Search creators⌘K
  1. Home
  2. Creators
  3. Janine Huizeling

Janine Huizeling

Janine Huizeling works in the beauty supply chain, buying and selling branded beauty products worldwide. Her LinkedIn posts analyze market trends, ecommerce, fragrance, skincare, and opportunities for beauty brands and distributors in different regions.

Beauty ecommerceSocial commerceBased on 16 posts · latest Oct 2026
LinkedIn

At a glance

They are most useful for supply-side beauty market intelligence on emerging regions, channels, and distribution.

Best for

Beauty brands or distributors seeking market-entry and sourcing insight in Asia and the Gulf.

Not for

Consumer-facing creator campaigns with contracted reach, engagement reporting, or documented sponsorship packages.

Key takeaways

  • Africa ecommerce beauty growth to 2030 is 33.5%, a growth rate, not global sales share.
  • Q2 2026: Puig Asia-Pacific grew 16.1%, Estée Lauder 8.1%, Shiseido 2%, Coty EMEA down about 10%.
  • Skintific rose from Indonesian founding in 2022 to top US fastest-growing ranking via TikTok Shop livestreaming.

Check first: Confirm whether paid work is available and terms, since no rate card or media kit is published.

Main ideas
Look for momentum before a market becomes large · Digital-first brands can become important before traditional distributors notice · Compare regional results, not just global brand names
Read first
Why beauty’s fastest-growing ecommerce markets may not be the biggest
Sources for this section

What they are known for

Janine Huizeling works in the beauty supply chain, buying and selling branded beauty products worldwide.

  • In their LinkedIn posts, they interpret beauty-market data and connect it to changes in ecommerce, fragrance, skincare, and regional demand.
  • They’re known for asking where growth is happening before it becomes obvious to established distributors—and for explaining how new sales channels may change the route from brand to customer.

Huizeling’s strength is turning market signals into practical questions for the beauty trade.

  • They distinguish fast growth from market size, as in their discussion of African ecommerce beauty growth, and compare regional performance while separating reported company results from observations in Indonesia.
  • They also examine how digital-first brands can grow beyond traditional distribution without dismissing the retailer networks and reach built by fragrance licensing houses.
  • Their watchlists and forecasts offer prompts for further investigation.
  • For example, their post on prestige fragrance notes that value growth can reflect higher prices even when unit sales are flat.
  • Follow their work for a supply-chain perspective on emerging brands, channels, and markets.
Sources for this section

Ideas and priorities

Janine Huizeling reads beauty through the supply chain, looking for changes conventional distribution may spot too late.

Read more

Across their posts, they argue that brands should watch where demand is growing, how consumers find products, and whether a premium still feels worth paying. Their examples range from fast-growing ecommerce markets to Korean skincare and more affordable fragrance.

Look for momentum before a market becomes large

Huizeling argues that current market size can obscure where growth is accelerating.

Read more

Brands and distributors that wait for emerging markets to look established may lose time building relationships there. They distinguish growth rate from market share, so a fast-growing channel isn’t mistaken for a large market.

Discussing a McKinsey report, they cite annual ecommerce beauty growth through 2030 of 33.5% in Africa, 16.3% in the Middle East, and 11.3% in South and Southeast Asia. They clarify that the Africa figure is a growth rate, not its share of global beauty sales.

Read original

Digital-first brands can become important before traditional distributors notice

Huizeling sees social commerce and ecommerce as routes to growth that can bypass department stores and conventional distributor networks.

Read more

The risk is that new brands can scale quickly through channels the traditional industry may not track closely.

They point to Skintific, which they describe as founded in Indonesia and built largely through TikTok Shop livestreaming. They say it grew rapidly in the US without distributor relationships or department-store listings.

Read original

Compare regional results, not just global brand names

Huizeling argues that the same beauty companies can face very different conditions across regions.

Read more

They pair company results with observations from time spent in Asia to challenge distribution conversations centred on established European markets. Their posts make a case for looking beyond Europe without treating every Asian market as the same.

In a post written from Indonesia, they compare Q2 2026 results: several major groups grew in APAC, while some reported weaker results in EMEA. They name Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Malaysia as markets where they see strong consumer interest.

Read original

Track local popularity to spot possible international breakouts

Huizeling sees a gap between a brand’s home-market attention and Western recognition as a signal worth investigating.

Read more

Drawing on earlier K-beauty growth patterns, they frame emerging names as candidates to watch, not guaranteed successes.

Citing a Spate ranking of Korean online popularity, they note that only three of its ten fastest-rising Korean skincare brands were already in the US top 100. They name Abib, Mary and May, Hanmi, Eqqualberry, and Arencia among the brands to watch, and ask which will break through and how quickly.

Read original

In fragrance, demand is shifting toward accessible prices and direct channels

Huizeling argues that fragrance remains in demand, but consumers are making sharper choices about price and value.

Read more

They see pressure on prestige fragrance when higher sales value doesn’t come with more units, while mass-market growth and online channels offer alternatives to traditional models. They credit licensing houses for building retail and distribution infrastructure, and argue those strengths now need to coexist with digital capabilities.

They read Circana’s H1 2026 figures as showing US mass fragrance up 15%, while prestige fragrance rose 6% in value but was flat in units. In a separate post, they describe how TikTok Shop, Amazon, and direct-to-consumer sales are changing the landscape for designer fragrance licensing.

Read original · Original 2

Sources for this section

Start with their work

Why beauty’s fastest-growing ecommerce markets may not be the biggest

This post looks at beauty ecommerce growth beyond established Western markets.

Read more

It distinguishes a high growth rate from a large market: the 33.5% figure cited for Africa is annual ecommerce beauty growth through 2030, not Africa’s share of global sales.

Huizeling contrasts the cited growth rates for Africa (33.5%), the Middle East (16.3%), Latin America (15.8%) and South and Southeast Asia (11.3%) with slower rates in North America and Europe.

  • They argue that brands and distributors risk arriving late if they wait for fast-growing markets to become large.
  • They also note the decline of department stores.
  • The figures come from a McKinsey report shared by Alexis Amann.

For brands planning a campaign

For a sourcing or distribution brief, use this post to compare market size, growth, channel access and local operating requirements. It points to emerging markets but does not identify the right country or route to market for a specific brand.

The same beauty groups, different regional results

This post shows how regional performance can differ for the same global beauty companies.

Read more

It offers newcomers a concrete APAC example and shows how Huizeling connects reported results with their observations while in Indonesia.

Using company results for calendar Q2 2026, Huizeling compares APAC growth with weaker results in EMEA for several major groups.

  • They argue that European distribution conversations may give too little attention to Southeast Asian markets, naming Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia.
  • The post combines reported figures with their own observations of local consumer interest; these are distinct kinds of information.

For brands planning a campaign

A brand considering regional expansion can use this post to frame a country-by-country discovery brief, comparing company performance with local demand, retail conditions and distribution access. Treat it as a starting hypothesis, not a substitute for current market research.

A watchlist of Korean skincare brands gaining attention

This post identifies Korean skincare brands Huizeling thinks may move from local popularity to wider international recognition.

Read more

It offers a practical entry point for readers interested in how they spot possible next-wave brands.

Huizeling uses a Spate chart of Korean online popularity increases to name brands including Abib, Mary and May, Hanmi, Tosowoong, Eqqualberry and Arencia.

  • They compare Korean popularity with US recognition and draw a parallel with earlier K-beauty growth.
  • The watchlist is a forecast based on a pattern they see, not proof that every named brand will succeed internationally.

For brands planning a campaign

For a sourcing team, the post can seed a screening list. Before approaching a brand, check current sales, product and regulatory fit, supply capacity and market-specific demand; online attention alone does not guarantee distribution success.

What fast-growing beauty brands reveal about routes to market

This post explores how brands can scale without the traditional distribution routes familiar to the established beauty industry.

Read more

It shows newcomers why Huizeling focuses on the speed and visibility of digital-first growth.

Huizeling discusses a YipitData ranking of fast-growing US beauty brands and singles out Skintific, which they say was founded in Indonesia and grew through TikTok Shop livestreaming. They contrast that route with distributor relationships and department-store listings, arguing that brands can become significant before traditional industry networks notice them.

For brands planning a campaign

For a distributor assessing an emerging brand, use this post as a prompt to examine its direct-sales channels, content-led demand and ability to serve new markets. Fast-growing social-commerce brands are not necessarily ready for wholesale distribution.

How the fragrance licensing model is adapting to new channels

This post explains how Huizeling sees the relationship between established licensing houses and newer sales channels.

Read more

It offers a starting point for readers weighing traditional distribution against direct-to-consumer and creator-led commerce.

Huizeling describes the retailer relationships, distribution networks, sampling and travel-retail reach built by licensing houses, then considers how TikTok Shop, Amazon and direct-to-consumer sales are changing the competitive landscape. Their point is not that existing infrastructure has lost value, but that companies need digital capabilities alongside it.

For brands planning a campaign

For a fragrance expansion plan, compare the reach and capabilities of licensing or distribution partners with the brand’s ability to sell directly and build digital demand. The post supports assessing both routes rather than treating them as interchangeable.

Sources for this section

Topics and approach

Fast-growing beauty brands are reaching consumers through ecommerce, not traditional distribution

Huizeling examines a US ranking of the ten fastest-growing beauty brands and is struck that, despite buying and selling branded beauty daily, most are unfamiliar to them.

Read more

One standout is Skintific, founded in Indonesia in 2022 and built largely through TikTok Shop livestreaming, without distributor relationships or department-store listings. The point is not simply that new brands can win, but how quickly and quietly they can grow: brands go from nothing to tens of millions in revenue through channels that bypass traditional retail, often escaping the notice of people closest to distribution.

Starts with a third-party consumer dataset covering 50,000 brands, then checks the ranking against their daily sourcing and network knowledge.

For brands planning a campaign

For brands and sourcing companies, creator-led and livestream commerce offer a route to market that can bypass distribution deals. Evaluate ecommerce-native brands early, before they appear in conventional retail data.

Examples: Source 1

Growth rates, not absolute size, show where to build

Using McKinsey's "From Aisle to Algorithm" data, Huizeling compares ecommerce beauty growth rates to 2030: Africa at 33.5% a year, the Middle East 16.3%, Latin America 15.8%, South and Southeast Asia 11.3%, North America 6.8% and Europe 7.1%.

Read more

Africa's absolute market remains small, while attention and distribution resources still concentrate on the largest, slowest-growing markets. Department stores are also declining, by roughly 3.7% a year in North America and 1.4% in Europe, as ecommerce absorbs the difference.

Interprets the regional chart as a compound annual growth rate, not a share of global sales, and considers who is forming buyer relationships early from the supply side.

The Africa figure measures growth in the ecommerce channel, not Africa's share of global beauty sales.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful for prioritising expansion markets by momentum rather than current revenue, and for making the case that early supplier and buyer relationships in emerging regions are scarce assets.

Examples: Source 1

Asia-Pacific drives industry growth as EMEA results sag

Reporting from Indonesia, Huizeling compares Q2 2026 corporate results: Puig grew 16.1% in Asia-Pacific, Estée Lauder 8.1%, L'Oréal an estimated 5.3–6%, and Shiseido 2%.

Read more

In EMEA, the same groups tell a different story: Coty fell around 10% amid weakness in the Middle East, Germany and Central and Eastern Europe; Shiseido fell 7.6%; and Estée Lauder rose just 1%. Huizeling sees beauty demand on the ground in Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia, while European distribution conversations remain centred on markets growing at low single digits.

Combines published corporate financial reports with firsthand observations from travel in the region, comparing the same companies across geographies.

For brands planning a campaign

Supports a case for APAC-facing sourcing, distribution and creator activity, and gives brands focused on mature European markets a concrete reason to broaden their attention.

Examples: Source 1

Fragrance licensing power is shifting to direct channels

Huizeling details the concentration of designer fragrance licensing: Coty holds 18 fashion and jewellery fragrance licences, including Boss, Burberry, Calvin Klein and Marc Jacobs; L'Oréal holds 16, including Armani, Prada, Valentino and Gucci; Interparfums holds 25 across two entities.

Read more

These houses built global retail, sampling and travel-retail infrastructure that fashion houses could not have built alone.

  • But the 2026 market is different from the one that model was designed for.
  • TikTok Shop, Amazon, direct-to-consumer and creator-led marketing require far less infrastructure, while brands with direct consumer relationships are growing at speeds traditional retail could not deliver.

Uses licence-count data to size the incumbent model, then assesses it against newer sales channels and licensing houses' digital and ecommerce investments.

For brands planning a campaign

Shows where licensing incumbents may need outside ecommerce and creator capabilities, and where independent fragrance brands can compete without traditional retail doors.

Examples: Source 1

Fragrance demand is shifting toward mass and accessible price points

Circana's H1 2026 data shows US mass fragrance growing 15%, while prestige fragrance grew 6% in value but was flat in units.

Read more

Huizeling reads this as price-driven rather than demand-driven prestige growth: the same volume at higher prices.

  • Mass fragrance is growing in both value and volume, helped by affordable Middle Eastern brands, drugstore lines and credible dupes of iconic scents.
  • Consumers have not lost interest in fragrance; they are deciding where a premium feels justified.

Separates value growth from unit growth to distinguish demand expansion from price inflation, then interprets the results through supply-chain experience across price points.

For brands planning a campaign

Relevant to pricing, portfolio and sourcing decisions in fragrance, and to brands weighing whether to extend into more accessible tiers or defend prestige pricing.

Examples: Source 1

K-Beauty's next cohort emerges in Korea before reaching Western shelves

Huizeling highlights a Spate ranking of the ten Korean skincare brands with the biggest online popularity increase in Korea over twelve months; only three are already in the US top 100.

Read more

Emerging candidates include Abib, known for minimalist sensitive-skin formulas; Mary and May, for high-concentration actives and ingredient transparency; Hanmi, with a pharmaceutical background; Tosowoong; Eqqualberry's viral Swimming Pool Toner; and Arencia's fermentation-led Rice Mochi textures. Huizeling points to the pattern that took Medicube, Skin1004 and now Centellian24 into the US through TikTok and Amazon within about eighteen months, and says appetite is accelerating beyond the first K-Beauty wave.

Tracks the gap between Korean popularity data and US recognition, checking the numbers against what Huizeling sees locally during time spent in Asia.

A watchlist based on current momentum, not a forecast: Huizeling asks which brands will break through, and how quickly, rather than suggesting they all will.

For brands planning a campaign

An early-warning list for brands and distributors weighing Korean skincare sourcing, and a case for acting on popularity signals in Korea before US retail listings appear.

Examples: Source 1

Sources for this section

Brands and businesses

The posts tie Huizeling's commercial identity to New Day Brands, named in the sign-off and contact address on every post and described as buying and selling branded beauty products worldwide.

Read more

Ask whether they own or work for the business.

  • Nearly every post also credits charts and data to Alexis Amann's Playbook of Beauty.
  • Other businesses named across the posts — including Skintific, Medicube, Skin1004, Coty, L'Oréal, Interparfums, Puig, Estée Lauder and Shiseido — appear as subjects of market analysis, not as clients, sponsors or partners.

New Day Brands

Disclosed partnership

Every 2026 post ends with the same sign-off and contact address: "New Day Brands — buying and selling branded beauty worldwide, jhuizeling@ndbrands.nl".

Read more

New Day Brands is presented as the trading operation behind Huizeling's stated work buying and selling branded beauty products, including derma care, skincare, hair care and fragrance, across Europe and beyond. Ask whether they own the company or work for it.

Original disclosure

New Day Brands — buying and selling branded beauty worldwide

View example

Playbook of Beauty

Mention

Five of the six posts credit their data or charts to "Alexis Amann, Playbook of Beauty", drawing on McKinsey's From Aisle to Algorithm report, YipitData's consumer dataset, Circana's H1 2026 report, Spate interaction data and corporate financial reports.

Read more

The posts show repeated sourcing and commentary on that outlet's material; none indicates sponsorship or a paid partnership.

View example

Sources for this section

Topics and similar creators

Huizeling writes as a buyer and seller of branded beauty, making their posts a running briefing on where demand is moving.

Read more

Start with the regional-growth posts: ecommerce beauty growth rates to 2030, and why Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and South and Southeast Asia are growing far faster than Europe or North America, despite having smaller absolute markets.

  • Q2 2026 corporate results show the same beauty groups posting very different numbers in Asia-Pacific and EMEA.
  • If K-beauty is your interest, the watchlist post names Korean skincare brands gaining popularity at home before Western recognition and explains how TikTok and Amazon carried earlier brands into the US.
  • For fragrance, one post maps the concentration of designer licensing and why TikTok Shop, Amazon and direct-to-consumer need less of that infrastructure.
  • Another separates value growth from unit growth to show mass fragrance expanding on real volume while prestige grows mostly on price.
  • Across the posts, Huizeling uses a third-party chart or ranking, checks it against what they see in daily trade, then draws a practical conclusion about where to look next.
Beauty distribution Beauty ecommerce Emerging beauty markets K-beauty Fragrance market Social commerce Brand sourcing and supply chain Market data analysis Chart-led commentary Distributors and importers

David Son

Both track which beauty brands are gaining momentum and explain why.

Read more

Son's ranking of the fastest-rising K-beauty brands covers the breakout pattern Huizeling describes. Both single out hero-product launches, micro-influencer marketing and online-first retail as routes into global markets.

Son's evidence is brand by brand: a ranked K-beauty list and a company profile of the licensing house behind Coach, Jimmy Choo and Montblanc fragrances. Huizeling draws on regional demand data and price-tier shifts from a buying and selling position, so the two overlap in subject but differ in standpoint and format.

Read original · Original 2

Shiyue Lou

Both closely track the fragrance market and write recurring commentary on how fragrance brands cross borders.

Read more

Lou's Chinese Fragrance Friday series analyses brand moves, consumer trends and the competitive landscape. Lou also reports securing distributors in France and Spain and getting a brand onto Parisian shelves.

Lou focuses on Chinese fragrance houses entering European retail, drawing on a hands-on brand-representation role and a stated focus on building an independent brand's distinctiveness without paid media. Huizeling examines the licensing structure and price tiers of the global fragrance market from a trading and distribution viewpoint.

Read original · Original 2

Erica La Sala

Both follow how ecommerce and direct-to-consumer economics are reshaping beauty and wellness businesses.

Read more

La Sala's reporting on how AI is cutting website-build and software costs while acquisition costs rise addresses the same question Huizeling raises: how brands can reach consumers through new channels rather than inherited retail infrastructure.

La Sala reports for a publication and gathers named operators and experts for comment, as in the Everlane and SHEIN analysis. Huizeling writes first-person market reads grounded in their sourcing and buyer relationships.

Read original · Original 2

Sources for this section

Audience

Janine Huizeling’s posts may suit a campaign about beauty sourcing and distribution in Asia: they discuss growth in Indonesia and other APAC markets, emerging Korean skincare brands, and changing beauty-sales channels.

Read more

Before booking, ask for recent LinkedIn audience analytics showing follower and impression geography, plus an audience survey or other documentation of relevant professional roles in the target markets.

Sources for this section

Partnership options

The six posts describe no sponsorship package, rate card or defined partnership offering.

Read more

They show how Huizeling presents their work: buying and selling branded beauty products worldwide, and sharing supply-side market intelligence on fast-growing regions, brand distribution channels and misallocated distributor attention.

  • A brand or sourcing company engaging them would most likely be seeking that market read or access to their buyer and supplier network, rather than a listed advertising placement.
  • Several posts include a business contact address for New Day Brands, the trading name they sign under.
  • Before committing spend, ask whether they offer paid placements, co-authored market research or distribution partnerships, and what each would include, cost and involve in terms of production.
  • For campaigns aimed at beauty distributors and brand teams, the posts offer a clear audience and register: short, chart-led analyses read by roughly 3,200 LinkedIn followers, with an explicit call for comments.
Sources for this section

Campaign fit

A campaign to shortlist

Read more

Market-entry need one: A European beauty distributor sourcing branded skincare, fragrance and derma care wants to prioritise Southeast Asia and the Gulf over the next 18 months. It needs to decide which markets to test first and how to enter them.

Huizeling fits because their posts address the four questions the distributor needs to answer, from the supply side rather than a brand-marketing position.

Market selection by momentum, not size. Their McKinsey-based post sets out annual ecommerce beauty growth to 2030 of 33.5% for Africa, 16.3% for the Middle East, 15.8% for Latin America and 11.3% for South and Southeast Asia, against 6.8% for North America and 7.1% for Europe. They warn that the Africa figure is a growth rate, not a share of global sales—a useful correction when someone proposes waiting until a market is “big enough.”

Regional results vary within the same company. Their Q2 2026 post compares Puig’s 16.1% growth in Asia-Pacific, Estée Lauder’s 8.1%, L’Oréal’s estimated 5.3-6% and Shiseido’s 2%, with Coty down around 10% in EMEA and Shiseido down 7.6%. A distributor allocating scarce launch support gets a concrete, named comparison rather than a general claim about Asia’s growth.

Route to market. They argue that Skintific rose from an Indonesian founding in 2022 to the top of a US fastest-growing ranking largely through TikTok Shop livestreaming, without distributor relationships or department-store listings. For a distributor, that is both a warning and an opportunity: ecommerce-native brands may seek a wholesale partner once their direct channels plateau, but remain invisible in conventional retail data in the meantime.

An early-supplier shortlist. Their Spate-based post names Abib, Mary and May, Hanmi, Tosowoong, Eqqualberry and Arencia as Korean brands with rising popularity in Korea but limited US presence. It also describes the roughly eighteen-month path Medicube, Skin1004 and Centellian24 took through TikTok and Amazon. That is a useful sourcing screen, but treat it as a watchlist, not a forecast.

Portfolio context. Their Circana post shows US mass fragrance up 15% in the first half of 2026, while prestige grew 6% in value and was flat in units. Their licensing post says Coty holds 18 fashion and jewellery fragrance licences, L’Oréal 16 and Interparfums 25, while newer channels require far less of that infrastructure. Both points matter when deciding whether a Gulf or Southeast Asian fragrance push should lean accessible or premium.

What to verify before relying on the analysis. Huizeling is a market commentator, not a research vendor with a published methodology. The underlying data comes from McKinsey, Circana, Spate, YipitData and company reports, relayed through Playbook of Beauty’s charts rather than raw datasets. Their Asia-Pacific post also combines reported financials with personal travel observations; those evidence types carry different weight in a board paper. Ask for the underlying sources and separate reported figures from observations before using the analysis in an investment decision.

When to choose a specialist

Read more

Consumer-facing campaign need two: A prestige fragrance house wants an awareness campaign in the UK, France and Germany built around creator content—TikTok and Instagram posts, livestream appearances and a department-store launch moment—with a contracted reach target and monthly engagement reporting.

Huizeling is a weak fit for this campaign for four reasons to assess before spending.

No documented commercial format. Six of their posts describe no sponsorship package, rate card, deliverable list or fee, and no media kit or partner page is published here. The posts sign off with New Day Brands and a business email address, so an approach is possible, but a buyer cannot budget against an undocumented format. Ask directly whether paid work is available and confirm the terms before budgeting.

No consumer-facing content track record in the posts. Every post is short, chart-led business analysis for people who buy, sell and distribute beauty. None shows product-led consumer content, on-camera demonstration, livestream hosting or the lifestyle format this campaign requires.

Audience information does not support a reach commitment. The only available audience figure is roughly 3,200 LinkedIn followers. There is no follower geography, impression data or documented information about professional roles. That points to an industry readership, but says nothing about reachable consumers in three European markets. Before booking, ask for recent platform analytics and audience research covering roles and markets.

Their stated position cuts against a prestige volume story. Their read of the H1 2026 fragrance data is that prestige growth is price-driven while mass fragrance grows in volume; consumers are choosing where a premium feels justified, and affordable Middle Eastern brands and credible dupes have strengthened the alternatives. A prestige house hiring a creator who argues that its price premium is increasingly hard to defend should expect scepticism—or a message that works against the campaign.

The brand could still use Huizeling for a paid, industry-facing market read on pricing tiers and channel shifts aimed at trade partners, not as consumer-facing campaign talent. Those are different jobs and should not be bought as one.

A worked campaign example

Worked angle for market-entry need one: a staged emerging-market entry read, not a one-off post.

Campaign angle: “Momentum over size.” Position the distributor as moving early into fast-growing markets while competitors are still arguing about Germany. The angle draws on Huizeling’s framing of growth rates versus absolute market size and the gap between Asian consumer demand and European distribution attention.

What the buyer commissions: A three-part paid market read, delivered as three industry-facing posts or short articles over roughly ten to twelve weeks, built on data the distributor already holds or can license, plus one private working session. Confirm terms, fees and whether co-authored formats are available before budgeting; Huizeling’s posts do not document a package.

Part one: market shortlist and rationale. Their growth-rate comparison supplies the spine: Africa at 33.5% annual ecommerce beauty growth to 2030, the Middle East at 16.3%, Latin America at 15.8%, and South and Southeast Asia at 11.3%. The distributor adds its current revenue split and margin data so the argument reflects its numbers, not just category trends. Output: two or three test markets, with a reason for each selection and for excluding the others.

Part two: the channel decision. The distributor specifies which route it intends to test: wholesale into local retail, supply to ecommerce-native brands, or a direct arrangement with one emerging brand. Huizeling’s contrast between Skintific’s TikTok Shop route and the department-store listings it bypassed, and their account of licensing houses building ecommerce and digital capability alongside retail infrastructure, give the post its tension. Output: a route-to-market recommendation that names the tradeoff—how quickly the direct route moves versus how much control and margin a distributor arrangement protects.

Part three: the sourcing shortlist. Use the Korean watchlist as the practical payload: Abib, Mary and May, Hanmi, Tosowoong, Eqqualberry, Arencia, and the eighteen-month pattern set by Medicube, Skin1004 and Centellian24 through TikTok and Amazon. The distributor adds its non-negotiables—regulatory readiness, supply capacity, minimum order quantities and ability to serve Gulf or Southeast Asian markets—and the post shows which candidates meet them. Output: a shortlist of brands or suppliers to approach, with questions for each.

What the buyer must supply: Current sales by market, margin expectations, regulatory constraints in target markets, and one named internal decision owner who will act on the shortlist.

What the buyer gets beyond the posts: A screening list with reasons, a channel recommendation with its tradeoff stated, and a market-selection argument that can be reused in an internal investment paper.

Next step: Confirm whether paid collaboration, co-authored research or a distribution partnership is available, and on what terms. Request recent LinkedIn audience analytics covering geography, seniority and sector to check for overlap with the distributor’s target markets and functions. Agree in writing which data the distributor licenses for any public post: the McKinsey, Circana, Spate and YipitData figures Huizeling cites were relayed through third-party charts, so use the distributor’s own or properly licensed equivalents before publication.

This angle will not reach consumers. If the goal is consumer awareness in Europe, the budget belongs with a different creator; the poor-fit case explains why.

Sources for this section

Who else to consider

David Son

Choose David Son when the next step is a brand and category shortlist, not a regional market read.

Read more

One post ranks the 20 fastest-rising K-beauty brands and explains its method: consumer demand signals, retail rankings, social virality, Amazon, Olive Young, TikTok and beauty market intelligence for 2025-2026.

  • It then identifies five shared success patterns: entry through a single hero SKU, micro- and nano-influencers over celebrity marketing, online-first validation before offline retail, long-term creator relationships instead of short campaigns, and renewed offline discovery through pop-ups and events.
  • A second post examines the licensing platform model in fragrance, showing how Interparfums supplies Coach, Jimmy Choo, Montblanc, Lacoste, Moncler and Van Cleef & Arpels rather than owning consumer brands itself.
  • For the distributor deciding which brands and categories to test first, David Son offers a ranked list, pattern analysis and a clear comparison of partnership versus ownership.
  • Choose David Son over Huizeling when the sourcing team needs names to approach this quarter, not the market-level argument behind them.

The ranking is momentum-based and self-described, with no regional growth figures, corporate results or channel economics behind it.

  • A distributor cannot use it to rank or size markets, choose between Southeast Asia and the Gulf, or defend a market-selection choice in an investment paper.
  • It also offers little reach or audience evidence, leaving the buyer without a clear picture of who it reaches.
  • Commissioning David Son alongside Huizeling would duplicate the brand shortlist without adding the market case.
  • Ask Huizeling for regional performance and audience data before using the ranking to support a market decision.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Shiyue Lou

Choose Shiyue Lou when the distributor needs someone who has run an emerging-market brand into European distribution, rather than analyzed the market from outside.

Read more

One post describes leading international expansion for an independent Chinese fragrance house over four months with no extra marketing budget: Instagram followers rose by more than 350%, engagement increased 7,800%, distributors were secured in France and Spain, the brand reached Parisian shop shelves, and further distribution pipelines were still being built.

  • Three lessons from the work speak directly to introducing an unknown brand into a new market: the category is physical and converts through in-person meetings and shop pitches; a small brand competes on distinctiveness rather than scale; and coherent content still performs without paid media.
  • A second post shows the same China-market focus taking shape through a weekly #ChineseFragranceFriday series on brand moves and consumer trends, presenting a Chinese brand at the Paris-Shanghai Perfume Show, where inventory sold out, and earning an LVMH luxury-brand certificate.
  • Pick Shiyue Lou for China-to-Europe route execution or a distributor-facing introduction for a niche fragrance brand in France or Spain.

The direction of travel is the reverse of a European distributor entering Asia and the Gulf: a Chinese brand entering Europe.

  • Janine Huizeling's posts do not address Africa, the Middle East or Latin America.
  • Two posts cover a single four-month role, with pipelines still under construction; the second is a job search, signaling interest and availability rather than an established commercial offering.
  • Use the posts to assess hands-on distributor outreach, not as evidence of a market-entry service for the distributor's target regions.
  • Before commissioning, ask for examples of sponsorship, consulting or paid-collaboration work.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Erica La Sala

Choose Erica La Sala when the question shifts from which market to enter to what going direct costs and where it breaks.

Read more

As a reporter for Beauty Independent, they revisited DTC beauty operations four years on with named practitioners Nikki Lindgren, Nik Sharma, Owen Loft, Kevin Gould and Jonathan Cohen, and detailed specific cost movements: premium website builds fell from roughly $150,000-$250,000 to nearer $50,000-$70,000; core operating costs rose an estimated 20-30% since early 2022; and customer acquisition costs climbed 40-50%.

  • They also examine Everlane's sale to SHEIN at around $100 million, against a 2020 valuation near $550 million, and draw lessons from 13 named industry experts on how rising acquisition costs, debt and changing consumer habits cracked the DTC playbook.
  • Pick La Sala when weighing a direct-to-consumer or ecommerce-native route and seeking reported cost benchmarks and quotable expert opinion, or when a credible account of how a well-funded direct brand failed would help.

This is US-centred generalist journalism published by a third party, not analysis of the distributor's target markets.

  • It explains direct-to-consumer costs and where the model fails, but does not identify which markets in Asia, Africa or the Middle East to enter or which partner to use.
  • For a Gulf or Southeast Asia entry recommendation, La Sala's work offers context on channel economics, not an actionable shortlist.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Sources for this section

Build your campaign brief

Editable Markdown templates for planning a campaign with this creator.

Beauty market-entry campaign brief

Worked example: assess Southeast Asia and Middle East entry

Sources for this section

Research methodology

  • Janine Huizeling's LinkedIn posts here cover a US fastest-growing-beauty-brand ranking, McKinsey regional ecommerce growth rates to 2030, Q2 2026 corporate results by region, designer fragrance licensing, Circana mass-versus-prestige fragrance figures for the first half of 2026, and a Spate ranking of rising Korean skincare brands.
  • The market data inside the posts comes from McKinsey, Circana, Spate, YipitData and company financial reports, relayed through Playbook of Beauty charts; those underlying reports are not discussed in the posts, so the figures are reported as the posts present them.
  • The comparisons to other creators draw on two posts each by David Son, Shiyue Lou and Erica La Sala.
  • The posts do not say what audience analytics, media kit, campaign performance data, interview material, video or transcript are available.
  • Claims about reach, commercial formats and paid partnerships are therefore left as open questions, and the audience figure used elsewhere on this page comes from the account listing rather than from the posts.

Brands they talk about