Search creators⌘K
  1. Home
  2. Creators
  3. Dalibor Lukeš

Dalibor Lukeš

Dalibor Lukeš works on cybersecurity at Vodafone Business, contributing to security services and speaking about enterprise cyber risk, artificial intelligence, and resilience during crises.

2.3K followersCybersecurityEnterprise AICyber resilienceBased on 11 posts · latest Sep 2026
LinkedIn

At a glance

Dalibor Lukeš is most useful for enterprise cybersecurity talks on AI, identity checks, and crisis resilience.

Best for

A cybersecurity vendor planning a joint webinar for security leaders.

Not for

Consumer deepfake or mobile security campaigns measured by reach or engagement.

Key takeaways

  • Buying security technology is not the same as being secure.
  • Labelling rules will not stop those who break them, so trust has to be verified.
  • The line between cyber security and physical security has gone.

Check first: Ask for documented audience data and terms before contacting them.

Main ideas
Buying technology is not the same as being secure · Labelling rules will not stop those who break them, so trust has to be verified · Not every SOC is the same
Audience
2,294 LinkedIn followers · 5 (published 2026-05-20 to 2026-08-03) Dated posts reviewed for audience characterisation
Read first
Interview on why buying security technology is not enough
Sources for this section

What they are known for

Dalibor Lukeš works on cybersecurity at Vodafone Business and writes about how digital risk reaches beyond IT.

  • Their posts connect enterprise security to building operations, AI-generated impersonation, and emergency communications.
  • Follow their work for concrete examples of those links: from the risks of connected buildings to tools for checking identities and deepfakes, and a mobile communications kit for crisis response.

Lukeš makes cybersecurity legible through its effects on people and operations, not just systems.

  • In their account of a talk on building security, a cyberattack could affect a building’s operations and the safety of people inside; they point to identities, access, and IT/OT connections as risks requiring a joined-up response.
  • The Vodafone Verify post applies a similar practical lens to AI: it describes checks for manipulated media, meeting identities, and synthetic signals in phone calls.
  • The INER post adds a distinct resilience perspective, explaining how a portable kit can provide satellite data and local Wi-Fi where power and ordinary networks are unavailable.
  • Together, these examples show a consistent interest in preparing for failures before they become crises, while also documenting their involvement in Vodafone security services.
Sources for this section

Ideas and priorities

Dalibor Lukeš writes about enterprise cybersecurity as a management problem, not a technology purchase.

Read more

Their recurring arguments: buying tools does not make a company secure; rules requiring AI content to be labelled will not restrain criminals, so verification has to sit in the network and the app; not every security operations centre means the same thing; the boundary between cyber and physical security has effectively gone; and resilience is built long before a crisis starts. The posts are short recaps of talks, interviews and service launches rather than extended essays, with the reasoning visible in the framing and the lists of takeaways they repeat.

Buying technology is not the same as being secure

Lukeš argues that security is a governance and operating problem, not a purchasing decision.

Read more

They say AI and cybersecurity now fill most of their meetings, and that the real exposure comes from uncontrolled AI use rather than a lack of tools. Cybersecurity, they conclude, belongs with a company's top management, not only its IT department.

Lukeš announced an interview with the Czech business daily Ekonomický deník, covering why simply buying technology is not enough, the risks of uncontrolled AI use and why senior management should take an interest in cybersecurity. The interview is behind a shortened link; readers can find Lukeš's own summary here.

Read original

Labelling rules will not stop those who break them, so trust has to be verified

Lukeš argues that AI has made it impossible to distinguish real from fabricated material by eye or ear, and that AI-generated content, spoofed identities and fake communication are present-day realities, not future scenarios.

Read more

European rules require AI-generated or modified content to be labelled, they note, but criminals will not label anything. Lukeš therefore puts the answer in verification services rather than disclosure.

Lukeš describes Vodafone Verify: an app that checks text, images, video and audio for manipulation and deepfake content; a tool for verifying the identity of online meeting participants; and network-level detection of synthetic signals during phone calls.

  • They say the first announcement came in early July 2026 at the Karlovy Vary International Film Festival, presented by Veronika Brázdilová and CEO Violeta Luca, and that their ICT segment team within Vodafone Business is helping build it.
  • Before repeating claims about what the tools detect, ask Vodafone for supporting evidence.

The tension worth noting is that AI is presented as both the source of the risk and the machinery of the fix: the same post says AI-generated material is now indistinguishable, then describes AI analysis as a way to detect it.

Read original

Not every SOC is the same

Lukeš argues that the term SOC is used loosely.

Read more

At Vodafone Business CZ, it means a Security Operations Center — continuous oversight of cyber security. The oversight takes different forms depending on who is covered and how large they are.

In a talk in the main hall at the ISSS conference, Lukeš explained that the company monitors its internal infrastructure and network, which they say form part of the state's critical infrastructure.

  • It also sells Vodafone SOC as a service to clients in several variants for small, medium and large organisations, with onboarding possible within about a month.
  • They helped create and prepare the service, making this a clear example of work they helped build, not just discuss.

Read original

The line between cyber security and physical security has gone

Lukeš argues that modern buildings are fully digital and therefore part of the IT world, with all its risks.

Read more

An attack can affect operations, safety and the people inside. Their takeaways: the cyber and physical boundary has practically disappeared; the biggest risks now lie in identities, access and the connection between IT and operational technology; and security has to bring technology, processes and people together.

Lukeš spoke in the security track at the Prague FM Summit with a talk titled "Cyber threats (not only) for buildings," invited by Jiří Knap and Jan Chodora.

  • The talk's framing line was that a hacker today does not need to switch off a server, only the building.
  • The line and takeaways are Lukeš's; Knap and Chodora invited them to present.

Read original

Resilience is built long before the crisis starts

Lukeš argues that disaster response capacity is built in advance by people willing to train for situations they may never face, not in the moment an emergency begins.

Read more

Communications and coordination, they say, have to keep working when everything else has stopped.

Lukeš volunteers for the Vodafone Foundation's INER (Instant Network Emergency Response) programme and presented it at the IS2 Information Security Summit with co-presenter Justin Waller.

  • The kit can be carried to a site on foot in a backpack, creates a secure satellite data link and a local Wi-Fi network, and runs where there is no power.
  • Lukeš says it can make the difference between chaos and effective help.
  • They connect this work to their preparation as a member of a state reserve body and to first-aid training for critical and unusual situations.

Read original

Sources for this section

Start with their work

Interview on why buying security technology is not enough

Answers "what is Lukeš's core argument?" in a few lines: security is a management and operating problem, not a purchasing decision.

Read more

A newcomer gets Lukeš's position before seeing Lukeš's projects.

Announces an interview for the Czech business daily Ekonomický deník on why buying technology is not enough, the risks of uncontrolled AI use, and why senior management should engage with cybersecurity. Lukeš opens by saying AI and cybersecurity are the subjects of most of their meetings at the moment.

For brands planning a campaign

Frames a joint webinar around governance and accountability rather than tooling—a debatable proposition for a security-leader audience.

Talk on cyber threats to buildings: "a hacker no longer has to switch off the server"

Answers "how does Lukeš connect cyber risk to the physical world?" — the clearest single example of Lukeš's signature argument that the line between cyber and physical security has gone.

Read more

Recounts a presentation at the Prague FM Summit, in the security track, titled "Cyber threats (not only) for buildings," given at the invitation of Jiří Knap and Jan Chodora.

  • Lukeš says modern buildings are now fully digital and therefore part of the IT world, with all its risks; a cyber attack can hit operations, safety and the people inside.
  • Their summary: the cyber/physical boundary has practically disappeared; the biggest risks now sit in identities, access and IT/OT interconnection; security has to work as one whole of technology, processes and people; and attacks are far more refined than before.

For brands planning a campaign

Offers a concrete hook for an audience spanning security and facilities or OT teams, and supports an IT/OT convergence theme in a joint session.

Conference talk: "there is no SOC like a SOC"

Answers "what has Lukeš built, not just said?" — direct evidence that Lukeš was involved in productising a security service, which matters when judging an advisor.

Read more

Writes about a talk in the main hall at the ISSS conference arguing that not every SOC is equivalent.

  • At Vodafone Business CZ, Lukeš says SOC means Security Operations Center: continuous monitoring.
  • The company monitors its own internal infrastructure and network, which Lukeš says forms part of the state's critical infrastructure, and also sells Vodafone SOC as a service in several variants for small, medium and large organisations, with onboarding possible within a month.
  • They took part in creating and preparing the service.

For brands planning a campaign

Supports a build-versus-buy or in-house-versus-managed-SOC discussion, starting with Lukeš's own product work.

Vodafone Verify: AI content, deepfakes and digital trust

Answers "where does Lukeš stand on AI-generated content and digital trust?" — the AI half of Lukeš's work, tied to a named service family rather than general commentary.

Read more

Argues that, at the current pace of AI adoption, people can no longer tell by eye or ear what is real, and that AI-created content, impersonated identities and fake communication are already present, not futuristic.

  • Lukeš notes European rules on labelling AI-generated or modified content, then points out that attackers are unlikely to label anything.
  • They describe the Vodafone Verify family their team is preparing: an app that checks text, images, video and audio for manipulation and deepfake content; a tool that verifies the identity of participants in online meetings; and network-level detection of synthetic signals during phone calls.
  • Lukeš says the first announcement came in early July at the Karlovy Vary International Film Festival, presented by Veronika Brázdilová and CEO Violeta Luca, and that their ICT segment team within Vodafone Business is part of building it.

For brands planning a campaign

Pairs AI risk with impersonation and deepfake detection for a security-leader webinar; identity verification is the angle most likely to match a vendor's existing audience.

Emergency communications programme INER and what resilience means before a crisis

Answers "what does resilience mean to Lukeš beyond enterprise IT?" — shows a crisis and humanitarian thread that runs alongside Lukeš's commercial security work.

Read more

Describes Lukeš speaking at the IS2 Information Security Summit with Justin Waller about INER (Instant Network Emergency Response), a Vodafone Foundation programme they volunteer in.

  • They explain the kit in practical terms: it can be carried to a site on foot in a backpack, creates a secure satellite data link and a local Wi-Fi network, and works where there is no power.
  • In a situation where information and coordination are critical, Lukeš says, it can be the difference between chaos and effective help.
  • They add that they are preparing for situations where normal procedures stop working, as a member of a state reserve body and through first-aid training for critical and unusual situations.
  • They close by arguing that resilience is built long before a crisis starts, by people willing to train for something they may never need.

For brands planning a campaign

Offers a credible non-commercial narrative to close a resilience-themed webinar, though it is not itself an enterprise security offer.

Sources for this section

Topics and approach

Enterprise AI risk and who owns it

In an interview with Ekonomický deník, Dalibor Lukeš says AI and cybersecurity are the subjects of most of his current meetings.

Read more

Buying the technology isn’t the answer, they argue: the real exposure comes from uncontrolled AI use. Cybersecurity belongs on the agenda of a company’s top management, not just its IT department.

A media interview, summarised by Lukeš as a list of topics rather than a written argument.

For brands planning a campaign

For a webinar aimed at security leaders, they can make the case for executive sponsorship of AI governance before any product is discussed. They’re a plausible opening or moderating voice, not just a vendor presenter.

Examples: Source 1

Digital trust when AI content can’t be spotted by eye

Lukeš argues that AI adoption has moved so quickly that people can no longer tell real material from fabricated content by sight or hearing.

Read more

They describe AI-generated content, spoofed identities and fake communications as present-day problems, not future ones.

  • European rules require AI-generated or AI-modified content to be labelled, they note, but criminals won’t label anything.
  • They present Vodafone Verify as the response: an app for checking text, images, video and audio for manipulation and deepfakes; a tool for verifying the identity of participants in online meetings; and network-level detection of synthetic voice signals during phone calls.

Product announcement: the post promotes a Vodafone offering. Check the claim about what the tools detect before repeating it in campaign copy.

For brands planning a campaign

A strong fit for a deepfake, fraud or identity-verification segment: they can address both the policy gap and the service-layer response.

  • The framing is a Vodafone service that Lukeš says the team contributes to; they credit named Vodafone leaders with the first announcement.
  • Ask for independent support before presenting the service as an endorsement.

Examples: Source 1

Managed security operations and what a SOC actually means

Speaking in the main hall at the ISSS conference, Lukeš opened with the line, “There is no SOC like a SOC,” explaining that at Vodafone Business CZ, SOC means Security Operations Center — continuous oversight of cyber security.

Read more

They explain that the company monitors its own internal infrastructure and network, part of the state’s critical infrastructure, and also sells Vodafone SOC as a service. The service has tiers for small, medium and large organisations, with onboarding possible within about a month.

Conference keynote, followed by a post that restates the argument and invites readers to get in touch.

For brands planning a campaign

The operational detail — tiers by organisation size, roughly one-month onboarding, and the split between in-house monitoring and client service — suits a session for security leaders comparing managed detection options. It gives a vendor webinar a practitioner’s account of what buyers are choosing between.

Examples: Source 1

Cyber and physical security have merged

At the FM Summit in Prague, Lukeš presented on cyber threats to buildings under the line that a hacker no longer needs to switch off a server, only the building.

Read more

They argue that modern buildings are fully digital and therefore part of the IT world, with all its risks; an attack can affect operations, safety and the people inside. Their takeaways: the boundary between cyber and physical security has effectively disappeared; the biggest risks now lie in identities, access, and the connection between IT and operational technology; and security must bring technology, process and people together.

For brands planning a campaign

A fresh angle for a security campaign: buildings and operational technology as attack surfaces. It also reaches facility and building-management audiences alongside security teams, making it a good fit for a jointly promoted webinar.

Examples: Source 1

Resilience is built long before the crisis

Lukeš volunteers for the Vodafone Foundation’s INER (Instant Network Emergency Response) programme and presented it with Justin Waller at the IS2 Information Security Summit.

Read more

They describe a kit that can be carried to a site in a backpack and set up without power, providing a satellite data connection and a local Wi-Fi network so information and coordination keep working after a disaster or in a conflict zone.

  • They link this to their preparation as a member of #StanovenéZálohyStátu (state reserves) and to first-aid training for critical and non-standard situations.
  • Their argument: resilience isn’t created when a crisis starts, but long beforehand, through people willing to train for something they may never need.

For brands planning a campaign

A human-interest and preparedness angle for opening a webinar on operational resilience without starting with a product. The humanitarian connectivity story pairs naturally with the case for planning ahead, and gives the session an emotional hook alongside its technical content.

Examples: Source 1

Sources for this section

Brands and businesses

Dalibor Lukeš's brand relationships centre on Vodafone Business, where they work.

Read more

They say the ICT segment team is building the Vodafone Verify services and the client-facing Vodafone SOC, which they helped create. They also write about volunteering for the Vodafone Foundation's INER emergency-communications programme and speaking or giving interviews at FM Summit, the ISSS conference and Ekonomický deník.

Vodafone Business

Employment

Dalibor Lukeš writes about Vodafone's security work from within the company.

Read more

They say the team is preparing the Vodafone Verify family of services: an app to check whether digital content is AI-generated or manipulated, meeting-identity checks and deepfake detection in phone calls.

  • They thank "our ICT segment team within Vodafone Business" for building it.
  • In a separate post, they say they were glad to help create Vodafone SOC, a continuous cyber-security monitoring service offered to small, medium and large client organisations.

View example

Vodafone Foundation

Mention

Dalibor Lukeš says they took part in the Foundation's INER (Instant Network Emergency Response) programme as a volunteer and presented it with Justin Waller at the IS2 – Information Security Summit.

Read more

They describe how a portable kit carried on foot can restore satellite data links, local Wi-Fi and power in disaster areas.

View example

FM Summit

Mention

Dalibor Lukeš spoke in the security section at FM Summit in Prague, invited by Jiří Knap and Jan Chodora, on "Cyber threats (not only) for buildings".

Read more

Their points: the line between cyber and physical security has effectively gone; the biggest risks sit in identities, access and the link between IT and OT; and security has to work as one whole across technology, processes and people.

View example

Konference ISSS

Mention

Dalibor Lukeš gave a main-hall talk at the ISSS conference titled "Není SOC jako SOC", explaining what Vodafone Business counts as a security operations centre.

Read more

They said the company runs monitoring for its own infrastructure and network, as well as selling Vodafone SOC as a client service in several variants.

View example

Ekonomický deník

Mention

Dalibor Lukeš gave an interview to Ekonomický deník, saying the discussion covered why buying technology is not enough, the risks of uncontrolled AI use, and why company leadership should pay attention to cyber security.

Read more

View example

Sources for this section

Topics and similar creators

Dalibor Lukeš writes short LinkedIn posts in Czech about enterprise cybersecurity, mostly recaps of talks, interviews and services they have worked on.

Read more

One recurring argument runs through the posts: AI has made identity and communication easy to fake, so trust has to be verified inside networks and apps rather than left to labelling rules or users’ eyes.

  • The posts also cover managed security operations, the intersection of building systems and IT security, and Vodafone Foundation’s emergency communications kit.
  • Each post runs to just a few paragraphs, making the operational detail quick to scan.
  • The conference recaps (ISSS, FM Summit, IS2) offer the most specific reasoning; the service announcements read more as company positions.
Cybersecurity Enterprise AI Digital trust Deepfakes and synthetic media Identity verification Security operations centres Managed security services IT and operational technology security Cyber resilience Emergency communications Telecoms and connectivity Conference speaking Short-form posts Security leaders

Salman Hussain

Both treat AI-enabled impersonation and deepfakes as a verification and business-process problem rather than an email-filtering problem.

Read more

They offer short, numbered guidance for security leaders: verify sensitive requests through a separate channel, use dual approvals and train staff.

Hussain writes from an advisory angle aimed at executives and CISOs, with countermeasures for chief-executive fraud and a Gulf-region focus. Lukeš writes from inside a telecoms operator, describing services the team is building, such as Vodafone Verify and Vodafone SOC, alongside conference talks.

Read original · Original 2

Ray A.

Both centre on digital identity and how a person or message gets verified.

Read more

Ray A. follows mobile IDs from issuance to acceptance by relying parties; Lukeš approaches the same trust problem through deepfake, spoofed-identity and network-verification work.

Ray A. publishes a weekly, standards-heavy round-up in English of US state wallet rollouts and the AAMVA, NIST and ISO work behind them.

  • Lukeš writes occasional posts in Czech tied to European conference appearances and operator services.
  • For more standards detail, ask for specific examples.

Read original · Original 2

Matti Perkkiö

Both write practical, example-led posts about applying AI inside real business processes and address non-English-speaking practitioner audiences: Perkkiö writes for sales teams working with CRM and ERP data, Lukeš for security and AI risk.

Read more

Perkkiö focuses on commercial productivity — AI in quoting, call analysis and CRM hygiene, with named tools and a vendor discount code.

  • Lukeš focuses on risk and trust: what AI makes forgeable and how networks and services check it.
  • The overlap is the AI-in-business framing, not the subject matter.

Read original · Original 2

Sources for this section

Audience

The public profile gives buyers one hard audience number: about 2,300 LinkedIn followers, observed 8 October 2026.

Read more

Across the five dated posts (20 May–3 August 2026), the topics are enterprise-facing: running a security operations centre as a service, deepfake and identity verification products, cyber risk in smart buildings and the IT/OT boundary, and emergency communications when networks fail.

  • Several posts are speaker write-ups from professional events (ISSS, IS2 Information Security Summit, FM Summit), addressing peers and buyers in security, IT and facility management rather than a general consumer following.
  • That makes a joint webinar aimed at security leaders a credibility placement rather than a reach placement: Dalibor Lukeš’s case rests on their standing in enterprise security circles, not on the size of an owned audience they can deliver.
  • Before committing, ask for documented audience data: LinkedIn follower or visitor data, or a post-campaign report from comparable content.
  • If you need to know who attends, request an audience survey or webinar registration report covering industry, job function or seniority, and country.
  • The posts do not establish the audience’s employers, occupations or seniority.

LinkedIn followers

2,294

Public LinkedIn profile listing · 2026-10-08

Dated posts reviewed for audience characterisation

5 (published 2026-05-20 to 2026-08-03)

Publication timestamps on the posts · 2026-10-08

Sources for this section

Partnership options

Dalibor Lukeš speaks at cybersecurity conferences, gives media interviews, and presents Vodafone Business services such as SOC and Vodafone Verify.

Read more

The posts describe these as employer and speaking activities, not personal brand-deal formats, and publish no sponsorship program, rate card, media kit, partnership inquiry route, or official partnership inquiry URL. A cybersecurity vendor considering a joint webinar or advisory engagement should ask directly about terms, availability, and approval.

Sources for this section

Campaign fit

A campaign to shortlist

The campaign need Dalibor Lukeš fits is a cybersecurity vendor seeking a speaker and adviser on enterprise AI and cyber-resilience, with a joint webinar for security leaders as the proposed format.

Read more

Three things in their posts support that.

  • First, the subject matter is what they say they are working on now.
  • They open a post by describing AI and cybersecurity as the themes of most of their current meetings.
  • Their argument is about governance, not products: buying the technology is not enough, uncontrolled AI use creates exposure, and cybersecurity belongs with top management rather than IT alone.
  • For a webinar aimed at security leaders, that offers an opening or moderating argument an audience is unlikely to get from a vendor slide deck.
  • Second, they can speak to the answer, not just the problem.
  • They describe the Vodafone Verify family their team is preparing: an app that checks text, images, video and audio for manipulation and deepfakes; a tool for verifying the identity of people in online meetings; and network-level detection of synthetic voice signals in calls.
  • They also argue that European labelling rules will not constrain anyone committing fraud.
  • That gives a vendor a partner who can frame identity verification and deepfake detection as a service layer rather than a feature list.
  • Third, they offer practitioner detail that stands up to a buyer's questions.
  • On security operations, they explain the distinction they care about, describe tiered managed-SOC options for small, medium and large organisations, and put onboarding at roughly a month.
  • The FM Summit talk on cyber threats to buildings extends their reach into facility management and operational technology, while the INER emergency-communications work provides a resilience narrative that can open a session without leading with a product.
  • The limits matter.
  • This is a credibility placement, not a reach placement: the only public audience figure is roughly 2,300 LinkedIn followers, and there are no published demographic or engagement figures.
  • Ask for audience and engagement data before setting success measures.
  • The service-related posts present company positions about Vodafone offerings and credit named Vodafone leaders, so do not frame them as an independent endorsement.
  • Confirm terms, availability and employer approval directly before proceeding.

When to choose a specialist

Dalibor Lukeš is a poor fit for a materially different campaign: a consumer-facing effort, such as a deepfake-awareness app or mobile-security service marketed to general Czech consumers, that expects them to promote it on their own channels and measures success by reach, follower growth or engagement.

Read more

Their posts are aimed at professional peers and buyers in security, IT and facility management, not consumers deciding whether to install an app.

  • The topics are framed for enterprise audiences: continuous monitoring over infrastructure that forms part of the state's critical infrastructure, the merging of cyber and physical security, identity and access risk at the IT/OT boundary, and emergency connectivity after a disaster.
  • Translating those topics for consumers would remove the reason to use them in the first place.
  • Scale is another problem.
  • The only public number is roughly 2,300 LinkedIn followers, and there is no published audience breakdown or engagement data.
  • That is not enough to assess, plan or guarantee a reach-led campaign.
  • Ask for audience and engagement data before setting delivery targets.
  • Commercial structure is also unclear.
  • Their published work is framed as Vodafone Business activity: they credit other Vodafone leaders with the Verify announcement and describe their own team as part of building the service.
  • Do not assume they can post as an independent sponsor; confirm sponsorship options, media materials, rates, inquiry arrangements and employer approval directly.
  • If a consumer or mainstream-reach campaign is genuinely needed, use them as the credible expert in an enterprise segment and put the reach load on a creator whose audience matches the target buyer.
A worked campaign example

A worked angle for a campaign aimed at security leaders: a 45-minute joint webinar built around the ownership question rather than the technology—for instance, who answers when AI-generated fraud reaches the building. The vendor supplies the platform and product depth; Dalibor Lukeš supplies the framing, practitioner detail and closing argument.

Running order: They open with the governance argument they already make publicly: purchasing tools is not the same as controlling AI risk, and the decision belongs with senior management.

  • Keep it to about ten minutes and keep the vendor off the screen.
  • The middle segment tackles identity: AI-generated content, spoofed identities and fake communication that people can no longer spot by eye or ear.
  • Set the vendor's detection capability alongside the category they describe, making the comparison about how identity verification is layered, not which named service wins.
  • They are well placed to explain this because they have written about the labelling gap: regulation will not stop anyone intent on fraud.
  • The closing fifteen minutes turns to resilience, using the two positions they own most clearly—the cyber and physical boundary has effectively gone, and readiness is built long before a crisis starts—with the INER emergency-connectivity work as a concrete illustration, not a pitch.
  • Then open Q&A with both speakers.

State their role precisely: opening speaker, category explainer and moderator of buyer questions—not product demonstrator or auditor of the vendor's detection claims. The session should leave the audience able to answer three buying questions: who owns AI risk in their organisation; how identity verification is layered across meetings, calls and content; and what managed monitoring onboarding involves for an organisation of their size.

Build three assets with them: a one-page pre-read restating their three published positions in their own words, with the original posts linked; a short set of Q&A prompts drawn from the SOC-tiering and IT/OT material; and a follow-up brief template the audience can fill in to take the discussion to their own management. The pre-read must not imply Vodafone endorsement of the vendor, and their service work should remain described as Vodafone Business activity.

Before committing, confirm directly with them whether they can appear independently of Vodafone approval, whether they are willing to serve as speaker and adviser or adviser only, what they will not endorse, and what recorded or written materials they can share beyond the posts.

  • The conference talks and the interview they reference are not described in the posts.
  • Ask for a registration or attendance report from a comparable webinar they have been part of rather than extrapolating from their follower count.
  • Judge success by qualified conversations and a usable brief template from the audience, not a large registration number.
Sources for this section

Who else to consider

Salman Hussain

Choose Salman Hussain when the webinar focuses on executive impersonation and AI-enabled fraud aimed at the leadership layer, and the vendor sells verification workflows, approval controls or employee-awareness training rather than a detection platform.

Read more

The two posts are already written as CISO-facing checklists.

  • One sets out controls against C-suite impersonation and CEO fraud in the Gulf: verify financial and sensitive requests through an independent channel, enforce dual approvals and segregation of duties for critical transactions, train people to spot impersonation, review executives' public digital exposure, and run business email compromise simulations.
  • The other takes a story about Chrome downloading a large on-device AI model in the background and turns it into questions about consent, privacy, local AI processing, supply-chain trust and governance.
  • That gives a security-leader session a slide structure.
  • The first post's closing line, always verify rather than trust but verify, is the kind of framing a vendor can build a session around.

To make Dalibor Lukeš's material usable mid-webinar, a vendor would need to supply the operational detail: a named service portfolio, monitoring of infrastructure that forms part of a country's critical infrastructure, tiered options by organisation size and an onboarding timeline.

  • Hussain's posts offer short commentary on external reporting and regional attack trends, so a vendor would be buying the framing rather than detail on running a programme, and would have to supply the implementation depth.
  • The lens is Gulf-region English; a Czech or wider European audience would need the examples re-based.
  • Both posts point to outside articles for the underlying facts, offering less original analysis than the topics suggest.
  • Ask directly about speaking experience and audience size.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Ray A.

Choose Ray A. when the webinar centres on digital identity credentialing—mobile driver's licences, wallet-based IDs and verifier apps—and the audience's real question is how a relying party accepts and verifies an ID.

Read more

The two posts are a running weekly update on the US Mobile ID market.

  • They cover Oklahoma moving from issuance in Apple Wallet to acceptance at alcohol and tobacco retailers through a free verifier app that needs no extra reader hardware, Ohio's addition of Google Wallet, North Carolina's planned launch, and the trust layer underneath: AAMVA's Digital Trust Service, NIST SP 1800-42 and ISO/IEC 18013-5.
  • The argument an identity vendor needs is clear: putting a credential into a wallet is only the first step; making verification easy for relying parties is what turns it into infrastructure.
  • A vendor selling verifier software, relying-party onboarding or trust services gets a session mapped to real deployments, named standards and a clear adoption sequence.

This is a different session from one aimed at discussing how AI changes enterprise risk.

  • There is no governance argument about AI risk to the business, no resilience or emergency-communications thread, and no material on cyber-physical or operational-technology security, so a vendor wanting to discuss how AI changes enterprise risk would be stretching the posts to fit.
  • The format is a regular market and standards roundup rather than an argued conference talk.
  • The posts give no indication of how Ray A. performs on stage or how well they translate policy for a room of security leaders.
  • The footprint is US-specific throughout, from state motor vehicle agencies to AAMVA and NIST; a Czech or European audience would need rebuilt examples.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Matti Perkkiö

Choose Matti Perkkiö when the webinar is about putting AI to work inside a sales organisation and the audience is a Nordic or Finnish B2B sales and sales-management group rather than security leaders.

Read more

The two posts show concretely how that adoption happens.

  • One reads a sales-state report and lays out a sequence: first, a tool that forces the sales playbook and the product's advantages over competitors to be written down; then transcription that produces meeting notes, to-dos and CRM entries; and finally a quotation agent that drafts an offer and a customer-specific landing page.
  • The other addresses the harder problem: the model becomes useful only once the seller's own knowledge is fed into it.
  • It illustrates this with phone agents that have to understand construction-sector vocabulary in Finnish, Swedish and Norwegian.
  • A vendor selling into sales operations, CRM or construction ERP would get a practitioner account with named tools and an order of work.

The posts do not touch cybersecurity, cyber-resilience or identity, so using Perkkiö for a session aimed at security leaders would mean changing the topic rather than the speaker.

  • The posts are written in Finnish, which limits a session aimed at international security leaders.
  • Some are openly commercial, naming tools, offering a discount code for one of them and inviting direct contact, so they read as part of a vendor ecosystem rather than neutral analysis.
  • The two posts, published seven months apart in 2026, give no employer detail, speaking record or audience information.
  • Ask Perkkiö directly about availability and reach before considering them.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Sources for this section

Build your campaign brief

Editable Markdown templates for planning a campaign with this creator.

Campaign brief template (blank)

Completed brief: joint webinar for security leaders (proceed)

Completed brief: consumer deepfake-awareness campaign (stop and redirect)

Completed brief: resilience session for critical-infrastructure audiences (proceed with limits)

Sources for this section

Research methodology

  • Dalibor Lukeš's five LinkedIn posts are in Czech.
  • They cover an interview with Ekonomický deník on AI and cybersecurity, the Vodafone Verify family of services, the client-facing Vodafone SOC, a conference talk on cyber threats to buildings at FM Summit, and the INER emergency-communications programme.
  • The posts are short recaps of talks, interviews and service announcements rather than extended writing, so the reasoning shows mainly in the framing and in the takeaways Lukeš chooses to repeat.
  • Six posts by three other practitioners in digital identity, cybersecurity and AI-enabled business offer context on how similar creators approach these topics.
  • The posts shown here do not include publication dates.
  • The Ekonomický deník interview and the conference talks Lukeš references are not included in the posts here, so Lukeš's longer-form argument and speaking performance cannot be judged; no audience demographics, engagement figures or webinar results are published here beyond a public follower count; and no personal sponsorship formats, rate card or inquiry route are published in the posts here.