Steve Prior writes about B2B marketing, especially for defence and security. The posts focus on making technical messages clearer, tailoring them to different buyers, and using stories, humour and emotion to help marketing stand out.
2.6K followersB2B marketingBased on 13 posts · latest Oct 2026
Steve Prior is most useful for clearer technical B2B messaging, audience-specific framing and more human defence marketing.
Best for
Brands or campaigns needing thought leadership on simplifying technical messaging for defence and industrial clients.
Not for
Broad-reach paid sponsorship for generic enterprise software aimed at all B2B decision-makers.
Key takeaways
Defence buying chains are not one audience; each role has different concerns.
SUV signals a benefit even if buyers do not know the letters.
B2B facts still need story and emotion for professional buyers.
Check first: Confirm commercial terms, audience demographics, engagement data and a business contact route.
Main ideas
Make technical language meaningful to people outside the industry · Adapt the message to each audience in the buying chain · B2B facts still need story and emotion
Steve Prior writes about B2B marketing, with a particular focus on defence and security.
Their posts argue that technical marketing should be clear, relevant to its readers and memorable—not just packed with facts.
They challenge jargon and one-size-fits-all messaging, and make the case that business buyers respond to emotion as well as logic.
Prior turns broad marketing principles into concrete tests.
In one post, they contrast “SUV,” which can signal a raised, safer-feeling car even when buyers do not know what the letters stand for, with “ADAS,” which may mean little without explanation.
Another post shows why a single defence message cannot serve everyone from frontline users to procurement and local communities: each audience has different concerns, so the framing must change.
Their posts also make a case for humour and creative risk, while a personal Armed Forces Week story about sweetheart brooches adds a reflective note to their defence writing.
These examples make their work useful to readers interested in clearer technical communication, audience-specific messaging and more human B2B marketing.
Steve Prior argues that B2B marketing should be clear, memorable and shaped for the people it needs to reach.
Read more
Technical accuracy matters, but it is not enough: buyers respond to emotion, and different people in a buying chain need different reasons to care.
Make technical language meaningful to people outside the industry
Prior says shorthand familiar to insiders can leave buyers unclear about what a product does or why it matters.
Read more
They don’t object to every acronym: the test is whether the audience already understands the benefit it signals.
Prior contrasts SUV, which they say commonly suggests a bigger, safer, higher car, with ADAS, a catch-all covering features such as lane warnings and proximity sensors. They suggest “advanced driver aids” or “safety aids” as clearer alternatives.
Adapt the message to each audience in the buying chain
One all-purpose message cannot answer the different questions raised by users, procurement, government and local communities.
Read more
Prior’s proposed answer is to keep the core assets but change the context for each audience—not to rebuild the whole story every time.
In defence, Prior says a frontline user wants reliability, while procurement wants compliance and cost discipline. They compare a single message for everyone to a film trying to satisfy horror, anime, romcom and documentary fans at once.
Prior pushes back against the idea that business buyers want only exhaustive, rational detail.
Read more
Facts matter, they argue, but need to be presented in a way that gives people a reason to notice and remember them.
Prior contrasts familiar words such as “new” and “better” with B2B copy built from jargon and vague promises of “efficiency uplift.” In another post, they joke that LinkedIn audiences are treated as if they never choose products for pleasure or respond to stories and comedy.
Take creative risks—and recognise the people who approve them
Prior praises B2B work that is playful and memorable, drawing attention not just to the creative idea but to the client willing to sign it off.
Read more
The example is from insurance, not a defence campaign.
At DSEI, Prior highlights a Hiscox campaign using branding associated with Specsavers, Weetabix and Cillit Bang. They call it fun and memorable, and give special credit to the client team that approved it.
Defence is also a personal subject, not just a marketing category
A more personal post shows a reflective register alongside Prior’s marketing arguments.
Read more
It connects service with the care and support of loved ones, giving readers a sense of their range of writing.
For Armed Forces Week, Prior writes about a collection of sweetheart brooches bought as a child and argues that the love behind them still matters, even as the idea of a “sweetheart” may feel dated.
Explains why jargon creeps into technical marketing and what to do about it.
Read more
This is the clearest statement of how Steve Prior approaches simplifying defence and industrial messaging, making it a good starting point for newcomers.
The post explains that industries develop shorthand over time, usually in the form of acronyms: ABS instead of anti-lock braking systems, ISR instead of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance.
The longer someone works in a sector, the more familiar that shorthand becomes, and social media accelerates the trend.
But familiarity for insiders is not understanding for everyone else.
Steve Prior contrasts SUV, which has come to signal "bigger, safer, higher" to buyers who cannot spell it out, with ADAS, a catch-all for lane departure warnings, proximity sensors and driver alerts that conveys no benefit on its own.
The suggested alternatives are "advanced driver aids" or "safety aids."
Defence collateral, the post says, can end up resembling "a bad scrabble hand."
The closing lines use the same acronym habit to make the point: IYKYK, AFAIK, TTFN.
For brands planning a campaign
A thought leadership series could turn acronym translation into a repeatable editorial format: one common defence or industrial acronym per episode, unpacking who in the buying chain understands it and which buyers need the plain-language version.
Answers how to handle a defence buying chain where different people want different things.
Read more
It is the strongest indication that the simplification work is not only about words, and it directly addresses the need to handle a defence buying chain where different people want different things.
The post names seven audiences and what each wants: a frontline user wants absolute reliability, a desk officer needs compatibility, procurement wants compliance and cost discipline, the Treasury wants justification, politicians want jobs and re-election stories, and local communities want prosperity.
Trying to reach all of them with one message is compared to making a single film for horror, anime, romcom, superhero, spy thriller and documentary fans at once, then being surprised when nobody enjoys it.
The fix is not more complexity but focus: build the core assets, such as the capability story, the demo and the film, then change the context for each audience.
In defence, the post concludes, relevance is earned audience by audience.
For brands planning a campaign
This gives the series a defensible spine: each episode takes one core asset and one audience in the chain, then rewrites the framing for that audience without changing the underlying claims. It also gives the agency a council-friendly argument for producing several framing variants rather than one catch-all deck.
Explains what B2B marketing loses when it strips out emotion, the argument underneath the technical-messaging work.
Read more
Read it before the more tactical acronym and audience pieces.
The post opens with a blunt proposition: if a business is not going to stand out, it should drop its price.
It describes B2B writing as factual to the point of lifelessness, and argues that facts still have to tell a story.
Steve Prior points to B2C vocabulary that has worked for decades: free, new, improved, better.
In B2B, by contrast, readers get jargon, detail and a vague promise of "efficiency uplift."
The closing claim is blunt: professional buyers respond to emotion, always have, and the industry should stop pretending otherwise.
For brands planning a campaign
A useful provocation for episode one: if the message is interchangeable, price is the only differentiator left. The rest of the series can show how simplification and emotional framing help prevent that outcome.
Challenges the assumption that business buyers are purely rational—the belief that makes technical messaging dull and that the rest of the work argues against.
Read more
The post notes that of the huge volume of posts and ads uploaded daily, very few make anyone stop, think or act.
It blames the assumption that people on the platform think and act wholly rationally, then lists the titles that supposedly define them: procurement, administration, finance, marketing, legal, management, C-suite.
It mocks the idea that these people are unlike consumers: they would never choose a BMW for "the ultimate driving machine," wear Chanel or Polo, cry reading Hamnet, laugh at Amandaland or cringe at Jackson Lamb.
Treating buyers as logic-only, the post implies, is why B2B communication is literal and overloaded with detail.
It closes by asking, ironically, whether LinkedIn audiences would ever work, rest and play.
For brands planning a campaign
Gives the series a premise reset: defence and industrial buyers are also people outside the buying chain. Each episode can test a technical message on emotional as well as rational grounds, showing what changes when both are considered.
Shows what Steve Prior praises in practice: a concrete example of the humour and emotional intelligence argued for elsewhere, rather than a statement of principle.
Read more
During a DSEI commute, the post describes finding a Hiscox campaign that is "fun, frivolous and memorable" and calls it simply brilliant.
Hiscox borrowed branding cues associated with Specsavers, Weetabix and Cillit Bang.
The post suggests the first reaction inside a marketing team to that pitch probably was not enthusiasm.
Steve Prior credits the creative team who pitched it, and gives even greater credit to the client team who signed it off.
For brands planning a campaign
For a defence series, this shows the argument is not only about plain language.
It is also about creative risk appetite and who is willing to approve an unfamiliar move.
An episode could examine which B2C creative approaches survive contact with a defence approval process, and what makes sign-off easier.
Shows the personal interest behind the defence marketing commentary: the subject is a long-standing interest, not a topical one.
Read more
The post marks Armed Forces Week as a chance to engage the wider public in the work of service personnel.
Behind the desk is a display of "sweetheart brooches," bought with pocket money about 40 years before the post from Bannister's jewellers in Petesfield for £10.
The purchase took the shop's entire stock, which had sat in the back since the 1940s.
The brooches were worn by the sweethearts of people who had gone to war and represent a range of regiments and services.
The post reflects that love and support for those risking their lives transcends time, and that service people serve to protect those they love.
If you know someone who serves, it says, show them some love every week, not just during Armed Forces Week.
For brands planning a campaign
Signals a genuine, long-running personal interest in defence. For a series judged on credibility with defence audiences, this gives the agency reason to treat the subject as authentic to Steve Prior and to ask what personal material can responsibly anchor the series introduction.
Good creative gets called out, including the client who approved it1
A personal, values-led register is part of the posting mix1
Defence buyers are not one audience
Steve Prior argues that a single piece of communication cannot serve everyone in a defence buying chain.
Read more
The same message is supposedly aimed at a frontline user who wants reliability, a desk officer who needs compatibility, procurement teams who want compliance and cost discipline, the Treasury, politicians chasing jobs and re-election stories, and local communities that want prosperity.
The analogy is a film that tries to satisfy horror, anime, romcom, superhero, spy thriller and documentary fans at once, leaving nobody satisfied.
The recommended fix is to keep the core assets — the capability story, the demonstration, the film — and change the context or frame for each audience.
Breaks down what each buyer values, then uses a genre-mix analogy to show why a catch-all narrative fails.
Prior frames the answer as focus, not complexity: the point is not to write six separate campaigns from scratch. An episode should show the asset being reused, not rebuilt.
For brands planning a campaign
This is the strongest single topic for a thought leadership series on simplifying technical messaging for defence and industrial clients.
An episode could map a real buying chain and show one core asset recast for three or four audiences.
It gives a campaign on the same subject a natural structure: build the core story once, then vary the frame.
Prior traces how industries build shorthand over time — ABS instead of anti-lock braking systems, ISR instead of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance — and warns that it can leak into marketing to audiences outside the habit.
Read more
The sharp example is the contrast between SUV and ADAS.
SUV has become shorthand for a bigger, safer, higher car in most buyers' minds, so the acronym carries a benefit.
ADAS is a catch-all covering lane departure warnings, proximity sensors and attention prompts, so it signals nothing useful.
The suggested fix is wording that conveys meaning and benefit immediately, such as 'advanced driver aids' or 'safety aids'.
Compares two automotive examples — one acronym that has absorbed a benefit, one that has not — then applies the test to defence collateral. Asks what is actually lost by spelling something out.
Prior accepts that some shorthand needs no explanation. The test is whether the audience already attaches a clear benefit to the term, not whether it is an acronym.
For brands planning a campaign
A practical episode or workshop on an acronym audit: take a live defence or industrial asset, list its shorthand, and mark which terms carry a benefit and which are catch-alls. It gives the series a repeatable exercise a client team can run, rather than a general argument about jargon.
Prior says B2B marketing is factual to the point of lifelessness, and that facts still have to tell a story.
Read more
The vocabulary they cite is the classic direct-response set — free, new, improved, better — which B2B rarely uses.
In its place, they see jargon, detail and a vague promise of efficiency uplift.
The blunt version: if you are not going to stand out, drop your price and be done with it.
For brands planning a campaign
Use this as the series' opening provocation: a side-by-side of a lifeless technical paragraph and a version that keeps the facts but adds a story and plain, benefit-led words. It sets up later episodes on segmentation and jargon.
A satirical post about how LinkedIn audiences are treated.
Read more
Prior lists what 'business people' with procurement, finance, legal and C-suite titles are apparently expected not to do: choose an iPhone for its camera, wear Chanel or Polo, cry reading Hamnet, laugh at Amandaland, cringe at Jackson Lamb. The joke is that professional buyers are not a separate species, so communicating with them as purely rational actors in maximum detail is a mistake.
Sarcasm built from a stacked list of consumer behaviours, closed with a rhetorical question ('would they?') that reverses the premise.
For brands planning a campaign
A short, quotable piece that challenges a client team's assumptions before the practical episodes. It also shows how Prior writes when they want to provoke rather than instruct, which matters if the brand wants debate rather than polished advice.
Good creative gets called out, including the client who approved it
Reporting from a defence and security event, Prior highlights a Hiscox insurance campaign that borrowed the branding of Specsavers, Weetabix and Cillit Bang.
Read more
They call it fun, frivolous, memorable and simply brilliant, and credit both the creative team who pitched it and the client team who signed it off. They note it arrived against their own repeated argument that B2B marketing lacks the humour and emotional intelligence of B2C work.
A close reading of a live campaign that tests a standing argument in the opposite direction: Prior reports being surprised, not confirmed.
Prior praises an insurance campaign seen during a defence event, not a defence client's work. Position the episode as an outside example, not a sector case study.
For brands planning a campaign
A concrete, contemporary example of brave B2B creative in an adjacent sector, and a ready-made angle on approval risk: client sign-off is treated as a bigger achievement than the idea. It also shows Prior publicly praising named work, which matters if the brand wants its campaigns discussed.
A personal, values-led register is part of the posting mix
For Armed Forces Week, Prior writes about a small display of sweetheart brooches behind the desk.
Read more
They bought them with pocket money about forty years ago, when a jeweller was closing and sold the shop's entire remaining stock for ten pounds. They explain what the brooches were and who wore them, acknowledge that the idea can now seem twee, and argue that the underlying idea of love and support for people risking their lives still holds.
A first-person memory anchored to a physical object, using the explicit paradox of love in a week about armed forces to carry the point.
This is not a marketing-advice post, so use it as evidence of the range of what Prior publishes, not as a method for client work.
For brands planning a campaign
A quieter, first-person mode that could close a series or carry a remembrance or people-focused episode. It is also the clearest evidence that military service and its human side matter to Prior personally, which a defence client may value in a collaborator.
The posts are short, argument-led LinkedIn pieces.
Read more
Recurring devices include a blunt opening claim or question, a two-sided comparison, a small numbered or listed set of items delivered as one-line paragraphs, and a closing acronym or quip (IYKYK, AFAIK, TTFN in the jargon post). Direct address to the reader is constant, and the pieces are written to be read in one pass rather than as long-form essays.
For brands planning a campaign
A series in this register will suit short episodes with one clear claim each, a comparison or example in the middle, and a closing line that lands. Long technical explainers in their voice would need a different format from the one visible here.
The six LinkedIn posts reviewed document no sponsorship, client, employment, affiliate, investment or owned-business relationship for Steve Prior.
Read more
The material is commentary and teaching about B2B marketing, defence messaging, jargon and creativity, and cites companies as examples rather than partners.
Hiscox, Specsavers, Weetabix, Cillit Bang, BMW, iPhone, Chanel and Polo illustrate arguments about emotional versus rational B2B communication.
They posted from the DSEI defence and security event, placing them in the defence marketing world they write about; no sponsorship or commercial tie is stated.
No dates are available, so ask for confirmation of any current commercial relationships.
DSEI
Mention
Prior posted from DSEI, describing the campaign they saw on the commute into the event and promising further defence and security coverage.
Read more
The post shows attendance and topical proximity to the defence industry; it does not disclose a sponsorship, exhibitor arrangement or commercial relationship.
Steve Prior writes short, argument-led LinkedIn posts on making B2B and defence marketing clearer, more human and better aimed at decision-makers.
Read more
In a post on acronyms and jargon, they distinguish shorthand that conveys a benefit from catch-all terms that obscure it.
Another post breaks a defence buying chain into the needs of users, desk officers, procurement, Treasury, political stakeholders and the community.
Their creative posts make the case that B2B creative can be memorable and business buyers are not a separate species from consumers.
Tags point to specific threads: technical messaging, defence marketing, B2B creative and short-form commentary.
For defence-sector guidance, Albina Kolomiets maps routes into UK Defence for SMEs.
For enterprise technology and supply chain, Carly Macmeikan writes about generative AI and aerospace and defence events.
For B2B technology skills and operations, Winston Hewitt writes about crossing skill borders and warehouse automation.
B2B marketingDefence marketingTechnical messagingAudience segmentationB2B creative and advertisingJargon and acronymsBrand voice and copyDefence and security sectorShort-form commentaryLinkedIn postsB2B marketing teamsDefence marketing teams
Albina Kolomiets
Albina Kolomiets writes practical guidance for UK defence-sector readers.
Read more
The posts map routes into UK Defence for SMEs and connect defence technology development with the commercial capabilities needed to sell and scale it.
The subject is procurement routes, exporting, investment and commercial scaling for defence SMEs—not marketing language, audience messaging or creative communication.
Carly Macmeikan writes about defence and aerospace audiences and how technology is changing the sector.
Read more
The posts cover generative AI in supply chain processes and aerospace and defence presence at Farnborough.
The focus is enterprise technology transformation and supply chain applications from a consultancy standpoint, rather than B2B marketing copy, acronyms or campaign creative.
Winston Hewitt writes about how B2B technology and professional roles are changing.
Read more
The posts cover crossing skill borders in sales, cybersecurity and AI, as well as warehouse automation reaching mid-market operations.
The focus is technology skills, cybersecurity, SaaS and supply chain operations—not defence marketing communication or simplifying technical messages for buyers.
For a thought leadership series on simplifying technical messaging for defence and industrial clients, Steve Prior’s posts support a niche relevance test, not a broad-reach placement.
Read more
The only measured audience number is their LinkedIn follower count: 2,592 on 9 October 2026.
The six complete posts focus consistently on defence and industrial B2B marketing: explaining acronyms and jargon, tailoring messages to different buying-chain roles, and using humour and emotion in B2B.
Before booking, ask for audience survey results or platform demographics covering followers’ employers, occupations, job titles, geography, age and gender, plus recent impressions, engagement and follower growth for comparable technical-simplification and defence/industrial topics and formats.
Use those results to confirm whether the audience matches the agency’s defence and industrial client base.
Steve Prior's posts offer editorial commentary and examples about B2B and defence marketing, but do not document sponsorships, paid collaborations, partnership formats, commercial terms or an official route for brands to inquire.
Read more
Ask for a media kit, sponsorship or collaboration page, rate card or direct business contact to confirm whether opportunities are available.
Brief: a B2B marketing agency wants a thought leadership series on simplifying technical messaging for defence and industrial clients.
Read more
Decision: good fit, subject to two evidence checks.
The strongest match is the direct overlap with the agency's topic.
The six complete posts show Steve Prior arguing that defence buying chains are not one audience: a frontline user wants reliability, a desk officer needs compatibility, procurement wants compliance and cost discipline, the Treasury wants justification, politicians want jobs and re-election stories, and local communities want prosperity.
The proposed fix is to build the core assets once and change the frame for each audience.
That is already the shape of a thought leadership series.
The second match is the practical simplification material.
The acronym post contrasts SUV, which has absorbed a clear benefit for buyers, with ADAS, which covers lane departure warnings, proximity sensors and driver alerts without conveying a benefit; the suggested replacements are 'advanced driver aids' or 'safety aids'.
It also describes defence collateral as vulnerable to what it calls a bad scrabble hand of acronyms.
The agency could turn that into a repeatable episode or workshop: audit a live asset, mark which shorthand carries a benefit and which is a catch-all, then rewrite the catch-alls.
The third match is the underlying argument that facts still need a story and that professional buyers respond to emotion.
The posts say B2B writing is often factual to the point of lifelessness, that B2C vocabulary such as free, new, improved and better has worked for decades, and that B2B readers get jargon, detail and a vague promise of efficiency uplift instead.
That gives the series a premise: simplification is not dumbing down; it makes a technical message usable for the people who have to decide.
The work section also shows Prior praising a Hiscox campaign at a defence event as fun, frivolous, memorable and simply brilliant, and crediting both the creative team who pitched it and the client team who signed it off.
For a defence and industrial series, that suggests they will discuss creative risk and approval, not only word choice.
The personal Armed Forces Week post adds a values-led register and a long-running interest in defence.
Before booking, request platform demographics, audience survey results and recent engagement for comparable defence and technical-simplification topics; the audience section gives only a LinkedIn follower count of 2,592 observed on 9 October 2026, with no occupations, employers, seniority or geography.
If the series is a paid sponsorship, request a media kit, rate card or collaboration terms; the partnerships section documents no sponsorship, paid collaboration or official inquiry route.
When to choose a specialist
Campaign need: a broad-reach paid sponsorship campaign for a generic enterprise software product, aimed at all B2B decision-makers, requiring large measured audience reach, conversion tracking and documented commercial terms.
Read more
Decision: poor fit.
The content is niche and argument-led, covering defence and industrial marketing practice, acronyms, audience segmentation, B2B emotion and creative approval.
It does not show product-specific or bottom-funnel acquisition content for a generic software product.
The only audience figure shown is a LinkedIn follower count of 2,592 observed on 9 October 2026; there are no audience demographics, impressions, engagement rates or follower-growth data.
Request those figures before assessing reach.
The posts also document no sponsorship format, paid collaboration terms, rate card or official inquiry URL.
Request commercial terms and a route for enquiries before treating a standard paid placement as viable.
The visible register is short, argument-led posts with a blunt opening, a comparison and a closing line, rather than conversion-led product campaigns.
To pursue the fit, rebuild the campaign around a specific defence or industrial messaging problem, or first obtain the missing audience and partnership information.
A worked campaign example
Campaign angle: 'Plain language, different frames', a short thought leadership series for defence and industrial clients.
It uses the format visible across the posts: a blunt opening claim, one clear argument per episode, a comparison or example in the middle, and a closing line that lands.
Episode 1: acronym audit.
The agency supplies one live defence or industrial asset.
Steve Prior lists its shorthand and tests each term against the SUV/ADAS distinction: does the acronym already carry a clear buyer benefit, or is it a catch-all that signals nothing?
The episode ends with a plain-language rewrite, for example replacing ADAS with 'advanced driver aids' or 'safety aids'.
Episode 2: one asset, many frames.
Using the seven-audience breakdown from the defence marketing post, the series takes one core asset, such as a capability story, demonstration or film, and shows how the context changes for a frontline user, a desk officer, procurement, the Treasury, politicians and local communities.
The genre-mix analogy carries the explanation: one film cannot satisfy horror, anime, romcom, superhero, spy thriller and documentary fans at once.
Episode 3: facts with a story.
The agency provides a lifeless technical paragraph.
The episode keeps the facts but rebuilds the framing with plain, benefit-led words and an emotional angle, testing the argument that professional buyers respond to emotion and that jargon and efficiency-uplift language do not travel.
Episode 4: getting brave creative signed off.
Using the Hiscox example seen at DSEI, the episode examines approval risk in defence and industrial marketing: the idea may be strong, but client sign-off is the harder step.
A closing or optional episode can use a personal, values-led register around Armed Forces Week if the calendar fits, as an expression of range and credibility rather than a marketing method.
Handoff: the agency brings one real asset and a named buyer panel; Prior produces the episode script and a plain-language rewrite; the client team tests the rewrite with its own buyers.
If the collaboration is paid, confirm the partnership format, terms and audience data before commissioning.
For a campaign aimed at simplifying technical messaging for defence and industrial clients, Albina Kolomiets is the stronger choice when the client's problem is route-to-market clarity rather than word choice.
Read more
The two posts address how small and medium-sized companies enter UK Defence and how defence technology companies build the commercial capability to scale.
One turns a list of defence programmes into a 'where do I start?' guide covering UK Defence Innovation, the Defence Office for Small Business Growth, the MOD Defence Export Team, the SME Defence Export Faculty, the Defence and Security Seed Fund, and the National Security Strategic Investment Fund.
The other argues that once the technology works, the harder problem is selling it: companies need people who understand the customer, open the right doors, handle procurement and capture, build relationships with primes, and lead a commercial organisation.
If the series needs to help a technical defence or industrial client understand which buying route to take and which commercial roles to add, Kolomiets brings that navigation and business-building angle.
These two posts do not demonstrate a repeatable method for simplifying technical language.
The first is a structured signposting guide; the second argues for stronger commercial capability.
Neither shows close reading of a live asset, an acronym audit, or a test of buyer understanding.
Compared with Steve Prior's six posts, which repeatedly work through language choices and audience framing, Kolomiets offers adjacent route-to-market and commercial-scaling content rather than hands-on simplification craft.
Ask for examples of the rewriting method before commissioning a messaging-simplification series.
For a thought leadership series on simplifying technical messaging for defence and industrial clients, Carly Macmeikan is the better choice when the agency wants an enterprise-scale AI and supply-chain angle with a live event hook.
Read more
One post cites Accenture research that generative AI has the potential to automate or augment 58% of supply chain processes across design, engineering, planning, sourcing, procurement, production, and fulfilment.
The other announces Accenture's team at Farnborough International Airshow, with live demos on generative AI for supply chain resilience, engineering, manufacturing, aftermarket operations, and business development.
If the series needs to show a large consultancy's current AI position in defence and industrial supply chains and tie its message to a showcase or airshow, Macmeikan provides that branded, event-linked frame.
The posts are short and largely promotional: one shares Accenture research and an external article; the other promotes an airshow presence.
They do not show a method for simplifying technical messaging, comparing audiences, or rewriting jargon.
They illustrate a topic rather than teach a repeatable writing approach.
They are also the oldest material in this comparison, from 2024, so the agency should check whether the AI and supply-chain examples still reflect current work.
Compared with Steve Prior's close readings of acronyms and buyer segments, Macmeikan offers a company-branded AI theme but not the hands-on language diagnostics the series needs.
For a campaign about simplifying technical messaging for defence and industrial clients, Winston Hewitt is the better choice when the campaign needs a personal-development narrative about technical and commercial skills converging, or an explanation of the mid-market warehouse-automation market.
Read more
One post argues that AI is changing the economics of knowledge work, that job boundaries between sales, engineering, security, and finance are eroding, and that professionals should cross skill borders; it cites passing the CompTIA Security+ exam as part of that effort.
The other explains why mid-market companies are adopting high-end warehouse automation, pointing to modular robotics, easier ERP and WMS integration, and faster time-to-value.
If the series needs to motivate a technical audience to broaden its commercial understanding, or explain an industrial automation shift to mid-market buyers, Hewitt brings those arguments.
Neither post is about simplifying technical messaging for defence and industrial clients.
The first is a professional-development argument; the second is a supply-chain automation analysis.
They do not demonstrate a method for testing acronyms with buyers, tailoring an asset to different audiences, or rewriting technical copy.
Using Hewitt would shift the series from messaging craft toward workforce change or automation adoption; ask for the simplification method separately.
Steve Prior's six posts stay closer to the series' language and audience-framing problem.
Steve Prior's six complete LinkedIn posts cover B2B and defence marketing, acronyms and jargon, audience segmentation, creative work and Armed Forces Week.
The page also includes overview, ideas, brand relationships, discovery and campaign fit sections.
No publication dates appear in the posts, so changes over time cannot be established.
No audience demographics, engagement metrics, media kit, sponsorship terms or partnership inquiry route are published here; those gaps remain open.
