Kelly Hobson

Customers reporting upstream and downstream transport emissions will find inconsistent methods harder to justify, giving providers that can supply verified primary data aligned to ISO 14083 an advantage over those using averages and assumptions. Hobson's practical advice: align calculations with ISO 14083; prepare platforms and reporting systems to scale emissions data across customers and shipments; train teams to explain methodologies; and embed carbon accounting in day-to-day operations rather than treating it as a separate sustainability exercise.

Hobson singles out the proposed requirement to disclose primary versus secondary data as potentially “the biggest commercial opportunity for logistics providers to date” and tells logistics service providers, freight forwarders, carriers and transport technology businesses that “the time to prepare is now”.

Read original

Progress is visible in organisations taking independent and collaborative action, but procurement remains anchored to lowest-cost decisions.

• As a result, carbon, resilience and long-term value fail to enter the buying decision, and even promising solutions stop at pilot stage.
• Supply chain teams also need a shared language and a clearer path to implementation.
• Service providers need to present a credible alternative — Hobson's phrase is presenting “Option B” regularly — and can only do that if they know the subject.

At the Amsterdam gathering, Hobson cites Microsoft's bulk sustainable aviation fuel deal, Geopost's internal carbon budgets, Procter & Gamble's auditing and verification process for renewable energy use, and DP World's UK ETC for funding low-carbon solutions. None of that scale of change, they argue, happens while procurement buys on lowest cost alone.

Read original

Logistics is managed predominantly as a cost centre: move it, store it and deliver it at the cheapest possible rate.

• Teams can become so embedded in tactical work that they don't step back to challenge the operation.
• When they do, efficiency improves, costs can fall and emissions often fall as a co-benefit.
• Hobson's proposed sequence is to find efficiency first, allocate a proportion of the savings to a sustainable initiative budget, then use that value to fund the harder parts of the transition.
• Perception often outweighs fact: teams assume sustainable change will cost more before finding the data or costing alternatives.

Hobson's answer to an audience question at the CILT Leadership & Transformation Annual Conference — how to implement more sustainable initiatives when customers won't pay the premium — is to start with exploration and stakeholder engagement, not with spending more money.

Read original

Systems thinking means connecting supply with demand, understanding the whole movement and bringing the right organisations into the same conversation.

• Hobson frames it as a choice between shaping the transition proactively and responding after change arrives.
• A companion post spells out the conditions for real collaboration: time to think strategically, joined-up ways of working, shared accountability and change management.
• A basic barrier is acknowledging that “we don't know what we don't know”.

Hobson notes that freight transport already accounts for roughly 7-8% of global CO2 emissions and that the IPCC has projected global freight volumes could double by 2050 on current trends. Yet logistics remains an operational afterthought: procurement decisions sit outside core supply chain strategy, while sustainability teams hold logistics at arm's length.

Read original · Original 2

Bringing volume and weight together, Hobson argues, can improve visibility and unlock improvement.

The guest is Bonne Goedhart, co-founder of Amsterdam-based consultancy AllChiefs and a keynote at Sustainable Logistics LIVE Manchester. Hobson describes Goedhart's approach as developing primary data to challenge how performance, resilience and decarbonisation are understood.

Read original

They describe Sustainable Logistics LIVE as intentionally broad, bringing together sustainability leads implementing change with expertise in legislation, procurement, electrification, alternative fuels, data, leadership and behaviour change.

• Hobson lists the job functions already registered so readers can judge whether their role is covered.
• They frame the wider Shape Tomorrow effort as an “ecosystem accelerator” for sustainable logistics, accessible beyond the event day, rather than another one-day sustainability conference.
• Across posts, they describe keynote delivery, panel chairing and moderation, workshop teaching and conference hosting.

For Sustainable Logistics LIVE London on 10 November, Hobson cites 500+ change makers, 30+ speakers and industry experts, 12 BriteLabs and four 50-minute panel discussions at the Royal Geographical Society. Attendees come from sustainability, ESG, logistics, transport, supply chain, procurement, operations, commercial, strategy, transformation, change, infrastructure, technology, policy, regulation, finance, investment and leadership.

The Manchester edition on 26 March is presented mainly as a shared-interest gathering across logistics, procurement, sustainability and supply chain. The London edition is one part of an ongoing ecosystem, with the mode-silo post making collaboration an explicit organising idea rather than an event theme.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3 · Original 4 · Original 5

SMEs must be brought along, they say, and standardisation is critical if new processes are to scale and automate effectively.

• In a separate post, they address students and early-career people searching for placements, acknowledging a tough period of self-doubt and encouraging patience and continued effort.
• Hobson also offers complimentary places to undergraduates with a genuine interest in sustainable logistics.

Hobson offers 10 complimentary guest passes for undergraduates with a genuine interest in sustainable logistics to attend Sustainable Logistics LIVE on 10 November in London, alongside advice to students about staying optimistic through placement season.

Read original · Original 2

Reflecting on their first Smart Freight Centre Week in Amsterdam, Hobson describes a 1,000-attendee gathering and cites Microsoft's bulk SAF deal, Geopost's internal carbon budgets, Procter & Gamble's renewable-energy auditing and DP World's UK ETC.

• Their conclusion is blunt: procurement is no longer just a barrier but the bottleneck.
• If carbon, resilience and long-term value are not embedded in buying decisions, promising solutions stall at pilot stage.
• They also call for a shared language and for service providers to present an 'Option B' regularly.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful for a logistics or freight company workshop on moving sustainability from pilot to purchase, especially where procurement teams still optimise for lowest cost.

Hobson highlights two developments: the GHG Protocol's proposed Scope 3 revisions, including a 95% coverage requirement and more transparency around primary versus secondary data, and the EU's direction on transport emissions reporting, with ISO 14083 becoming the recognised methodology.

• They tell logistics service providers, freight forwarders, carriers and transport technology businesses that the time to prepare is now: align calculations with ISO 14083, get platforms ready to scale emissions data and train teams to explain methodologies.
• Hobson sees verified primary transport emissions data as a significant competitive advantage over averages and assumptions.

For brands planning a campaign

Directly supports an advisory or workshop offer on ISO 14083 alignment, Scope 3 Category 4 and 9 reporting, and building commercial advantage from primary emissions data.

Speaking at the CILT Leadership & Transformation Annual Conference, Hobson recounts an audience question about implementing sustainable initiatives that carry a premium customers will not pay.

• They argue sustainability does not start with spending more money; it starts with asking whether the operation could be done better.
• Logistics is still treated as a cost centre, but when teams step back and challenge the operation, efficiency improves, costs can fall and emissions often fall too.
• Hobson suggests finding efficiency first, allocating part of those savings to a sustainable initiative budget, then funding harder parts of the transition.
• Logistics service providers can do heavy lifting, and cargo owners can create demand.

For brands planning a campaign

Offers a practical workshop frame for cost-conscious logistics teams: efficiency-first sustainability, commercial viability and using savings to fund decarbonisation.

Ahead of Sustainable Logistics LIVE in Manchester, Hobson notes freight transport accounts for around 7-8% of global CO2 emissions and that global freight volumes could double by 2050 if current trends continue.

• They argue logistics is still treated as an operational afterthought, with decisions made through procurement processes outside core supply-chain strategy and sustainability teams viewing logistics at arm's length.
• Real collaboration, Hobson writes, requires time to think strategically, joined-up ways of working, shared accountability and change management.
• The barrier is often the basic acknowledgement that 'we don't know what we don't know'.

For brands planning a campaign

Supports a session on cross-functional collaboration between logistics, procurement, sustainability and supply chain, with change management as a named capability.

Hobson asks what would change if the industry stopped talking in modes.

• Road talks to road, rail to rail, ports to ports and technology to technology, but freight movement does not work that way.
• They argue systems thinking means connecting supply with demand, understanding the entire movement and bringing the right organisations into the same conversations.
• Hobson links this to Shape Tomorrow's stated aim of building an 'ecosystem accelerator' for sustainable logistics that connects cargo owners, logistics providers, infrastructure, technology, academia, policy and people.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful for framing multimodal collaboration and ecosystem engagement, especially for freight businesses working across road, rail, port and technology partners.

In a conversation with Bonne Goedhart of AllChiefs ahead of Sustainable Logistics LIVE Manchester, Hobson draws out three points: decarbonising supply chains is part of optimising operations rather than a separate sustainability task; companies are already making real cost savings through logistics decarbonisation but not measuring them through a carbon lens; and traditional logistics metrics focus on volume while carbon accounting introduces weight. The opportunity is to bring volume and weight together for better visibility and improvement.

For brands planning a campaign

Can inform a workshop or advisory session on metrics, carbon accounting and surfacing existing cost savings through a carbon lens.

Hobson describes Sustainable Logistics LIVE London as deliberately packed: 500+ change makers, 30+ speakers and industry experts, 12 BriteLabs and four 50-minute panel discussions.

• Attendees span sustainability, ESG, logistics, transport, supply chain, procurement, operations, commercial, strategy, transformation, change, infrastructure, technology, policy, regulation, finance, investment and leadership.
• They say Shape Tomorrow is creating an ecosystem accelerator accessible 24/7 for sustainable logistics, not simply another one-day sustainability conference.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful for assessing event partnership or audience reach and understanding the scale at which Hobson convenes the sustainable logistics community.

In a post, Hobson says they love their job and describes spending a few days delivering a Sustainable Logistics Foundation course in workshops. The post confirms a workshop-based training format.

For brands planning a campaign

A fit for buyers seeking a workshop or foundation-course format rather than a keynote or panel appearance.

They highlight proposed GHG Protocol Scope 3 revisions, including a possible 95% coverage requirement, greater transparency about primary versus secondary data, and new expectations for enabled and facilitated emissions. They pair this with ISO 14083 becoming the recognised methodology for calculating and reporting transport emissions, and argue that logistics providers able to supply verified primary emissions data will have a competitive advantage over those relying on averages and assumptions.

Hobson links each standards change to a practical provider action: use the right calculation methodology, align calculations with ISO 14083, prepare platforms and reporting systems, train teams, and embed carbon accounting into daily operations.

For brands planning a campaign

A workshop or advisory session can help a logistics or freight company turn reporting changes into a service proposition, data-readiness plan, and internal training programme. The strongest angle is commercial readiness for customers reporting upstream and downstream transport emissions, rather than a general introduction to sustainability.

Examples: Source 1

Without carbon, resilience, and long-term value embedded in buying decisions, even promising decarbonisation solutions stall at pilot stage. They also point to a deeper knowledge gap: supply chain teams need a shared language and a clearer path to implementation, while service providers need to present a credible Option B regularly.

Hobson uses conference examples from Microsoft, Geopost, Procter & Gamble, and DP World to ground a systemic argument, then names the functions that must be involved: procurement, operations, and finance.

For brands planning a campaign

A session aimed jointly at procurement, sustainability, and logistics teams would suit this theme. The practical output should be a way to embed carbon and resilience criteria into buying decisions, along with a shared language for translating ambition into day-to-day operational choices.

Examples: Source 1

Speaking from a CILT conference, they say implementation starts with asking whether the operation could be done better, not with spending more money.

• Logistics is often still managed as a cost centre, and teams rarely get the chance to step back and challenge the operation.
• When they do, efficiency can improve, costs can fall, and emissions can fall as a co-benefit.

Hobson proposes a sequence: find the efficiency first, allocate part of the cost savings to a sustainable initiative budget, then use that value to fund harder parts of the transition. They also put responsibility on logistics service providers to bring ideas to the table.

For brands planning a campaign

This is a strong basis for a workshop on the internal business case for sustainable logistics. A brand can use it to help a client identify operational savings that fund decarbonisation and frame logistics providers as proactive contributors rather than cost-line vendors.

Examples: Source 1

They call for connecting supply with demand and bringing the right organisations into the same conversation. In another post, they say logistics is often treated as an operational afterthought in sustainability discussions, and that real collaboration requires strategic thinking time, joined-up working, shared accountability, and change management.

Hobson uses contrast and direct questions to challenge inward-looking industry habits, then presents Sustainable Logistics LIVE and Shape Tomorrow as vehicles for turning fragmented conversations into collective action.

For brands planning a campaign

A brand can commission a collaboration-focused workshop or event session that maps the whole movement of goods and brings cargo owners, logistics providers, technology, and policy voices into one discussion. The differentiator is joining up supply and demand, not adding another single-mode panel.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Their posts promote and describe Sustainable Logistics LIVE in Manchester and London, including keynotes, panels, BriteLabs, expert speakers, and large change-maker audiences.

• They also describe delivering a Sustainable Logistics Foundation course and moderating or chairing panels at industry events such as Multimodal and Road Transport Expo.
• The format combines conference hosting, panel moderation, keynote delivery, and workshop teaching.

Hobson's event posts mix agenda detail with a point of view: they explain who should attend, what topics will be covered, and why the conversation matters.

For brands planning a campaign

For a logistics or freight company, the natural fit is sponsorship, partnership, or a commissioned workshop connected to this event ecosystem. A brand could also use Hobson as a moderator or keynote speaker to convene sustainability, procurement, and supply chain audiences around practical action.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4 · Source 5

Their Smart Freight Centre Week post reflects on global freight progress and speakers from Microsoft, Geopost, Procter & Gamble, and DP World.

• Elsewhere, they speak with Bonne Goedhart of Amsterdam-based consultancy AllChiefs about international thinking for UK supply chain strategy, primary data, and bringing carbon accounting into performance and resilience decisions.
• They note that traditional logistics metrics focus on volume while carbon accounting introduces weight, creating a data and visibility challenge.

Hobson uses outside examples and conversations to challenge domestic assumptions, then translates them into implications for UK and global supply chain teams.

For brands planning a campaign

A brand with international freight or supply chain operations can use this angle for a session on cross-border emissions data, primary versus secondary data, and how to combine volume and weight metrics. The value is a globally informed view that still speaks to local operational decisions.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

They say SMEs must be brought along on the sustainability journey and that standardisation is critical to scaling and automating new processes. They also write directly to students and early-career people looking for sustainability placements, acknowledge how tough the search can be and offer complimentary guest passes for undergraduates with a genuine interest in sustainable logistics.

For buyers seeking a detailed SME programme, placement scheme or formal mentoring offer, ask Hobson what they can provide.

For brands planning a campaign

If a brand wants to reach SMEs, students, or new entrants, Hobson is a credible voice for access-focused activity such as funded places, learning sessions, or an early-career pathway. Ask what structured programmes, if any, already exist.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Their posts use first-person plural to describe its activity; ask whether they own or work for the organization.

View example

View example

They also wrote about attending Smart Freight Centre Week in Amsterdam.

View example

Trenchard explains DP World's lower-carbon services, including the Low Carbon Truck Programme, modal shift and carbon insetting aligned to GLEC and ISO 14083.

• They also track how SBTi's draft net-zero standard treats activity-level and pool-level action.
• This closely aligns with Hobson's argument that verified transport data and reporting standards are becoming commercially decisive.

Trenchard writes from a port and terminal operator's perspective, explaining specific programmes and certificates. Hobson focuses on the wider commercial and knowledge barriers, as well as convening, training and event-led learning across logistics, procurement and sustainability teams.

Read original · Original 2

Brown's RouteZero posts cover business travel emissions, carbon reporting and practical reduction opportunities for universities and colleges. Their focus on moving from reporting to action echoes Hobson's emphasis on operational decisions and supplier data.

Brown's examples focus on business travel and higher education institutions, using travel data and modelling. Hobson writes about freight and logistics operations, procurement decisions and industry-wide collaboration rather than institutional travel programmes.

Read original · Original 2

Rappa analyses GHG Protocol revisions and how accounting could better reward reuse, repair and refurbishment, as well as EU circular economy regulations, digital product passports and CSRD disclosure. This standards-focused approach parallels Hobson's work on Scope 3 and transport emissions reporting.

Rappa focuses on material circularity in products and the built environment, including embodied carbon and durable goods.

• Hobson applies a similar interest in standards to freight and logistics operations, procurement and supply chain collaboration.
• Event convening and training are also a visible part of their work.

Read original · Original 2

The posts cover SBTi-aligned activity-level and pool-level actions, DP World’s low-carbon truck, modal shift, and carbon inset programmes, and a member programme with trials, EVITA, and an annual award. For a freight company that needs implementation detail inside a carrier or terminal programme, this is more specific than Hobson’s posts, including GLEC and ISO 14083 accounting, registry and certificate tracking, additionality, and independent audit.

The tradeoff is narrower scope and visible commercial attachment.

• The posts are closely tied to DP World services and the Low Carbon Truck Programme, so buyers may get an operator’s or programme sponsor’s view rather than a neutral workshop for a mixed supply chain audience.
• Hobson’s posts don’t say they offer general advisory or workshop services, and they centre on fleet, container, and terminal decarbonisation rather than procurement, cross-functional change management, or event-led collaboration.
• For a broad sustainable logistics workshop spanning procurement, finance, and operations, their posts are the better starting point; ask whether they can cover that wider brief.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The reviewed RouteZero posts address universities and colleges trying to turn travel data into decisions across estates, finance, procurement, staff, students, and leadership.

• They cover Scope 3 business travel, travel policy, behaviour change, and moving from reporting to action.
• This is a better match than Kelly Hobson if the campaign is for a university, college, or employer travel programme, or if the workshop needs a data-platform angle for travel demand and carbon reporting.

The tradeoff is category and sector focus.

• The posts are about travel emissions, higher education, and RouteZero’s data and modelling approach; they don’t cover freight transport, ISO 14083, alternative fuels, procurement as a bottleneck in logistics buying, or supply chain collaboration in the same way.
• Hobson’s posts don’t say they offer a workshop or advisory format, and their commercial relationship to RouteZero is visible.
• Buyers seeking independent freight and logistics advice should keep Hobson as the stronger fit; ask whether they can provide the workshop or advisory format you need.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts explain why the GHG Protocol struggles to reward reuse, repair, and refurbishment, describe the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s proposal to amortise manufacturing emissions over a product’s lifetime, and outline EU circular economy rules including the Circular Economy Act, Digital Product Passports, and CSRD circular performance reporting. She is a better alternative to Kelly Hobson if the campaign needs a workshop on embodied carbon, durable goods, circular procurement, or reporting for reuse and refurbishment, especially in the built environment or furniture.

The tradeoff is that the core logistics task doesn’t match.

• The posts don’t address freight movement, ISO 14083, Category 4 or Category 9 transport emissions, fleet decarbonisation, or supply chain collaboration for logistics providers.
• Hobson’s posts are tied to circular economy policy, Rheaply, and the built environment, so logistics or freight companies seeking a sustainable logistics workshop should treat this as an adjacent option only if circularity and product-lifetime accounting are central to the need.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2