Brand L. Elverston writes about retail asset protection and loss prevention, with a focus on using technology to improve inventory visibility and understand retail shrink. Elverston also shares perspectives on retail leadership and mentors students exploring careers in the field.
Brand L. Elverston is most useful for explaining retail shrink, inventory visibility, RFID, and serialization.
Best for
A retail technology vendor selling item-level visibility, RFID, serialization, or returns-fraud tools.
Not for
A consumer purchase campaign needing guaranteed impressions and a tracked consumer audience.
Key takeaways
A point-of-sale system without an RFID reader leaves retailers inferring a sale, not confirming it.
Serialization gives every item a unique digital identity tied to its EPC for chain of custody.
Shrink is broader than theft, and disciplined inventory work is loss management.
Check first: Confirm recent LinkedIn performance and any follower job-function or seniority breakdown.
Main ideas
The point-of-sale scan is the weak link in the inventory record, and serialization closes it · Estimation and best guesses should be retired in favor of item-level visibility · Shrink is broader than theft, and disciplined inventory work is loss management
Elverston writes about retail asset protection and loss prevention, especially how better inventory visibility can help retailers understand shrink.
The posts connect a broad claim—that shrink is more than theft—to practical examples: how a sale is recorded at checkout, how item-level serialization could fill gaps in that record, and how retailers discuss shrink in earnings reports.
Elverston also writes about retail leadership and spends time teaching and mentoring students interested in the field.
The posts refer to books that students requested, but do not name them; identifying any signature publication would require further research.
The work’s distinctive value is its effort to replace estimates with evidence about individual items and inventory movement.
In one post, Elverston explains why a point-of-sale system without an RFID reader can leave retailers inferring rather than confirming a sale, then describes serialization as a way to connect an item’s identity to its path through the store.
Another post broadens the discussion beyond theft, using retailer earnings disclosures to argue that disciplined inventory management is also loss management.
These concrete explanations make the technology and the business problem easier to assess than general calls to reduce shrink.
The range is not limited to technology: posts about hiring and student mentoring show an interest in leadership and career development, though they are less central to the inventory and loss-prevention argument.
Elverston writes about retail asset protection and loss prevention, and the arguments repeat a single conviction: retailers should stop estimating where merchandise goes and start validating it item by item.
From that base, Elverston argues that shrink is a broader business problem than theft, that inventory discipline is loss management, and that new technology has made older guessing-based practice obsolete.
A second thread runs through the same posts — hiring and mentoring.
Elverston spends time on university campuses, credits students as the engine of inventory research, and argues that curiosity and discipline matter more than a resume that matches a job posting.
The public voice is not confined to retail; one post reflects on a historical site in Germany, which sits outside the recurring professional themes.
The point-of-sale scan is the weak link in the inventory record, and serialization closes it
Elverston starts from how retail inventory records actually get updated: the point-of-sale transaction or scan supplies the final read that completes an item's record.
Read more
But most point-of-sale systems have no RFID reader, so Elverston argues retailers are left inferring that a sale happened rather than confirming it.
The proposed fix is item-level serialization — giving every item a unique digital identity tied to its EPC — which builds a chain of custody from manufacture to sale and captures the last known read at the register.
Beyond the record of sale, Elverston claims serialization can stop sales of expired or recalled merchandise and block fraudulent refund attempts.
A post on inventory visibility walks through the POS gap, the EPC-based digital identity, and the exceptions serialization is meant to catch, then points readers to a further link in the comments.
Estimation and best guesses should be retired in favor of item-level visibility
Writing from what they describe as more than 30 years in retail asset protection and loss prevention, Elverston says the pace of change in the field has accelerated noticeably since the pandemic and that item-level visibility is foundational to reducing total retail loss.
Read more
Without it, Elverston argues, teams keep estimating the how, when, and where of loss with mixed and fleeting results, and the competing challenges facing retail AP and LP leaders are best met by technology that strips out the ambiguity. The stated measure that matters is total retail loss, not theft alone.
One post sets out the 30-year career frame, the pandemic-era acceleration, and the call to move past estimation toward what Elverston calls the naked truth, without offering a product pitch.
Shrink is broader than theft, and disciplined inventory work is loss management
Elverston argues that even now, retail shrinkage is rarely discussed in the same breath as inventory management, and that shrink encompasses far more than theft.
Read more
Those who manage inventory with discipline, in this framing, are also managing the risk of loss. Elverston tests the argument against retailers' own reporting rather than industry opinion alone, and notes that post-pandemic improvements in total loss now appear to be settling.
A post reviews recent quarterly earnings from major U.S. retailers: only Kroger is described as mentioning a shrinkage increase, while Dollar General is described as mentioning shrink repeatedly in discussing financial performance. Elverston flags this as the retailers named in the post rather than a market-wide audit.
Hire for curiosity and discipline rather than a resume that matches the posting
Elverston makes a hiring argument from a sports clip: look past the listed job qualifications and the resume match, and question whether stated qualifications and experience are actually required when they can often be taught.
Read more
Elverston says the preference is for someone curious and disciplined over a self-proclaimed subject-matter expert, and describes a career habit of seeking different backgrounds and experiences rather than a narrow focus. The guest's words here are Nick Saban's, not Elverston's — the coaching clip is quoted material that Elverston uses as an illustration.
A post shares a clip of Nick Saban talking about Derrick Henry, including Saban's blunt line about Henry's early rawness, and translates it into a talent-management point.
Elverston notes Henry went on to win the Heisman in 2015.
The argument rests on an analogy from football rather than a documented hiring framework or data set.
The student pipeline is a priority in its own right, not a side activity
A recurring share of Elverston's posts documents time on university campuses spent on students: classroom presentations, one-on-one mentoring, leadership board meetings, and follow-up with graduates.
Read more
Elverston frames the value of these programs in terms of the range of career paths open to students — public sector and private sector alike — and treats students as the people doing the real research behind inventory management work. Former students who return to campus to talk about careers get public credit.
One post recounts a week at the University of Alabama: presenting in five classes, hosting six mentoring lunches and dinners, attending a college leadership board meeting, and receiving more than 350 student requests for copies of Elverston's books. Another thanks Auburn University RFID Lab students as the lifeblood of the lab's inventory research while also describing meetings with Los Alamos National Laboratory, GS1, and TechSource as participants rather than endorsements.
Answers how this person believes inventory accuracy should actually be fixed, in one concrete mechanism rather than a general call for better data.
Read more
Walks through how a retail inventory record normally gets its final update: the point-of-sale scan.
Elverston points out that most point-of-sale systems have no RFID reader, so retailers infer a sale happened instead of confirming it.
The proposed fix is item-level serialization, giving each item a unique digital identity tied to its EPC so a chain of custody runs from manufacture to sale, including the last read at the register.
The post also claims serialization can block sales of expired or recalled goods and stop fraudulent refund attempts.
For brands planning a campaign
A vendor selling item-level visibility, RFID, or returns-fraud tools can treat this post as the clearest statement of the problem its product addresses, and build a collaboration around closing the point-of-sale gap.
Gives a newcomer the core thesis and the vocabulary Elverston uses repeatedly, including total retail loss and item-level visibility.
Read more
Elverston describes over 30 years in retail asset protection and loss prevention and argues the pace of change has accelerated since the pandemic.
The central claim is that item-level visibility is foundational to reducing total retail loss, because without it teams keep estimating the how, when, and where of loss.
The post calls for replacing estimation and best guesses with what it calls the naked truth, and names total retail loss as the metric that matters.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful as the anchor for a thought-leadership piece on total retail loss; a partner can respond directly to the claim that estimation should be retired.
Shows the research and advisory relationships behind the writing, and makes clear that mentoring and student research are a sustained commitment rather than a one-off.
Read more
Describes a stretch of meetings on the Auburn University campus with the RFID Lab team, including sessions with Los Alamos National Laboratory, GS1, and TechSource, ending with a Lab Advisory Board meeting.
Elverston says the common thread across the meetings was the students, who do the research while also completing degrees, and thanks them directly.
The work is framed as inventory management and visibility through technology, independent of industry.
For brands planning a campaign
An academic or lab-linked angle is available here, but a partner should treat the mentioned organizations as meeting participants, not as endorsements or paid relationships.
Demonstrates a method: using public financial disclosures as evidence for a loss-prevention argument instead of relying only on industry opinion.
Read more
Elverston notes that even in 2026 retail shrinkage is rarely discussed alongside inventory management, then examines how major U.S. retailers described shrink in their most recent quarterly earnings.
Kroger is singled out as the only one mentioning a shrinkage increase, while Dollar General mentions shrink repeatedly in a positive light.
The argument is that shrink is broader than theft, and that disciplined inventory management is also loss management.
For brands planning a campaign
A data-driven content collaboration can copy this approach, pairing a vendor's inventory data with retailers' own reported shrink language.
Explains the campus work that runs alongside the retail commentary, and shows where a next generation of loss-prevention practitioners is being introduced to the field.
Read more
Recounts a week on the University of Alabama campus: presenting in five classes, hosting six one-on-one mentoring meals, and attending a college leadership board meeting.
Elverston highlights the criminology and criminal justice department for balancing public-sector and private-sector career paths, thanks named faculty, and notes that over 350 students requested copies of books.
The books are referred to but not titled.
For brands planning a campaign
A careers, recruiting, or early-talent campaign fits this audience, and this post shows the person already has an active channel into students; the untitled books are a gap worth filling before any book-related collaboration.
Shows the range of the writing beyond store technology and gives the person's stated view on leadership and talent.
Read more
Uses a clip of Nick Saban talking about Derrick Henry to make a hiring point: look past the listed job qualifications and the resume match, and ask whether the stated experience can simply be taught. Elverston says the preference is for someone curious and disciplined over a self-proclaimed subject-matter expert, and describes a career habit of seeking different backgrounds rather than a narrow focus.
For brands planning a campaign
A leadership, hiring, or workforce-technology angle is plausible, though this post sits outside the shrink and inventory subject matter a loss-prevention vendor would normally buy.
Format and evidence style: short operational explainers anchored in named examples8
Inventory visibility as the foundation of loss prevention4
Technology change is accelerating in asset protection and loss prevention3
Career development and the student pipeline3
Industry events and vendor ecosystem coverage3
Retail shrink is broader than theft2
Hiring and leadership: curiosity and discipline over narrow credentials2
Historical and military interest appears outside the core retail beat1
Inventory visibility as the foundation of loss prevention
Elverston treats item-level visibility as the core requirement for reducing retail loss.
Read more
One post explains serialization as a way to give every item a digital identity tied to its EPC, creating a chain of custody from manufacture to sale and capturing the last read at the point of sale.
Elverston argues this replaces inference with validation and can also block sales of expired or recalled goods and fraudulent refunds.
Related posts call item-level visibility foundational to impacting total retail loss and describe inventory management and visibility work at the Auburn University RFID Lab.
Explains technology through operational steps: POS final read, EPC identity, chain of custody, and specific exceptions such as recalls and refund fraud.
For brands planning a campaign
A retail technology vendor pitching serialization, RFID, or inventory visibility should consider Elverston for explainer content that connects technical mechanics to practical loss prevention outcomes. The strongest angle is not product features alone but closing inventory ambiguity at the point of sale and across the chain of custody.
Elverston argues that retail shrink encompasses more than theft and that disciplined inventory management is also loss management.
Read more
One post notes that most major U.S. retailers had reported Q2 earnings but only Kroger mentioned a shrinkage increase, while Dollar General mentioned shrink repeatedly in discussing financial performance. Elverston says total loss improvements since the pandemic now appear to be settling, with one retailer describing shrink as improving to near pre-pandemic levels.
Reads retailer earnings narratives and contrasts how different companies disclose shrink.
The earnings observations are based on the retailers Elverston names; they are not a complete market-wide audit.
For brands planning a campaign
Campaign messaging that equates shrink only with theft may miss Elverston's framing. A vendor can collaborate on content that positions inventory discipline, visibility, and total retail loss as connected business issues, using Elverston's earnings-review observations as a practitioner entry point.
Technology change is accelerating in asset protection and loss prevention
Elverston writes from more than 30 years in retail asset protection and loss prevention and says change has accelerated since the pandemic.
Read more
Elverston points to innovative technologies with broader use cases across retail and argues that those who manage inventory with discipline are also managing loss risk. The recurring warning is that estimation and best guesses should be left behind in favor of item-level visibility that reduces ambiguity.
Uses career perspective plus current technology examples rather than abstract trend claims.
For brands planning a campaign
A vendor can use Elverston as a change-narrative voice: a long-tenured practitioner arguing that new technology now makes older estimation-based approaches obsolete. Content could pair Elverston's industry perspective with concrete examples of moving from inferred loss to validated inventory records.
A significant share of Elverston's posts document time on university campuses focused on students.
Read more
One post describes presenting in five classes, hosting six one-on-one mentoring meals, attending a leadership board meeting, and receiving over 350 student requests for copies of Elverston's books.
Another thanks Auburn University RFID Lab students as the lifeblood of inventory-management research.
Elverston also celebrates a former student who returned to campus to discuss careers.
Tells specific classroom, lab, and mentoring stories with named programs and institutions.
For brands planning a campaign
For a vendor with an academic, workforce, or next-generation talent angle, Elverston can bridge industry practice and student audiences. The evidence supports campus talks, mentoring content, and early-career pipeline collaborations more than formal academic research authorship.
Hiring and leadership: curiosity and discipline over narrow credentials
Elverston uses a Nick Saban clip about Derrick Henry to argue that hiring should look beyond listed job qualifications and resume matching.
Read more
Elverston says stated qualifications and experience can often be taught, and would rather hire someone curious and disciplined than a self-proclaimed subject-matter expert. Elverston also describes looking for different backgrounds and experiences rather than narrow fits.
Uses a sports coaching story as an analogy for hiring and leadership decisions.
The hiring argument is illustrated through football, not through a documented hiring framework or data set.
For brands planning a campaign
This is adjacent to retail technology but useful for employer-brand or leadership content. A vendor could invite Elverston into conversations about building loss prevention and retail operations teams, especially where the brief touches talent or team design.
Elverston attends and reports on retail industry gatherings.
Read more
One post covers the Winning With Walmart '26 forum in Bentonville, listing AI, product packaging and marketing, retail media, on-shelf availability, technologies, and supply chain as substantive discussion areas.
Another covers meetings with Los Alamos National Laboratory, GS1, TechSource, and an RFID Lab advisory board.
A separate post celebrates a former student now working at Walmart.
Reports event topics and participants directly, with brief judgments about format quality.
For brands planning a campaign
A vendor can work with Elverston on event-based content: recaps, panel takeaways, or on-site interviews that tie forum themes back to shrink and inventory visibility. The evidence shows Elverston values focused discussion over slideware, so a no-PowerPoint or conversation-led format may fit better.
Format and evidence style: short operational explainers anchored in named examples
Across the reviewed posts, Elverston's format is short LinkedIn commentary built around a specific operational detail, company event, classroom experience, or leadership observation.
Read more
Posts often name companies and institutions, use hashtags for retail and loss prevention topics, and place links in comments. The approach is explanatory rather than promotional: define a problem, describe a mechanism or example, then state a practical conclusion.
Observed pattern across the full set of supplied posts rather than a single example.
For brands planning a campaign
A collaboration should be written in concise, source-backed explainers or field notes, not long-form whitepapers unless the format is a deliberate exception. Elverston's style suits a vendor that wants practitioner-framed education on shrink, inventory visibility, or technology adoption.
Historical and military interest appears outside the core retail beat
One post discusses the Eagle's Nest retreat in Germany, which Elverston says they visited six weeks earlier, and reports that it was damaged by apparent arson.
Read more
The post uses history, World War II, European Union, veterans, and military hashtags. This is a personal and historical subject rather than part of the retail asset protection or inventory technology thread.
A single post on a historical and military subject; the reviewed material does not show this as a recurring theme.
For brands planning a campaign
This topic is unlikely to fit a retail technology campaign. It is useful mainly as context that Elverston's public voice is not limited to industry commentary, and it should not be forced into a shrink or inventory visibility collaboration.
The reviewed posts show recurring teaching and mentoring at The University of Alabama and work with the Auburn University RFID Lab.
Read more
They do not state an employment, ownership, sponsorship, or paid partnership relationship with either.
The University of Alabama
Mention
Elverston describes presenting in five classes, mentoring students, and contributing each semester to the university's criminology and criminal justice program.
Read more
The posts do not specify an employment or paid relationship.
Elverston writes short, operational posts about retail asset protection and loss prevention, built around a single argument: stop estimating where merchandise goes and start validating it item by item.
The easiest way into the work is to start with the posts about inventory records — how a sale gets confirmed at the point of sale, why serialization and RFID change that, and what it means for shrink, recalls, and refund fraud.
From there, two adjacent threads are worth following: campus teaching and mentoring, where Elverston appears most often as a guest in university classes and RFID lab work, and hiring and leadership observations drawn from sports and from former students' careers.
Posts are usually one operational detail or one named example long, with companies and institutions named directly and links placed in comments.
A single post about a historical site in Germany sits outside the professional themes and is best read as a personal interest rather than a guide to the rest.
Retail asset protectionLoss preventionInventory visibilityRetail shrinkRetail technologyRFIDItem-level serializationWorkforce developmentMentoringHiring and leadershipRetail industry eventsMilitary historyShort operational explainersRetail loss prevention leadersRetail operations and inventory teams
Colarossi makes the same basic case Elverston does: that supply chain and retail losses usually come from late or missing data rather than bad product, and that item-level visibility — RFID, sensors, products carrying their own data — is what closes the gap.
Read more
Both write short LinkedIn arguments that define a problem, name a specific mechanism, and draw an operational conclusion, and both use retail examples such as grocery inventory counts and food waste to make an abstract technology point concrete.
Colarossi writes from inside a materials and labeling company (Avery Dennison) and from the supply chain side, where the stakes are temperature shifts, delays, and sustainability-linked margin.
Elverston writes from the retail asset protection and loss prevention side, and the machinery is the point-of-sale read, the chain of custody, and refund or recall fraud.
Follow Colarossi for supply chain and food-waste visibility; follow Elverston for store-level shrink and loss prevention.
Posadas covers retail technology adoption in the same format Elverston uses: a concrete company story, a named person or brand, and a practical takeaway about what retailers get wrong.
Read more
The posts on cross-border ecommerce and a retail AI forum sit in the same practitioner-commentary space — technology choices explained through what actually happened at a retailer rather than through trend claims.
Posadas's subject is international ecommerce and localization — language, search indexing, running ads across markets — plus AI in retail.
Elverston's subject is physical inventory and loss.
They share a genre and an audience of retail operators, but a reader looking for shrink, RFID, or serialization will not find it in Posadas, and a reader looking for cross-border commerce will not find it in Elverston.
Bone writes the same kind of post Elverston does: one operating problem, spelled out in plain steps, ending with questions for other practitioners.
Read more
Both name the systems and handoffs that break — inventory accuracy, fulfillment, ownership across teams — and both treat channel or technology change as a test of operating discipline rather than a marketing decision.
Bone's subject is marketplace channel expansion, mainly moving consumer brands from Amazon to Walmart, Target, and Best Buy marketplaces, and the gaps in inventory, returns, and pricing that appear when that happens.
Elverston stays inside the store and the loss prevention function.
The overlap is the operational skepticism and the post format more than the topic.
For a retail technology vendor targeting loss prevention, the available evidence supports a topic-fit screening decision, not a precise audience-composition or reach decision.
Read more
Elverston's LinkedIn profile reported 5,908 followers as of October 7, 2026.
The reviewed posts concentrate on retail asset protection and loss prevention, inventory visibility, RFID and serialization, shrink, retail technology, and adjacent retail leadership and career mentoring.
That makes the account plausibly relevant to buyers interested in shrink and inventory-visibility conversations, but the supplied material does not measure the audience's geography, age, gender, employer, job role, or seniority.
Follower count and post topics are therefore content-relevance signals, not proof that the audience contains the specific loss prevention executives, store operators, or technology decision-makers a campaign needs.
Next step: ask Elverston for recent LinkedIn performance on comparable shrink and inventory-visibility posts, including impressions, reactions, comments, and any available follower-company or job-function breakdown, and for audience survey results or another documented source covering professional roles and seniority.
Do not treat the 5,908 figure as a forecast of sponsored-post delivery.
The reviewed material contains no disclosed sponsorship, paid-partnership, or content-collaboration formats.
Read more
Companies and events appear as industry context rather than commercial relationships: Elverston writes about Walmart, Kroger, Dollar General and other retailers when discussing shrink reporting and loss prevention, and about the University of Alabama, the Auburn University RFID Lab, and the Winning With Walmart forum as venues for teaching, mentoring, and conference attendance.
No rate card, media kit, sponsored-post example, deliverable specification, or partnership inquiry route appears in the posts.
That absence is a documented gap in the reviewed material, not a claim that Elverston never accepts sponsorships.
What the posts do establish is the subject territory a collaboration would sit in — inventory visibility, item-level serialization and RFID, and retail shrink — and the current shape of Elverston's public activity: classroom presentations, one-on-one student mentoring, advisory board work, and industry forum attendance.
Those are operational realities a vendor would need to plan around, not offers already on the table.
A retail-technology vendor selling item-level visibility, RFID, serialization, or returns-fraud tools is a strong topic fit.
Read more
Elverston already makes the product's core argument from the practitioner side, so a collaboration would extend an existing line of thinking rather than bolt a sponsor message onto unrelated posts.
The clearest example is the serialization explainer: Elverston walks through how an inventory record normally receives its final update at the point-of-sale scan, notes that most point-of-sale systems have no RFID reader, and argues that retailers therefore infer a sale instead of confirming it.
The proposed fix is a unique digital identity for every item, tied to its EPC, so a chain of custody runs from manufacture to sale, including the last read at the register.
The same post claims serialization can block sales of expired or recalled goods and stop fraudulent refund attempts, which gives a returns-fraud or inventory-accuracy vendor two concrete hooks.
A second post frames item-level visibility as foundational to reducing total retail loss and argues that teams without it keep estimating the how, when, and where of loss.
A third reads shrink through retailers' own quarterly earnings language, singling out Kroger as the only major retailer to mention a shrinkage increase while Dollar General mentioned shrink repeatedly in describing financial performance.
That is a usable content method: take public disclosures and treat them as evidence for a loss-prevention argument.
Commercial format matters here too.
Elverston's posts are short operational explainers built around one specific detail, often naming companies and institutions, rather than long research papers, so a co-produced explainer series fits the written style better than a whitepaper.
A vendor should plan around real constraints.
The reviewed material documents no sponsorship, paid-partnership, or content-collaboration formats, no rate card, and no partnership inquiry route, and that is a gap in the material rather than a statement that Elverston never accepts sponsorships.
The only audience figure supplied is 5,908 LinkedIn followers as of October 7, 2026, with no breakdown by employer, job role, or seniority, so reach must be agreed in advance rather than assumed.
Practical next step: ask Elverston for recent performance on comparable shrink and inventory-visibility posts and for any follower-company or job-function data, then scope deliverables directly with them.
When to choose a specialist
A consumer purchase campaign is a poor fit.
Read more
Picture a consumer electronics or home-security brand that wants a paid post series to drive holiday sales and needs guaranteed impressions and a tracked audience.
Three things stand against it.
First, no sponsorship or paid-partnership format appears in the reviewed material, so a buyer cannot assume a published rate, a deliverable menu, or a booking path exists.
Second, the audience evidence does not support a reach forecast.
The only supplied figure is 5,908 LinkedIn followers as of October 7, 2026, with no geography, age, employer, job role, or seniority data, and follower count is a relevance signal, not a delivery estimate.
Third, the recorded authority is in retail asset protection and inventory visibility, a business-to-business operations subject.
The reviewed posts do not show consumer purchase recommendations, product reviews, or a lifestyle audience.
The one departure from the retail beat is a post about arson damage at the Eagle's Nest retreat in Germany, drawn from a personal visit and tagged to history, World War II, veterans, and military subjects.
It shows Elverston's public voice is not limited to industry commentary, but it is a single post and not a recurring theme, so it does not establish a consumer-facing audience either.
A brief that depends on fast consumer conversion, guaranteed reach, or an already-documented sponsored format should look elsewhere first, and any buyer still interested should treat the absence of documented formats as a question to ask Elverston directly rather than as a refusal.
A worked campaign example
Brief: a retail technology vendor wants to engage a loss prevention thought leader and propose a content collaboration on shrink and inventory visibility.
Recommendation: proceed, as a short co-produced explainer series plus one live conversation, not a long-form report and not a consumer-style sponsored post.
Campaign angle, closing the last gap in the inventory record.
Part one, the weak link at the register: open with the everyday fact that the point-of-sale scan is what completes an item's inventory record and that most registers cannot read RFID, so sales activity gets inferred instead of validated.
Follow with the serialization mechanism, a unique item identity tied to its EPC and a chain of custody from manufacture to sale, and name the side benefits that matter to an operator, including blocking expired or recalled goods and stopping fraudulent refunds.
Part two, shrinking the definition: use retailer earnings language as the entry point, as Elverston does when comparing how Kroger and Dollar General described shrink in the same reporting season, and make the case that theft alone does not explain the number and that disciplined inventory management is also loss management.
Part three, the decision: hand the reader a short set of questions an operations or loss-prevention leader should answer before committing to item-level serialization, covering what to test, what to measure, and how to tell inference from validation.
Format notes: keep each piece to one specific operational detail with named examples, since that is the observed rhythm of the writing, and run the live segment as a conversation-led session; the account's own coverage of the Winning With Walmart forum singles out the absence of slide decks as a virtue.
What the vendor must supply: subject-matter review, any customer examples it wants cited, and agreement on disclosure language.
What to request from Elverston first: recent performance on comparable shrink and inventory-visibility posts, any follower-company or job-function data, and confirmation of the commercial terms, because the reviewed posts show no rate card, deliverable list, or inquiry route.
Keep the collaboration inside the asset protection and inventory visibility subject matter, where the evidence is strongest, rather than stretching it to hiring or campus content.
Choose Colarossi when the collaboration is really about the technology that produces visibility rather than the loss-prevention argument for it.
Read more
Both retained posts are written from inside the vendor building the capability.
One describes Avery Dennison's investment in Wiliot and explains that passive Bluetooth sensors combined with RFID let a product carry its own data, so a temperature shift or a logistics delay is caught before it becomes a loss.
The other starts from a scene the writer saw — handwritten sticky notes counting stock in a grocery refrigerated aisle — and uses it to argue that RFID cuts count time to minutes and reduces food waste.
A brief that needs someone to explain how real-time, scan-free visibility works, or to connect item-level data to freshness and sustainability, gets more from that perspective than from a practitioner describing what they want the tools to do.
The subject shifts.
Colarossi's retained posts are framed around supply-chain waste, data delay, food safety, and sustainability, which points at supply chain and grocery operations audiences rather than loss prevention.
Neither post uses shrink, theft, or asset protection as its frame.
A vendor selling to loss-prevention leaders would gain product-side credibility but lose the operator language that makes the collaboration land with that audience — quarterly earnings commentary on shrink, register-level validation instead of inference, fraudulent refund attempts.
Elverston supplies the loss-prevention translation; Colarossi supplies the mechanism behind the tool.
Posadas is the better choice when the campaign is about selling across borders rather than about loss.
Read more
The retained posts are cross-border ecommerce.
One tells the Fairtex story — a brand with one English store speaking to the whole world, localisation across more than 20 markets, and the observation that shoppers search in their own language, so a site that is not in that language is never indexed and never appears.
The other announces a roundtable Posadas is leading at a retail AI forum on making international ecommerce faster, more relevant, and more scalable, and names the organisers and collaborators publicly.
For a vendor whose product helps retailers grow internationally, or an event that needs a retail-AI localisation voice, the fit is direct.
There is no overlap with shrink or inventory visibility.
Posadas's evidence is entirely about international demand, localisation, and the operational complexity of selling across borders.
A loss-prevention brief has no hook in these posts, so choosing Posadas means changing the brief rather than changing the speaker, and the shrink and item-level inventory angle would have to be built from nothing — neither post touches item records, total retail loss, or returns.
Bone is the alternative when the buyer's question is channel strategy rather than loss.
Read more
Both retained posts are about using U.S. retail marketplaces — Walmart, Target Plus, Best Buy — as a more agile route to growth once Amazon sales begin to slow, written from the position of running Americas growth.
The second is the more useful for a vendor: it works through the handoffs that break when a brand moves marketplace, asking which system holds the right inventory, who owns pricing and promotions, and who owns a problem that crosses ecommerce, operations, finance, and technology.
That is a specific operational decision with named failure points, delivered as a question back to the audience.
The inventory thread here is channel operations and ownership, not loss.
Bone's posts do not discuss shrink, theft, refund fraud, or asset protection, so a vendor brief aimed at a loss-prevention collaboration would be borrowing marketplace-transition language and hoping it transfers.
Bone also writes as an operator and advisor rather than a technology vendor, so a buyer gains the brand-side perspective but not the product-mechanism explanation Colarossi offers or the loss-prevention framing Elverston does.
This profile was built from nine supplied LinkedIn posts by Brand L.
Elverston, read in full.
Topics included retail asset protection and loss prevention, inventory visibility and shrink, RFID and item-level serialization, retailer earnings commentary, an industry forum, hiring and leadership, university teaching and mentoring, and one historical post about a site in Germany.
Three posts carry recorded dates between September 24 and October 7, 2026; the remaining six are undated in the supplied records, so the order and development of these themes over time could not be established.
The follower figure cited on the page (5,908) is dated October 7, 2026.
For context, three comparison creators were reviewed with two full posts each, dated July to September 2026.
The material contains no long-form articles, video transcripts, comments, or other channels, and the posts mention books without naming them, so no signature publication is identified.
No sponsorship formats, rate card, partnership inquiry route, or audience demographics were supplied.
Elverston's current title, employer, and credentials are not established by the reviewed posts; those remain open questions rather than findings.
Recent engagement
Across their last 7 LinkedIn posts, the median post got 13 reactions and 2 comments. Checked 2026-11-02.
