Dylan Jones advises data firms on how to explain and sell their services. In his LinkedIn posts, he covers content strategy, positioning offers for business buyers, and turning technical expertise into clear client benefits.
Dylan Jones is most useful for helping data firms explain services and package offers for business buyers.
Best for
It fits a B2B data consultancy or analytics vendor sharpening content, packaging, and lead generation.
Not for
This is not for developer tools vendors needing hands-on product walkthroughs, tutorials, or guaranteed implementer audiences.
Key takeaways
Separate buyer-focused content from technical tutorials for data firms.
Rename data profiling as a pre-migration assessment and list buyer results.
How-to posts drew more engagement; positioning content brought more clients.
Check first: Confirm audience demographics and any sponsorship package, rate card, or inquiry route.
Main ideas
Make the main content channel useful to one buyer · Describe what the buyer gets, not what the team does · Build attention by contributing, not only publishing
Dylan Jones advises data firms on content strategy and how to explain specialist services to business buyers.
His LinkedIn work focuses on making technical expertise useful to decision-makers: separate buyer-focused content from technical tutorials, describe services by the outcomes clients receive, and use practical examples to move readers from confusion to clarity.
Posts also draw on his experience with data quality, data migration and marketing through Data Quality Pro, Data Migration Pro and myDataBrand.
He is worth following for concrete ways to turn a data firm's methods, client work and expertise into clearer content and offers.
Jones connects content choices to commercial outcomes rather than treating reach or technical detail as the goal.
In one post, he replaces a technical description of data profiling with a named pre-migration assessment and a list of buyer-facing results, such as defect costs and a project roadmap.
In another, he recommends testing topics for both engagement and client conversion, noting that his how-to posts drew more engagement while positioning content had brought more clients.
His practical tools include a five-part exercise for finding ideas in existing work and a “stumble, search, supply” model for turning discovery into an ongoing audience.
The advice is especially useful to data firms balancing a technical team with non-technical buyers; it is grounded in examples, though the supplied posts do not establish how broadly the approaches work beyond those cases.
Dylan Jones’s central idea is that data firms should explain their expertise in the language of the people who buy it.
Read more
His posts turn that principle into practical advice: focus each channel on a clear audience, sell the outcome rather than the technical process, and use content to build trust and test what brings in clients—not just likes.
Make the main content channel useful to one buyer
Many data firms sell to business leaders but are drawn to publish technical material.
Read more
Jones recommends keeping the main company blog focused on the ideal client and giving technical content a separate home, such as a Labs section. That lets a firm explain business problems to buyers while still showing technical depth to practitioners and potential hires.
Jones describes an analytics firm whose blog mixed Excel macros and Power BI queries with a business-leader audience. He also recommends keeping technical guides, case studies and tutorials in a separate resource area, where they can be shared through channels such as YouTube or a company newsletter.
Describe what the buyer gets, not what the team does
A list of technical tasks can be accurate but still leave a business buyer unsure why the service matters.
Read more
Jones’s approach is to name the offer in terms the buyer understands, describe the practical outcome, and make that outcome credible with evidence such as a report, screenshot or testimonial.
For a data-profiling service used in migrations, Jones says his firm used the name “Pre-Migration Impact Assessment.” Instead of focusing on profiling mechanics, the description could promise a breakdown of data defects and their cost, suitable tools and resources, a migration timeline, and an executive impact report.
Build attention by contributing, not only publishing
Jones argues that content works alongside commentary, connection and community participation.
Read more
His advice is to leave substantive comments, connect thoughtfully and contribute before asking a community to promote or host your work. The principle matters for firms with limited time: build relationships at a sustainable pace rather than copying an influencer’s extreme posting routine.
Jones recalls that thoughtful responses on data bloggers’ posts helped him form connections and eventually build a community. He also recounts declining requests from firms that wanted to present to his Data Quality Pro audience without first contributing to it.
A large transformation project can feel like a big commitment to a new client.
Read more
Jones recommends offering a paid, focused piece of work that delivers value quickly and connects naturally to a larger service. A fast result gives the client evidence of what the firm can do before they commit to a longer engagement.
Jones’s “state of the nation” data assessment used a platform he had built to find issues such as stranded cash or unbilled revenue. He says work that once took weeks or months could be completed in one to three days, and that the assessment sometimes led to larger data migration, quality or governance projects.
Test what attracts clients, then improve the usefulness
Jones suggests trying topics and measuring more than engagement: views and likes can show interest, but discovery calls and sales are a better test of business value.
Read more
Once a topic proves useful, improve it with a clearer explanation, visual, tutorial or checklist rather than simply making it longer. He also recommends mining existing work—models, methods, materials, adaptations and lessons—for ideas.
Jones says content tips received more engagement for his business than positioning advice, while positioning historically converted into more clients. For firms without much of their own data, he suggests using competitors’ engagement as an initial clue, then checking it against their own results.
Answers the question many technical firms cannot answer well: how do I describe a specialist service so a business buyer understands the value?
Read more
This is the clearest worked example of the advice in practice.
Jones quotes a real provider blurb, "we specialise in carrying out data profiling as a part of your PIM implementation projects", followed by a list of accurate technical bullets: relationship discovery, structure discovery, pattern analysis, min and max stats.
Every word describes the work and none of it describes what the buyer receives.
He renames the same activity a "Pre-Migration Impact Assessment" and rewrites the output for the people who actually sign off, often a product director or chief revenue officer: a breakdown of data defects and their cost impact, recommended tooling and resources, migration timelines, and an executive impact report.
The test he applies is whether a buyer can see their own problem in the description, in this case wanting a credible project roadmap.
He ends with three rules: package through the ideal-client lens, lead with the outcome, and make each outcome believable through screenshots, testimonials or a walkthrough.
For brands planning a campaign
For a consultancy brief this is a ready-made repositioning method: rename the offer, state the buyer's outcome, then prove it. It also sets the order for a landing page or campaign narrative.
The practical answer to the most common content question Jones reports from data firms: what do we do when our engineers want to publish?
Read more
Jones sets out the clash directly.
Many data firms are technical by background but sell to non-technical buyers such as a CFO, CMO or CRO, so a blog written for everyone attracts no one.
He points to an analytics firm publishing Excel macro and Power BI tutorials while its ideal client was business leaders.
His fix is two streams: a company blog that follows the buyer through each stage of the decision, and an "R&D Labs" zone holding tutorials, papers, guides, Q&A and code for the technical community, with a list of the assets and channels that zone can grow into.
He also tells a story about a cloud platform client who had always entered through the technical door and got nowhere, then doubled their fees and led with strategic messaging, ending up working alongside McKinsey consultants at around three thousand pounds a day and being treated as the CDO's right-hand person.
For brands planning a campaign
This is the structural decision to settle before commissioning content: one channel measured on buyer enquiries, one measured on technical credibility and hiring, rather than one feed trying to do both.
Explains how a large, slow data project can be sold without asking a client to commit months up front.
Read more
Jones describes a "Trojan Horse" gateway offer: a small, paid piece of work that delivers fast value and connects naturally to bigger signature offers such as a data strategy roadmap, an analytics platform or a data quality centre of excellence.
His own example was a data processing platform that found stranded cash and unbilled or overbilled revenue, converting poor data quality into a financial figure.
After studying Six Sigma and Lean, work that had taken weeks or months ran in one to three days, and he quotes the client reaction: "You've told us more about our data in a day than the last firm found in months."
His pointers are to charge for it, standardise it as a documented process, remove bottlenecks, give it a name and brand, and weave it into existing content through stories, examples and screenshots.
For brands planning a campaign
Consultancies and agencies can structure a first engagement around one fast, paid diagnostic instead of a long retainer pitch, and pick content topics that lead directly into it.
Useful when the idea of thought leadership feels out of reach, or when a client needs a reason to publish without being a recognised name.
Read more
Jones lists the markers consultants use to disqualify themselves: tens of thousands of followers, paradigm-shifting ideas, book deals, keynote status.
He then offers a definition that drops all of them, describing thought leadership as providing contextual information that leads an ideal client from a problem state of confusion to a goal state of informed clarity.
The examples are deliberately ordinary: a metaphor that explains data governance to a COO in utilities, or a story about reducing compute costs on a cloud analytics project that helps a chief data officer plan a budget.
He cites his own record, articles read hundreds of thousands of times over twenty years, as evidence that closing everyday knowledge gaps rather than breaking new ground is what earns an audience.
For brands planning a campaign
Gives a content team permission to publish practitioner explanations rather than novelty, and a test for every draft: does it move a named buyer from confusion to clarity?
A compact model for anyone who has started posting and wants to understand how it becomes leads.
Read more
Jones splits discovery into two routes.
"Stumble" is people finding a post through their feed, a share or a comment, leaving signals such as a like, comment, share or follow, and he lists ways to raise the odds: comment on content their buyers already read, post more often, connect with the right people, recycle to other platforms, appear on podcasts.
"Search" is the slower route; he reports his own long-standing SEO traffic dropping as people move to AI tools, and argues the response is longer, deeper articles with videos, framework images, client quotes, checklists and templates.
"Supply" is the step most firms skip: once someone finds the content, give them a reason to subscribe, usually a checklist, framework, spreadsheet or webinar in exchange for an email address, with his own two industry sites' lead magnets as examples.
For brands planning a campaign
Sets realistic expectations for a campaign: distribution work runs alongside publishing, and a follow-up asset is what turns attention into a contactable list.
A two-step exercise for choosing topics when a firm has little publishing history of its own to learn from.
Read more
The "Deadliest Catch" half borrows the fishing show's habit of dropping sample pots to find hot spots: publish across a range of themes and see which pull views and interactions, or, with no history, study competitors' engagement while remembering that likes do not equal clients.
Jones notes that his own how-to content out-performs his positioning posts on engagement, while positioning work converts better into clients.
The "Skyscraper" half takes the winning theme and asks how to build a better version of it, which he says is now about utility rather than length, since AI can match almost any topic for sheer volume.
His examples of extra value are better visuals, tutorials, explanations, walkthroughs and supporting checklists.
For brands planning a campaign
A low-cost way to select topics for a first campaign, and a reminder to report enquiries rather than engagement when judging results.
A concrete starting point for a firm that says it has nothing to write about.
Read more
Jones sets out a paper exercise with five headings, each given room for seven to ten lines: Model, Methods, Materials, Mods and Memories.
Under each, the firm lists what it already owns, such as framework diagrams, cost-benefit models, methodologies, checklists, screenshots, templates and spreadsheets.
The Mods column captures how a method was adapted for a particular client, with his example of a GIS dashboard that showed poor data quality by telephone exchange for a telecoms client.
Memories is for case studies and lessons, with the instruction to make the customer the hero and to choose failures carefully.
A second column then assigns each idea to a short post, a longer article or a webinar.
For brands planning a campaign
Can be run with a client as a workshop, and the output doubles as a content plan with formats already attached.
Content strategy built around stumble, search and supply
Jones describes a three-part model for data firms.
Read more
"Stumble" is content that reaches people through LinkedIn feeds, comments, shares and follows.
"Search" is longer-form articles that rank on Google and, increasingly, get surfaced by AI assistants.
"Supply" is converting that attention into email subscribers through lead magnets such as checklists, frameworks, guides and webinars.
Jones argues email is the most dependable route from content to leads, because it is personal and does not depend on an algorithm.
Write search-oriented pieces at 1,500 to 3,000 words and strengthen them with video, framework images, client quotes and templates. Recycle posts across Substack, X and YouTube.
For brands planning a campaign
A sponsor can attach to the supply step directly by funding the checklist, framework or guide that a data firm uses as a lead magnet, or by co-creating a longer search-oriented piece on a topic the sponsor already sells into.
Splitting technical and business content into separate channels
Jones returns to this problem across several posts: data firms often have a technical culture but sell to non-technical buyers such as a CFO, CMO or CRO.
Read more
Mixing engineering how-tos with business content on one blog, Jones argues, means the blog speaks to nobody in particular. The recommended fix is to keep the main blog focused on the ideal client profile and move technical material into a separate "Labs" area, a dedicated section of the same site, or syndicated channels.
Run two streams: strategic and stakeholder content on the company blog, tactical and technical content in an R&D zone covering tutorials, tech papers, case studies, Q&A, interviews and code.
Syndicate technical pieces to Substack, a company YouTube channel or a separate company newsletter.
Build the technical content on the company's own site first so it can rank.
Jones warns that if staff publish technical content only on personal accounts, the brand equity leaves with them. The content should sit on company channels, with incentives rather than bans.
For brands planning a campaign
A vendor with a technical product can sponsor the technical stream without blurring the buyer-facing message. Campaigns can place the sponsor as the tool the client's engineering team already uses, while the main brand message stays aimed at the business buyer.
Jones argues that most data firms describe the work they perform rather than what the client receives.
Read more
A data profiling service page might list relationship discovery, pattern analysis and summary statistics, all accurate but written for people inside the data world.
The fix is to reframe the offer around the buyer's problem and the outcome they take away.
Jones gives the example of renaming data profiling for migrations a "Pre-Migration Impact Assessment", then listing deliverables a business sponsor would recognise: a breakdown of defects and their cost impact, tooling and resource recommendations, migration timelines and an executive project report.
Shift the narrative from doing to getting, framed by the ideal client profile, then make the outcome believable with video snippets, screenshots, testimonials, buyer-friendly webinars and before-and-after write-ups.
For brands planning a campaign
Sponsors can build campaigns around outcome framing rather than service mechanics. A post or guide that shows consultancies how to repackage a technical service also gives a tool or platform vendor a natural place to appear as part of the new outcome.
Jones describes using a small paid entry offer to lower the anxiety of a first engagement with a new supplier, then using that first win to open the door to a larger signature offer such as a data strategy roadmap, an analytics platform or a data quality centre of excellence.
Read more
Jones's own example was a rapid "state of the nation" data assessment that found stranded cash and unbilled revenue in one to three days, which then led clients into migrations, governance launches or fraud audits.
Charge for the entry offer rather than giving it away, standardise it as a repeatable procedure, remove the bottlenecks that slow it down, give it a name, and weave it into existing content through stories, examples and screenshots that connect the problem, the process and the larger proposition.
For brands planning a campaign
Tool vendors that shorten a first assessment can supply the asset a Trojan Horse offer is built on. A campaign aimed at consultancies can sponsor or co-create the entry-offer content that markets the service and the tool behind it at the same time.
Redefining thought leadership as leading a buyer from confusion to clarity
Jones pushes back on the idea that thought leadership requires a large following, novel frameworks, a book deal or keynote status.
Read more
The definition offered is the ability to give contextual information that leads an ideal client from confusion to informed clarity.
The argument is aimed at consultants who feel like imposters and therefore publish less, which in turn attracts fewer clients.
In Jones's account, explaining a simple metaphor for data governance or sharing a real cost-reduction experience does the same job as a grand theory.
For brands planning a campaign
This is an argument for practical, clarity-first content rather than prestige positioning. A campaign that sponsors plain-language explainers of a technical subject fits the approach, particularly when the subject is one buyers routinely find confusing.
Choosing topics by testing, then building something better than rivals
Jones combines two models for deciding what to publish.
Read more
The "Deadliest Catch" model treats content as sample pots dropped in different spots: publish across themes such as product head-to-heads, detailed demos and framework articles, then watch not only views but which themes produce discovery calls and sales. The "Skyscraper Technique" then applies to a proven theme: build a version better than competing pages through a stronger visual, tutorial, walkthrough, video or supporting asset, rather than a longer article that AI can easily out-produce.
Firms with little content of their own can shortcut the testing by studying which competitor posts draw engagement, while treating likes and comments as a weak proxy for clients.
For brands planning a campaign
A vendor can fund the better asset that lets a client beat competitors on a proven topic, whether that is a calculator, template, checklist or video. Sponsorship of an improved resource is a straightforward fit here.
A repeatable worksheet for finding content ideas in existing work
Jones walks through an ideation exercise that sorts what a firm already owns into five groups: models and frameworks, methods and processes, materials such as checklists and templates, modifications made for particular clients, and memorable case studies or failures.
Read more
Each idea is then matched to the format it suits, a short post, a longer article or a webinar. The examples come from Jones's own consultancy work, including a framework diagram for data quality dimensions and a GIS dashboard built to show poor data quality by telephone exchange.
Draw a page with MODEL, METHODS, MATERIALS, MODS and MEMORIES down the left and POST, ARTICLE and WEBINAR down the right.
List ideas under each left-hand heading, then decide the format.
Make the customer the hero in case studies, and use failures sparingly but honestly.
For brands planning a campaign
A campaign offering a planning template or worksheet reaches data firms at the moment they are deciding what to publish, which is when a vendor's tool or service can be named as part of the answer.
Jones argues that visibility on LinkedIn comes from a combination of commentary, connections, community and content, not content on its own.
Read more
The mechanics suggested are substantive comments on other people's posts and blogs, personalised connection requests and steady contribution to communities of interest. Jones describes building the Data Quality Pro community to around 20,000 subscribers and turning away firms that asked to present to the list without having contributed anything first.
Treat commenting as part of the schedule, write comments with real content instead of quick praise, comment before connecting, personalise introductions, and help communities led by people the firm wants to reach. Apply the same approach at a pace a working firm can sustain.
Jones rejects comments such as "Great post!" and the habit of taking attention from a community without giving expertise first.
For brands planning a campaign
Community sponsorship, co-hosted discussions and contributed expertise fit this approach better than straight ad placements. A brand can back the community layer of a data firm's marketing where a standalone promotion would not be welcome.
The retained posts document businesses Dylan Jones built or writes from, not brand partnerships.
Read more
He writes from myDataBrand, says he launched Data Quality Pro in 2007, and names Data Migration Pro among his own data-industry websites. No sponsorship, affiliate, investment, or named-client relationships appear in the reviewed posts.
myDataBrand
Owned business
The brand Dylan Jones writes from and refers to as his own.
Read more
He describes the four 'Clarity Conversion' phases the brand works with — Problem, Solution, Provider, and Launch Clarity — and says positioning content under it has converted into more clients than his higher-engagement content tips.
A data quality community and website Dylan Jones says he launched in 2007.
Read more
He describes growing its community to roughly 20,000 subscribers, sharing technical tutorials and guides to build an email audience, and using data quality tools, guides, and checklists as signup incentives.
A data-industry website Dylan Jones groups with Data Quality Pro as one of his properties.
Read more
He says a data migration checklist on the site brings in thousands of email addresses a year and points readers to his Data Migration Pro checklist and planner.
Dylan Jones writes for the people who run and market data consultancies.
Read more
The posts are practical: keep the main blog aimed at one buyer, move engineering how-tos into a separate 'labs' area, describe a service by what the client receives rather than what the team does, and use a small paid first project to reduce the risk of trying a new supplier.
To explore the work, start with the posts on splitting technical and business content and on repackaging a technical service, then move to the tactics he builds around them — testing topics before committing to them, the ideation worksheet that mines existing models and materials, and contributing to communities before asking them for attention.
The same handful of themes recurs, so a few posts give a fair picture of the thinking.
Content strategy for data firmsService positioning and packagingLead generation and email listsCommunity-led growthData and analytics consultingChecklists, frameworks and templatesLinkedIn postsOwners of data and analytics firmsB2B services marketers
Micky Deming
Writes for the owners of professional-services firms and argues the same way Jones does: get the fundamentals right before chasing new tactics.
Read more
Both name a clear ideal client as the prerequisite for anything else working, both point to a consistent email list as a low-cost channel that quietly produces revenue, and both build the argument from everyday analogies and client examples rather than theory.
The niche is accounting firms rather than data firms, and the emphasis falls on the newsletter and on reviews and word of mouth. Jones spends more time on how a firm's own website and channels should be structured, including the split between buyer-facing and technical content.
Turns hands-on client experience into numbered, step-by-step content marketing playbooks for B2B service businesses, the same working style as Jones's rule-based posts on channel splits and topic testing.
Read more
Both write for a market they sell into themselves, and both argue that smaller, high-intent audiences beat broad traffic.
Dunning's subject is search and AI-answer visibility for SaaS companies, with client demo and revenue numbers as the proof. Jones stays closer to positioning, packaging and community building for consultancies, and rarely cites campaign results as evidence.
Publishes strategic commentary about search and how service partners work together on a project, rather than technical how-tos, and frames an established process as a growth opportunity instead of a delivery milestone — a similar move to Jones reframing data profiling as a pre-migration assessment.
Read more
The subject is ecommerce replatforming and agency partnerships around Shopify migrations, not content strategy for consultancies. The material supplied is two posts, so the comparison rests on less evidence than the other two.
Dylan Jones's documented reach is a LinkedIn following of 15,190, recorded on 7 October 2026.
Read more
That is the only measured audience figure in the reviewed material; the nine supplied posts show what the content is written for, not who is reading it.
The content reads as written for the owners and senior leaders of data and analytics firms — consultants, data quality and data migration specialists, and the people who decide what those firms publish and how they package offers.
Openings such as "if you run a data firm" and the worked examples (an MDM/PIM provider's services page, an analytics firm blogging about Excel macros) make that audience assumption explicit.
The posts also discuss business buyers such as CFOs, CMOs, COOs, and CDOs, but there in the role of clients' ideal client profile — people Jones advises data firms to write for.
That is a content-theme observation, not evidence that senior business buyers are present in this following.
So for a data consultancy sharpening its content and packaging strategy, the placement question is whether you want to reach the peer group of data-industry founders and marketing leads who follow industry commentary, or the non-technical business buyers described in the posts.
The first is the more defensible read of the evidence.
The second would need audience data that has not been supplied.
A practical next step before committing: ask for recent LinkedIn follower demographics (geography, job function, seniority, company size) and any audience survey or newsletter-reader data that documents employer type, occupation, or role.
If reaching enterprise business sponsors matters to your brief, request those figures before you buy, rather than inferring them from the topics covered.
None of the nine posts reviewed describes a sponsorship package, paid placement, or partnership programme.
Read more
Dylan Jones writes as an adviser to data consultancies, and the commercial activity visible in the material runs the other way: he promotes his own myDataBrand frameworks, asks readers to follow his profile and switch on notifications, and points to his own lead magnets such as checklists and guides.
That leaves no documented format a brand could book, no stated deliverable or price, and no published inquiry route.
This is a gap in the reviewed material, not a finding that he never takes on sponsorships; the featured section of his LinkedIn profile and the myDataBrand site would need checking before a buyer assumes either way.
A planner should treat the partnership question as open and either confirm terms directly or plan around a creator whose offer cannot be verified from his posts.
Good fit for content-led advisory campaigns, with one audience caveat.
Read more
Brief
A B2B data consultancy or analytics vendor wants campaign messaging that helps data-firm owners sharpen content, packaging, and lead generation.
Reasons
The reviewed posts are directly about this job. Dylan Jones writes for people who run data firms and need to decide what the company publishes, how to split technical and buyer-facing material, how to package services around buyer outcomes, how to find topics, and how to turn attention into email subscribers and sales conversations.
The strongest evidence is practical and specific: renaming data profiling for migrations as a 'Pre-Migration Impact Assessment' and listing what the buyer gets; separating a buyer-facing company blog from an R&D Labs stream for technical content; using a fast, paid Trojan Horse offer to create a first win before a larger signature project; testing themes with the Deadliest Catch approach and then improving utility with the Skyscraper Technique; and using the five-column worksheet to turn existing models, methods, materials, modifications, and memories into posts, articles, and webinars.
The channel model gives a campaign a clear structure: stumble, search, and supply. Shorter posts meet people in the feed, longer 1,500 to 3,000 word pieces carry search and AI-assistant discovery, and a checklist, framework, guide, or webinar converts attention into email subscribers.
A campaign can also borrow the positioning point that thought leadership is not keynote status or a book deal. It is moving a named buyer from confusion to clarity on a subject the buyer already finds difficult. For a consultancy selling a technical service to non-technical buyers, that is the messaging problem in one line.
Caveats
The reviewed posts point at data-firm founders and marketing leads more clearly than at non-technical enterprise buyers. If the campaign must reach CFOs, CMOs, or CROs, audience demographics would need checking before committing spend.
No sponsorship package, rate card, media kit, or inquiry route is documented in the reviewed material. A paid placement or formal partnership cannot be treated as bookable from the supplied evidence alone; terms would need direct confirmation.
No campaign performance data was supplied. The fit rests on the content and its relevance to the brief, not on proven conversion results from Dylan Jones campaigns.
When to choose a specialist
Poor fit on the supplied evidence.
Read more
Brief
A developer-tools vendor wants a creator to publish a hands-on product walkthrough and technical tutorial for data engineers, with a bookable demo link and a guaranteed audience of implementers.
Reasons
The reviewed posts are about marketing, positioning, packaging, and content strategy for data firms. They are not hands-on implementation tutorials, product reviews, or code walkthroughs. The posts may mention technical content types such as tutorials, tech papers, and code, but that is advice about what data firms should publish, not examples of Dylan Jones publishing that kind of product-led technical demo.
No commercial format is documented in the nine posts: no sponsorship package, no rate card, no booking link, no published inquiry route, and no stated deliverable. A vendor that needs a bookable creator placement cannot assume one exists from this material.
The audience evidence is a LinkedIn following of 15,190 observed on 7 October 2026, with no demographic export. The posts read as being written for data-firm owners and marketing leaders. That is not the same as a verified audience of data engineers who evaluate tooling and would follow a demo link.
If the brief were changed to strategic messaging advice, a content workshop, or a campaign aimed at data-firm leaders, fit would improve. For a technical product demo aimed at implementers, the reviewed evidence does not support the ask.
A worked campaign example
Brief
A data quality consultancy wants a campaign that sells a diagnostic assessment to business sponsors, then leads into a larger data governance or migration project.
Campaign angle
Rename the technical entry service around the buyer outcome, make it a fast paid diagnostic, and publish content that moves a business sponsor from confusion to a clear next step.
Cautions
This is a messaging angle built from Dylan Jones's published advice. No client outcomes, conversion rates, or campaign performance data were supplied, so the angle should be tested as a hypothesis.
A paid media placement or formal partnership would need direct confirmation. The reviewed posts do not document a sponsorship product, rate card, or inquiry route.
Steps
Action
Do not sell 'data profiling' or list technical mechanics first. Rename the entry work around what the buyer receives, as Dylan Jones did with 'Pre-Migration Impact Assessment'. State the deliverables a product director, CFO, or chief revenue officer would recognise: data defects and cost impact, tooling and resource recommendations, migration timelines, and an executive project report.
Evidence source ids
Step
Repackage the offer
Action
Turn the first engagement into a small, paid, fast diagnostic that produces an early win and naturally opens onto the larger signature offer. Charge for it, standardise it as a repeatable procedure, remove bottlenecks, give it a name and brand, and use stories, examples, and screenshots to connect the buyer's problem, the process, and the larger proposition. A one-to-three-day state-of-the-nation assessment is the model.
Evidence source ids
Step
Build the Trojan Horse
Action
Keep the main company blog focused on the ideal client profile and the buyer journey. Put technical tutorials, papers, guides, Q&A, interviews, and code into a separate R&D Labs zone on the same site, then syndicate that technical material to appropriate channels. This stops the buyer-facing message from being diluted by engineering content.
Evidence source ids
Step
Split the channels
Action
Run the five-column worksheet: Model, Methods, Materials, Mods, and Memories. List the frameworks, methodologies, checklists, templates, client adaptations, and case studies the consultancy already owns. Match each idea to a short post, a longer article, or a webinar. This produces a campaign plan from real work rather than generic topics.
Evidence source ids
Step
Plan the content from owned assets
Action
Use short posts and comments to reach people through feeds and shares. Write longer search-oriented pieces of roughly 1,500 to 3,000 words with videos, framework images, client quotes, checklists, and templates. Convert attention into email subscribers with a useful lead magnet such as a checklist, framework, spreadsheet, guide, or webinar. Treat email as the more dependable path to leads.
Evidence source ids
Step
Distribute through stumble, search, and supply
Action
Test a handful of themes and watch which ones produce discovery calls and sales, not just views and reactions. Once a theme proves useful, improve the utility of the best competing resource through a better visual, tutorial, walkthrough, video, or supporting asset rather than a longer article. This is the Deadliest Catch and Skyscraper combination.
Evidence source ids
Step
Choose and improve topics
Action
Frame thought leadership as leading a named buyer from confusion to informed clarity. Explain a difficult subject in plain language, use ordinary examples, and make the next step obvious. Pair that with community behaviour: leave substantive comments on content the buyer already reads, comment before connecting, and contribute to communities before asking for attention.
Evidence source ids
Step
Keep the writing clarity-first
What to measure
Track discovery calls, sales conversations, and lead magnet signups rather than likes and comments alone. The reviewed posts specifically warn that engagement is a weak substitute for client enquiries.
If the campaign targets enterprise business sponsors, confirm audience demographics first. The reviewed evidence shows a LinkedIn following but not its composition by role, seniority, geography, or company size.
Choose Marco Felicio instead when the engagement hinges on a platform or site migration rather than on what the company publishes.
Read more
The two reviewed posts treat a replatforming as a market-share decision: they cite that only about 10% of website migrations improve organic performance, that average recovery runs beyond 500 days, and that failures come from siloed SEO and development teams, poor sequencing, missing redirects, and thin pre-launch validation.
The advice is to rebuild information architecture, product relationships, and structured data during the move so the site is found in AI-driven discovery as well as traditional rankings.
For a data consultancy whose near-term buyer decision is "are we safe to migrate?", that is closer to the question than content or packaging guidance.
The material covers migration and search visibility, not the wider content job.
There is no guidance on which topics to publish, how to separate technical from buyer-facing channels, how to package a service around buyer outcomes, or how to turn attention into subscribers and sales conversations.
It also arrives as partner commentary around a named agency collaboration, so the reader gets a point of view on migration strategy rather than a reusable method for running a content programme.
Choose Micky Deming instead when the consultancy has not settled the basics and the campaign is aimed at professional-services firm owners.
Read more
The reviewed posts make the case that new tactics fail without fundamentals: a specific ideal client and a consistent newsletter.
The reasoning is concrete and easy for a firm owner to act on, with examples of clients closing revenue from people who had been on an email list for more than three years, and a warning that AI-generated content is average by definition and will not differentiate a firm.
The second post pushes the same point toward human stories, real experiences, and the problems actually solved.
This is deliberately generalist: it names accounting firms, not data firms, and it does not go near the technical-versus-business content split, the packaging of a technical service for a non-technical sponsor, or search and AI-assistant discovery. A data consultancy with an already-defined buyer and a working newsletter would find little here it does not have, and it would still need the more specific material Dylan Jones supplies.
Choose Sam Dunning instead when the campaign's target is measurable pipeline from search and AI assistants, and the consultancy wants a system with numbers attached.
Read more
The reviewed posts lay out a seven-step play to drive organic demos in 90 days: target long-tail buyer-intent phrases rather than early-stage questions, build listicle and comparison pages in the formats AI assistants pull from, fix existing pages that slipped, earn brand mentions as well as links, make sure AI crawlers are not blocked, and track "dark AI search" by asking on signup and demo forms how buyers heard about the firm. The case studies are specific, including long-tail searches of roughly 10 to 20 monthly searches that produced multiple high-value demos within weeks.
The frame is B2B and SaaS growth, and the advice is search-led from end to end, closing with a playbook download.
It does not cover running a consultancy's content strategy, building community and comment-based reach, or packaging a service so a business sponsor understands what they are buying.
A data consultancy whose constraint is what to say and how to say it would take only part of this, and would still need the positioning and offer work that is the centre of Dylan Jones's material.
This profile draws on nine LinkedIn posts published by Dylan Jones about marketing, content and growth for data and analytics firms, read in full.
The posts cover channel strategy, splitting buyer-facing from technical content, renaming and packaging services around buyer outcomes, paid entry offers, topic testing, idea generation and community building.
Topics and approach, similar creators and the campaign fit judgments all come from this material.
Three comparable creators were each assessed from two posts dated January to October 2026.
No publication dates were supplied for the nine posts, so they are treated as a snapshot of the current thinking rather than a dated record of how the views developed, and the set does not establish a full account of Dylan Jones's career or other published work.
A LinkedIn account record observed on October 7, 2026 shows a following of 15,190; no audience demographic breakdown was available.
No sponsorship terms, rate card, media kit, inquiry route, engagement figures or campaign performance data were supplied, so commercial formats are described only where the posts document them and the fit conclusions rest on the content rather than on measured campaign results.
A gap remains for anything outside this post set: earlier or later writing, other channels, and any client work or speaking that would widen the picture.
Recent engagement
Across their last 9 LinkedIn posts, the median post got 24 reactions and 4 comments. Checked 2026-11-02.