Mobile app CRM and retention messaging, especially separating inactivity from pre-deletion signals.
Best for
Mobile app growth platform planning content collaboration on CRM retention.
Not for
Consumer brand paid partnership built on short-form video and verified audience reach.
Key takeaways
Inactive users and pre-deletion signals are different problems requiring separate responses.
Control group example: 4,480 treatment purchases, 3,360 would have happened without push.
Behavior-based lifecycle journeys can support distributor adoption at scale in B2B2C.
Check first: Confirm terms, sponsorship policy, media kit, rate card, inquiry route, and audience demographics.
Main ideas
Spot the difference between inactivity and a user preparing to leave · Use a control group to find out whether messaging caused a result · Connect retention evidence to acquisition decisions
Product-linked post built on a named client story · Technical explainer tied to a platform feature · Benchmark or pricing post aimed at a buying decision
Ilja Torski writes about mobile app growth, focusing on CRM, lifecycle messaging, retention, and push notifications.
The posts take a practical approach: distinguish users who are merely inactive from those showing signs they may delete an app, and measure whether messaging changes behavior rather than taking credit for conversions that would have happened anyway.
Torski also connects day-to-day messaging decisions to wider shifts in app growth, from sharing retention data with app-store teams to considering how AI agents could change notifications.
The posts center on LinkedIn.
Ask for examples of other signature work, such as a book or show.
Ilja Torski makes mobile engagement problems easier to act on by distinguishing cases teams often lump together and tying each distinction to a decision.
An inactive app user may still be reachable through push, while someone showing pre-deletion signals—such as repeated visits to settings—needs a different, more urgent response.
A gaming example shows why a control group matters: of 4,480 treatment-group purchases, Torski says 3,360 would have happened without the push.
The work also ranges beyond campaign tactics: a B2B2C case explains how behavior-based lifecycle journeys can support distributor adoption at scale, while other posts connect CRM findings to acquisition and consider how messaging may change as AI agents make purchases.
Readers interested in app retention and messaging strategy will find concrete examples and questions about how the underlying approach may need to evolve.
Ilja Torski’s posts treat mobile messaging as a system for noticing user behavior, reaching people at the right moment, and measuring whether a message changed anything.
Read more
A recurring priority is acting before users disappear, while adapting tactics to the audience and channel rather than relying on broad broadcasts.
Spot the difference between inactivity and a user preparing to leave
Torski argues that recency alone is a poor measure of churn risk.
Read more
Someone who has stopped using an app may still be reachable; behaviors that suggest a decision to leave deserve a separate, faster response. They also caution that winning back deleted users may not pay off equally across app categories.
In a fitness app, four workouts last month and none this month indicate inactivity.
The same user opening settings twice, then disappearing for ten days, may be showing a pre-deletion signal.
Torski recommends treating those patterns differently.
Use a control group to find out whether messaging caused a result
A conversion after a message is not necessarily a conversion because of it.
Read more
Torski argues that teams should compare messaged users with a group that receives no message, then report the difference rather than claiming every treatment conversion.
In a gaming LiveOps campaign, Torski reports 5.60% conversion among 80,000 messaged users and 4.20% among 8,500 controls: a reported 33.3% uplift. They say messaging drove 1,120 purchases, rather than all 4,480 treatment purchases.
Connect retention evidence to acquisition decisions
Torski sees CRM and app-store optimization as a two-way relationship: retention teams can give acquisition teams evidence about which promises and traffic sources lead to lasting use.
Read more
That makes post-install behavior useful before the next user installs.
Torski suggests sharing which value propositions prompt re-engagement, which feature users try first, and which acquisition sources still produce active users at Day 30. Those signals can shape store-page copy and screenshots.
Make messaging fit the user journey, not just the channel
Torski favors behavior-triggered, owned communication over relying only on paid remarketing or transactional notices.
Read more
Their examples connect web capture, email, push, and delivery updates to different moments of user intent.
An e-commerce visitor might submit an email for a first-visit offer, then receive push messages after installing. For an order, Torski recommends timely tracking updates, proactive delay notices, and a post-delivery follow-up.
As technology changes, messaging may need to explain rather than persuade
Torski considers how operating-system changes and AI purchasing agents could alter the role of push.
Read more
Their argument is that relevance depends on who is affected by a platform feature, and that messages to AI-mediated shoppers may become less frequent but more consequential. They frame the tension as keeping users informed and in control without recreating notification fatigue.
Torski says language support could leave some global app users outside iOS notification prioritization, making audience segmentation important. In agentic commerce, they imagine messages confirming a purchase within a user’s price limit or asking them to approve a better option.
This is Torski’s clearest statement of the core retention argument: catch decline before deletion.
Read more
Start here to understand the framework behind the other posts.
Torski separates two states that retention dashboards often merge.
Inactivity means the app is still installed, so push notifications or behavioral triggers can still reach the user.
Deletion is a decision: afterward, only email or SMS remains if the app collected that information.
They cite 62% of installed apps going unused in a given month and over half of downloads being uninstalled within 30 days.
In a fitness app, someone who logged four workouts last month and none this month is inactive; someone who logged four workouts, opened settings twice, then stayed away for 10 days is showing a pre-deletion signal.
Torski recommends segmenting inactivity by depth and pattern, treating pre-deletion signals as a separate high-priority trigger, and being realistic about win-back economics.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this as the opening framework for a webinar or article series on managing user inactivity, with the fitness example as a diagnostic exercise.
This explains how to show that a message caused conversions rather than merely coincided with them, complementing the retention framework’s focus on measurement.
Read more
Torski explains why A/B tests alone can overstate messaging impact.
A control group withholds messaging from a segment to show what would have happened anyway.
In the example, a gaming client sent a LiveOps event push to 80,000 users in the treatment group and 8,500 in the control group, then measured in-app purchases over the event window.
Treatment conversion was 5.60%, versus 4.20% in the control group: a +33.3% uplift at 95% confidence, with 1,120 purchases directly driven by messaging.
Without the control group, all 4,480 treatment conversions might have looked like campaign results, though 3,360 would have happened anyway.
Torski also lists subscription re-engagement, e-commerce cart recovery, and fintech feature adoption as control-group use cases.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this for content aimed at growth and CRM teams defending messaging budgets. The gaming example provides concrete figures for an article or webinar slide.
This shows Torski working on the strategic edge of mobile messaging, beyond retention tactics.
Read more
Read it to see how they frame the next platform shift.
Torski argues that agentic commerce changes the purpose of messaging.
Push notifications once triggered decisions; if AI agents make purchases on users’ behalf, decisions are already made, and messaging becomes the layer where people audit, approve, or override them.
Nudge tactics such as low-stock warnings and limited-time discounts rely on human hesitation and distraction, which agents don’t share.
They predict that messaging will shift from persuasion to protocol, in-app messages will become an explanation layer, frequency will collapse as importance increases, and the central tension will be autonomy versus control.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this in a future-facing webinar segment that moves beyond campaign mechanics to how messaging earns attention when agents mediate purchases.
This explains how retention data can improve acquisition creative and store pages, building a practical bridge between teams that often work separately.
Read more
Torski notes that teams often use ASO data to optimize CRM but rarely use CRM results to adapt ASO.
CRM data shows which messages retain users, which features drive activation, and which acquisition sources produce loyal cohorts, yet it usually stays in the retention dashboard.
They identify three data points to share upstream: the value propositions that resonate after install, the features users engage with first, and the acquisition sources that produce users still active at Day 30.
Torski notes that a customer engagement platform such as Pushwoosh already has push performance by segment, first-session behavioral events, and onboarding funnel drop-offs.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this as the outline for an article or webinar on connecting retention and acquisition teams, with the three data points as a viewer checklist.
This explains how to capture intent before app install and connect web behavior to mobile messaging.
Read more
It’s a useful starting point for teams that focus on engagement only after install.
Torski presents web popups as a first-party data capture point that feeds the messaging stack before a user installs an app.
A web visit often signals high intent: someone searches for a product, lands on the site, and reads about it.
They offer examples by category: media can offer free articles in exchange for a subscription; e-commerce can offer a discount for an email address, then follow up with push; fintech can offer a rate estimate and start email nurture immediately; and games can offer a launch bonus before release.
Torski recommends syncing the popup with messaging channels so each channel plays its part in sequence.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this as the pre-install section of a guide or article on owned-channel capture, with the four category examples as ready-made scenarios.
This explains whether a new platform feature applies to all users and shows how Torski checks an operating-system change against real global audiences.
Read more
Torski highlights a practical constraint in iOS 27’s AI-powered notification prioritization: it sorts notifications by urgency and relevance only for users whose language is among 16 supported languages.
Arabic, Hindi, Polish, Thai, Indonesian, Russian, Ukrainian, and Bengali aren’t on the list.
For global apps in fintech, gaming, e-commerce, and delivery, this creates two realities within the iOS audience.
For users of supported languages, generic broadcast messages are more likely to be deprioritized, making behavioral triggers and relevant copy more important.
For users of unsupported languages, nothing changes on the OS side, so the messaging platform must deliver relevance through segmentation, send-time optimization, behavioral triggers, and personalization.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this in a webinar or article on global push deliverability, especially for teams that haven’t checked their audience by country and language.
Shows why owned messaging deserves a larger role when paid remarketing dominates, connecting channel strategy to product and growth roadmaps.
Read more
Torski reacts to AppsFlyer's 2026 State of e-commerce report, which shows that 92% of iOS ad spend now goes to remarketing.
They argue that brands spend heavily on paid re-engagement while underusing owned messaging.
Most e-commerce messaging is transactional, such as order confirmations and shipping updates, but they point to upsell sequences, behavior-based cross-sell, and win-back campaigns.
Behavior-triggered messages convert 3-5x better than broadcast campaigns, and owned channels avoid CPMs.
They also warn against waiting until Q4 to re-engage dormant users: competitors who messaged consistently through the year will convert them first.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this as the market-context opener for an e-commerce retention campaign, then move into segmentation, triggers, and testing as roadmap priorities.
Shows how lifecycle messaging works when the end user is not the direct customer.
Read more
It is the strongest concrete case study in Ilja Torski's posts.
Torski describes a B2B2C case in which Hussle Technology sells a white-label sales enablement platform to direct and field sales brands, which roll the app out to their own distributor networks.
The product only works if hundreds of thousands of individual sellers use it, so the company built lifecycle journeys like those in consumer apps.
The example includes a 60-day onboarding sequence that branches on behavioral signals such as syncing contacts, making a first share, or getting a click back.
A separate re-engagement track fires for distributors who go quiet.
One template architecture is cloned across hundreds of brand deployments, making the system scalable.
For brands planning a campaign
A B2B2C article or webinar can use this as a full case study, discussing the 60-day sequence and cloned template architecture as operational details.
Push notification strategy when the platform or buying behaviour changes3
Owned channels versus paid remarketing, and capturing intent before install3
Retention and churn prevention: inactivity versus pre-deletion signals2
Measuring true campaign impact with control groups2
Post-purchase and delivery communication as an engagement window2
Connecting CRM results to acquisition and store presence1
B2B2C lifecycle messaging in multi-stakeholder deployments1
Retention and churn prevention: inactivity versus pre-deletion signals
Torski's most developed theme is the difference between a user who has gone quiet and one who is about to leave.
Read more
An inactive user still has the app installed, so push and behavioural triggers can still reach them; a deleted user has made a decision, leaving only email or SMS — and only if that contact data was collected.
Torski illustrates the distinction with a fitness app: someone who logged four workouts last month and none this month is inactive, while someone who logged four workouts, then opened the settings page twice and disappeared for ten days is showing a pre-deletion signal.
They recommend segmenting inactivity by depth and pattern rather than recency alone, and treating signals such as accessing account settings, viewing cancellation pages or filing an unresolved support ticket as a separate trigger category for immediate, high-priority intervention instead of a standard re-engagement flow.
Segment inactivity by depth and pattern, not just recency. Route pre-deletion signals into a separate, immediate intervention track rather than a routine re-engagement sequence.
Torski says email and SMS win-back works best in high-intent categories such as fintech and fitness, where users had a specific goal they did not complete. For entertainment or utility apps, prevention is the play because win-back returns rarely justify the effort.
For brands planning a campaign
A webinar or article series built on this distinction has a clear spine: how to define and detect pre-deletion behaviour, what intervention looks like at each stage, and how to make the economic case for prevention over win-back. A partner is buying a named framework with industry-specific examples, not general retention advice; the topic suits a session for CRM and lifecycle teams.
Push notification strategy when the platform or buying behaviour changes
A second recurring subject is how push changes when the operating system or the purchase decision changes.
Read more
On iOS 27's AI-powered notification prioritisation, Torski notes that the feature depends on the user's language, lists 16 supported languages and points out that Arabic, Hindi, Polish, Thai, Indonesian, Russian, Ukrainian and Bengali are not among them.
For apps with audiences in the Middle East, South or Southeast Asia, or Eastern Europe, whether a notification is noticed or buried still depends on the messaging platform's own segmentation, send-time optimisation and behavioural triggers.
Torski applies similar reasoning to agentic commerce: when AI agents make purchases, urgency-based nudges stop working, messaging shifts from persuasion to protocol (a purchase executed within a set threshold, or a request to approve a new option), frequency collapses, and almost every notification that remains matters.
They frame the central tension as autonomy versus control: too little messaging and users feel they have lost control; too much and notification fatigue returns.
Check language and country coverage before assuming a platform feature applies to an audience. Treat unsupported segments as a separate strategy, with the messaging platform responsible for relevance.
For brands planning a campaign
This offers a current, checkable angle for collaboration: audit how much of an app's audience will actually be affected by an operating-system feature before building strategy around it, and design for the segment that is not. The agentic-commerce post provides a forward-looking hook for an article, panel or conference session without over-claiming what has already happened.
Measuring true campaign impact with control groups
Torski argues that conversions attributed to messaging are inflated without a holdout.
Read more
In a gaming example, they set out 80,000 users in treatment and 8,500 in control during a LiveOps event: treatment conversion was 5.60% against 4.20% in control, a 33.3% uplift statistically significant at 95% confidence, with 1,120 purchases attributed to messaging rather than all 4,480 treatment conversions.
They name further use cases for control groups in subscription re-engagement, e-commerce cart and post-browse triggers, and fintech feature adoption, and boil the question down to whether sending the message made any difference.
In a separate post, Torski recommends testing messaging the way ads are tested, including the ability to segment by purchase behaviour and trigger campaigns from app activity.
Hold back a control segment and measure uplift against it over the same window, rather than counting all treatment conversions as campaign results.
For brands planning a campaign
Strong material for a practical, numbers-first article or webinar segment on incrementality: how to size a holdout, read uplift and report messaging return internally. It also shows that Torski can present a specific client result, not just a conceptual argument — useful if the collaboration promises demonstrated results rather than opinion.
Connecting CRM results to acquisition and store presence
Torski argues that data usually flows one way between retention and acquisition teams.
Read more
CRM knows which messages retain users, which features drive activation and which acquisition sources produce cohorts still active at day 30, yet that data often stays in the retention dashboard instead of reaching the app-store optimisation team.
They name three data points worth sharing upstream: value propositions that resonate after install, the feature users engage with first in their opening session, and retention curves by acquisition source.
Push performance by segment, first-session behavioural events and onboarding funnel drop-offs already sit inside an engagement platform, Torski notes, so the gap is usually process rather than tooling.
Feed post-install behavioural and retention signals into store-page and acquisition decisions. Treat retention by acquisition source as a measure of quality, not volume.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful for a collaboration aimed at growth or product teams, not just CRM specialists: a session on closing the loop between retention data and store-page or acquisition decisions, with concrete handoff points between teams. It broadens the appeal beyond lifecycle marketers.
Owned channels versus paid remarketing, and capturing intent before install
Torski uses an AppsFlyer figure — 92% of iOS ad spend now going to remarketing — to argue that brands over-invest in paid re-engagement while underusing channels they already own.
Read more
Most e-commerce messaging remains transactional (order confirmation, shipping, delivery), they argue, while behavioural triggers for upsell, cross-sell and win-back convert several times better than broadcast campaigns and carry no media cost.
They extend the same logic to web popups as a first-party data capture point before install, with examples from media, e-commerce, fintech and games where a single email submitted on the website activates email and then push in sequence.
Torski also addresses teams that already run their own CRM or marketing automation stack and want to replace an unreliable push provider without reworking the rest of their setup.
They list what such teams typically look for: reliable delivery, GDPR and CCPA compliance out of the box, and SDKs that integrate with iOS, Android, Flutter and React Native.
Assign each channel a function and a stage of the user journey instead of repeating the same message everywhere. Sync web capture directly with the messaging stack.
For brands planning a campaign
A ready-made theme for an article series on owned-channel strategy: where messaging fits against paid remarketing, how to sequence web capture into push and email, and what infrastructure a growth roadmap needs for behavioural triggers and testing. It also reaches a second audience: technically minded teams evaluating infrastructure on price, deliverability and compliance.
Post-purchase and delivery communication as an engagement window
Two posts focus on the period between payment and delivery.
Read more
Torski describes brands investing in next-day or same-day logistics while order confirmations, shipping updates and delay notices lag behind, turning a customer's excitement into uncertainty.
They recommend real-time communication: push and SMS the moment the parcel moves, proactive notices before support tickets accumulate, and post-delivery follow-up that turns a completed order into a review, cross-sell or repeat purchase.
Torski frames the goal as turning logistics moments into engagement moments, linking faster communication to repeat purchase behaviour and lifetime value, and asking retail teams whether shipping anxiety is eating into customer value.
Communicate in real time across push, SMS and email at each stage of the delivery journey. Send proactive notices when a delay happens, not after a complaint.
For brands planning a campaign
A concrete seasonal angle for retail and delivery audiences: holiday shipping anxiety as a revenue issue, not a service issue. It supports a co-authored piece or webinar timed to peak season, and brands can localise the framing with their own logistics data.
B2B2C lifecycle messaging in multi-stakeholder deployments
In a client story, Torski describes a white-label sales enablement platform sold to direct and field sales brands that roll the app out to their own distributor networks.
Read more
The product only works if hundreds of thousands of individual sellers use it, so the company built lifecycle journeys the way consumer apps do: a 60-day onboarding sequence that branches on real behavioural signals such as syncing contacts, making a first share or getting a click back, plus a separate re-engagement track for distributors who go quiet. It all runs from one template architecture cloned across hundreds of brand deployments, which they identify as the key to scaling.
Branch onboarding on real behavioural signals and clone a single template architecture across deployments, giving each brand its own journeys without rebuilding them.
Torski frames distributor engagement as a harder version of the same consumer problem: more stakeholders and less patience for guesswork.
For brands planning a campaign
This is the clearest example of a topic that spans B2B and consumer engagement, useful for collaborations targeting platform and channel teams rather than only consumer app marketers. It also shows Torski explaining a partner's architecture and results in a way that holds up to technical scrutiny.
Across Torski's posts, the pattern is consistent: a short argument built from one statistic or one client situation, followed by a numbered or arrowed list of practical steps, an industry-specific example drawn from fintech, gaming, e-commerce, media or delivery, and a closing question that invites readers to compare their own practice.
Read more
Posts are concrete and often quantified.
Several end by naming a specific capability, plan or pricing detail of the platform they work with, with a case-study link where one exists.
The writing is direct and example-led rather than abstract.
For brands planning a campaign
A collaboration should use a structured, example-led format with a direct question to the audience, which transfers well to article series, newsletter contributions and webinar segments. Campaign requests that supply a real data point or client situation are more likely to match Torski's existing writing than requests for general commentary.
The posts show one recurring commercial presence: Pushwoosh, the customer engagement platform whose messaging features, plans and pricing Torski describes in the first person ("At Pushwoosh, we have a push-only plan for exactly this").
Read more
They also cover Hussle Technology, a Pushwoosh client, as a lifecycle-marketing case study, and draw on AppsFlyer's ecommerce research.
None of these posts carries a sponsorship, affiliate or investment disclosure.
Ask Torski to clarify their formal role at Pushwoosh.
Pushwoosh
Disclosed partnership
Torski promotes Pushwoosh products in the first person.
Read more
They tell readers about the push-only plan at $7 per 1,000 MAU and link the live pricing calculator, noting that if the number works "we can talk"; explain how web popups sync with messaging channels in Pushwoosh; and recommend routing Pushwoosh CRM retention data to ASO teams. The posts do not specify whether the tie is employment, agency work or another arrangement.
A post presents Hussle Technology, a white-label sales enablement platform, as a Pushwoosh client that runs 60-day behavioural onboarding and separate re-engagement journeys across hundreds of brand deployments, and links out for details.
One post draws on AppsFlyer's 2026 State of Ecommerce finding that 92% of iOS ad spend now goes to remarketing, using it to argue that brands underinvest in owned messaging channels.
Ilja Torski writes about mobile messaging as a system: noticing what users actually do, reaching them at the right moment, and checking whether the message changed anything.
Read more
They return most often to the difference between a user who has gone quiet and one who is about to leave: an inactive user still has the app installed and can be reached, while someone who opens settings or cancellation pages twice and then vanishes is a separate, more urgent case.
Their measurement posts cover holdout groups and true campaign impact; other writing examines how push changes when the operating system or buying behaviour changes, alongside practical examples of web capture, post-purchase updates and B2B2C rollouts.
The tags below point to those threads.
Other listed creators approach overlapping problems from different angles, offering a second perspective on retention, measurement or e-commerce lifecycle work.
Yuwen works the same retention territory as Torski: detecting disengagement before a customer formally leaves and deciding what to send at that moment.
Read more
Yuwen’s example of a subscription tier where a ten-day login gap in month four predicts an 85% chance of not renewing in month six reflects the same instinct as Torski’s pre-deletion signals: find the behaviour that precedes the loss, then intervene while the relationship can still be saved rather than sending a win-back after the fact.
Both also distinguish reported numbers from real ones.
Yuwen rebuilds attribution across Shopify, ad and email data because each platform claims the same sale; Torski uses holdout groups for the same reason.
Yuwen approaches the problem through data infrastructure: predictive models, data warehouses, deduplication logic and attribution models built for brand operators.
Torski stays in the messaging layer: which channel can still reach a user, what the notification should say, and how the operating system or an AI agent changes what gets through.
Read Yuwen to understand why your channel reports are wrong; read Torski to learn what to send and when.
Gallagher argues that email and SMS are not separate revenue streams but stabilisers for an e-commerce system under pressure from rising Meta costs.
Read more
They get specific about where the first contact happens: a home-page-only popup with no extra discount, pre-purchase flows built on winning ad angles, and a deliberate refusal to trade bounce rate for subscriber count. Torski makes the same structural argument from the app side, treating web popups as a first-party capture point that feeds email and then push, and warning that paid remarketing is over-funded relative to channels a brand already owns.
Gallagher writes as a brand owner inside a supplement business, drawing examples from his own P&L and site behaviour; his channel mix is email plus Meta. Torski writes as a messaging practitioner, with client examples across gaming, fintech, media and delivery, and focuses on push and multi-channel journeys for apps rather than email-led e-commerce.
Biller runs lifecycle and email operations and shows the machinery rather than the theory: an onboarding flow of custom forms, documents and emails; a deliverability dashboard built for Klaviyo users; and project tasks generated automatically from CRM and chat history.
Read more
That practical, build-it-and-describe-it approach matches how Torski explains segmentation, trigger categories and web-to-push handoffs: both describe working setups and the decisions inside them.
Biller focuses largely on how AI tooling is wired into agency operations and client delivery, with email platforms as the working environment.
Torski focuses on the retention problem itself: who is at risk, which channel can still reach them, and whether the message caused the result.
Ilja Torski’s posts target people working in mobile app growth, CRM and retention, making them a potential fit for campaigns aimed at app-side practitioners—especially on lifecycle messaging or measuring its impact.
Read more
The advice is practical and example-led.
In a post on inactivity, they distinguish users who have stopped opening an app from those showing possible deletion signals, such as visiting account settings.
Another post uses a gaming example to show how a control group can separate purchases caused by a push campaign from those that would have happened anyway.
These approaches speak to teams deciding how to segment users and measure CRM results.
Torski also connects app growth disciplines: they argue that CRM retention data can inform app-store messaging and describe how behavioral signals can shape lifecycle journeys for distributors using a white-label sales platform.
Campaign topics could include retention strategy, push and in-app messaging, campaign measurement, and the link between acquisition and engagement.
LinkedIn lists 12,146 followers, observed on 8 October 2026.
Before booking, ask for a breakdown of followers’ roles, industries and locations.
Ilja Torski's commercial work runs through Pushwoosh, the customer engagement platform they write about.
Read more
The formats include product-linked posts, a named client story, benchmark and pricing posts, and campaign examples with measured results.
The posts do not show a sponsorship policy, media kit, rate card, or partnership inquiry route.
Ask Torski directly for those details and confirm terms before planning spend.
Product-linked post built on a named client story
Buyer requirement
Supply a real deployment you can describe in operational detail and a client willing to be named.
The reviewed example covers Hussle Technology, a white-label sales enablement platform.
It explains the 60-day onboarding sequence, how it branches on behavioral signals such as a distributor syncing contacts or making a first share, and a separate re-engagement track for distributors who go quiet—all cloned across hundreds of brand deployments.
Buyers need those mechanics, not a general testimonial.
Technical explainer tied to a platform feature
Buyer requirement
Point them to a working capability or published specification, and provide a product or documentation contact who can keep the details accurate.
Posts explain how iOS 27 notification prioritization depends on supported languages, how a control group measures incremental lift, and how web popups feed a messaging stack.
Each describes how the feature works and what it changes for the app team, so buyers must be ready to answer follow-up questions, not just approve copy.
Benchmark or pricing post aimed at a buying decision
Buyer requirement
Supply figures you are willing to see quoted publicly, plus someone to keep them current.
One post quotes a push-only plan at $7 per 1,000 monthly active users and links a live pricing calculator; another builds an argument on AppsFlyer's e-commerce report and its 92% iOS remarketing figure.
Prices and third-party statistics go stale, so the buyer needs a refresh owner.
Campaign example with measured results
Buyer requirement
Supply the test design and outcome data, including the control arm.
The reviewed gaming example gives treatment and control group sizes, treatment and control conversion rates, the uplift, the confidence level, and the number of purchases attributed to messaging.
These posts show what happened both with and without the message, so a case study without a holdout will not fit.
Post paired with a longer hosted resource
Buyer requirement
Have a destination ready, such as a documentation page, a full write-up, or a gated explainer; several posts point readers to one. The buyer must ensure the page exists, is reachable, and matches the post's claim.
Yes for a mobile app growth platform planning a content collaboration on CRM retention.
Read more
A webinar or article series on managing user inactivity and pre-deletion signals fits the subject Ilja Torski develops most fully, and they already write about it in a structure that transfers to a series.
The substance is specific.
They distinguish two states that retention dashboards often merge: a user who has gone quiet but still has the app installed, and a user who has decided to leave.
A fitness-app comparison makes the difference concrete: four workouts last month and none this month is inactivity; four workouts followed by two visits to the settings page and ten days of silence is a pre-deletion signal.
They recommend segmenting by depth and pattern rather than recency alone, routing settings visits, cancellation pages and unresolved support tickets into a separate, immediate-intervention track instead of a routine re-engagement flow.
They also spell out where win-back does not pay: email and SMS recovery work best in high-intent categories such as fintech and fitness; for entertainment or utility apps, prevention is the play.
A second session or article could draw on their measurement work.
Their control-group example — 80,000 users in treatment against 8,500 in control, 5.60% against 4.20% conversion, a 33.3% uplift at 95% confidence and 1,120 purchases attributed to messaging rather than all 4,480 treatment conversions — gives the collaboration a numbers-first piece on proving what a campaign actually caused.
Their posts also reach beyond lifecycle marketers: the argument that CRM results should feed app-store messaging, the iOS 27 notification-prioritisation language gap, and the B2B2C distributor story at Hussle Technology offer different entry points without changing the core promise.
Two qualifications matter to the decision.
Their published work runs through Pushwoosh, the customer engagement platform they write about, so a competing platform should expect a product-linked rather than vendor-neutral treatment.
The only audience figure available is 12,146 LinkedIn followers, observed on 8 October 2026.
Ask for audience composition and verified reach before treating it as a fit.
When to choose a specialist
No for a consumer brand seeking a paid creator partnership built on short-form video and verified audience reach.
Read more
The posts do not support that decision.
Before committing spend, a buyer would need evidence of suitable formats, a way to scope and price the placement, and audience data.
All eleven posts are text.
They offer no example of Torski presenting on camera, hosting a session or carrying a format longer than a post.
There is no sponsorship policy, media kit, rate card or inquiry route, so there is no basis for scoping or pricing a paid placement.
The published formats are shaped around a platform's own product and clients rather than a brand's consumer audience.
Follower count is available, but not audience demographics; ask for audience composition before planning a campaign aimed at a defined consumer segment.
A second, narrower mismatch is worth flagging.
Torski's posts start with one statistic or client situation, then develop it through steps and industry examples.
A request for open-ended commentary or a general quote, without a data point, test result or named deployment, gives them little to build on and is unlikely to deliver the specific retention advice the request calls for.
A worked campaign example
A worked angle for the mobile app growth platform: a two-article series plus a 45-minute webinar, published as "The ten days before deletion."
Article one, "Inactive is not the same as leaving," opens with the two-state distinction and the two figures Torski uses — 62% of installed apps going unused in a given month, and over half of downloads uninstalled within 30 days — then walks through the fitness-app comparison.
It turns the example into a working exercise: readers classify their own inactivity segments by depth and pattern, not recency, and mark which are pre-deletion signals.
Article two, "Did the message do anything?," uses the gaming control-group result to show how to size a holdout, read uplift and report messaging return internally.
Torski's other use cases — subscription re-engagement, e-commerce cart and post-browse triggers, fintech feature adoption — become short scenarios.
The webinar, "From signal to intervention," brings the two together: how to define the pre-deletion trigger category, what immediate intervention looks like at each stage compared with a standard re-engagement flow, and the economics of prevention versus win-back.
It can include Torski's caveat that recovery works best in high-intent categories and rarely justifies the effort in entertainment or utility apps.
For a forward-looking segment, the agentic-commerce post supplies a panel hook — messaging shifting from persuasion to protocol when AI agents make purchases — while the iOS 27 language gap offers a short audit exercise: check what share of their iOS users sit outside the 16 supported languages before building strategy around the feature.
The partner supplies a real deployment and a client willing to be named, a test design with holdout data, someone to keep quoted figures current, and a hosted destination for the links the posts point to.
Torski brings the framework, industry examples and closing-question format, turning each piece into a discussion prompt rather than a statement.
Suitable success measures include webinar registrations and attendance, article completion, and qualified follow-up conversations with the audience Torski addresses: app growth, CRM and lifecycle teams.
Choose Meilech Biller when a collaboration needs someone who builds and runs lifecycle email systems hands-on, including the AI-assisted operational layer behind them, and when the audience is ecommerce- or agency-side rather than a mobile app team.
Read more
Their posts show Claude-built CRM and project systems, a client onboarding flow with custom forms, documents and emails, automatic task creation, a daily AI review of leads across CRM, projects, WhatsApp and email that decides the next action, and client-facing tools such as a Klaviyo deliverability dashboard.
For a series on running retention operations, the operational detail is the draw: how flows get built, how leads get worked and what a new-client onboarding actually contains.
A second post shows the pre-launch state — welcome flow, browse and cart abandonment, campaigns built and waiting on stock — useful for a campaign about the work between signing and going live.
The tradeoff is distance from the buyer's core question.
Biller's material is ecommerce- and email-first; it does not cover mobile app retention, push notifications, in-app behaviour or pre-deletion signals.
A brief on managing user inactivity and pre-deletion signals would need another contributor for the app-side framework, leaving Biller to speak to operations rather than retention signals.
Choose Oliver Yuwen when the collaboration needs early-warning churn thinking and measurement discipline — the two areas closest to Torski's own ground.
Read more
One post argues that a "we miss you" email after churn is wasted spend, then walks through predictive decay signals, an engagement cliff defined as the number of inactive days that precede cancellation, and a value-first intervention triggered at half that threshold; the line "don't save the subscription; save the habit" is the kind of framing a webinar audience remembers.
The other post is a worked attribution example: a $14M outdoor apparel brand where Klaviyo claimed $1.8M in email revenue against $1.1M in Shopify email-originated orders, resolved by pulling orders, ad spend, email events and session data into a warehouse and deduplicating — email landed near $803K and paid channels showed a 4.2x blended return.
That pairs directly with a session on proving what messaging actually caused.
The tradeoff is context: Yuwen's examples are ecommerce and DTC, not mobile apps, and the measurement angle is attribution and warehouse deduplication rather than holdout test design for push campaigns. Their posts also close with a contact link for a consultancy, so a competing platform should expect a service-led rather than platform-neutral framing.
Choose Conor Gallagher when the collaboration wants a brand operator's first-hand account of how email sits inside a paid-media system, told from the P&L rather than from the retention tool.
Read more
They run a supplement brand and write as an owner: email is not a standalone revenue channel but an efficiency tool that fights the natural decay of Meta performance as audiences get colder; the popup runs on the home page only, deliberately without an extra discount, to avoid the bounce-rate hit that pushes CPMs up; pre-purchase flows follow the winning ad angles; and three campaigns a week go to different segments for new customers, second orders and subscriptions. For an audience that buys media, that operator view offers a different and useful angle.
The tradeoff is narrowness and platform distance.
The material covers one brand's email, popup and Meta decisions, not mobile apps, push notifications or lifecycle signals.
A series on user inactivity and pre-deletion signals would use Gallagher as the commercial-efficiency counterpoint, not the retention subject; ask another contributor to provide the app-side retention framework.
This profile draws on the full text of eleven LinkedIn posts from Ilja Torski, alongside the identity, overview, ideas, relationships, discovery and fit sections.
The posts cover retention and churn prevention, push notification strategy under operating-system and AI-driven change, incrementality measurement with holdout groups, post-purchase and delivery communication, and one B2B2C client story.
For comparison, it also draws on LinkedIn posts by Meilech Biller, Oliver Yuwen and Conor Gallagher.
The dates associated with the posts run from 22 October 2025 to 24 September 2026; the post text itself carries no dates.
The posts are text only: no video, webinar or long-form article bodies appear here, no audience-demographics data appears here, and no published sponsorship, media-kit or rate-card terms appear in the posts.
Follower count is a scale indicator, not a measure of audience composition.
The profile does not establish signature books, shows or earlier career details, and that remains an open gap.