Marko Mandic

The post opens by saying everyone talks about retention but almost nobody understands what has to be in place before it works, then lists eight requirements: a reason to repurchase, a purchase experience worth remembering, product education rather than promo emails, repurchase timing, a usage habit, a cross-sell based on what customers actually buy together, a discount strategy backed by margin and acquisition-cost math, and a loyalty program with real stakes. The framing is deliberately pre-campaign.

If a product lasts a year and has no logical next purchase, Mandic writes, no campaign will fix that: build a product ecosystem first. The same post distinguishes quick fixes from larger projects: a handwritten note or better packaging inserts can be done in a week, while adding a new product line is a three-to-six month project covering research, beta testing, supplier negotiations, and launch.

Read original

They say this data costs nothing and can feed ad optimization, email setup, next product-line planning, the customer journey, landing and product pages, bundles, and customer-support communication. The deliverable is a question bank of 400 questions across ten DTC verticals, with 40 ready-to-use questions per niche and guidance on mapping answers to Klaviyo profile properties.

The bank covers beauty and skincare, fashion and apparel, health and supplements, wine and spirits, home and lifestyle, pet care, fitness and sports, jewelry and accessories, baby and kids, and food and beverage.

• Mandic describes it as the internal document used with clients, not a swipe file.
• Delivery includes a step-by-step video explaining zero-party data.

This echoes the retention post's warning that no campaign can fix a product with no next purchase. Mandic treats data as a way to diagnose and prioritize what is broken, not as a substitute for the product-level conditions described there.

Read original

For consumable products, they advise knowing when the product runs out before sending a reminder, using customer surveys and repeat-purchase data to time it so the message feels helpful rather than random. They also recommend helping customers build a routine around the product, making it visual and rewarding.

Mandic writes that a 30-day streak card works better than another discount. Brands should design and support the habit rather than expect customers to arrive with one.

Read original

Loyalty programs follow the same logic. Tiers are built on the idea that people chase status, so each level has to be meaningfully better than the one below it.

Mandic's test for a loyalty tier is whether the benefit feels worth chasing: if it doesn't, nobody moves. Their discount test is just as blunt: a discount that kills brand perception is not a strategy.

Read original

The announcement set out nine live episodes for brand owners and service providers, presented as free to attend with no retainer, no pitch, and no catch, with the first session on Zoom on the 1st of October. It shows Mandic participating in a live, community-based teaching format.

The announcement names operators across specialties including Shopify, paid ads, retention marketing, creatives, cash flow, TikTok Shop, and brand protection. These specialties belong to the wider group, not to Mandic alone; the post announces participation rather than sessions they personally delivered.

Read original

It is the clearest statement of their position—retention is a set of conditions, not a channel—and shows how they prioritize before campaign work begins.

The post contrasts a popular topic with a misunderstood one: everyone talks about retention, but few understand what must be in place for it to work.

• It lists eight requirements: a reason to repurchase (if a product lasts a year with no logical next purchase, no campaign will fix that; build a product ecosystem first); a purchase experience worth remembering (packaging, unboxing and a handwritten note); product education rather than promotional emails; repurchase timing based on survey and repeat-purchase data; a usage habit built into a routine (a 30-day streak card instead of another discount); a cross-sell based on what customers actually buy together; a discount strategy grounded in margin and acquisition-cost math; and a loyalty program with tiers whose benefits improve meaningfully at each level.
• The closing distinction is practical: a handwritten note or better packaging inserts can be done in a week, while adding a product line takes three to six months of research, beta testing, supplier negotiations and launch.

For brands planning a campaign

Treat the eight items as a diagnostic pass before approving any retention-email calendar.

• The post argues that common campaign requests—a new automation or another discount—cannot work when the underlying conditions are missing.
• A brief focused only on email flows may therefore need to start with the product ecosystem, packaging and repurchase timing.
• The week-versus-months split also helps scope the work: quick wins can come early, while product changes need a longer window.

It shows what a brand would receive and reflects the data-first approach in the retention post.

The post describes six months spent writing 400 questions across the top ten eCommerce niches, following audits of more than 150 Klaviyo accounts.

• It argues that most brands collect no zero-party data and that nearly all those that do manage it poorly, even though it is, in the post’s framing, the cheapest valuable asset available.
• Stated applications include optimizing ads, improving email setup, planning the next product line, improving the customer journey, optimizing landing and product pages, creating useful bundles, and informing customer support communication.
• The bank covers Beauty and Skincare, Fashion and Apparel, Health and Supplements, Wine and Spirits, Home and Lifestyle, Pet Care, Fitness and Sports, Jewelry and Accessories, Baby and Kids, and Food and Beverage, with 40 ready-to-use questions per niche.
• The post describes delivery as a step-by-step video on zero-party data, the questions, ways to collect answers, and guidance on mapping them to Klaviyo profile properties.
• It presents the bank as an internal document used with clients, not a swipe file, and asks readers to connect and comment to receive it.

For brands planning a campaign

Zero-party data collection is a plausible first phase of a retention engagement: it produces inputs for segmentation, product decisions and bundle logic, rather than just another email send.

• The bank is organized by vertical, so a brand can check whether its niche is covered and request that specific set.
• The post also names Klaviyo profile property mapping, making the deliverable testable: the answers either arrive as usable profile fields or they do not.

The post announces selection to join Ecomm Hero League, described as a virtual community for brands and service providers, with more than 20 international eCommerce operators covering Shopify, paid ads, retention marketing, creatives, cash flow, TikTok Shop and brand protection.

• It announces nine live episodes for brand owners and service providers, presenting them as the kind of material agencies charge thousands a month to teach.
• The offer includes a free pass, no retainer and no pitch, with the first session on Zoom on the 1st of October.
• The post names a long list of operators, including the host and specialists across the listed areas, and invites readers to share it with their eCommerce community.

For brands planning a campaign

This shows a format beyond written posts: live group sessions with a multi-specialist roster, aimed at brand owners, free to attend and open to being shared.

• For a brand weighing a live or community element, it shows the context Marko operates in and the other specialists available in the same room.
• The post announces participation, not sponsorship, and does not describe paid arrangements; brands considering a paid activation should ask about commercial terms.

The requirements are a reason to repurchase, a purchase experience worth remembering, product education, repurchase timing, a usage habit, a listening cross-sell, discount math, and a loyalty program with real stakes. The framing is deliberately pre-campaign: retention is a set of conditions that must exist before email or paid efforts can work.

A checklist comes with effort estimates: some items, such as a handwritten note or better packaging inserts, can ship within a week; a new product line is framed as a 3–6 month project covering research, beta testing, supplier negotiation, and launch. The post recommends working through the list to find gaps, then building a roadmap with real deadlines, handled like a product launch.

For brands planning a campaign

For a retention brief, expect the first move to be an audit against this list, not a new email flow. A brand that cannot show a repurchase reason or a timed reminder trigger is likely to hear that the product or lifecycle gap comes first, followed by a sequenced roadmap with dates rather than a single campaign concept.

Examples: Source 1

The verticals are beauty and skincare, fashion and apparel, health and supplements, wine and spirits, home and lifestyle, pet care, fitness and sports, jewelry and accessories, baby and kids, and food and beverage, with 40 ready-to-use questions per niche. Applications range from ad optimization and email setup to product-line planning, landing pages, bundles, and customer-support communication.

Each niche gets a fixed set of questions, guidance on collecting answers, and instructions for mapping them to Klaviyo profile properties, turning responses into usable profile data rather than a one-off survey.

For brands planning a campaign

A retention or email brief is likely to center on a quiz or survey that captures customer attributes, with answers wired into Klaviyo segments to inform later flows, bundles, and product decisions. The key question is whether the brand's category falls within one of the ten named verticals.

Examples: Source 1

For consumable products, Mandic advises finding out when the product runs out before sending a reminder, so it feels helpful rather than random. They also recommend helping customers build a routine around the product, made visual and rewarding, with a 30-day streak card positioned as more effective than another discount.

Surveys and repeat-purchase data are named as inputs for timing; the usage habit is a mechanism the brand builds, not something customers arrive with.

For brands planning a campaign

Expect recommendations to include a concrete reorder trigger derived from customer data and a habit-building device, not a blanket monthly newsletter. Brands without repeat-purchase data would likely be asked to collect it first.

Examples: Source 1

Loyalty programs follow the same logic: people chase status, so each tier must be meaningfully better than the one below it or nobody moves.

Margin and acquisition cost are the numbers behind a discount decision; tier design depends on whether the benefit feels worth chasing.

For brands planning a campaign

Promotional or loyalty concepts are likely to come with unit economics attached. A brand seeking aggressive discounting may get a different proposal, or be asked for its margin and acquisition figures before anything is designed.

Examples: Source 1

Sessions are presented as free to attend, with no retainer, pitch, or catch. The post names other participating operators across specialties including Shopify, paid ads, retention marketing, creatives, cash flow, TikTok Shop, and brand protection.

The specialties listed belong to the wider group of operators, not Mandic alone. The post announces participation but does not describe sessions they personally delivered; treat it as evidence of a teaching format and network they participate in, not a service offering.

For brands planning a campaign

Mandic’s work includes live, community-based teaching, relevant for brands seeking a practitioner who appears in live or group formats as well as written content. Ask whether they have a paid brand partnership or formal affiliation with the community; the announcement does not specify either.

Examples: Source 1

Ask whether the affiliation is paid, unpaid, or an operator role.

View example

Both treat retention as something measured across customer behaviour, not as a single campaign.

Kitchen's posts centre on reading cohort and first-purchase data, showing, for example, how AOV gains masked weaker repeat rates, and testing whether common tactics such as first-purchase bundling apply. Mandic's posts start more often with preconditions and data collection, including repurchase timing, usage habits, and a zero-party data question bank mapped to Klaviyo.

Read original · Original 2

Ahmad's argument that an email strategy working for one DTC brand will not necessarily work for another closely matches Mandic's emphasis on customer-specific data rather than copied campaigns.

Ahmad's posts are primarily diagnostic lists and consultation prompts about email strategy and audience psychology. Mandic's posts anchor retention in product and repurchase conditions, then offer a zero-party data question bank and Klaviyo profile mapping as concrete outputs.

Read original · Original 2

This overlaps directly with Mandic's claim that retention depends on a set of conditions and that no campaign fixes a product with no logical next purchase.

Salomon's posts frame the argument around accountability and leadership, showing where customer behaviour breaks down and why churn is not solely a retention team's problem. Mandic sets out the precondition argument as an eight-item retention checklist, extending it to repurchase timing, usage habits, discount math, and zero-party data collection.

Read original · Original 2

The posts run a months-since-first-order table for a US outdoor brand where 12-month customer value rose every year while repurchase rate fell: month-1 repeat purchase dropped from 10.2% to 8.9%, returning customers per new customer from 0.85 to 0.71, and customer spend after the first month from $29.50 to $27.

• The conclusion is that bigger first orders were covering for fewer repeat orders.
• The post names the four levers behind lifetime value: how many customers are acquired, first-order spend, how often they return, and what they spend when they do.
• A second post reports that bundling on the first purchase hurt 180- and 365-day LTV at two brands above $80 million in revenue, against the usual pattern.
• For a brand whose retention question is measurement-first, and where someone willing to contradict a best practice is useful, this is the closer match.

The posts focus on diagnosis and lever selection, not building an email programme.

• They name complementary products, text and direct mail alongside email distribution, and subscription or membership models as levers, but offer no vertical-specific question set, flow build, or detail on segmentation mechanics or how answers map into Klaviyo.
• A brand that needs data collection and lifecycle marketing built will have to assemble that work separately.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts set out eight failure points, in order: no clear strategy; a weak welcome flow that leads with a discount instead of the brand story; blasting one message to everyone; too many discounts training customers to wait for deals; ignoring open and unsubscribe data; no post-purchase flow; never testing; and no zero-party data collection.

• A second post argues that a strategy that worked for one DTC brand will not transfer to another in the same niche, and lists the intake questions to ask first: what stage the brand is at, what emotion drives the purchase, whether the product promise is instant results or long-term change, and whether the customer journey is aspirational or educational.
• That gives a brand a practical starting point when the problem is programme design and personalisation, not the product or acquisition.

The arguments sit at the level of principles and checklists; the posts do not offer the worked numbers, cohort tables, or counterintuitive findings in Kitchen's posts.

• Nor do they include a ready-made question bank mapped to a vertical, as Marko Mandic's posts are described.
• Ask for client outcomes before assuming these approaches have delivered results.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts argue that a retention team can be held accountable for customers it never had a chance of keeping, that customers acquired through a large discount or a bad offer churn faster, and that if cancellations keep mentioning product experience or pricing, more emails will not help.

• The suggested response to leadership is to tag customers, show the cohorts, and point to where behaviour starts to change rather than saying retention cannot fix it.
• For a brand whose retention spend is being questioned while the cause sits upstream in acquisition or product, this framing is directly useful and cheap to test.

This is diagnosis and internal advocacy.

• A brand that already knows its product and experience hold up, and needs the retention programme built, would get less from it.
• The posts do not cover question design, flow structure, loyalty tiers, or discount arithmetic; they establish why a flow would not have worked.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2