Dean Spencer

Leads arrive interested but not ready to decide: marketing has captured attention and filled the CRM without building enough trust, leaving sales to explain the value and educate buyers from scratch.

• The fix is not a new sales script but a shared process: marketing learns what the sales conversation sounds like so messaging sharpens, and sales reports what buyers care about so content improves.
• Spencer frames the problem as a structure to repair, not a team to blame.

The post opens on a scene most manufacturing teams recognise: salespeople show up, follow the process, put in the hours and watch deals drag anyway. Spencer adds that in their own LinkedIn campaigns, education and pre-qualification happen before a lead reaches sales.

Read original

The reason is history: marketing’s last contribution was often an unwanted leaflet or a show list that went nowhere, so another request looks like a cost with no return.

• Start with useful work, not a favour: pick one salesperson and one live account, write something they can send, then ask for a conversation.
• Drawing on twenty-five years marketing for manufacturers, Spencer says the pattern holds everywhere: sales engages when marketing produces something that helps a deal already in motion.

Start with a single page for the quality manager holding up a decision. It can be produced in two days, before any wider planning.

Read original

Then the week plays out differently: sales returns to outbound, while marketing builds a campaign for people who showed interest years ago.

• Spencer says there is no bad intent, only habit, and that the pattern has repeated for over twenty years.
• The remedy is not more tools or longer meetings but a shared focus: agree who to stop trying to win, settle on one definition of success (revenue, not awareness), use shared materials built around real questions, meet briefly each week to exchange what sales hears and marketing sees, and open the CRM.

The weekly meeting is deliberately short and two-way, and ends with the CRM open. Spencer treats the record of what happened as the arbiter, rather than either team’s account.

Read original

Two manufacturers with the same product and budget are separated mainly by who gets there first; the second arrives to a buyer who has already formed a view. Spencer says reducing that number from three weeks to three days accounts for most of the value they add in a client’s first quarter, and has very little to do with creative.

Spencer describes the measure as a future line on a board pack, not a dashboard item. It will feel strange to marketing teams and completely normal to everyone else in the building.

Spencer is unsure whether anyone will welcome being measured this way. Measuring marketing on speed can go wrong in obvious ways; they can already name two.

Read original

Waiting is tidier: everything is accurate, the photos are real, and nobody has to field questions about something that does not exist yet.

• The other route is to say nothing about the product and publish about the problem it solves instead—the failure mode, the cost of the current workaround, what existing options miss—so that by launch the audience already agrees the problem exists.
• Spencer acknowledges the tension: competitors may read the material and move faster, though most manufacturers overestimate how closely anyone is watching them.

Spencer cites helping an F1 team launch a new product outside racing, with collateral built six months out, some teasers, then the launch. The exception is a regulated product or anything with certification pending: waiting is the only option, and Spencer would not argue with it.

Read original

Written work suits the rare engineer who enjoys writing—roughly one in ten, by their estimate—and delivers accuracy and depth, though it usually needs substantial work before a buyer would read it.

• Spoken work, captured in a half-hour call, is faster, sounds more natural and picks up asides that would never survive a first draft.
• The trade-off is clear: whoever writes it up takes on the accuracy risk, a real concern with a technical product.
• Spencer’s default is spoken content, with written work where a willing writer exists and a technical check either way.

A recorded half-hour conversation is the raw material. The writer’s job is to protect the technical claims while preserving the expert’s natural voice.

Spencer has asked for both over the years: first as the person being asked inside a manufacturing business, and later as the person doing the asking.

Read original

Marketers end up defending numbers they do not believe either.

• Spencer’s alternative is three measures: how many new conversations started with a target account; how many people at a target account engaged with anything published; and how many deals in the current forecast had a marketing touch before sales got involved.
• The third requires sales to provide information, which Spencer sees as a conversation worth having anyway.
• Lead with conversations started: it is the number an owner recognises as the beginning of an order.
• None of the three is perfect, but a number an MD understands and half trusts beats a dashboard nobody acts on.

The post is aimed at the one-person marketing team in a manufacturing business, reporting to an owner or MD rather than a marketing department.

Read original

Spencer calls that the worst thing you can do—and admits to doing it for years.

• A deck answers questions nobody has asked yet and turns a chat between two people into a document judged by someone you cannot see.
• Instead, send two or three sentences and one question to reopen the conversation—for example, whether volume or the quality of who you speak to matters more right now.
• If the buyer insists on a document, send one page describing their situation, what you would do about it and the cost.
• Spencer says the request itself is usually a polite way of saying, “I am not ready to decide,” though procurement people sometimes genuinely need the document.
• The same insistence on plain language shapes the positioning argument: a founder’s description of an integrated platform that drives digital transformation boils down to helping warehouse managers track inventory in real time.
• That plain version gets meetings.
• Clarity, Spencer writes, is the cost of attention.

A founder pitching operational visibility and digital transformation across mid-market logistics is asked what the company actually does. The founder answers with one sentence about warehouse managers tracking inventory; Spencer says that is the sentence that would win the meeting.

Read original · Original 2

It shows where Spencer sees the problem and what they propose instead.

The post opens on a scene most manufacturing teams recognise: salespeople showing up, following the process, putting in the hours and watching deals drag anyway.

• Spencer traces the cause back to before sales: leads arrive interested but not ready to decide.
• Marketing captured attention and filled the CRM but did not build enough trust before the handoff, so sales ends up selling the value and educating the buyer from scratch.
• The fix is not a new script but one shared process: marketing learns what the sales conversation actually sounds like so messaging sharpens, and sales reports what buyers care about so content does too.
• They say that in their own LinkedIn campaigning, they complete education and pre-qualification before a lead ever reaches sales, and call that the only way to do it properly into 2026.

For brands planning a campaign

For a manufacturer with slow conversion, inspect the marketing-to-sales handover first. Make it the natural scope for a campaign: build education and pre-qualification into marketing so sales opens with buyers who already understand the problem.

Spencer argues that sending the deck in response to "sounds interesting, send me some info" is the worst move available, and admits to having done it for years.

• The reason is specific: a deck answers questions nobody has asked yet and turns a conversation between two people into a document judged by someone you cannot see.
• The alternative is two or three sentences and one question to reopen the exchange, such as asking whether volume or lead quality matters more right now.
• If the buyer insists on a document, they recommend one page covering the buyer's situation, what you would do about it and the cost.
• The post reframes the request itself as usually a polite way of saying "I am not ready to decide", while noting one exception: procurement people sometimes genuinely need the document.

For brands planning a campaign

A buyer-reply template to copy into sales enablement, plus a prompt to commission one-page, situation-specific leave-behinds for each buyer role instead of a general capabilities deck.

Spencer sets out two ways to get expert content: have the expert write it, or have them speak while someone else writes.

• Written work suits the rare engineer who enjoys writing — their estimate is roughly one in ten — and offers accuracy and depth, though the draft usually needs heavy work before a buyer would read it.
• Spoken work, such as a recorded half-hour call, is faster, sounds more human and surfaces asides that would never survive a first draft.
• The trade-off is explicit: whoever writes it up takes on the accuracy risk, which matters for technical products.
• The default is to use spoken material unless you have a willing writer, with a technical check either way.

For brands planning a campaign

For manufacturers selling technical products, budget for recorded interviews and a technical review instead of asking engineers to draft. It is a lower-friction route to publishable content and gives the writer raw material that reads like speech.

Marketing asks sales for forty-five minutes and gets nothing back; Spencer says the answer is not a better meeting invite.

• The reason is history: the last thing marketing sent was often a leaflet nobody asked for or a show list that went nowhere, so another request looks like a cost with no return.
• The way back is a small piece of useful work: pick one salesperson and one live account, then write something they can actually send — for example, a page aimed at the quality manager holding up the decision — in two days.
• Then ask for the conversation.
• Writing from twenty-five years marketing for manufacturers, they say the pattern holds everywhere: sales engages once marketing produces something that helps a deal already in motion.

For brands planning a campaign

Start a sales-alignment programme with one account-specific deliverable rather than a planning workshop. It produces useful collateral and earns the access needed to build the wider campaign.

Spencer dismisses the usual reporting set — website visits, followers and open rates — as easy to pull but unable to withstand an MD asking what it brought in.

• The replacement is three measures: how many new conversations started with a target account, how many people at a target account touched anything you published, and how many deals currently in the forecast had a marketing touch before sales got involved.
• The third measure requires sales to supply information, which they frame as a conversation worth having in itself.
• They say their client reports lead on conversations started because it is the number an owner recognises as the beginning of an order.
• The three measures are not perfect, but half-trusted numbers an MD understands beat a dashboard nobody has acted on.

For brands planning a campaign

A ready-made measurement frame for a manufacturer's campaign plan; collecting the third metric also prompts the sales conversation the campaign depends on.

Two senior people — a head of sales and a marketing director — agree on a plan in a good conversation with real nods, then revert the following week: sales goes back to outbound, while marketing builds a campaign for people who showed interest years ago.

• Spencer says there is no bad intent, just habit, and has seen the pattern repeat for over twenty years.
• What works, in their account, is not more tools or longer meetings but one shared focus: decide who to stop trying to win; agree on a single definition of success (revenue, not awareness); work from one shared set of materials built around real questions; meet briefly each week, with sales bringing what they hear and marketing what they see; and open the CRM, where the truth is always there.

For brands planning a campaign

Use the sequence as the operating rhythm for a manufacturer campaign: agreed exclusions, a revenue-based success definition, shared materials and a weekly CRM-based review. It is a low-cost structure a client can sustain.

Spencer frames a new product six months from release as a choice.

• Waiting is tidier: everything is accurate, the photos are real, and nobody fields questions about a product that does not exist yet.
• For a regulated product or anything with certification pending, they say it is the only option and would not argue with it.
• The other route is to talk early about the problem rather than the product — the failure mode, the cost of the workaround, what current options miss — so that by launch the audience already agrees a problem exists.
• The stated risk is a competitor reading it and moving quicker, though they suggest most manufacturers overestimate how closely anyone is watching.
• They cite a concrete engagement: helping an F1 team launch a new product outside racing, with collateral built six months out, teasers, then launch.

For brands planning a campaign

For a manufacturer with a long runway and no certification constraint, turn the pre-launch phase into a problem-focused content programme. If certification is pending, hold product claims, as the post recommends.

Spencer predicts that manufacturing will start measuring speed to market for marketing itself — not leads or impressions, but weeks from decision to live — and that it will end up tracked like on-time delivery, a number on a board pack.

• The reasoning is that two manufacturers with the same product and budget are separated mainly by who got there first.
• They state that taking that number from three weeks down to three days is most of the value they add in a first quarter with a client and has little to do with creative.
• The post also admits uncertainty: measuring marketing on speed has obvious ways to go wrong, and they say they can already think of two.
• Ask them to explain those risks before adopting the metric.

For brands planning a campaign

Scope the first phase of work around shortening approval-to-publish time, since that is where Spencer claims early value, while keeping creative quality as a separate measure so the speed metric does not distort the work.

Their posts recommend shared target accounts, buyer-focused materials and regular exchanges about what sales hears and marketing sees.

Start with a salesperson and an active account. Create something useful for the deal before asking sales for more time.

For brands planning a campaign

A campaign could bring marketing and sales together around a live account, a shared success measure and a weekly review of buyer questions. This suits manufacturers looking to improve handoffs or make marketing more useful to sales.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3

When buyers reach sales before they trust or understand the offer, sales must repeat the education from the beginning.

For brands planning a campaign

Plan a sequence that addresses buyer questions and builds understanding before handing a lead to sales. Agree with sales on what readiness means instead of treating captured interest as sufficient.

Examples: Source 1

Another advises discussing the product's problem and the limits of current options before launch, when appropriate.

Spencer distinguishes early problem education from promoting an unreleased product.

The post says waiting is necessary for regulated products or products awaiting certification, and notes the risk of disclosing information to competitors.

For brands planning a campaign

For a launch, map approval steps and set a realistic time-to-market measure. Early, problem-focused content may help buyers recognize the need before launch, but should not disclose a product that cannot yet be discussed safely.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

This can capture a more natural voice, but technical claims still need checking.

Use a recorded conversation as the starting point; retain a willing expert writer when available.

Spencer identifies accuracy as a particular risk for technical products and calls for a technical check.

For brands planning a campaign

A manufacturer could interview engineers or product experts, then turn their answers into buyer-facing content. Build in technical approval before publication.

Examples: Source 1

For a reply such as “send me some info,” they recommend asking a short qualifying question before sending material; if a document is needed, make it specific to the buyer's situation.

Procurement teams may genuinely need a document.

For brands planning a campaign

Test whether a buyer can explain the offer simply. Equip sales with a concise, situation-specific follow-up and a question that keeps the conversation moving.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

For brands planning a campaign

Choose a small set of account- and deal-related measures with sales, and explain what each can and cannot show. This gives teams seeking commercial context more than a dashboard of activity alone.

Examples: Source 1

Malviya argues that consistent posts from a company's own people create distribution an ad budget cannot buy.

• They describe a compounding sequence: content warms accounts, outreach targets people who have already been watching, and paid media amplifies what has worked.
• Spencer likewise links publishing to sales conversations.
• Both tie content to positioning and inbound replies rather than impressions.

Malviya writes from an agency running founder-led content and outbound for clients across SaaS, cybersecurity, consulting and other sectors, with lead counts and closed revenue as proof. Spencer writes from manufacturing marketing, focusing on the marketing-to-sales handover, launch timing and reporting to an owner or MD.

Read original · Original 2

Nilsson's skill list begins with explaining what you sell in three sentences and asking one follow-up question before answering.

• Their AI post insists teams map their real sales process before inserting tools.
• Spencer similarly argues that the handover and the buyer's understanding matter more than a new script or another subscription.

Nilsson writes about sales training and AI adoption for salespeople and sales leaders, mostly through numbered skill lists with a practice attached to each point. Spencer writes from the marketing side of a manufacturing business, using narrative scenes about campaigns, launches and reporting to address marketing teams and the people they report to.

Read original · Original 2

They treat repeated objections as information rather than something to overcome. Spencer likewise diagnoses the process rather than the team, starting with what buyers said and what the sales team heard.

Wright writes about sales leadership and performance: reviewing calls, objections and forecasts, and coaching individual reps. Spencer focuses upstream on what marketing publishes, how quickly it ships and how the handover to sales is designed.

Read original · Original 2

Malviya's posts describe building visibility across several people inside a company, then using paid ads to amplify what worked organically and outreach to target people who have been watching.

• For a manufacturer building familiarity with a target account list before sales makes contact, that flywheel is a stronger fit than a single marketing-sales handover exercise, especially if the company has several credible people who can post.
• The case-study post adds examples of founder-led content and warm outbound generating qualified calls and revenue across B2B clients.

The posts focus on general B2B demand generation, not manufacturing marketing.

• They do not cover production launch timing, certification, technical expert interviews or the practical sales-marketing handover behind Spencer's recommendations.
• The system assumes several willing participants and months of consistent posting before inbound appears, making it better suited to building target-account familiarity than meeting a launch deadline.
• If manufacturing-specific sales alignment and a shorter sign-off-to-live time are priorities, ask Malviya for examples addressing those needs.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Nilsson's posts cover sales skills including storytelling, active listening, emotional intelligence, pipeline discipline, follow-up and coaching.

• They also set out a practical stance on AI in B2B sales: use it to prep calls, test arguments and cut admin, but keep human judgment in the live conversation.
• A manufacturer whose reps struggle with discovery, next steps or consistent CRM discipline may get more from that sales-side skills and AI programme than from another marketing campaign.

Nilsson's posts are sales-side and mostly about general B2B.

• They do not cover manufacturing marketing, pre-launch education or how to align marketing content with the sales conversation.
• Nor do they provide a content production plan or a way to measure marketing's contribution to forecast deals.
• If the goal is to align marketing with sales and shorten launch timelines, Nilsson addresses the sales-capability half; Spencer's posts address the handover and launch-timing half directly.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Wright's posts describe listening to calls, checking whether reps ask enough questions, noticing when buyers lose interest and treating repeated objections as clues to what has not been addressed.

• They also argue that missed targets should not automatically trigger more activity; the better question is what must improve so work turns into revenue.
• A manufacturer facing forecast slippage and vague next steps may get more from that conversation-level diagnosis and coaching than from a new content programme.

Wright's work focuses on sales leadership and diagnostics, not marketing production, manufacturing-specific content or launch timing.

• It requires access to sales calls and manager coaching time, and stops short of campaign execution, content creation or marketing measurement.
• If the task is to build marketing that supports sales alignment and shorter launches, Wright can sharpen the sales half but does not replace Spencer's marketing-side handover, reporting and pre-launch content recommendations.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2