builds the business case and why it matters.

Read more

It explains what 'CFO-ready' means in practice, beyond a tidy deck.

MG Gurbaxani opens with the line every vendor hears: 'Thanks, but we've got our own business case.

  • IT is building it.' They argue this is not good news: a case built by someone who has never sat in a discovery call gives the internal champion nothing to defend when the vendor is not in the room.
  • Their alternative is to put the customer's fingerprints on the numbers: the champion understands the bottom-up assumptions and benchmarks, can share the case with stakeholders, looks good doing it, and has something bulletproof for the CFO.
  • By the time the case reaches a decision, they say, it is the customer's own value story rather than a vendor business case.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful for a session on co-building value narratives with buyers instead of handing over a finished model. It shows that adoption inside the account, not polish, carries a case to signature.

An enterprise AI had everything except something to say

This is the clearest statement of the problem MG Gurbaxani builds products and talks around: more research does not create a decision.

Read more

It explains why enterprise deals stall at 'maybe next quarter' even when the buying signals look good.

MG Gurbaxani describes an enterprise deal sixty days into the cycle.

  • The seller had the call recording, the LinkedIn research, and the company news summary, and still had nothing to say.
  • The champion had been carrying the internal case alone, fielding the same question every time, 'What's the actual value here for us?', and improvising an answer because discovery had produced research, not a point of view.
  • The deal went to no-decision.
  • They conclude that the product was not the problem; nobody had built the argument that makes a CFO say yes rather than 'maybe next quarter.' The post also promotes a small Dublin session on May 13 with 25 revenue and value leaders, followed by Berlin on June 4 and London on June 24, framed as an open conversation rather than a presentation.

For brands planning a campaign

Good evidence for a workshop on turning discovery notes into a point of view a champion can reuse. The no-decision framing also suits CROs and value leads who already measure stall rates.

The Friday 4:30pm email and the weekend it gave back

A founder-side story about what the product is for.

Read more

It explains what Cuvama does in a customer's words rather than a feature list.

The setup: a Friday afternoon, an enterprise account executive, a seven-figure ARR deal forecast to close before year-end, and a CRO email asking for one line on why the customer is going to buy.

  • MG Gurbaxani lists where that line is usually buried: a 10-K nobody opened, investor reports nobody bookmarked, 52 emails in the CRM, 14 call recordings, and the seller's memory.
  • In this case, the account executive used Cuvama to pull the material into a short why-buy narrative that could be pasted into an executive email, then sent them a WhatsApp message ten minutes later: 'You just gave me my weekend back.' They close with a founder's reflection on the quiet moments when a tool genuinely makes someone's job easier, and on returning time, confidence, and clarity to the seller.

For brands planning a campaign

A talk-ready story about a seller's lived problem. It works as the emotional hook before the mechanics of building a CFO-ready narrative and shows how they position the product against scattered research.

Three ways to build a value tool, and who carries it in year three

A clear breakdown of build-versus-buy in value tooling, for budget holders considering an in-house value calculator.

Read more

MG Gurbaxani starts with two instructions that are reasonable separately and expensive together: the board says to cut the tech stack by building more in-house with AI agents, and the value team is told to DIY something that solves 80% of what a value platform does.

  • They lay out three paths, distinguished by what you keep running afterwards.
  • Write an agent and you keep running a prompt.
  • Build on an MCP layer with a screen, CRM connection, and callable tools and you keep running a configuration on infrastructure someone else maintains.
  • Write the software and you keep running a repository, deploy pipeline, security review, and a team to maintain it.
  • They say the first path is often correct for a single deal, then list when building stops being right: the case has to keep living, the champion needs to work inside it rather than receive it, one value story has to carry from first call to customer-success handoff, you need to see who validated the numbers, and this deal should teach the next one.
  • They close by noting the calculator the company built, and that almost all of the cost is people rather than tokens.

For brands planning a campaign

Strong material for a buyer-side audience weighing platform spend against internal builds. It also gives a sponsoring vendor a credible position on when a simple agent is enough and when it is not.

East versus West, babies versus boardrooms, and a negotiated compromise

Read this to hear MG Gurbaxani's voice outside the sales playbook.

Read more

It shows what kind of storyteller they are on a personal topic and the negotiating instinct they bring to work.

MG Gurbaxani writes about the early months of parenthood with their wife after their baby arrived five weeks early, and the fight over who handles night feedings once paternity leave ends.

  • The exchange is written as dialogue: they assume they sleep in the other room on weeknights because they need to be sharp for clients; she points out that maternity leave covers business hours, 7am to 7pm, and that 7pm to 7am is 50-50.
  • They note that in the moment they thought, but did not say, 'I have married a monster.' They resolve it the way they say they were trained to: benchmarking against peers.
  • The reported pattern is that households in Asia say sleep separately because one parent works tomorrow, while households in the West say support your partner at night because she made career sacrifices.
  • The compromise was two nights a week in the other room.
  • They close by linking the same dynamic to agentic procurement: surprises are guaranteed, compromises mandatory, and if you cannot laugh at yourself you will not survive the chaos.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful as a lighter segment or event opener, and as evidence that MG Gurbaxani can carry a room with a personal story before turning to commercial negotiation.

Sources for this section

Topics and approach

Posts cited for each topic
A consistent LinkedIn format: scenes, frameworks, and founder updates6
Building CFO-ready value cases with the champion's fingerprints4
Using founder and cross-cultural stories to open pricing and negotiation topics3
Turning discovery research into a point of view that prevents no-decision2
Choosing between prompts, MCP configurations, and real software for value tools2
Running small, senior rooms instead of vendor pitch events2
Holding price under quarter-end pressure1

Building CFO-ready value cases with the champion's fingerprints

Across several posts, the recurring argument is that a business case has to be defensible when the seller is not in the room.

Read more

It should include bottom-up assumptions, benchmarks, and a record that survives past close.

  • The champion and other stakeholders should be able to open it, move numbers, and make it their own rather than receive a finished vendor document.
  • Cuvama is the platform MG is building around this idea.

For brands planning a campaign

For a value-selling workshop, the strongest fit is a working session on co-created business cases: how to leave the buyer's fingerprints on assumptions, make the case survive procurement and customer-success handoff, and avoid a vendor-only deck. Useful for enterprise account executives, value teams, and sales enablement.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4

Turning discovery research into a point of view that prevents no-decision

MG describes a deal lost to no-decision despite the seller having call recordings, LinkedIn research, and company news.

Read more

The gap was not information but a point of view: the champion had to keep answering 'What's the actual value here for us?' alone. Another post shows a CRO asking for one line on why the customer will buy, with the answer scattered across documents, emails, and recordings.

For brands planning a campaign

A talk or workshop should focus on converting discovery into a CFO-ready Why Buy narrative, not just more research. This is a practical angle for revenue leaders trying to reduce no-decision rates as AI increases the volume of information available to sellers.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Holding price under quarter-end pressure

In a retrospective post, MG contrasts a 2019 pricing-consultant persona with later founder experience.

Read more

The buyer's procurement team asks for flexibility before quarter end.

  • MG drafts a discount, reconsiders, keeps the price, and instead moves the start date and splits the first payment.
  • The deal signs four days after quarter end.
  • The point: discount governance looks different when you carry a forecast and a team.

For brands planning a campaign

This supports a pricing-discipline workshop or keynote with a quarter-end negotiation simulation.

  • The hook is non-price levers such as payment timing, start date, and terms rather than discounting.
  • It also offers a founder-credible story about the gap between pricing theory and quota pressure.

Examples: Source 1

Choosing between prompts, MCP configurations, and real software for value tools

A post lays out three paths for teams told to build value tooling in-house with AI: write an agent and keep a prompt; build agents on an MCP layer and keep a configuration; or write software and keep a repository, deploy pipeline, security review, and maintainers.

Read more

MG argues that building stops being the right answer when the case has to keep living, the champion needs to work inside it, one value story must carry from first call to customer-success handoff, or the deal should teach the next one. Those needs require a real backend and governed data.

Three-path build framework: prompt, MCP configuration, or owned software, each with a different maintenance owner.

For brands planning a campaign

Good material for a product, RevOps, or value-engineering webinar on build-versus-buy decisions for AI value tools. A brand can use the three-path framing and the ownership question: who carries it in year three?

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Running small, senior rooms instead of vendor pitch events

MG promotes a three-city European roadshow for B2B tech revenue leaders: CROs, heads of value, senior enterprise account executives, and sales enablement leaders.

Read more

The rooms are about 25 people, two and a half hours, with breakfast and a panel.

  • One post explicitly says the room is not for vendors hoping to pitch over pastries.
  • The topic is why no-decision rates keep climbing even as AI investment grows.

Small-room, senior-peer format with a narrow guest list and a discussion-led agenda.

For brands planning a campaign

For a brand, the format is an invite-only executive roundtable or salon rather than a lead-generation webinar. The audience is specific and senior; the content should pressure-test value narratives and no-decision problems, not run product slides.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Using founder and cross-cultural stories to open pricing and negotiation topics

MG mixes business arguments with personal narrative.

Read more

One post rewrites the pricing-consultant past as humorous self-critique and ends with 'First round's on me.' Another uses a parenting disagreement—East versus West expectations, peer benchmarking, a negotiated compromise—to set up a point about surprises and compromises in agentic procurement. The storytelling is how the business message gets carried.

The parenting post shows the range of MG's storytelling format and how they connect negotiation lessons across contexts.

For brands planning a campaign

Campaigns can use MG for narrative-led sessions where a personal story opens a serious discussion of pricing, negotiation, and value selling. The tone is self-aware and practical rather than formal analyst.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3

A consistent LinkedIn format: scenes, frameworks, and founder updates

MG Gurbaxani's LinkedIn posts are text posts.

Read more

They often start with a concrete scene, such as a quarter-end email, a Friday afternoon CRO request, or an enterprise AI walking into a meeting, then turn to a framework or argument.

  • Some posts are product or event updates, including Cuvama MCP availability and the European roadshow.
  • One is a personal parenting story.

For brands planning a campaign

A brand can expect founder-voice posts, event promotion, and practical value-selling arguments rather than polished studio content. A collaboration could combine a written post series with a live workshop or roundtable on the same themes.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4 · Source 5 · Source 6

Sources for this section

Brands and businesses

MG Gurbaxani's posts document two businesses connected to them: Cuvama, which they describe as their own company, and mgpricing.com, presented as an earlier pricing consultancy they ran.

Read more

Their posts do not mention sponsorship, affiliate, or client relationships with named brands.

Cuvama

Owned business

Gurbaxani writes as a founder building Cuvama and describes the company's work in value selling.

Read more

One post announces general availability of Cuvama MCP, an integration layer for the platform; another closes with the Cuvama name after arguing that business cases need a champion's fingerprints; a third contrasts what the team built—a calculator showing every assumption—with the cost of platform alternatives. Cuvama is the business behind the value-case and roadshow content, and the posts state their founder relationship directly.

View example

mgpricing.com

Owned business

A retrospective post re-introduces "2019 pricing consultant MG" as someone running mgpricing.com, helping B2B SaaS businesses with packaging and pricing, and names that period's approach as "Consultant MG."

Read more

The post treats the practice as an earlier phase of their own career, not a current engagement. Ask whether mgpricing.com work is active if current pricing services matter to your decision.

View example

Sources for this section

Topics and similar creators

MG Gurbaxani writes LinkedIn posts about enterprise value selling, pricing discipline, and building business cases buyers can defend.

Read more

Start with the pricing retrospective on holding price under quarter-end pressure, then read the posts on customer-owned value cases and no-decision deals, followed by the AI value-tool build paths and the European roadshow.

  • Recurring themes include giving the champion a CFO-ready argument, avoiding vendor-only business cases, and choosing value technology based on who will maintain it.
  • For adjacent reading, Askia Sisay covers sales forecasting and GTM habits, Sid Khaitan covers product marketing careers and independent work, and Andrius Avinas covers agency business development and client fit.
Packaging and pricing Enterprise value selling Business case development No-decision deals AI value tools Quarter-end negotiation Value engineering B2B SaaS Revenue leadership Value teams Enterprise account executives Sales enablement leaders LinkedIn text posts Founder stories Executive roundtables

Askia Sisay

Both write short LinkedIn posts about B2B sales and GTM, often using humor or lists to expose forecasting, pipeline, and sales habits.

Read more

Askia Sisay focuses on reps’ and sales leaders’ day-to-day sales operations and forecasting; MG Gurbaxani writes about enterprise value cases, pricing, and value-selling tools.

Read original · Original 2

Sid Khaitan

Both write about commercial roles in B2B technology and focusing work on pipeline and revenue outcomes.

Read more

Sid Khaitan’s posts center on product marketing careers, gap-filling work, and running a side business; MG Gurbaxani’s focus on enterprise value selling, pricing, and value-case infrastructure.

Read original · Original 2

Andrius Avinas

Both write from a founder or owner perspective about sales conversations, rejection, and client relationships.

Read more

Andrius Avinas writes about agency business development and when to fire a client; MG Gurbaxani writes about pricing discipline, value cases, and AI value tools.

Read original · Original 2

Sources for this section

Audience

MG Gurbaxani’s posts speak to B2B technology revenue teams working on enterprise value cases, pricing, and AI-supported selling.

Read more

They cover CFO-ready business cases, champions’ ability to defend value, and quarter-end negotiation pressure. For campaigns targeting specific job roles or seniority, ask for documented audience survey results or another source covering those professional attributes; platform demographics alone won’t establish them.

Sources for this section

Partnership options

MG Gurbaxani runs Cuvama, a value-selling platform.

Read more

The commercial activity in the posts is promotion of the company and its own events, not a published partnership programme.

  • The clearest format is the Cuvama roundtable roadshow: rooms deliberately kept to about 25 B2B tech revenue leaders — CROs, heads of value, senior enterprise AEs and sales enablement leaders who carry a number — running roughly two and a half hours with breakfast and a panel, in Dublin, Berlin and London.
  • One post states plainly that the events are not for vendors hoping to pitch attendees, so paid presence there should not be assumed.
  • Before building a plan around these rooms, ask whether Cuvama accepts sponsors, co-hosts or speakers, and on what terms.
Sources for this section

Campaign fit

A campaign to shortlist

A B2B SaaS company selling into enterprise accounts wants its revenue team to sharpen value selling and pricing discipline: a strong fit.

Read more

It is weighing a keynote or a half-day workshop for enterprise account executives, value teams and sales enablement leaders on building CFO-ready value narratives and holding price under quarter-end pressure.

  • MG Gurbaxani's posts here are directly about this job.
  • The recurring argument across several posts is that a business case has to be defensible when the seller is not in the room, which in practice means the champion can open it, move the numbers, and make it their own rather than receive a finished vendor document.
  • A companion post describes an enterprise deal that went to no-decision not because the product was wrong but because discovery had produced research instead of a point of view, leaving the champion to improvise an answer to "what's the actual value here for us?" every time the question came up.
  • A third shows the problem from the buyer's side of the table: a Friday afternoon CRO email asking for one line on why the customer will buy, with the answer scattered across a 10-K, investor reports, CRM emails and call recordings.
  • On pricing discipline specifically, MG Gurbaxani's own retrospective is unusually candid: it introduces a 2019 pricing consultant who flew in, ran two-day workshops, left a 94-slide deck and a discount governance framework, and was gone before anyone had to use it, then flips to the same person four years later, at 4:52pm on a Thursday in the last week of the quarter, drafting 15% off, changing it to 10% "because 10% felt more principled," and learning on the phone that the real ask was budget timing rather than budget size.
  • That self-critique is the hook a seller audience tends to remember.
  • The commercial format is already visible.
  • MG Gurbaxani runs small senior rooms rather than broadcasts: about 25 B2B tech revenue leaders, roughly two and a half hours, breakfast and a panel, in Dublin, Berlin and London, on why no-decision rates keep climbing even as AI investment grows.
  • That shape suits an executive roundtable or a working clinic.
  • It does not suit a large lead-generation webinar.
  • What to confirm before committing: no fee, availability, speaker terms, or recording permissions appear in the posts here.
  • Confirm these directly.
  • Note also that one roadshow post states plainly the rooms are not for vendors hoping to pitch attendees, so a sponsoring company should not budget for a pitch slot in the room.

When to choose a specialist

A consumer-facing or broad small-business brand wants a high-volume, short-form video and social campaign measured on impressions, registrations and cost per lead, delivered to a general audience of consumers and small-business owners, with a scripted product demonstration and a sponsored pitch segment inside the content: a poor fit.

Read more

Almost nothing in MG Gurbaxani's posts here supports this need.

  • Every post here is a text post written for senior B2B revenue roles: enterprise account executives, CROs, heads of value, sales enablement leaders.
  • The work is argument-led, not visual: scenes, frameworks and founder updates rather than short-form video, product demos or consumer entertainment.
  • MG Gurbaxani's posts do not say there is consumer reach, and no follower, engagement or traffic data appears in the posts here to support volume or cost-per-lead commitments on either side.
  • The commercial model is also a mismatch.
  • No sponsor programme, rate card, audience package or partnership inquiry route appears anywhere in the posts here, so paid placement terms cannot be verified in advance.
  • The roundtable posts describe the rooms as deliberately small and state that if you are a vendor hoping to pitch someone over pastries, "this isn't the one".
  • A campaign whose success depends on a scripted vendor pitch read to a general audience would leave MG Gurbaxani's strongest asset, a practitioner argument about how buyers actually behave, doing none of the work.
  • A cheaper version of the same mistake is asking for a broad awareness push with no defined audience: the value of the material depends on the reader holding a number, defending a case, or sitting across from procurement.
A worked campaign example

Worked campaign angle: “Holding the line: a quarter-end pricing clinic.”

Format. A 60- to 90-minute workshop, or a 45-minute keynote followed by 30 minutes of moderated Q&A, for 20 to 40 people: enterprise account executives, value engineers, sales enablement leads and pricing or RevOps staff. Make it a half-day if the client wants the buyer-side exercise included. This follows the small senior-room format already in use, rather than a broadcast webinar.

Opening segment, 15 minutes. Retell the 2019 consultant story in the speaker’s own framing: the crisp shirt, the clicker, the 2x2 matrix for every human emotion, the 94-slide deck and discount governance framework left behind before anyone had to use them, and the line sellers remember: “discounting at quarter end trains your buyers to wait for quarter end.” The audience recognises the type immediately, making it an effective opening rather than a confession.

Second segment, 15 minutes. Flip the story. Thursday, the last week of the quarter, 4:52pm. The champion has gone quiet. Procurement asks about price flexibility. The draft reply offers 15% off in exchange for a video case study, then gets edited to 10% because 10% felt more principled—and never gets sent. On the call, the real ask turns out to be budget timing, not budget size: the start date moves, the first payment splits, the number holds, and the deal signs the following Tuesday. Draw out the dilemma: the seller has held the line, nothing is signed, and they cannot tell whether they have been disciplined or just stubborn.

Working exercise, 30 minutes, in pairs. Each pair takes a stalled deal from their own pipeline and writes two lists side by side: what the buyer has actually asked for, and what the seller has assumed the buyer wants. They then rewrite one planned concession as terms instead of price, using the levers in the story: start date, payment split, scope and term length. Each pair reports back in two minutes.

Closing segment, 15 minutes. Move from negotiation to what makes a case survive after the room empties. A business case built by someone who has never sat in a discovery call gives the champion nothing to defend when the vendor is absent. The version that travels has bottom-up assumptions and benchmarks the champion can understand and change, so that by the time it reaches a decision, it is the customer’s own value story rather than a vendor business case. Offer the timeline only if the client is interested: three paths for building this in-house, distinguished by who maintains it in year three—a prompt, an MCP configuration or owned software.

Follow-up artifact, delivered after the session. A one-page why-buy template built around the CRO’s one-line question: why this customer will buy. It draws on the 10-K, investor material, CRM threads and call recordings rather than memory. Give the client a completed version and a blank one so attendees can use it on the next deal without the speaker in the room.

Why this angle, rather than a general value-selling talk. It uses what MG Gurbaxani can say that most pricing speakers cannot: they taught the framework before having to live under it, with the discount governance slides, the quarter-end email and the four days of bad sleep that followed. It gives the sponsor a substantive session instead of a pitch slot, which matters because the existing rooms are explicitly closed to vendor pitching. It also turns the material into a working resource.

Before planning, confirm the speaking fee, availability, recording or repurposing permissions, whether the session would sit within MG Gurbaxani’s roadshow calendar or be a sponsor-hosted room, and who owns the resulting template. The posts do not include a recording of a talk, workshop or panel, so the format recommendations draw on the material’s structure and the stated shape of the roadshow, not an observed session.

Sources for this section

Who else to consider

Askia Sisay

Choose Askia Sisay instead if the need is a workshop on forecast discipline, sales-operations process or the weekly operating rhythm of a B2B sales team rather than CFO-ready value cases and quarter-end pricing.

Read more

Sisay's posts address the same broad commercial decision—helping a revenue team make better calls—but focus on pipeline and forecast quality.

  • One post lists the deals that appear in the forecast without existing on Friday: resurrected closed-lost deals, verbal-only commitments, inbound demos forecast to close in four days, sandbagging revealed late and last-minute enterprise Hail Marys.
  • The companion post is a Q3-resolution piece about CRM hygiene, early pipeline building, honest forecasting, follow-up quality, lunch breaks and after-hours Slack, with the practical line that a team does not need eight new habits; it needs one it will keep.
  • This is a better fit when the session's measurable outcome is forecast accuracy, CRM adoption or pipeline-generation behaviour, and the audience responds to short, recognisable sales-floor humour.

The tradeoff is distance from the core need.

  • Their posts do not address pricing practice, packaging, discount governance, value cases, CFO-ready narratives or quarter-end negotiation.
  • A buyer seeking a workshop on holding price under procurement pressure would get sales-process discipline, not the pricing and value-selling substance their posts cover.
  • Ask for workshop formats, senior-room facilitation experience, fees and delivery experience before booking.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Sid Khaitan

Choose Sid Khaitan instead if the need is product marketing scope, protecting focus, commercial-launch ownership or how a B2B marketing function decides what it will and will not own.

Read more

Khaitan's posts keep the same revenue-accountability frame—tie work to pipeline and closed-won—but apply it to the product marketing role rather than enterprise deal value.

  • One post argues that product marketers become gap fillers when they repeatedly patch work nobody else owns, and that the fix is to prioritise work tied to numbers and name the actual owner out loud when a gap must be filled.
  • The other argues for the 'corpie plus indie hacker' stack: a day job plus outside building provides more reps, financial stability, risk tolerance and commercial perspective, while allowing that people should not compete with their employer or let their work suffer.
  • This is a stronger choice when the campaign's goal is to help a product marketing or GTM team clarify ownership, defend its roadmap or build commercial-launch accountability.

The tradeoff is that their posts do not address pricing strategy, value engineering, CFO business cases or enterprise negotiation.

  • They cover product marketing operating choices and side-project perspective, not the requested workshop on building CFO-ready value narratives and holding price under quarter-end pressure.
  • Ask for workshop delivery experience, senior executive facilitation and commercial terms before booking.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Andrius Avinas

Choose Andrius Avinas instead if the need shifts to agency business development, client qualification or protecting a service team's energy while selling.

Read more

The same commercial decision—who should train a B2B revenue team—looks different when the audience is agency owners, account managers or consultancies rather than SaaS enterprise sellers.

  • One post describes two years of business development and reframes rejection as usually a matter of timing, budget, priorities or bandwidth rather than personal failure, with the arithmetic that asking 100 people might mean talking to 20 and closing 3.
  • The other describes firing a client after repeated last-minute changes, urgent updates and feedback that felt like insults, arguing that not every client is your client and that protecting team energy matters.
  • This is a better fit when the session's outcome is better lead conversations, stronger qualification or permission to walk away from bad-fit work.

The tradeoff is that their posts cover running an agency and handling client relationships, not SaaS value selling, packaging, pricing governance or enterprise deal negotiation.

  • A company needing a CFO-ready value-case workshop would not get that substance here.
  • Ask for keynote or workshop formats, enterprise-revenue audience experience, rates and delivery track record before booking.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Sources for this section

Build your campaign brief

Editable Markdown templates for planning a campaign with this creator.

Campaign brief — blank template

Completed brief — quarter-end pricing clinic (strong fit)

Completed brief — CFO-ready value case keynote (smaller budget)

Sources for this section

Research methodology

  • This page draws on eight LinkedIn text posts by MG Gurbaxani (linkedin.com/in/mg-gurbaxani).
  • They cover pricing practice, enterprise value cases, the Cuvama platform and its MCP release, build-versus-buy choices for value tooling, a three-city European roadshow, and one personal piece about cross-cultural negotiation.
  • The posts identify MG Gurbaxani as the founder of Cuvama and refer back to earlier packaging-and-pricing consulting work at mgpricing.com.
  • None are video, audio or talk recordings.
  • For the similar-creators section, two posts each by three adjacent creators provide comparisons.
  • Selection favoured material that answers a general reader's questions: who MG Gurbaxani is, what they write about, how their arguments develop, and where a live session would draw its substance.
  • Posts about a roadshow and a personal story are included because they show format and voice, not because they support a purchase.
  • MG Gurbaxani's posts here do not provide publication dates or timestamps; any recording of a talk, workshop or panel; articles, books or other long-form writing; a sponsor page or rate card; audience demographics or platform metrics; or past campaign results.
  • Fees, availability and recording permissions are not documented either.
  • These gaps matter most for anyone weighing live delivery or a paid engagement and should be confirmed directly with MG Gurbaxani or Cuvama.
  • This page describes the posts and information available here; it is not an endorsement.

Brands they talk about