Tulsi Kewat

Most brands take about two weeks to ship three static banners and one generic video.

• By then, the audience has seen the ads several times, frequency has spiked and costs have doubled — so the brand blames targeting when the real constraint is how quickly it replaces creative.
• The alternative is one person handling competitor research, review mining, scriptwriting and static design fast enough to stay ahead of fatigue, with results framed in ROAS and CAC terms.
• Kewat also treats static ads as a deliberate parallel track, keeping tests running when video editors are unavailable or the video pipeline runs dry, rather than as a lesser fallback to video.

A scaling brand hits a wall, and the media buyer blames the Facebook algorithm. Kewat compares the brand's creative engine to a bicycle racing sports cars and cites a rebuild that moved ROAS from 1.5x to 4x as the payoff for fixing the system.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3 · Original 4

The job is to read low-star and angry reviews — often late at night — and lift the complaint's exact phrasing into the ad's opening line, then resolve it with the product.

• This starts the copy with what buyers actually say at 2 AM, not product features or brand language.
• A specific, uncomfortable detail makes viewers stop.

A customer review complaining that a product broke after two washes, or an angry note about a broken zipper or shrunken fabric, becomes the script's shocking first line instead of a feature claim.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3 · Original 4 · Original 5

To break the pattern, an ad should read as an honest admission: open on a raw, specific problem, hold attention with a curiosity loop, introduce the product as the only logical fix, prove it with a real test, then tell people exactly where to click. The named failure mode is opening on a brand logo and a polite corporate line.

An account with doubled CAC whose video opened with a logo and the line "Introducing our new luxury collection". Kewat's counterexample opens on a ruined batch of stock that a customer flagged for a hidden flaw — showing the mistake rather than hiding it.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3 · Original 4

They describe agencies wrapping simple ideas in layers of metaphor to look clever while the founder loses money because nobody understands the product.

• The standard: a line a twelve-year-old grasps instantly.
• The test is blunt: if a script needs a manual or a dictionary, it is already dead on arrival.
• Readability drives conversion; clarity is the mechanism, not a nicety.

The angry-review opening works only in plain speech. Kewat contrasts scripts drafted with "fancy corporate words" in a quiet conference room with the plain language people actually type on a website at 2 AM.

Read original · Original 2

They say to read the Meta Ad Library for unaddressed objections and messaging gaps — angles competitors overlook — rather than copy whatever is spending most heavily. The aim is to build concepts around what the category is not saying, complementing review mining: one source of angles is the buyer, the other the competitor's blind spot.

Kewat's first step in a four-step system for taking over a brand's creative engine is a deep dive into the Meta Ad Library for ruthless competitor research and messaging gaps.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3

They write that they treated LinkedIn as a content game for a long time, chasing impressions and engagement from people unconnected to revenue, and now call that a trap.

• Their revised view: LinkedIn works as a B2B client-acquisition channel when the writing addresses the operational problems of D2C founders and agency directors, and real business happens in direct messages.
• This post focuses on their own pipeline rather than client creative work.

The trade-off: one thousand targeted connections over one hundred thousand empty followers, and a single conversation with a brand owner over a thousand likes from other marketers.

Kewat describes changing their own practice: moving from chasing impressions and vanity metrics on LinkedIn to using it as a networking and client-acquisition channel.

Read original

It is the fastest way to check whether the work matches a brief that needs research and production rather than copywriting alone.

The post pushes back on the idea that a performance creative strategist just writes ad scripts.

• Kewat lists the tasks they describe doing for D2C brands: reading Meta Ad Libraries to find market gaps, mining one and two star reviews late at night for consumer complaints, writing direct-response scripts meant to stop a scroll in 0.2 seconds, building static ads when video production stalls, and analyzing edits frame by frame while managing client expectations.
• They describe the role as a mix of data analyst, behavioral psychologist, media buyer's partner and project manager, and cite ROAS moving from 1.5x to 4x as the payoff.

For brands planning a campaign

If the need is only for a script, this is more scope than required.

• If the need is a research-to-production pipeline covering statics and video, this list is a usable starting point for a statement of work.
• The ROAS figure is Kewat's own summary; ask for the underlying campaign data.

It is the clearest statement of how Kewat says an engagement runs from research to delivered assets.

The post sets out four numbered steps Kewat says they run when taking over a brand's creative engine: competitor research in Meta Ad Libraries to find messaging gaps, mining one and two star reviews for frustrations buyers do not say out loud, writing scripts engineered to stop the scroll in 0.2 seconds, and building static ads described as accurate mirrors of the buyer.

• They frame the output as research-backed direct-response strategy rather than copywriting or design.
• Nearly the same four steps appear in other posts, making this a settled pitch rather than a one-off.

For brands planning a campaign

Use the four steps as a scoping checklist.

• Ask which ones Kewat owns, which ones your team keeps, and what evidence is handed over at each handoff, such as review quotes or competitor ad examples.
• Ask to see review-mining notes from a past project to verify the research step.

The post opens with a scaling brand that hit a wall and a media buyer blaming the Facebook algorithm.

• Kewat says the algorithm is fine and the creative engine is the problem.
• They describe most brands as taking two full weeks to produce three static images and one video, by which point the audience has seen the ads repeatedly and costs have doubled.
• The image used is a bicycle racing sports cars.
• A second post makes the same argument in nearly identical wording, suggesting this is Kewat's standard pitch to brands with slowing performance.

For brands planning a campaign

Velocity is the organising claim of Kewat's offer, so test whether the promised production cadence is realistic for your brand and how it holds up when a video pipeline stalls. Ask how many concepts per week is a normal output and what happens when a testing round fails.

It also gives a named structure you can apply to your own ads before any conversation.

Kewat describes a founder whose CAC had doubled and whose ad account had gone quiet.

• The ad opened with a brand logo and a polite line introducing a new luxury collection.
• They argue nobody cares about a logo at midnight and that an ad should open with a raw problem, such as a customer complaining about a broken zipper, a bad smell or a failed delivery.
• The line used is that the best ads do not look like commercials, they look like a confession.
• The suggested structure: show the mistake, open a curiosity loop, bring the product in as the only logical fix, close the loop with a real test, and tell people where to click.

For brands planning a campaign

Usable as a creative review rubric, especially for the first three seconds and the confession structure. A brand could ask Kewat to tear down its current top-spending ads as a small paid test before committing to a longer engagement, producing a comparable sample of their thinking rather than a pitch.

The argument is that ads looking like every other post get deleted by the viewer's brain, so an ad cannot just be good; it has to break the pattern of the feed.

• The example is opening a video with a ruined batch of stock after a customer pointed out a hidden flaw, which Kewat says stops the scroll because it reads as an honest confession rather than corporate polish.
• The post then describes introducing the product as the fix, testing it, and telling people where to click.
• The same confession example appears in the teardown post, so read the two pieces together.

For brands planning a campaign

On-pattern versus off-pattern openings become a testable variable, not just a style preference. A brief can fund a hook test that deliberately contrasts a polished opening with a problem-first opening and measures which holds attention, keeping the creative argument accountable to data.

Kewat criticises agencies that write scripts in corporate language, build large strategy decks and wrap simple ideas in metaphors to look clever, while the founder loses money because nobody understands the product.

• They advocate painful clarity and brutal simplicity.
• The example is an angry review about a broken zipper or shrunken fabric turned into a shocking opening line a twelve-year-old understands, with curiosity built from there.
• The line used is that a script requiring a manual is dead on arrival.
• A later post repeats the point with a two star review about a product that broke after two washes.

For brands planning a campaign

This is a standard you can test rather than discuss.

• Ask for a rewrite of one of your existing scripts in plain language, then judge whether it is clearer and still persuasive.
• Because the idea repeats across posts, expect consistency in the answer.
• Treat the rewrite as an opening, not a finished ad; ask for a full script before judging the finished work.

Kewat says they spent a long time treating LinkedIn as a content creation game, chasing impressions and engagement from people with no connection to revenue—a trap.

• They argue LinkedIn works as a B2B networking and client acquisition channel when you address the operational problems of D2C founders and agency directors.
• One thousand targeted connections matter more than one hundred thousand empty followers; a single conversation with a brand owner beats a thousand likes; and business happens in direct messages.
• This describes their own pipeline, not client work.

For brands planning a campaign

Relevant if you are considering Kewat as a distribution or content partner rather than only a creative vendor, because it sets expectations about how they sell and where their attention sits. It also explains the outreach pattern in the other posts, where most pieces end with an invitation to a direct message or a comment.

Kewat describes a common failure pattern: a brand takes two weeks to ship three static banners and one generic video, by which point frequency has spiked, audiences have seen the ads repeatedly and costs have doubled.

• The alternative is a single person who researches competitors, mines reviews, writes scripts and builds statics quickly enough to stay ahead of fatigue.
• Results are framed in ROAS and CAC terms, including one account where ROAS is said to have moved from 1.5x to 4x on a rebuilt system.

For brands planning a campaign

This is the clearest problem Kewat claims to solve. A brand with a working offer but a stalled or slow creative pipeline should ask for a proposed weekly output cadence and examples showing how many new angles are produced and tested per cycle, rather than judge on follower count.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4

Examples include a broken zipper, shrinking fabric, a bad smell and a failed delivery.

• The complaint becomes the opening problem, and the product is reintroduced as the fix.
• The stated value is that the copy starts from what buyers actually say rather than product features or brand language.

Mine one- and two-star reviews for the exact phrasing of a product failure, use it as the ad's opening line, then resolve the problem with the product and a clear reason to buy.

For brands planning a campaign

Best suited to categories with a large existing review corpus and repeat purchases or considered purchases; less applicable to a new product with little review history. Ask which review sources would be mined for a specific brand and how complaints that cut against the brand would be handled.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4 · Source 5

One post lists this as the first step when handed a brand's creative engine. The aim is to find angles competitors are ignoring, not to copy the highest-spending ad.

Review competitor ads in the Meta Ad Library, identify unaddressed objections or claims, and build new ad concepts around those gaps.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful for a brand in a crowded category where most competitors converge on the same claims. Ask for a short written readout of the gaps identified in the brand's category and how those gaps would shape the first test batch.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3

The sequence opens with a raw, specific problem, holds the viewer with a curiosity loop, introduces the product as the only logical fix, proves it with a real test and points to a clear next click.

• The named failure mode is an ad that opens on a brand logo and a polite line such as "Introducing our new luxury collection."
• Kewat also frames the goal as breaking the feed's boring pattern, for example by showing a ruined batch of stock after a customer flagged a flaw.

For brands planning a campaign

Evaluate against the brand's current top-of-funnel hook. Ask for a rewrite of one existing underperforming ad using this structure, then compare it with the ad currently running.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4

Statics are presented as a deliberate system, not a fallback, providing speed and depth alongside video scripts.

For brands planning a campaign

Relevant for brands whose video output is capacity-constrained or expensive to scale. Ask how static concepts are developed and tested relative to video, and whether statics are used to validate angles before investing in video.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4

The standard is a line a twelve-year-old understands instantly; if a script needs a manual or a dictionary, it has already failed. This applies to both the ad copy and how the work is presented to the client.

For brands planning a campaign

Expect short, concrete communication and resistance to elaborate strategy documents. A brand that wants substantial deck deliverables should confirm how those requests would be handled.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

It addresses D2C founders, bootstrapped brand owners and agency directors, asking them to comment or connect.

This post describes Kewat's business development: treating LinkedIn as a B2B networking and client-acquisition engine rather than a content game.

For brands planning a campaign

Expect initial contact and scoping to happen through direct messages. Ask for a working sample or test brief rather than relying on post engagement as evidence of creative quality.

Examples: Source 1

Wasim's account of a hair-care brand whose ads spoke almost entirely to existing customers, causing ROAS to fall as spend rose, makes the same case as Kewat's: the account needed better creative direction, not a bigger budget.

Wasim's material focuses on the business side of marketing — choosing a niche, writing an offer people understand in ten seconds, fixing a LinkedIn profile and landing a first client — and walks through client conversations in progress.

• Kewat stays closer to making the ad itself: what goes in the opening line, how reviews and competitor libraries supply angles, and how scripts and statics get produced fast.
• Follow Wasim for positioning and client acquisition, Kewat for creative craft.

Read original · Original 2

Their notes on what's missing from a brief, scriptwriting designed to create ROAS, and using AI for research while preserving writing instinct overlap directly with Kewat's focus on hooks, briefs and the plain-language test.

Holley's vantage point is the creator side: filming, mentoring UGC creators, running a creator community, building creator programs for brands and advocating performance-based compensation.

• Kewat addresses the brand's ad account and the strategist inside it.
• Choose Holley to understand creator programmes and UGC talent; choose Kewat for direct-response strategy on the account.

Read original · Original 2

Rafiq's list of ways to fail as a media buyer — expecting day-one sales, chasing vanity metrics, mistaking one winner for expertise and stopping learning — echoes Kewat's insistence that results come from a repeatable creative system, not from blaming the algorithm.

Rafiq writes from the perspective of a media buyer and account manager: campaign behaviour, testing discipline, patience with data and process over shortcuts.

• Kewat's posts focus on messaging and production — what the ad says, where the opening line comes from and how quickly new versions reach the account.
• Follow Rafiq for buying and measurement, Kewat for creative and copy.

Read original · Original 2

In the material reviewed, a hair care brand arrived describing a scaling issue and left with a creative-funnel diagnosis: roughly a quarter of its creatives were built for people who already knew the brand, with little aimed at unaware or problem-aware buyers.

• Kewat's method assumes the bottleneck is how fast hooks get written and shipped; this alternative starts a level up, deciding which awareness stage each ad should speak to before a script exists.
• Waleed is the stronger pick when a brand has plenty of creative volume but most of it talks to warm audiences, or when the deliverable is a written funnel map and creative direction by awareness stage rather than a weekly batch of scripts.

The tradeoff is throughput and hook craft.

• Tulsi Kewat's posts describe funnel diagnosis and an audit offer, not a high-velocity script-and-static pipeline or complaint-mining process; they include no worked script or static example.
• Waleed also writes for marketers building a career, covering positioning, offer clarity and getting a first client.
• That is useful context, but not the service a brand is buying.
• Two posts is a narrow base, with no ad examples, campaign data or client names.
• Check the funnel claim in the same paid test batch that would test Kewat.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts describe brand-side work sourcing and hiring creators, building creative strategy, mentoring newer creators, and running focused creator programs on a performance-compensation platform, alongside named brand collaborations from the creator side.

• If a D2C brand has no reliable supply of on-camera talent, no briefs a newer creator can act on, or no way to pay creators against performance, this covers ground Kewat's posts do not.
• Kewat writes scripts and builds statics; Terri works on the pipeline that feeds them—briefs, talent and feedback loops—and has stood on both sides by filming UGC and hiring creators.

The tradeoff is the shape of the engagement and how directly the ad account improves.

• Terri's posts concern creator sourcing, briefing, mentoring and training, not running a brand's Meta testing budget or diagnosing a stalled account.
• They include no account-level ROAS or CAC example.
• The offering leans toward training and community for UGC creators, plus managing creator programs.
• A brand wanting one person to own strategy through to shipped scripts and statics should expect to keep part of that work in house or with another partner.
• The posts cover two posts, with no priced program terms or client-side results available.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts are written from a media buyer's seat: managing Meta ads for eCommerce clients, treating results as built rather than found, resisting day-one panic, ignoring vanity metrics, and testing patiently enough to gather usable data.

• Kewat's posts position that role as a media buyer's best friend—a creative partner rather than the person holding bidding, structure or budget.
• If the need includes deciding budget moves and campaign structure when costs climb, that is Rafiq's stated territory and a gap in Kewat's posts.

The tradeoff is depth on creative concepts.

• The posts describe how to run and judge media buying well, but do not show complaint mining, hook writing or static architecture—the specific output Kewat's method produces.
• The account also describes a short career path, several failed ventures, then Facebook Ads, then managing six- to eight-figure clients.
• The discipline argument is coherent, but the results are self-reported, as with Kewat.
• Two posts is a narrow base.
• Ask for ad examples, client names and campaign figures for either comparison.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2