Useful for helping professional services firms link LinkedIn visibility and fee conversations to business outcomes.
Best for
Professional services firms wanting consultant visibility and better fee and payment conversations on LinkedIn.
Not for
Consumer brands or paid creator sponsorship campaigns, especially short-form video for younger buyers.
Key takeaways
Steady repeatable posts can matter more than a handful of viral hits.
LinkedIn profile writing is where fee conversations start.
Lead magnets need acquisition layers, not just a download button.
Check first: Ask for client references and verify audience demographics before committing budget.
Main ideas
Viral posts are not a strategy; the repeatable middle is · Choose formats and opening lines for repeatable attention · A LinkedIn profile is where fee conversations start
Audience
23% Audience senior-level share · 11% Audience director share
Melanie Goodman is a LinkedIn consultant whose work connects content and profile writing to practical business outcomes: visibility, stronger enquiries, and clearer conversations about fees.
In a post analyzing LinkedIn performance, they argue that steady, repeatable posts can matter more than a handful of viral hits.
Other examples show how to describe client outcomes in a profile, build a system around a lead magnet, and treat professional presentation as part of earning trust.
Follow them for practical advice linking LinkedIn activity to how a professional services business wins and serves clients.
Goodman connects marketing choices to business outcomes.
Their LinkedIn analysis separates reach from profile views and highlights the value of the ordinary-performing “boring middle,” rather than treating virality as a plan.
A post on profile writing links explaining client outcomes to justifying fees.
They also share personal business decisions, such as investing nearly £3,000 in a brand shoot, alongside broader advice.
The piece about getting paid up front is a guest article by Vanessa Ugatti, presented for professional services readers.
These examples offer grounded LinkedIn and business-development ideas, rather than platform tactics in isolation.
Melanie Goodman's ideas center on turning LinkedIn and professional-services growth into measurable, repeatable systems.
Read more
The recurring priorities are: study ordinary posting patterns instead of chasing viral spikes; choose formats and opening lines that produce repeatable attention; write profiles around client outcomes so fee discussions feel justified; make upfront payment a deliberate habit; build acquisition layers around lead magnets; and treat visual presentation as part of the product. A detailed payment-collection argument is attributed to guest contributor Vanessa Ugatti, with Goodman providing the framing.
Viral posts are not a strategy; the repeatable middle is
Melanie Goodman analyzed 987 posts over a 365-day period and separated viral posts from what they call the "boring middle."
Read more
Thirty-four viral posts, 3.4% of the total, generated 47% of impressions but often little action: a birthday post with the second-highest impressions produced zero recorded profile views.
By contrast, 590 posts—60% of everything published—landed between 3,000 and 20,000 impressions each and together produced 46.6% of total impressions.
They argue the middle is not a consolation prize but the result, because it is repeatable and can be studied.
A birthday post reached 206,330 impressions but brought zero recorded profile views; a Christmas travel post reached 94,608 and drove 2,289 profile views, the most of anything published that year, without being planned for reach.
An early pass through the data sorted top posts and pointed toward a "copy my viral posts" lesson; Melanie Goodman rejected that conclusion after checking what the viral posts actually did beyond reach.
Choose formats and opening lines for repeatable attention
Melanie Goodman found image posts were both the most-used format and among the strongest performers, and the only format that reliably drove measurable profile views (8.6 per post on average).
Read more
Video and document/carousel posts also outperformed plain text and polls.
Opening lines mattered: posts starting with a specific number or statistic averaged 6,804 impressions, nearly three times the 2,345 average for question openings.
Personal "I" statement openings were the second-strongest hook at 5,333 average impressions.
A number-led opening averaged 6,804 impressions against 2,345 for a question opening; every viral post included a real photo of Melanie Goodman.
A LinkedIn profile is where fee conversations start
Melanie Goodman reports reviewing hundreds of LinkedIn profiles and argues most describe what the person does all day rather than what is different for the client afterwards.
Read more
That gap becomes a fee problem: undercharging, quoting low so the client says yes, and over-servicing until the fee no longer covers the work. They frame the profile as a low-stakes place to practise saying what your work is worth before a real negotiation.
Melanie Goodman recommends Vanessa Ugatti's How to Get Paid Your True Worth and says the prompt led to a re-evaluation of their own profile and fee structure; the post states the book copy was bought and no payment was received to mention it.
Getting paid up front should be a standard business habit
In a guest piece hosted on Melanie Goodman's Substack, Vanessa Ugatti argues that professionals often love their craft but avoid the money conversation, and that getting money on account should become standard practice.
Read more
The piece lists the costs of billing after delivery—lost money, poor cash flow, debt, write-offs, wasted time, and stress—and the benefits of upfront payment: reliable income, better cash flow, reduced debt, more professional standing, and better clients. It also notes that staff may resist the change.
Melanie Goodman's framing uses a personal cautionary story: a client paid on time for a long while, then stopped and owed money to a long list of people. The guest piece by Vanessa Ugatti adds the practitioner's argument, including the line that you do not need to be stung to decide that money on account is simply how you work.
Lead magnets need acquisition layers, not just a download button
Melanie Goodman argues most lead magnets do nothing because a guide sitting on a website with a download button is only step one.
Read more
Clients come from five layers wrapped around the asset; miss them and the PDF is forgotten by Thursday. The newsletter promises concrete steps for each layer so a business implements a system rather than owning one standalone asset.
The post contrasts "a guide sitting on your site with a download button" with the five layers that turn it into a client acquisition system, then asks readers which layer is missing from their setup.
Presentation is part of the product, not a cost beside it
Melanie Goodman argues that prospects read visual signals before they read written claims, so cheap presentation costs more over time than it saves upfront.
Read more
The argument is built from a personal spending decision: a brand shoot booked in the first year when the business account held a fraction of the £3,000 cost, against the sensible instinct to wait and build a buffer.
Before the shoot, enquiries were trickling in despite hours spent on content; within about six weeks after the shoot, enquiries picked up and the calibre of prospects changed. Melanie Goodman also acknowledges vanity and a love of shopping as part of the motivation.
It answers "What content actually builds a LinkedIn presence over time?" with a data-backed method for readers seeking repeatable results rather than viral moments.
Read more
Melanie Goodman analyzed 987 LinkedIn posts over 365 days, generating 3,237,176 total impressions, up 607% year over year.
Thirty-four viral posts (3.4% of the total) produced 47% of impressions but often little action.
By contrast, 590 posts (60%) in the 3,000–20,000 impression range they call the "boring middle" produced 46.6% of impressions and were repeatable.
Image posts drove the most measurable profile views, averaging 8.6 per post.
Posts opening with a specific number averaged 6,804 impressions, versus 2,345 for question openings.
The dataset shows 4,847 profile views from 4,014,179 impressions, roughly a 0.12% conversion.
For brands planning a campaign
A workshop or content plan could train consultants to use number-led hooks, image formats and consistent mid-range posts instead of chasing one-off viral hits.
It answers "What does Melanie Goodman's platform teach about payment collection?" and shows the expert material they publish for professional services firms.
Read more
In this Substack guest piece, Vanessa Ugatti argues that getting money on account should be standard business practice, not an exception.
They list the risks of billing after work (lost money, poor cash flow, debt, write-offs and stress) and the benefits of upfront payment (more reliable income, better clients and professionalism).
The piece also notes that staff may resist the change and need support.
Melanie Goodman hosts it for professionals and business owners who want to charge their true worth and collect it.
For brands planning a campaign
A workshop on payment collection could use this as a starting text, then add LinkedIn visibility tactics to help consultants attract clients who accept upfront terms.
It answers "Does visual presentation really affect B2B client decisions?" with a firsthand spending decision and a measurable business result.
Read more
Melanie Goodman describes spending nearly £3,000 on a brand shoot in their first year, despite sensible instincts to wait.
Before the shoot, enquiries trickled in despite hours of content work.
Within about six weeks after the shoot, enquiries picked up and the calibre changed; prospects no longer had to work out whether the business was legitimate before the call.
The post's lesson: presentation is part of the product, and people read visual signals before words.
For brands planning a campaign
A workshop can include visual identity and profile photography in consultant positioning, linking them to enquiry quality rather than vanity.
Recurring approach: specific numbers, personal stakes, and practical frameworks5
LinkedIn content performance analysis and repeatable formats1
Profile positioning and the fee conversation1
Getting paid up front and cash-flow discipline1
Presentation and brand assets as trust signals1
Lead magnets as client acquisition systems, not standalone downloads1
LinkedIn content performance analysis and repeatable formats
Melanie Goodman analyzed 987 posts published from their account, reporting 4,014,179 impressions and 4,847 profile views in the available text.
Read more
The central finding is the “boring middle”: 590 posts with 3,000–20,000 impressions each produced 46.6% of total impressions, while 34 viral posts produced 47%.
Image posts were the most reliable format for profile views; posts opening with a specific number averaged 6,804 impressions, against 2,345 for question openings.
The method: inspect LinkedIn’s own analytics, sort by outcomes beyond reach, and repeat formats and hooks that work in ordinary posts.
Own-account analytics, format and hook comparisons, and correlations between impressions, profile views and followers.
Melanie Goodman notes that viral posts are real but not a strategy; a Christmas travel post drove the most profile views without being planned for reach.
For brands planning a campaign
A brand can build a workshop or content plan around measurable LinkedIn formats: number-led openings, image posts, personal stakes and a publishing cadence that treats consistent middle-tier posts as the asset rather than chasing virals.
Melanie Goodman reports reviewing hundreds of LinkedIn profiles and argues that most describe what the person does all day rather than what changes for the client.
Read more
That gap can make it harder to justify fees.
A profile offers a low-stakes place to practise stating the value of one’s work.
The post recommends Vanessa Ugatti’s book How to Get Paid Your True Worth; Goodman says they bought the copy and received no payment to mention it.
Profile review and a book-informed exercise linking client outcomes to fees.
For brands planning a campaign
For professional services firms, a practical workshop could rewrite consultant profiles around client outcomes and use that language in fee discussions.
A Substack post presents collecting money on account as a standard business habit rather than an awkward exception.
Read more
It describes professionals who deliver well but avoid the money conversation, then covers the costs of billing after delivery: lost money, poor cash flow, debt, write-offs, wasted time and stress.
The proposed benefits are better collection, cash flow, professionalism and client selection.
The post includes a guest piece from Vanessa Ugatti on the True Worth Methodology, while Goodman frames payment collection as a practice to build deliberately.
Case-based argument, a list of problems and benefits, and a guest practitioner’s explanation.
The detailed methodology is attributed to Vanessa Ugatti in a guest piece; Goodman provides the framing and curation. Ask for the guest piece if you need the methodology.
For brands planning a campaign
A firm can use this as a workshop or content theme on deposit and upfront-payment policies, scripts for raising fees, and reducing late-payment risk.
Melanie Goodman describes spending nearly £3,000 on a brand shoot in their first year, when the business account held a fraction of that.
Read more
Before the shoot, they used a conference photo taken on a friend’s phone, and enquiries trickled in despite their content work.
Within about six weeks of the shoot, enquiries picked up and the calibre changed.
The argument: presentation is part of the product, not a cost beside it, because prospects read visual signals before written claims.
Before-and-after business anecdote with a specific spend and observed outcome.
The post acknowledges vanity and a love of shopping as part of the motivation, presenting a personal experience rather than a controlled test.
For brands planning a campaign
A brand evaluating Melanie Goodman for a professional-services audience can brief a session on visual credibility: when to invest in photography, how presentation affects enquiry quality, and how to connect brand assets to LinkedIn profiles and content.
Lead magnets as client acquisition systems, not standalone downloads
Melanie Goodman argues that most lead magnets do nothing because a guide with a download button is step one, not a client acquisition system.
Read more
Clients come from the five layers wrapped around it; without them, the PDF is forgotten by Thursday. The newsletter breaks down all five layers with concrete steps to help a business implement a system rather than own one standalone asset.
Five-layer framework and newsletter prompt asking which layer is missing.
For brands planning a campaign
A campaign plan can use this topic for a workshop or content series on building distribution and follow-up around an existing lead magnet: the five layers, ownership inside the firm and concrete implementation steps.
Recurring approach: specific numbers, personal stakes, and practical frameworks
Across available posts, Melanie Goodman uses specific numbers and personal stakes as entry points: the 3,237,176 impressions figure, the £3,000 brand shoot, the client who stopped paying, and the five lead-magnet layers.
Read more
They pair first-person business experiences with frameworks, lists, or diagnostic questions. Posts are largely text and image on LinkedIn, alongside longer newsletter pieces on Substack.
First-person anecdote plus a framework, list or diagnostic question.
For brands planning a campaign
A brand can expect direct, numeric and practice-oriented content, suited to professional-services audiences looking for implementation steps rather than abstract thought leadership.
The posts do not disclose sponsorship, affiliate, investment, or client contracts.
Read more
The clearest named relationship is a recommendation of Vanessa Ugatti's book How to Get Paid Your True Worth; the post says the copy was purchased and no payment was received for the mention.
A Substack guest piece by Ugatti also appears in the posts.
Other posts reference platforms and tools without stating commercial relationships.
Ask for details of any contracts or commercial relationships.
Vanessa Ugatti
Mention
Melanie Goodman recommends Vanessa Ugatti's book How to Get Paid Your True Worth, noting that they purchased the copy and received no payment for the mention.
Read more
A Substack guest piece by Ugatti outlines the True Worth Methodology and getting money on account.
Original disclosure
I bought this copy. Nobody sent it to me, nobody is paying me to mention it.
Melanie Goodman writes about using LinkedIn to win clients and handle the money conversations that follow.
Read more
Their analysis of 3.2m impressions shows how ordinary posts, image formats, and number-led openings drive more profile views than viral spikes.
Their profile and payment posts offer practical guidance: write profiles around client outcomes to help justify fees, and make upfront payment a standard habit.
The lead-magnet newsletter and brand-shoot story extend this system to acquisition layers and visual credibility.
Follow the sequence from content performance to profile positioning to payment collection.
LinkedIn content strategyProfessional services growthFee setting and paymentLead magnet systemsPersonal brand presentationLinkedIn analyticsLinkedIn consultingProfessional services marketingContent performance analysisLinkedIn postsNewsletterImage-led postsGuest essaysB2B professional servicesConsultants and advisersBusiness ownersSenior decision-makers
John Soriano
Both diagnose underperforming content or ad creative and develop repeatable variations.
Read more
John Soriano checks hook rate, hold rate, and CTR before killing an ad, then re-cuts one clip into five testable ads. Melanie Goodman compares post formats and opening lines to find repeatable patterns in the ordinary middle of their LinkedIn account.
John Soriano works on paid ad creative for DTC brands, mainly video and UGC editing for Meta and TikTok. Melanie Goodman focuses on organic LinkedIn content and professional-services profiles, with an emphasis on fee conversations and client acquisition for consultants.
Both treat LinkedIn profile presentation as a conversion asset.
Read more
Ibtehaj Ahmed critiques generic banners and offers a who/what/why/how formula. Melanie Goodman argues that brand photography and profile wording shape enquiry quality and the ability to justify fees.
Ibtehaj Ahmed focuses on visual brand systems, LinkedIn banner design, and ghostwriting. Melanie Goodman focuses on content performance analysis, professional-services positioning, and payment collection.
Both teach LinkedIn as a client acquisition channel and emphasize personal profiles over company pages.
Read more
Tim S Dodd writes about humanized outreach to warm up prospects; Melanie Goodman covers content patterns, profile positioning, and payment habits for professional services.
Tim S Dodd centers on outreach systems and an AI SDR-style product for B2B sales teams. Melanie Goodman focuses on organic content performance and the fee conversations that follow profile attention.
For a campaign aimed at professional-services firms seeking to improve consultants’ LinkedIn visibility and payment collection, the audience figures suggest a strong match by seniority and industry.
Read more
Melanie Goodman’s LinkedIn account had 43,965 followers on October 9, 2026.
LinkedIn audience analytics reported in an August 31, 2026 Substack post show 23% senior-level, 11% director and 8% CXO followers.
Leading industries include financial services (16%), consulting (5%) and legal/professional services; London accounts for 20% of the audience.
That mix fits a campaign targeting partners, directors and senior managers in professional services.
The same post reports 3.2 million impressions, a content-performance figure.
For a precise fit check, ask Goodman for recent audience demographics filtered to consultants and fee-earners in payment-collection roles, and whether they have audience survey results if you need employer or occupation verification beyond platform categories.
Audience senior-level share
23%
LinkedIn audience demographics reported by Melanie Goodman · 2026-08-31
Audience director share
11%
LinkedIn audience demographics reported by Melanie Goodman · 2026-08-31
Audience CXO share
8%
LinkedIn audience demographics reported by Melanie Goodman · 2026-08-31
Audience financial services share
16%
LinkedIn audience demographics reported by Melanie Goodman · 2026-08-31
Audience consulting share
5%
LinkedIn audience demographics reported by Melanie Goodman · 2026-08-31
Audience London share
20%
LinkedIn audience demographics reported by Melanie Goodman · 2026-08-31
Melanie Goodman's LinkedIn posts and newsletter pieces show no sponsorship, ambassador, or paid-partnership format.
Read more
They document her own commercial offers—a consulting practice and a free-subscribe newsletter that delivers a 60-page LinkedIn Success Workbook—and one guest-essay slot: a September 2026 newsletter issue gives the main piece to consultant Vanessa Ugatti, writing about getting paid up front for professional services.
Goodman says they were not paid to mention Ugatti's book and do not endorse anything they do not mean.
Before planning a spend, ask for rates and sponsorship tiers, disclosure and approval terms, and a partnership inquiry route.
Treat outreach as an unlisted arrangement to negotiate directly, and confirm scope, deliverables, disclosure wording, and lead times in writing.
Good fit. The brief's two goals — consultant visibility and payment collection — map onto the two strongest themes in the available material, and the audience data matches the buyer a partner-level campaign needs to reach.
Read more
Brief
A professional services firm — a legal and financial advisory practice with roughly 40 partners and fee-earners — wants its consultants to be more visible on LinkedIn and handle fee and payment conversations better. It is commissioning a workshop and a six-week content programme.
Reasons
The reported audience includes the right buyers. Melanie Goodman's LinkedIn demographics show 23% senior-level, 11% director and 8% CXO readers, concentrated in financial services (16%), consulting (5%) and legal and professional services, with London at 20%. A firm selling to partners and directors is speaking to an audience already assembled.
The visibility teaching comes with numbers, not slogans. The 987-post analysis reports 3,237,176 impressions and 4,847 profile views (roughly 0.12% conversion), and identifies repeatable patterns: image posts drove the most measurable profile views, at about 8.6 per post; number-led openings averaged 6,804 impressions against 2,345 for question openings; 590 mid-range posts produced 46.6% of total impressions. Firms can give consultants these instructions and check the results afterwards.
The profile-to-fee link is explicit. After reviewing hundreds of LinkedIn profiles, Melanie Goodman found that most describe what someone does all day rather than what changes for the client — the same gap that surfaces when a fee cannot be justified. They present the profile as a low-stakes place to practise explaining what the work is worth.
Payment collection gets direct treatment. The newsletter's argument for money on account lists the risks of billing after delivery (lost money, poor cash flow, debt, write-offs, wasted time, stress) and identifies staff resistance as the predictable obstacle when a firm changes policy — exactly the challenge a rollout would face.
Caveats
The performance figures come from one self-published analysis of Melanie Goodman's own account, not client campaigns or a controlled test. Treat them as methods to try and measure, not as a forecast of results.
The detailed payment methodology and scripts belong to guest contributor Vanessa Ugatti, whose essay Melanie Goodman published. Any payment module in a workshop would likely be a credited or joint piece, not Melanie's own method.
No client case study, workshop reference or delivered-engagement example appears in Melanie Goodman's posts. Ask for client references before committing budget.
When to choose a specialist
Not a fit based on the available posts.
Read more
Brief
A consumer skincare brand wants to reach 18–34-year-old UK buyers through short-form video and paid creator sponsorship, with placements booked for the next quarter.
Reasons
Audience mismatch. The only audience data shows senior decision-makers in financial, consulting and legal work, with a concentration in London and smaller clusters in Geneva, Zürich and Scotland. That is a business-buyer audience. The available sources do not show consumer reach or consumer-facing content.
Format mismatch. The reviewed output is long-form newsletter essays plus LinkedIn text and image posts. There is no short-form video or product-led or lifestyle content to assess against a video brief.
Commercial format gap. The reviewed accounts show no sponsorship format, rate card, media kit, disclosure policy or partnership inquiry route. A paid placement would have to be negotiated blind, with no published terms to check.
Register mismatch. The content starts from first-person business decisions — an analytics dataset, a nearly £3,000 brand shoot, a client who stopped paying, a five-layer lead-magnet system. A consumer beauty brief needs a different kind of story and proof.
Caveats
Melanie Goodman's posts do not say that sponsorship is never accepted. If the brand still wants to test, confirm scope, deliverables, disclosure wording and lead times in writing before booking.
The reviewer held the second brief deliberately far from the first in audience and commercial format. A B2B brand seeking a paid newsletter placement raises a different question — commercial terms — which can be assessed only after Melanie Goodman publishes or shares them.
A worked campaign example
Angle
"Profile to invoice" — three workshop modules followed by a measured practice period, using the formats and arguments Melanie Goodman has already published rather than generic LinkedIn advice.
Brief
The professional services brief: consultant LinkedIn visibility plus better fee and payment handling, delivered as a workshop with a six-week practice sprint.
Steps
Pre-work, two weeks before the workshop. Each consultant opens LinkedIn's own Audience Demographics panel and brings their reader profile and one anonymised late-payment or fee-negotiation story. The firm agrees its payment policy in writing first, since the material frames money on account as a company decision rather than a personal habit.
Module 1 — formats that travel. Apply the published findings: image posts, openings built on a specific number or personal stake rather than a vague question, and steady mid-range publishing instead of chasing virals. Set a six-week cadence of one post per consultant per week.
Module 2 — profiles that name the client outcome. Rewrite each consultant's headline and About section to focus on what changes for the client rather than what they do all day, then have each consultant say the rewritten sentence aloud as their fee statement.
Module 3 — money on account. Script the conversation for new and existing clients, list the objections the firm will actually face (staff resistance to a changed policy, long-standing clients who always pay), and agree a top-up schedule so no work is delivered unpaid.
Measurement at six weeks. Track profile views and inbound enquiries per consultant, plus the share of new engagements that begin with money on account. Do not use impressions as the scoreboard: the reference data shows 3,237,176 impressions producing 4,847 profile views, so reach alone tells the firm very little.
What to confirm
Ask for client references or examples of delivered workshops.
Confirm how the payment module will be credited, since the detailed method comes from guest contributor Vanessa Ugatti.
Confirm whether Melanie Goodman works with teams of this size and over what period.
Ask for commercial terms; no rate card or booking route is published on the accounts reviewed.
Why it works
The programme answers both halves of the brief, uses published formats and arguments rather than aphorisms, and leaves the firm with a written policy plus six weeks of individual practice data.
When the firm wants outbound pipeline rather than a publishing programme.
Read more
The posts argue that a buyer lands on a person's content, clicks the name, scrolls the profile and forms an opinion before any contact happens.
Companies getting the best results, they say, build personal presence for sales and marketing staff alongside a company page.
That suits a practice whose partners or business-development staff work named prospect lists and need warm approaches, or one that wants a managed outreach operation: the posts describe 11 years of client acquisition work and a LinkedIn outreach service built on it, emphasizing humanising approaches so prospects are warm by the time a call happens.
The posts don't address fees or payment collection, so ask for a separate source on those needs.
Their proof is testimonial rather than measured: they describe consistent high-value meetings and referral-warm calls, and cite a 73% figure about members preferring posts from people over company pages, but publish no account data of their own that readers can check.
The teaching also sits inside promotion of a paid outreach product, so firms buying workshop modules should distinguish what is taught from what is sold.
When the consultants' profiles look interchangeable and presentation is the first fix.
Read more
The posts treat the profile banner as the most-seen piece of real estate a person owns, offer a copy formula—who you help, what you do, why they should care, how to act—and report before-and-after results after replacing generic templates, including a 280% rise in profile views over three weeks and 19 inbound messages for one client. This is the fastest, cheapest slice of the visibility goal and can run before any publishing cadence starts.
It covers one layer.
The posts don't deal with post formats, publishing cadence, audience demographics or fee and payment conversations; ask for the creator's published method or another source to cover the firm's remaining publishing and pricing needs.
The results are per-client anecdotes rather than account-level data a reader can audit, and the offer is design work requested by direct message, so the firm buys a service rather than a reusable method.
Melanie Goodman ties format and opening line to profile views and follower growth across 987 published posts; this alternative's numbers are individual claims.
When the firm's priority is fee-setting and collection rather than visibility.
Read more
The money-on-account method published on Melanie Goodman's newsletter is credited to Vanessa Ugatti.
It covers the risks of billing after delivery, how to answer standard objections, why money on account must be topped up during a project rather than taken only at the start, and why staff resistance is a predictable obstacle when a firm changes policy.
Melanie credits the book How to Get Paid Your True Worth and describes Vanessa Ugatti as working with lawyers and professional services firms on the psychology of charging, so the fee half of the firm's needs traces back to this material.
This is a named source for the fee method, not a fully described alternative.
The material appears here in one guest essay and one post mentioning the book, both published on Melanie Goodman's newsletter.
Vanessa Ugatti's own accounts, talks, rates and delivered engagements aren't described; collect that material before choosing between the two for the payment module.
When the campaign becomes paid short-form video for a consumer brand rather than a professional-services LinkedIn programme.
Read more
The posts offer a cheap diagnostic for ads that appear to have stopped working: check hook rate, hold rate, click-through and conversion in turn, and judge each against the account's own average.
They also provide a re-edit list that turns one raw UGC clip into five testable openers without a reshoot.
That's the practical alternative if the firm ever runs comparable work for a DTC or ecommerce client.
Melanie Goodman's posts don't address LinkedIn, consultant profiles, professional-services buyers or fee conversations, so this alternative answers neither need for a LinkedIn campaign.
Its method also depends on data a LinkedIn programme doesn't produce: hook rate and hold rate come from paid social impressions, and the worked numbers are ad account metrics, not profile views or enquiries.
Choosing it means changing the campaign, not swapping supplier.
Melanie Goodman's Substack and LinkedIn include five items: a long-form analysis of 987 LinkedIn posts over a 365-day period, a guest essay on getting paid up front by Vanessa Ugatti, and three LinkedIn posts on profile writing, lead-magnet systems, and brand photography.
The Substack page is dated 9 October 2026.
The performance analysis ends mid-sentence, so its final patterns are not available.
Individual publication dates for the LinkedIn posts are not stated in the posts here.
No signature books, shows, sponsorship terms, client case studies, or delivered workshop examples appear in the posts here.
Performance figures, audience demographics, and format findings are Melanie Goodman's own reported figures, not independently verified.
Similar-creator comparisons use published posts from John Soriano, Ibtehaj Ahmed, and Tim S Dodd.
The posts here show no sponsorship formats; that does not mean Melanie Goodman never accepts sponsorships.