Jonathan Joel Mentor

Until those questions have answers, Mentor says, you do not have an innovation initiative; you have an announcement. The priority is to work backwards from finance, governance, contracting and delivery, rather than forwards from the pitch.

The post lists five questions as a checklist, then describes Mentor's work at Successment as bridging ambition and execution: helping institutions, investors and companies make innovation financeable, governable, contractable and deliverable. It invites organisations with a 2027 initiative important enough to fund but still structurally fuzzy to get in touch.

Read original

The argument is that the Dominican Republic has been making itself readable to outside investors, but that success creates a second, less-discussed problem.

• Once a multinational arrives, can it identify Dominican companies capable of supplying it?
• The issue is not whether suppliers exist, but whether an unfamiliar procurement team can assess which local firms have the capacity, certifications, experience, financial stability and operational maturity to enter a sophisticated supply chain.
• This idea directly addresses the harder half of attracting investment.

Mentor points to the country attracting US$3.28 billion in foreign direct investment in the first half of 2026, a 7.7% increase over the same period a year earlier, with roughly two-thirds of it new capital rather than reinvested earnings. The post also notes a 2026 to 2036 strategy targeting semiconductors, software, HealthTech and higher-value business services, and draws on a longer Dominican Today column.

Read original

The rooms are full, the intentions sincere and the photographs travel fast.

• Then the lights go down, the banners come off, and the question that usually goes unasked is: which of those companies received a purchase order?
• Mentor argues that events, pep talks and photo opportunities are not an innovation ecosystem but innovation theater.
• What works instead is meaningful capital investment or a path to corporate or public procurement.
• The measure of success is a buyer committing money—not attention or activity.

One post bluntly calls the room-and-photos formula innovation theater and says capital investment or a procurement path is what works.

• A longer post on the same theme names the specific result to ask for: which companies on stage ever received a purchase order.
• Neither post supplies a case study or data, so the claim remains an assertion rather than a documented trend.

The short post states the position as a provocation, without supporting detail.

• The procurement post turns the same claim into a diagnostic question readers can apply to their own programmes and points to a fuller Dominican Today article.
• The idea stays constant; only its form becomes more actionable.

Read original · Original 2

The country already generates founders, prototypes and competitions, but the route to a paid contract runs through procurement rules and buyer behaviour that nobody has fixed. For anyone working on local economic development, the levers are supplier readiness and buyer readability, not another round of showcase events.

The procurement post opens with that statement, then walks through the recurring showcase scene before landing on the purchase-order question. It illustrates the constraint with activity rather than transaction data.

Read original · Original 2

If you only read one post, this one tells you the problem they keep returning to and the question they use to test whether anything has actually changed.

Mentor describes a familiar Dominican scene: a minister beside young entrepreneurs, a bank executive congratulating a startup competition winner, students presenting prototypes under an LED screen, a corporate group announcing an accelerator or hackathon.

• The rooms are full, the intentions sincere, and the photographs travel quickly.
• Then the lights come down, the banners come off, and one question usually goes unasked — which of those companies received a purchase order?
• The post names the gap between visibility and demand: attention and events are not the same as a buyer committing money.

For brands planning a campaign

For a keynote or advisory session, this is the framing piece.

• It lets an agency open by naming the gap its audience already suspects, then argue that procurement-readiness — not another ecosystem showcase — is the lever.
• It also supplies a diagnostic question for the agency's own portfolio: which local firms have actually received a purchase order?

It is the closest single piece to that need.

Mentor uses one idea — legibility — to explain why capital moves: investors want clarity on incentives, infrastructure, talent, regulation, risk, market access and institutional stability.

• They point to the country attracting US$3.28 billion in foreign direct investment in the first half of 2026, a 7.7% increase on the same period a year earlier, with roughly two-thirds of it new capital rather than reinvested earnings, and to a 2026–2036 strategy aimed at semiconductors, software, HealthTech and higher-value business services.
• Then they turn the idea around: if a multinational does arrive, can it see the Dominican companies around it clearly enough to buy from them?
• The answer is not about whether suppliers exist but whether an unfamiliar procurement team can tell which local firms have the capacity, certifications, experience, financial stability and operational maturity to enter a sophisticated supply chain.
• The post links to a longer Dominican Today column.

For brands planning a campaign

This is the strongest anchor for a session aimed at an economic development agency.

• The two-sided frame — attract capital, then make local suppliers readable to that capital — maps directly onto the agency's goal and gives it a name for its second, harder problem.
• The specific capability list (certifications, financial stability, operational maturity) can become the outline of a supplier-readiness programme.

It shows how Mentor turns a diagnosis into a working checklist, which matters if you are deciding whether to book them to advise rather than only to speak.

Mentor argues that innovation strategy usually fails not because the idea was bad but because five unglamorous questions went unanswered: who owns the decision, what budget actually pays for it, what procurement or contracting vehicle gets it through the door, who is accountable for implementation, and what measurable result determines whether it worked.

• Until those have answers, they say, you don't have an innovation initiative — you have an announcement.
• The post describes their work at Successment as sitting between ambition and execution, helping institutions, investors and companies make innovation something that can be financed, governed, contracted and delivered.
• It invites organisations carrying a structurally fuzzy 2027 initiative to talk.

For brands planning a campaign

Use this to convert a talk into a workshop. The five questions work as an agenda an agency can apply to its own supplier programmes, and the explicit offer of a financing/governance/contracting conversation positions Mentor for an advisory engagement rather than a one-off presentation.

It is useful for seeing how they sound when compressed, and it names the two things they say actually work.

In a deliberately blunt post, Mentor calls putting entrepreneurs in a room with each other, giving them pep talks from long-serving executives, and photographing the result not an innovation ecosystem but innovation theater. What works instead, they say, is a meaningful capital investment or a path to corporate or public procurement.

For brands planning a campaign

This is the provocation line for an opening slide or social promotion, giving the agency a memorable shorthand for the difference between activity and outcomes. Pair it with the fuller procurement and legibility posts when the argument needs evidence.

Without clear ownership of decisions, available budgets, procurement vehicles and measurable results, an initiative remains an announcement rather than a functioning innovation effort.

For brands planning a campaign

Brands can use this expertise to assess whether their innovation roadmaps are structurally sound or seek advice on turning “fuzzy” corporate initiatives into projects that can be financed, governed and delivered.

Examples: Source 1

For brands planning a campaign

Economic development agencies and multinational corporations can use these insights to improve a region’s transparency and institutional understanding, helping attract high-quality, informed capital.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Multinational procurement teams struggle to identify and integrate local firms because of challenges with certifications, capacity and operational maturity.

For brands planning a campaign

Brands committed to sustainable or local sourcing can engage this specialist to identify systemic barriers to successful procurement from local vendors and develop strategies to bridge the gap.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The post presents the firm as a place to bring a funded but structurally unclear 2027 innovation initiative, and links to its site. Ask for Mentor’s title, ownership stake and role terms.

View example

Two posts point to the column: one on investment arriving while local suppliers remain hard for corporate buyers to assess, and another on companies that win startup showcases but never receive a purchase order. The posts identify the publication and column; ask whether the arrangement is paid, syndicated or governed by a contributor agreement.

View example

Nasraty uses a Crunchbase study of 576 venture-backed AI B2B companies to argue that counter-positioning and network economies are the moats that matter, then ties that to financial discipline and reliable accounting. Mentor makes a related point: innovation strategy dies without answers on budget, procurement, accountability, and measurable results.

Nasraty's frame is financial and firm-level: competitive advantage should show up in a business's economics, and the advisory work centers on CFO-style visibility, cash flow, and investor-ready reporting. Mentor's frame is institutional and market-level: they write about countries becoming legible to foreign capital and local suppliers becoming readable to corporate procurement teams, with the Dominican Republic as the recurring case.

Read original · Original 2

Wellen's recaps of Chicago AI executive sessions read like Mentor's five-question checklist transposed to AI: one accountable owner, contracts and vendor expectations, approved tools, cost management, and operations. Both also use practitioner convenings and peer learning to develop their arguments.

Wellen focuses on enterprise AI governance and adoption for Chicago CIOs and executives, and on building an orderly-house operating model around models, data quality, and monitoring. Mentor focuses on innovation execution in economic development and procurement, asking whether a country's productive base is readable enough for outside buyers and whether an initiative has a budget and contracting vehicle rather than a governance framework.

Read original · Original 2

Buddha's posts on India's internship portal and a domestic messaging backbone argue that public systems should connect education to employability and reduce dependence on foreign platforms.

• Mentor's posts argue that investment attraction pays off only when local suppliers are readable to corporate buyers and innovation has a procurement path.
• Both use LinkedIn to press policymakers, industry, and institutions.

Buddha writes at national scale, using government programme data from an education and digital-sovereignty perspective focused on India's workforce and communications infrastructure. Mentor writes from a business and investment perspective, focused on the Dominican Republic and the harder half of foreign direct investment: whether multinationals can identify, certify, and buy from local firms.

Read original · Original 2

Their two posts describe helping owners get timely, reliable financial information: real-time visibility into reports, improved cash flow management, investor-ready reporting and stronger accounting data to support a claim of competitive advantage. That offers depth on one specific readiness signal — supplier financial maturity — that the broader need for supplier legibility names but does not detail.

Nasraty's material focuses on finance and accounting support for founders and business owners, mostly at small and midsize firms.

• It does not cover investment promotion, public or corporate procurement pathways, or how to make a country or region easier for outside buyers to assess.
• Choosing Nasraty trades the institutional frame — ministries, investors and procurement routes — for hands-on financial readiness work.
• If the session must also cover how suppliers reach a purchase order, ask for another contributor.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts describe convening Chicago AI executive and CIO groups, including sessions on AI governance, vendor agreement terms, approved-tool guidance, cost oversight, and treating use cases like normal projects with defined value and ROI. If the agency needs to understand how corporate buyers and their governance processes should assess suppliers of a new technology, Wellen's facilitation experience is the closer match.

The posts focus on AI and technology leadership gatherings in Chicago.

• They do not cover supplier development, emerging-market investment or local productive capacity.
• Choosing Wellen trades subject-matter expertise in Dominican supplier readiness for access to corporate technology decision-makers.
• The event would likely become a conversation about AI or technology governance, and the agency would still need someone to cover supplier capability, certification and procurement routes.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

The posts present an internship platform at that scale, with figures for registered students, verified students, internship opportunities offered, completed internships, participating companies and colleges, and named government and industry participants. For an agency asking how to connect skills to employment across a whole country and bring ministries and companies onto one platform, this is a demonstrated large-scale example rather than a discussion of the problem.

The material focuses on India, with no evidence of work in Latin America or the Caribbean and nothing on helping multinational buyers assess local suppliers.

• Choosing Buddha trades fit with the local procurement problem for a transferable model from a different country.
• Much of the posted material is programme data and acknowledgements; ask what method, staff and delivery steps sit behind the numbers before treating it as a playbook.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2