Oliver Hurrey brings companies, suppliers and sustainability practitioners together to make supply-chain decarbonization more practical, with a focus on Scope 3 emissions and procurement.
Useful for connecting procurement, suppliers and carbon accountants to make Scope 3 decarbonization practical and decision-focused.
Best for
A Scope 3 software vendor or consultancy selling procurement-side decarbonization services for a content programme.
Not for
A consumer-facing brand or B2C software company wanting high-volume paid social endorsement.
Key takeaways
Over 500 suppliers: 43% raised cost or said sustainability did not count at contract award.
24% pointed to customer specifications or sourcing choices as drivers of their emissions.
Carbon data only matters if it changes a decision.
Check first: Confirm commercial terms, follower demographics and recent comparable results before committing budget.
Main ideas
Suppliers want to decarbonize; the problem is how customers ask · Make carbon part of normal commercial decisions, not an add-on report · Carbon data only matters if it changes a decision
Oliver Hurrey’s work centers on making supply-chain decarbonization more practical.
Through Scope 3 Peer Group briefings, events and tool discussions, they bring procurement teams, suppliers and carbon-accounting practitioners into the same conversation.
Their posts are especially useful for seeing how climate goals meet commercial decisions: suppliers say that customer requests can conflict with buying on price, while procurement examples show ways to bring carbon into tenders, specifications and contracts.
Follow their work for grounded accounts of what these groups are trying, and for their recurring question about whether carbon data changes real decisions.
Hurrey connects people and turns their experience into concrete questions and examples.
In one post, they report feedback from more than 500 suppliers, including that 43% raised cost or said sustainability did not count at contract award, and that 24% pointed to customer specifications or sourcing choices as drivers of their emissions.
In another, they pair the supplier perspective with examples of carbon pricing in tenders and sustainability-related contract terms.
They also apply the same practical test to carbon accounting: what decisions will the data change?
That combination—listening across a supply chain, convening its different roles, and asking what action follows—sets their posts apart from content focused on measurement or tools alone.
Oliver Hurrey's recurring argument is that supply-chain decarbonization stalls less from a lack of will than from how the ask is made and whether carbon counts in business decisions.
Read more
Across their posts, they push three connected priorities: treat suppliers as partners and fix the commercial mechanics of the request; put carbon into specifications, tenders and contracts instead of reporting on it afterwards; and tie carbon data to a decision someone will actually change. They work mainly by convening—running peer briefings, tool clinics and event sessions that bring procurement leaders, suppliers and carbon accountants into the same conversation—and repeatedly warn that measurement without a decision is just a better way of recording failure.
Suppliers want to decarbonize; the problem is how customers ask
Hurrey's central diagnosis is that decarbonization requests fail because of how buyers make them, not because suppliers refuse.
Read more
In a briefing based on a survey of more than 500 suppliers, they report four objections for procurement teams: buyers ask suppliers to decarbonize, then award on price; customer specifications and directed sourcing set much of a supplier's own emissions; reporting takes more time than acting; and many suppliers have almost no sustainability capacity. Hurrey concludes that requests need to be consistent, commercially realistic and proportionate to the size of the supplier.
The five supplier messages Hurrey highlights include that 43% raised cost or said sustainability does not count when a contract is awarded, 24% said customer specifications or upstream sourcing drive their biggest emissions, and one in five flagged limited capacity. One supplier tells Hurrey: "No point in making the ask if the support doesn't follow!"
Make carbon part of normal commercial decisions, not an add-on report
Hurrey argues that carbon only moves when it is built into the machinery buyers already use: specifications, evaluations, contracts and supplier relationships.
Read more
Rather than bolting sustainability onto a deal after agreeing the price, they say buyers should negotiate it into the deal using levers such as KPIs, contract length and payment terms, with governance from the top of the organization. Hurrey presents this to procurement teams and, separately, to suppliers as a commercial offer: suppliers should state what they need in return, such as volume certainty or a specification change.
Hurrey cites Chris Low at Haleon, who ran carbon pricing in tenders on more than £1.5bn and moved from zero product carbon footprints to over 300; Rory Lamont, CPO at Siemens Mobility, who reviews sustainability with the CEO every month and recycles old train steel and aluminium back into the supply chain, showing how it can work on cost, resilience and carbon at once; and Lewis Howard at BRAE and Need2Know, who suggested a footprint halved in two years in exchange for an automatic two-year contract extension.
Speaking to a carbon accounting audience, Hurrey argues that the field risks getting very good at measurement without changing what organizations do.
Read more
They want technical people and data specialists to start with real-world use cases—the decisions carbon data is meant to inform—rather than making data easier to handle for its own sake. Hurrey also says more corporate voices need to explain what they actually need built, so the work is guided by demand rather than by what is technically interesting.
Hurrey closes one reflection with the question "what decisions are we actually going to change with carbon data?" and warns that without an answer, the profession is putting exceptional people to work "expertly measuring how much we’re failing." In the same post Hurrey notes that several people pushed a conference to move venue over sponsorship ties, and that Hurrey wants the community to move beyond the therapeutic value of talking to each other.
Coordinate the practitioner communities instead of working in parallel
Hurrey's recurring priority is joining up the groups that touch Scope 3: practitioners doing the work, their carbon accounting colleagues and the software vendors serving them.
Read more
They see this as a way to move faster and with less confusion, and position their own peer group as a partner to adjacent professional communities rather than a competitor. The same instinct shapes their event work, bringing procurement, supplier, healthcare, clean heat, renewables and accounting audiences into the same week of sessions.
Hurrey describes supporting the Carbon Accounting Alliance as a key partner to the Scope 3 Peer Group and speaking at its London event alongside named peers to examine "if/what is really working on scope 3." Their Climate Week recap lists sessions and launches spanning product carbon footprints, a Decarb Supply Program, a Scope 3 Tools Review, healthcare value chain work and a Scope 3 Governance Framework, as well as a Scope 3 Podcast conversation with Erik Roberts, CPO at P&G.
Evaluate tools through peer practice, and move past surveys
Hurrey treats the Scope 3 software market as something practitioners should assess by comparing notes, not by relying on vendor claims.
Read more
They run tool clinics where peers examine what solutions actually do and compare the stacks they are building, and report what the community is trying to leave behind—particularly the supplier survey as the default way to collect data. This is a practical, buyer-side view of the tool market: which vendors are being tested, what they publish and what peers recommend to each other.
One post covers a Tools Clinic with Gravity and Tracera, links to guides on AI agents, Scope 3 data and emissions-factor maturity, and utility billing errors, and cites Tracera's customer examples from La-Z-Boy and Sauder Woodworking. Hurrey says the biggest talking point in the peer room was how to move beyond surveys; there seemed to be a clear favourite, and peers were comparing solutions through a Scope3Navigator.
It answers a question brands should ask before designing a supplier engagement program: what does the ask look like from the supplier side?
Read more
Hurrey draws on a survey of over 500 suppliers, rather than procurement teams’ assumptions.
Hurrey reports that the Scope 3 Peer Group collected opinions from more than 500 suppliers about what customers get wrong when they ask for decarbonization.
The post distils the responses into five messages for procurement teams, with percentages attached: 43% raised cost or said sustainability does not count when a contract is awarded; 24% said their biggest emissions are set by customer material specifications, directed sourcing or upstream suppliers; and one in five flagged limited capacity.
Suppliers also said they spend more time reporting than doing because each customer uses different platforms, methods and deadlines.
One supplier is quoted as saying: "No point in making the ask if the support doesn't follow!"
The post closes with suppliers’ requests: count carbon when awarding business, align requests, open specifications to change, commit for the long term, explain how data is used and keep requests in proportion for smaller suppliers.
For brands planning a campaign
A campaign aimed at procurement audiences can lead with the gap between decarbonization asks and purchasing decisions, using the supplier survey percentages as a hook. For a consulting firm, the post shows how Hurrey turns raw supplier feedback into a structured briefing for a commercial audience.
It shows how Hurrey turns a shared problem into separate briefings for buyers and suppliers, naming specific commercial mechanics that make decarbonization part of a deal rather than a report.
Read more
Hurrey describes two days of briefings: more than 160 procurement leaders from 13 Peers, followed by 150 commercial and sustainability leaders from their suppliers, all before a Value Exchange Summit.
For procurement, the post repeats suppliers’ message that customers ask for decarbonization and then buy on price.
It argues that carbon must become part of normal commercial decisions, including specifications, evaluations, contracts and supplier relationships.
Examples include Chris Low at Haleon, who has run carbon pricing in tenders on more than £1.5bn and moved from zero product carbon footprints to 300 or more; Rory Lamont, CPO at Siemens Mobility, who reviews sustainability with the CEO every month, and whose example of recycling old train steel and aluminium back into the supply chain made the case on cost, resilience and carbon at once; and Lewis Howard at BRAE and Need2Know, who suggested using existing levers such as KPIs, contract length and payment terms—for example, halving a footprint in two years in exchange for an automatic two-year extension.
For suppliers, the commercial case includes the point that at €80 a tonne, a lower product carbon footprint can beat a lower headline price.
Suppliers should also say what they need in return, such as a longer contract, volume certainty or a specification change.
For brands planning a campaign
This is a useful source for a consulting firm building procurement-focused content: it gives specific examples of carbon entering tender and contract decisions. A campaign can use the buyer-versus-supplier, two-briefing structure to frame one piece of content for both sides of a supply chain relationship.
It states the coordination idea behind Hurrey's peer-group work in a short, readable form, and shows how they position the group alongside another professional community rather than in competition with it.
Read more
Hurrey suggests that coordination among the world's Scope 3 practitioners, their carbon accounting colleagues and the world's Scope 3 solutions could help them reach the goal faster, or at least with slightly less confusion.
They are supporting Emilien Hoet and Andrew Griffiths and the Carbon Accounting Alliance as a key partner to the Scope 3 Peer Group, and look forward to speaking at their London event on 6 October.
They invite readers to join them and named Peers to discuss whether and what is really working on Scope 3.
For brands planning a campaign
This post shows Hurrey connecting professional communities. A consulting firm assessing them for content creation can use the partnership framing as a model for introducing a client to an established practitioner network rather than speaking at it from outside.
It maps the people, events and resources Hurrey's peer group runs or supports, giving newcomers a view of the activity behind the posts rather than a single argument.
Read more
Hurrey recaps a final day at Climate Week NYC, moving between Scope 3 Peer Group Do Project sessions and feeling the group was doing too much against a consensus that the world was not doing enough.
Highlights include a PACT Summit session on product carbon footprints as actionable business intelligence, steered by Aneta Wierzynska, and a product carbon footprint session with Rachel Delacour and the SWEEP team; a Scope 3 Peer Group drinks event with over 100 attendees and the launch of Martin Chilcott's book Get Sh*t Done; the launch of a Decarb Supply Program and a Scope 3 Tools Review; a procurement peers session hosted by S&P Global, including the launch of a Scope 3 Governance Framework; and a Scope 3 Podcast conversation with Erik Roberts, CPO at P&G.
They also name practitioners and organizations involved, including Cynthia Cummis, Dexter Galvin of EcoVadis, Jon Hughes of ERM, Nancy Gillis and others.
For brands planning a campaign
For a brand looking to reach this audience, the post maps the events, resources and named practitioners around the peer group. An agency can use it to identify potential partnerships or event-adjacent placements; a consulting firm can point to Hurrey's relationships across procurement, carbon accounting and tools.
It shows how Hurrey frames the carbon data problem for a technical audience, pushing beyond measurement to decisions and identifying a concern that can anchor a longer piece of content.
Read more
After attending the Carbon Accounting Conference, Hurrey thanks the organizers and their panelists and reflects on the room.
They praise the Carbon Accounting Alliance leadership and note that several people pushed the event to move from the Science Museum because of sponsorship ties.
They welcome the community's move beyond the therapy benefits of a profession-of-practice community, but say more corporates were needed in the room to spell out what they needed to build.
People offered ideas for changing the world with carbon data and open-source databases, they write, but the field needs to guide those ideas toward real-world use cases rather than just making data easier to work with.
Their closing question is: "what decisions are we actually going to change with carbon data?"
Without an answer, they warn, the profession is putting exceptional people to work expertly measuring how much the world is failing.
For brands planning a campaign
A consulting firm creating content on supply chain decarbonization can use the decisions question as a hook for technical audiences. The post also shows that Hurrey writes for carbon accountants and data specialists, not only procurement leaders.
It offers a compact look at how Hurrey treats the tool market as a practical evaluation exercise, including the solutions being compared and what peers are trying to move away from.
Read more
Hurrey opens with news from the Scope 3 tools world, especially for customers of Normative.io or Greenly.
They describe a Scope 3 Peer Group Tools Clinic with Gravity and Tracera, where peers picked each other's brains, and list Gravity guides on AI agents, Scope 3 data and emissions-factor maturity, and utility billing errors.
Tracera shared how La-Z-Boy improved transparency in sustainability reporting and how Sauder Woodworking moved beyond spreadsheets.
The biggest talking point in the peer-to-peer room was how to move beyond the surveys.
There seemed to be a clear favorite, and peers were comparing solution stacks through a Scope3Navigator.
Hurrey invites peers to contact them for introductions to others using these tools.
For brands planning a campaign
For a tool vendor or consultancy, this post shows how Hurrey convenes peers to compare solutions and address a specific operational problem. A campaign could take the form of a Tools Clinic-style session or comparison piece rather than a general webcast.
Oliver Hurrey collects and presents supplier feedback at scale, then briefs buyers and suppliers.
Read more
In one post, they report opinions from over 500 suppliers about decarbonization requests.
Five supplier messages stand out: buyers ask suppliers to decarbonize but then buy on price; customer specifications and directed sourcing determine much of suppliers' emissions; reporting takes more time than action; many suppliers have very small sustainability teams; and suppliers want partnership rather than transactional tenders.
The post says 43% raised cost or said sustainability does not count in contract awards, 24% said customer specifications or upstream sourcing drive their biggest emissions, and 1 in 5 flagged limited capacity.
Synthesize feedback from a large respondent group, then create separate briefings for procurement leaders and supplier commercial teams.
For brands planning a campaign
For a sustainability consulting firm hiring for supply chain decarbonization content, this is a strong topic for supplier-engagement diagnostics and buyer-supplier alignment. A content creator could turn survey findings into practical briefings on supplier objections, changes procurement teams should make, and commercially realistic requests.
Oliver Hurrey argues that procurement is central to sustainable value in supply chains and shows how carbon can become part of routine commercial decisions.
Read more
Posts describe briefings to more than 160 procurement leaders from 13 peer organizations and around 150 commercial and sustainability leaders from suppliers.
Practical recommendations include making carbon part of specifications, evaluations and contracts; using carbon pricing in tenders; governing sustainability from the top; and negotiating sustainability into the deal rather than adding it afterward.
Named examples include Haleon running carbon pricing on more than £1.5bn of tenders and moving from zero product carbon footprints to over 300, and Siemens Mobility's procurement chief reviewing sustainability with the CEO every month.
They also discuss contract levers such as KPIs, contract length and payment terms.
Executive briefings and roundtables with procurement leaders, backed by named company examples and practical contract levers.
For brands planning a campaign
Content on supply chain decarbonization should speak the language of procurement and commercial value, not just sustainability reporting. A creator could produce case-study explainers, tender and contract guidance, or executive briefing notes showing how carbon requirements hold up under price pressure and supply shocks.
Oliver Hurrey runs and reports on Scope 3 tool clinics where practitioners compare software and approaches.
Read more
One post covers a Tools Clinic with Gravity and Tracera, links to guides on AI agents, Scope 3 data and emissions-factor maturity, and utility billing errors, and cites customer examples from La-Z-Boy and Sauder Woodworking.
It also notes peer discussion about moving beyond supplier surveys and using a Scope3Navigator to compare solution stacks.
A separate post flags news relevant to Normative.io and Greenly customers.
Vendor clinics, peer-to-peer discussions, and solution-stack comparisons.
The post says peers had a clear favourite alternative to surveys but does not name it. Ask for evidence before treating that preference as an endorsement.
For brands planning a campaign
This suggests Oliver Hurrey can evaluate tools through practitioner use and peer comparison rather than vendor marketing. Campaign content could focus on buyer questions, tool-selection criteria, and what peers recommend when moving beyond spreadsheet- or survey-heavy processes.
Oliver Hurrey engages with carbon accounting professionals through the Carbon Accounting Alliance and a carbon accounting conference.
Read more
He praises the technical depth and passion in the community, but argues that more corporate voices are needed to say what they need to build.
Hurrey's central concern is that carbon data work should be tied to decisions that actually change; without that, the field risks expertly measuring failure.
He also supports the alliance's move to shift an event away from a sponsor with questionable ties.
Conference panel participation, partnership with a professional carbon accounting community, and direct commentary on what the community is missing.
Conference panel participation, partnership with a professional carbon accounting community, and commentary on what the community is missing.
For brands planning a campaign
For supply chain decarbonization content, start with the business or procurement decision, then identify the carbon data needed. A creator can focus on real-world use cases and changes in decision-making, not data infrastructure for its own sake.
Oliver Hurrey's posts show a recurring role as convener across procurement, supplier, carbon accounting and Scope 3 practitioner communities.
Read more
A Climate Week post describes moving between multiple Scope 3 Peer Group sessions; product carbon footprints as actionable business intelligence; drinks with over 100 peers hosted by Gravity, carbmee and Watershed; the launch of a Decarb Supply Program; a data dinner; healthcare value chain work with Accenture; clean heat in supply chains; renewables supplier engagement; a procurement peers session hosted by S&P Global; and a Scope 3 Governance Framework. Other posts cover a partnership with the Carbon Accounting Alliance and an event in London, plus a supplier-focused briefing with procurement leaders.
Convening cross-community events and briefings
The posts name many partners and speakers but do not show the underlying session materials or recorded interviews, so specific claims about those discussions rely on Oliver Hurrey's summaries.
For brands planning a campaign
For a consulting firm, this demonstrates event coverage, partner curation and multi-stakeholder convening. A content creator could produce event recaps, interview summaries, and community-facing explainers that connect procurement, supplier and carbon accounting audiences around practical next steps.
The posts use consistent formats: numbered lessons for procurement teams or suppliers, direct quotes from supplier feedback, named partners and practitioners, event recaps, invitations to briefings and summits, and practical links or downloads.
Read more
Recurring themes include making carbon part of commercial decisions, treating suppliers as partners, reducing reporting burden, using peer communities to compare tools, and tying carbon data to decisions. They point readers to next steps such as briefings, summits, tools clinics or direct contact.
LinkedIn posts featuring numbered takeaways, quoted feedback, named examples, event summaries and invitations to briefings.
The posts do not include publication dates. Ask for dates if you need to assess how the work has changed over time.
For brands planning a campaign
For a consulting firm, this demonstrates event coverage, partner curation and multi-stakeholder convening. A content creator could produce event recaps, interview summaries, and community-facing explainers that connect procurement, supplier and carbon accounting audiences around practical next steps.
Oliver Hurrey's documented brand relationships are mostly with organisations they convene and co-create with.
Read more
The Scope 3 Peer Group is the hub of their work, and they publicly collaborate with the Carbon Accounting Alliance and The Sustainable Procurement Pledge on procurement and carbon-accounting initiatives.
Tool vendors such as Gravity appear as participants in the Peer Group's clinics and social events.
Ask whether any sponsorship or paid endorsement supports their publishing.
Scope 3 Peer Group
Disclosed partnership
The centre of Oliver Hurrey's work.
Read more
Their posts describe collecting candid feedback from more than 500 suppliers, briefing procurement and supplier leaders, running Scope 3 tools clinics, embedding a Scope 3 governance framework and convening the Value Exchange Summit.
They write about the group in the first person and list oliver@scope3peergroup.com as the contact address.
Ask whether they own the group or are employed by it.
Hurrey says they are supporting the Carbon Accounting Alliance as a key partner to the Scope 3 Peer Group and spoke at its London event on 6 October alongside peers from Mars, NHS England and Sandoz.
Read more
They describe the alliance as an already strong community led by two committed organisers.
The carbon-pricing-in-tenders method Hurrey publicises, used by Haleon's Chris Low across more than £1.5bn of tenders, was developed by Peers together with The Sustainable Procurement Pledge.
Read more
They also name its leaders among the procurement speakers supporting their briefings.
Hurrey highlights the PACT Summit at Climate Week NYC for treating product carbon footprints as genuinely actionable business intelligence, and names PACT's Isobel Farnsworth among the panellists they assembled for a carbon accounting conference session.
A carbon accounting software provider that ran a session in the Peer Group's Scope 3 Tools Clinic, shared three guides on AI agents, emissions-factor maturity and supplier utility billing errors, and co-hosted Peer Group drinks during Climate Week NYC.
Read more
Hurrey presents it as a participant in the group's vendor reviews, not as a sponsor of their writing.
Oliver Hurrey's posts fall into three connected threads: supplier-voice research on why decarbonization requests stall; procurement briefings that bring carbon into tenders and contracts; and peer-community events and tool clinics where practitioners compare what works.
Read more
Across these threads, their argument is that supply-chain decarbonization needs commercial mechanisms and decisions, not more reporting.
Marketers looking for supplier engagement, procurement and Scope 3 practitioner debate will find consistent positions and named examples.
For freight-specific emissions methodology or AI product design, see the similar creators below.
Both treat supply-chain carbon as a decision layer, not a reporting exercise, and write about resilience, cost and procurement.
Read more
Heinrich's posts also sit close to the Scope 3 Peer Group orbit, naming it among the partners in his company's decarbonization forum.
Heinrich focuses on product exposure, critical materials and geopolitical dependency, often through enterprise-software events and customer-advisory work. Hurrey focuses on supplier feedback, procurement briefings and peer-community clinics, with less emphasis on materials-level exposure and trade risk.
Both work on Scope 3 and the commercial conditions needed to cut supply-chain emissions.
Read more
They argue that procurement can hold back progress unless carbon, resilience and long-term value shape buying decisions.
Hobson focuses on freight and logistics emissions, ISO 14083 and logistics service providers' readiness to supply primary transport data. Hurrey covers a wider range of topics, including supplier engagement, Scope 3 tools and carbon-accounting communities.
Both aim to move Scope 3 from measurement to action and give procurement professionals practical support without expecting them to become carbon experts.
Read more
They also question efforts that produce reports instead of decisions.
Pumfrey's posts centre on AI product design, the limits of prompt engineering and an AI platform built for procurement workflows. Hurrey's focus on peer convening, supplier research and briefings brings less product-design commentary.
The posts point to a practitioner audience: procurement teams, suppliers, carbon accountants and sustainability leaders working on Scope 3 and supply-chain decarbonization.
Read more
The only measured audience figure is 17,433 LinkedIn followers, observed 7 October 2026.
The posts do not show follower job titles, seniority, geography or employer type.
For a sustainability consulting firm assessing a content-creation role focused on supply-chain decarbonization, they suggest likely relevance to people already working in the field, but not whether the audience includes the specific buyer roles the firm needs.
Ask Oliver Hurrey for LinkedIn follower demographics or a documented audience survey, plus recent results for comparable supply-chain decarbonization posts, before making the placement decision.
Oliver Hurrey's partnership activity runs through the Scope 3 Peer Group, the supply-chain decarbonization community they convene, rather than personally sponsored content.
Read more
Posts show the group working with named organizations through partner events and conference sessions, briefings and a multi-day summit, vendor sessions in a recurring Tools Clinic, hosted hospitality at peer gatherings, jointly developed resources, and podcast guest slots.
They do not publish a sponsorship policy, rate card, audience specification, or partnership inquiry page.
The only contact address shown is oliver@scope3peergroup.com, offered for procurement engagement and Peer introductions, not as a documented sponsorship route.
Ask the group directly about commercial terms and the right route for a partnership inquiry.
Partner events and conference sessions
Buyer requirement
Plan around a fixed event date and named public credits.
Posts describe a Carbon Accounting Conference in London and New York Climate Week sessions where partner organizations and panellists are announced in advance.
Settle budget and speaker approval before the programme is locked.
Briefings and multi-day summits
Buyer requirement
Expect audiences split by function.
The group ran separate briefings for more than 160 procurement leaders from 13 Peer organizations and 150 commercial and sustainability leaders from their suppliers, leading into a Value Exchange Summit held over three days in October.
Decide which side of that divide your product or service serves before committing.
Tools Clinic vendor sessions
Buyer requirement
Bring a product demonstration and usable supporting material.
Vendors such as Gravity and Tracera presented at a Tools Clinic and shared guides on AI agents, emissions-factor maturity, utility billing errors, and customer case studies.
The sessions invite peer comparison between competing tools, so expect scrutiny of how your product handles surveys and data collection.
Hosting and hospitality at peer convenings
Buyer requirement
Budget for venue or social hosting rather than content placement.
Gravity, carbmee and Watershed hosted drinks for more than 100 attendees, S&P Global hosted a procurement session, and ClimeCo hosted a data dinner.
Public acknowledgements credit these organizations for supporting the gatherings, not for dedicated promotion.
Joint resource development
Buyer requirement
Commit staff time over a longer horizon.
The group co-developed resources such as a carbon-pricing tender method with the Sustainable Procurement Pledge, a Decarb Supply Program, and a Scope 3 Governance Framework with partner organizations.
This suits a buyer seeking a co-authored, reusable asset who can contribute expertise, not just funding.
Podcast guest slot
Buyer requirement
Prepare a long-form interview rather than a scripted spot.
Posts record a Scope 3 Podcast conversation with a chief procurement officer scheduled as a special guest episode.
Supply a senior spokesperson able to discuss supply-chain practice in detail.
A Scope 3 software vendor or consultancy selling procurement-side decarbonization services wants a six-month content programme to help procurement teams turn carbon asks into contract terms, while taking the supplier side of the conversation seriously.
Read more
Reasons
Supplier research gives the campaign its spine. Oliver Hurrey reports on opinions collected from more than 500 suppliers, with percentages attached: 43% raised cost or said sustainability does not count when a contract is awarded, 24% said their biggest emissions are set by customer specifications or directed sourcing, and one in five flagged limited sustainability capacity. It is a specific, quotable evidence base for a topic otherwise full of general claims.
The two-sided briefing structure is directly reusable. The group ran briefings for more than 160 procurement leaders from 13 Peer organizations, then for around 150 commercial and sustainability leaders from their suppliers, feeding both into a Value Exchange Summit. A buyer can commission the same structure: one message for those writing the ask, another for those receiving it.
The content names commercial mechanics, not just sustainability sentiment. Chris Low at Haleon ran carbon pricing across more than £1.5bn of tenders and moved from zero product carbon footprints to over 300. Rory Lamont, CPO at Siemens Mobility, reviews sustainability with the CEO every month. Lewis Howard at BRAE and Need2Know described using existing levers — KPIs, contract length and payment terms — including halving a footprint in two years in return for an automatic two-year extension. The supplier briefing cites €80 a tonne as the point where a lower product carbon footprint can beat a lower headline price.
The formats suit a content retainer: numbered takeaways, direct supplier quotes, named examples, event recaps and clear next steps. Firms can apply the repeatable editorial pattern to their own research.
The topic closely matches a campaign aimed at buyers of supply-chain decarbonization solutions. Supply-chain decarbonization, procurement engagement and Scope 3 tooling run through every post by Oliver Hurrey.
Conditions
Oliver Hurrey's posts show no published sponsorship policy, rate card or partnership inquiry page. The only contact address, oliver@scope3peergroup.com, is offered for procurement engagement and Peer introductions, not sponsorship. Buyers should confirm commercial terms directly with the group.
The work is largely delivered through the Scope 3 Peer Group. Buyers get access to a community programme and its audiences, not just an individual creator posting on a brand's behalf. Firms seeking a single named author publishing under their own brand should test that assumption first.
The only measured audience figure in Oliver Hurrey's posts is 17,433 LinkedIn followers, observed 7 October 2026. The posts give no details on followers' job titles, seniority, geography or employer type. Before committing budget, ask for follower demographics or a documented audience survey.
The posts reference a Scope 3 Podcast episode, a carbon-pricing tender method, a Scope 3 Governance Framework, vendor guides and sign-up pages. Ask to review the materials before relying on the descriptions.
Verdict
Strong fit for content and subject matter. Commercial terms are unconfirmed.
When to choose a specialist
A consumer-facing brand or B2C software company wants a high-volume paid social endorsement: short promotional posts about a product, with success measured in reach and direct response.
Read more
Reasons
The demonstrated formats are community infrastructure, not one-off promotion. The posts cover supplier research, briefings, conferences, Tools Clinics, event recaps and a podcast guest slot, but no short promotional posts written to a product brief.
Partnership visibility in these posts comes from hosting or supporting gatherings, not dedicated promotion. Gravity, carbmee and Watershed hosted drinks for more than 100 attendees; S&P Global hosted a procurement session; ClimeCo hosted a data dinner. Buyers appear as hosts and co-authors, not advertisers.
The stated audience is practitioner-led: procurement teams, suppliers, carbon accountants and sustainability leads. The only measured figure is 17,433 LinkedIn followers, observed 7 October 2026; no demographics indicate consumer reach. A consumer campaign would target people largely absent from the posts.
Tool-vendor content is peer-reviewed and comparative. Vendors present at a Tools Clinic and peers compare solution stacks. The post says peers had a clear favourite alternative to surveys but does not name it, so buyers cannot treat that preference as an endorsement.
The group takes a careful approach to commercial ties. One post records that event organizers moved a conference away from the Science Museum over sponsorship concerns and praises them for it. A sponsor-badge deal without a substantive role would sit awkwardly with that posture.
The posts show no rate card, sponsorship policy or inquiry page. Buyers expecting standard sponsored-post packages should ask the group about available options.
Conditions
This is a judgment about commercial format and audience, not a statement that Oliver Hurrey refuses any promotion. Oliver Hurrey's posts simply do not show that format.
Verdict
Poor fit.
A worked campaign example
Angle
Start with the supplier's complaint, not the buyer's ambition. Open with the gap documented in the research — customers ask suppliers to decarbonize and then award on price — then show each audience what a fair, workable ask looks like.
Audience
Run two segments separately: procurement and sourcing leaders at buyer organizations, and commercial and sustainability leads at their suppliers.
Content plan
Lead piece: a supplier-ask diagnostic built on five supplier messages reported by more than 500 respondents. One page per message: cost versus carbon in awards (43%); specifications and directed sourcing setting supplier emissions (24%); reporting burden and thin supplier teams (one in five); and partnership versus transactional tenders.
Buyer briefing: what to change. Make carbon part of specifications, evaluations, contracts and supplier relationships. Show the contract levers — KPIs, contract length and payment terms — with the worked example of halving a footprint in two years in exchange for an automatic two-year extension.
Supplier briefing: what to ask for and offer: longer contracts, volume certainty, specification changes, shared investment and better payment terms. Frame decarbonization as a commercial offer with a cost, risk and target story, not a report.
Two named case notes: carbon pricing in tenders across more than £1.5bn at Haleon, moving from zero product carbon footprints to over 300; and monthly CEO-level sustainability review at Siemens Mobility, where recycling old train steel and aluminium made the case on cost, resilience and carbon at once.
Closing explainer for technical readers: which decisions will carbon data change? Without an answer, the work becomes expertly measuring failure.
Editorial form
Use numbered takeaways, direct supplier quotes, one worked example per section and an explicit next step at the end. This mirrors Oliver Hurrey’s posts and keeps the tone commercial rather than promotional.
Handoff
Close with a concrete next step — book a briefing slot or request the diagnostic — and route enquiries through the contact address shown in the posts. Confirm commercial terms with the group first.
Measurement
Track whether buyers or suppliers complete the diagnostic, the share of each audience that downloads the contract-lever checklist, and follow-up conversations attributed to the two briefings. The posts provide no historical performance data for comparable campaigns, so set expectations from the first run rather than a claimed benchmark.
Scenario
A Scope 3 software vendor has signed two enterprise customers who are being pressed by their own suppliers to explain how decarbonization data is used. The vendor wants a three-month content programme that positions its product in that conversation without leading with the product.
Title
Supplier engagement briefing programme: “Make the ask, then make it count”
Why it works
Every claim is anchored in material Oliver Hurrey has already produced and reported from, so the vendor contributes subject expertise rather than seeking a borrowed endorsement. The two-briefing structure gives the vendor a credible reason to reach both sides of a supply chain relationship.
Choose Bernhard Heinrich when the campaign’s central question is what a product is exposed to, rather than what a supplier is being asked to do.
Read more
The posts trace risks across materials, parts, suppliers and geographies — energy prices, trade dynamics, carbon costs, regulation, geopolitical dependencies and critical materials — and cite figures from the IEA Global Critical Minerals Outlook: for gallium, graphite, manganese and rare earths, the leading refining country accounts for more than 90% of global supply.
This makes them useful for campaigns aimed at sourcing, engineering, compliance or product teams deciding where to buy and what to redesign.
They also suit software or data vendors positioning carbon data as a decision layer alongside cost and resilience, rather than another reporting obligation.
The later post sharpens the case: understanding what a product costs today is one thing; understanding what could change its economics tomorrow is becoming just as important.
The tradeoff is audience.
These posts take a vendor-forum perspective, centred on the carbmee Global Decarbonization Forum and a customer advisory board, and address product exposure and supply chain redesign from the buyer and product side.
They offer nothing equivalent to Oliver Hurrey’s two-sided briefing programme: they neither quantify suppliers’ views nor describe supplier-facing briefings.
Buyers seeking suppliers’ own words or a programme convening both sides of a supply chain relationship should ask for that research.
The sample is also narrow: two posts, dated 25 September 2026 and 7 October 2026.
Choose Kelly Hobson when the campaign is specifically about transport and logistics emissions and targets logistics service providers, freight forwarders, carriers and transport technology businesses.
Read more
The posts speak directly to those firms, drawing on two regulatory shifts: the GHG Protocol’s proposed Scope 3 revisions, including a 95% coverage requirement, greater transparency on primary versus secondary data, and new expectations for enabled and facilitated emissions; and ISO 14083 becoming the recognised methodology for calculating and reporting logistics emissions.
The argument is deliberately commercial: firms that give customers verified primary transport emissions data aligned to ISO 14083 gain a competitive advantage over those still using averages and assumptions.
ISO 14083, the posts argue, is becoming business critical rather than a nice to have.
This is a sharper, more standards-and-compliance-led frame than a general procurement engagement programme, suited to a defined industry segment that needs to prepare its systems, teams and reporting now.
The tradeoff is scope and role.
The material focuses on freight and transport within Scope 3 Categories 4 and 9, so it does not cover the wider category spread, contract levers or supplier engagement mechanics a broader procurement decarbonization campaign needs.
It is one advisor’s argument to an industry segment, supported by first-person conference reporting from Smart Freight Centre Week in Amsterdam and a panel appearance, rather than a programme convening buyers and suppliers.
Buyers seeking supplier research percentages, named buyer contract results or a comparable briefing structure should ask for those specifically.
The two posts, dated 20 April 2026 and 16 June 2026, are a few months older than the other comparators.
Buyers focused on procurement-side decarbonization across many categories get a narrower but more specific point of view.
Choose Matt Pumfrey when the campaign is about making Scope 3 ambition useful to procurement staff, or about how AI products in this space should be built and explained.
Read more
The posts argue that the gap is no longer measurement but execution: years and millions have gone into measuring supply chain emissions, setting targets and producing strategies, yet firms remain stuck.
Procurement people should not have to become carbon experts or prompt engineers.
They make supplier, contract, cost, quality, risk and performance decisions every day; the useful move is to put relevant knowledge into their workflow at the point of decision, not hand them another long report or questionnaire.
This fits a brand seeking a builder’s narrative: how the product works, what verification, validation and governance took, and why simplicity for the end user matters.
The skeptic’s angle on prompt-engineering content is also directly reusable for a campaign about AI slop versus tooling that disappears into the job.
The tradeoff is that this is a product-and-practice perspective, not a documented audience research base.
The posts explain a problem and a build — an AI platform developed over roughly eight to nine months and tied to the launch of Martin Chilcott’s book Get Sh*t Done at Climate Week New York — but offer no supplier survey percentages, multi-organization briefings or named customer outcomes.
Buyers seeking quotable primary research from the buying side or a two-sided buyer-and-supplier programme should source that separately.
The material is also tied to one product and one partner context, rather than the broader community convening that runs through Oliver Hurrey’s work.
The sample comprises two posts, dated 24 September 2026 and 29 September 2026.
Seven LinkedIn posts by Oliver Hurrey cover supplier-voice research reporting feedback from more than 500 suppliers, procurement and supplier briefings, Scope 3 tool clinics with named vendors, a carbon accounting conference, and Climate Week NYC convening.
The posts have no publication dates, so their claims are presented as recurring positions and named examples rather than as a dated sequence.
People, companies, percentages and links are reported as the posts state them and were not independently verified.
A LinkedIn profile snapshot dated 7 October 2026 shows 17,433 followers, and no demographics are available.
Several items the posts point to — a Scope 3 Podcast conversation, a carbon-pricing tender method, a Scope 3 Governance Framework, vendor guides and event sign-up pages — are mentioned but not presented in full here.
Oliver Hurrey's posts do not identify signature books, shows or earlier career work; targeted searches for those topics remain an open gap.
Comparisons with three other creators use two posts each.
