James Thrasher

Customers also need to get a quote and place an order easily.

• In a post about SendCutSend, they point to instant quoting as part of the company's model, then connect the same challenge to Stella Source's sales tools.
• The argument supports a commercial pitch, rather than offering neutral product analysis.

James Thrasher describes SendCutSend's software pricing a part as soon as a customer uploads a file, and says building such software is difficult for an average fabrication shop. In a separate post, they link the speed of buying to growth among FAB 40 companies, while noting that the comparison does not prove Stella Source caused its customers' results.

Read original · Original 2

The emphasis is not only on rising revenue but also on the sources of demand and the ability to respond quickly. The line about speed is a quotation from Cadrex's chief commercial officer, not Thrasher's own wording.

In a post on The Fabricator's 2026 FAB 40, James Thrasher highlights projected growth among 39 of 40 firms, demand from data centers, power generation and warehouse automation, and gains among mid-ranked fabricators. They return to the executive's point that customers need products sooner, connecting it to quoting and ease of purchase.

Read original

They link an individual example to a possible trend without claiming that one anecdote establishes it.

After hearing a Meta ad recruiting welders and metalworkers on a basketball podcast, James Thrasher connects the training and jobs described in the ad to the metalwork involved in data-center construction. They say one ad is not proof, but treat it as a small signal of demand for skilled labor.

Read original

The post names the company they work with and the problem it addresses, answering a newcomer's basic question: what is their interest in manufacturing?

James Thrasher opens with a deliberately exaggerated claim: adding a “Buy Now” button to a fabrication shop's website is worth a billion dollars.

• The hook is SendCutSend's reported $110M funding round and the valuation that followed.
• They explain what happens after the click: customer service, real manufacturing capability, and instant-quoting software that prices a part as soon as a file is uploaded.
• The post identifies software as the hard part, argues that a typical fab shop cannot build it in-house “even with AI tools,” and presents Stella Source as the solution.
• It closes with an offer to demonstrate the tool and a note that instant quoting is one of several capabilities.

For brands planning a campaign

For a software company assessing thought leadership, this post shows the pitch structure James Thrasher uses: a striking industry event, a named bottleneck, then a product answer.

• A webinar or content series on “making a shop easier to buy from” could reuse that arc.
• Because the post is promotional, any collaboration should separate sales-framing skill from independent editorial tone.

Open it first to judge whether they can absorb a report and turn it into a useful argument.

The post summarizes The Fabricator's 2026 FAB 40 list in four points: 39 of 40 companies expect a bigger year, with aggregate revenue moving from $5.87B to $6.71B; demand traces to AI data centers, power generation, and warehousing automation; the middle of the field is rising, with the No.

• 40 shop near a record $50M and No.
• 10 at $219M; and speed is the differentiator.
• They quote Cadrex's chief commercial officer — “Speed is the currency in our market now” — and return to that line.
• They note that Stella Source customers among the 40 show roughly 25% projected growth against about 13% for the rest, adding, “I won't claim we caused it,” before describing the product as an “easy button” for sales.

For brands planning a campaign

This is the strongest sample for a thought-leadership collaboration: it shows they can read a trade report, pick out four findings, quote a named executive, and reach a business conclusion. A content series on quote-to-order speed could build on it, but ask for independent verification before repeating the claim about Stella Source customers.

It answers “where do their ideas come from?” in a short, self-contained example.

James Thrasher reports hearing a Meta recruitment ad for welders and metalworkers during a basketball podcast.

• They note that the company has put $115 million into free training for skilled tradespeople, with jobs building its data centers at the end, and point out how much of that work is metal: welding structural steel, fabricating frames, fitting piping.
• The post names two reasons the ad stood out — work topics appearing in unexpected places, and a data-center boom short of land, power, materials, and skilled labor — and then hedges honestly: “One ad isn't proof of anything,” before treating it as a small signal that American manufacturing is moving up.

For brands planning a campaign

This lightweight, anecdote-first format could suit a short-video or newsletter collaboration on workforce and reindustrialization trends.

• It also shows a useful hedge: framing one observation as a signal, not evidence.
• Preserve that restraint rather than rewriting it as a stronger claim.

They single out speed—not just production capacity—as a competitive advantage, quoting a fabricator executive on customers’ need to get products to market faster.

Selects a few figures from industry reporting, then connects them to a broader commercial argument instead of recapping the whole ranking.

For brands planning a campaign

A sponsored industry-data readout could suit this approach, especially if it connects market figures to a practical question for fabrication shops, such as capacity or quoting speed.

Examples: Source 1

In a separate post, they use a Meta recruiting ad for welders as a sign of the skills needed to build data centers. They call one ad a signal, not proof, connecting a visible hiring effort to the broader need for skilled tradespeople.

Starts with a concrete example—a market report or an unexpected ad—and uses it to make a wider industry trend easier to see, while distinguishing a signal from conclusive evidence.

For brands planning a campaign

A discussion or resource on data-center construction could bring together fabrication capacity and skilled-trades training, with an angle grounded in the buildout’s needs rather than a generic manufacturing-growth claim.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

They point to SendCutSend’s instant-quoting software as part of its business model, then connect the idea to Stella Source’s sales tools. In the FAB 40 post, they say that among the top 40 fabricators, Stella Source’s customers average about 25% projected growth, compared with about 13% for the rest of the field; they do not attribute the difference to the software.

Uses a company example to illustrate a change in how customers buy, then relates that change to a product offering. They distinguish the growth comparison from proof that the product caused it.

For brands planning a campaign

A practical session or guide on quoting and sales workflows for fabrication shops fits this theme. Because the posts connect the argument to Stella Source, a collaboration should make that product relationship clear rather than frame the material as neutral product coverage.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

A second post pitches instant quoting as a way for a fab shop to copy SendCutSend’s model, then invites readers to see how Stella Source can open that door.

• The posts use “we” about Stella Source and say Thrasher continues to build there, but don’t specify their role.
• Ask whether they own the company, work there, or partner with it in another way.

Original disclosure

“Among these 40, the companies we work with at Stella Source have an average projected growth rate nearly double the rest of the field (~25% vs. ~13%).

• I won't claim we caused it...
• And that's what we continue to build at Stella Source — the 'easy button' for sales.”
• “Which is exactly why Stella Source exists.
• If you're thinking about adding instant quoting to your site and expanding your potential customer base, I'd love to show you how Stella Source can open that door for you.”

View example

Their focus on trust and relationships overlaps with Thrasher’s argument that shops win by making it easier for customers to buy. Both use concrete shop situations rather than abstract trend talk.

Weeks focuses on distribution relationships, tooling costs, and shop-floor decisions, not the quoting software or industry rankings that Thrasher covers. Weeks comments on the trade as an operator; Thrasher writes to sell a product.

Read original · Original 2

That aligns with Thrasher’s core claim that a shop’s sales and quoting process, not just its machines, determines how much business it wins. Both write for small manufacturers rather than large enterprises.

Janaitis draws on an advertising and analytics background to build a systems business focused on measurement, forecasting, and connecting CRM, ERP, and ad platforms. Thrasher’s posts focus on fabrication markets, instant quoting, and demand signals from data centers and workforce programs.

Read original · Original 2

Both writers turn manufacturing operations into lessons for owners and favor concrete numbers and examples over general encouragement.

Zurborg focuses on leadership and operations: giving every employee a quality KPI, tracking scrap and rework, and joining peer round tables.

• Thrasher covers the buying side, quoting speed, and market demand.
• Choose Zurborg for operations advice and Thrasher for sales and market context.

Read original · Original 2

Both posts draw on 35 years in metalworking: one argues that distributors, reps, and shops have stopped trusting one another, with vending machines and auto-reorders used as leverage rather than service; the other follows a shop burning through the wrong inserts, restocked several times a week and paying the bill on autopilot. A sponsor selling tooling, purchasing, or distributor-relationship software—or a series aimed at the shop floor rather than the front office—will find familiar ground in their work.

Weeks’s posts do not discuss quoting, order management, or sales software, so a speed-of-quoting series would need examples and instruction from the sponsor.

• The posts offer industry complaint and opinion rather than reported analysis, in blunt language — “a toxic cloud of distrust,” “profit over service.”
• That suits a sponsor seeking a confrontational voice, but not one looking for measured category coverage.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Janaitis launched Janaitis Business Systems to connect the software a small manufacturer already owns "into one set of numbers they can trust, then fix the bottleneck those numbers expose," and the posts describe quoting that does not talk to the ERP, production numbers living in spreadsheets, and ad data that never links back to closed sales. A sponsor whose product is one component of that stack — quoting, CRM, ERP, reporting — can use the integration problem exactly as Janaitis already frames it.

Janaitis sells systems and marketing services, so a software vendor may be approaching a competitor or channel partner rather than an independent creator.

• The relationship should be stated openly.
• Their examples cover advertising measurement and general small-business operations, not the fabrication floor; the stated target of a $2M to $20M shop may also sit below a sponsor’s target market of larger fabricators.
• A speed-of-quoting argument would be adjacent to their material, so a sponsor should bring its own examples.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Zurborg when the campaign aims to reach owners and managers on how to run the business—quality metrics, KPI discipline, and peer accountability—rather than how to sell.

• Zurborg owned a precision sheet metal fabrication company and writes from that experience about tracking in-process scrap, customer returns, and rework rates against top-10% industry targets on the way to Supplier of the Year awards.
• They also moderate a confidential round table for executives.
• A sponsor whose product is bought for operational improvement, or that wants a coaching-adjacent voice for a management audience, has a natural place in their material.

Zurborg focuses on coaching and leadership, using Scaling Up and Traction/EOS methods—not industry news, market data, or software.

• Their fabrication ownership is described in the past tense, and their posts do not mention quoting, sales technology, or manufacturing-technology trends.
• A speed-of-quoting series would need the sponsor to provide data and briefing.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2