Most useful for practical explanations of applied AI in manufacturing, including industrial context and agent interaction details.
Best for
Manufacturing technology companies seeking conference talks, panels, webinars or technical explainers on industrial AI adoption.
Not for
Paid creator endorsements or product performance claims, especially voice AI demos with satisfaction or support cost claims.
Key takeaways
Industrial AI needs captured human context, not just smarter models.
Voice agents need interruption handling and honest identity.
Agentic AI should be goal-driven because real workflows keep changing.
Check first: Confirm whether they accept paid speaking or sponsorship, and ask for audience analytics and recent post results.
Main ideas
Industrial AI needs captured human context, not just smarter models · Foundation models create value at the vertical last mile · Agentic AI should be goal-driven because real workflows keep changing
Anoop Mohan writes about applying AI to real operating work, especially manufacturing.
The posts focus on what makes an agent useful beyond the model itself: plant-specific knowledge, machine data, clear workflows, and behavior people can trust.
They describe Augury’s Industrial AI Workforce and an open-source OKF Industrial Profile for structuring operator knowledge.
The examples also reach beyond factories, from changing business workflows to voice agents that should handle interruptions and identify themselves honestly.
Follow their work for practical explanations of the context and interaction details that shape whether AI works in everyday operations.
Mohan connects broad AI claims to concrete operating conditions.
In their manufacturing posts, they point to knowledge such as how a line behaves at cold start or what a recurring pressure pattern has meant, then describe ways to structure that knowledge for agents.
In their voice-agent post, they turn trust into two observable tests: can the system stop when interrupted, and does it tell the truth about being AI?
That range—from industrial context to customer interaction—makes their work useful to readers evaluating applied AI.
Anoop Mohan's recurring ideas focus on the conditions that make applied AI work in real operations.
Read more
The strongest thread is that model intelligence is not enough: industrial agents need captured human context, domain-specific workflows, and reviewable knowledge.
A second thread applies that logic to automation, voice agents, and distribution: technology is only as good as the operating details around it.
The posts also show a practical priority on live demonstrations and hybrid teams over abstract predictions.
Industrial AI needs captured human context, not just smarter models
Anoop Mohan argues that the plant-floor bottleneck is missing operational judgment: how a line behaves on a cold start, what a pressure signature meant the last times it spiked, and cause-and-effect knowledge buried in email threads and people's heads.
Read more
That context retires with workers and isn't captured in the model.
The OKF Industrial Profile is presented as an open-source extension of Google Cloud Open Knowledge Format.
It structures operator heuristics with human sign-off, trust rules for incoming readings, and cause-and-effect relationships in plain files that process engineers can review and operational agents can use.
The OKF Industrial Profile announcement offers a concrete example, naming operator heuristics, trust rules, and cause-and-effect relationships. A related post makes the same case through the Industrial AI Workforce and a Google Cloud piece by Praveen Rao, which Anoop Mohan cites rather than authors.
The posts link two parts of the same argument: pair Gemini with machine telemetry and operational context, and capture operator judgment in a knowledge format.
Foundation models create value at the vertical last mile
Anoop Mohan argues that general models deliver most value when paired with deep industry context and tailored workflows, turning raw reasoning into trusted execution.
Read more
In manufacturing, that means pairing Gemini's reasoning with industrial machine telemetry and operational context, through role-based agents for reliability, operations, and maintenance.
At IMTS in Chicago, Anoop Mohan posted about demonstrating the Industrial AI Workforce at the Google Cloud booth, built with Google Cloud and Gemini. The post invites readers to see agents running on the floor rather than just read about them.
The posts connect Google's move into domain-specialized financial and legal solutions to the same thesis for the physical world, extending the domain-specific argument beyond manufacturing.
Agentic AI should be goal-driven because real workflows keep changing
Drawing on automation failures in telecoms, complex IT organizations, and SMBs, Anoop Mohan argues that teams fail not because they misunderstand their processes but because workflows refuse to stay still.
Read more
Rigid, script-driven automation breaks against dynamic problems; goal-driven agents let experts act as AI coaches, teaching systems in plain English.
The post contrasts fixed routing with adaptive guidance through MapQuest versus Waze, and uses an 'Automation Iceberg' to describe hidden maintenance costs. It calls the approach 'deterministically addressing nondeterministic workflows.'
This argument extends beyond manufacturing and offers the clearest bridge between Anoop Mohan's industrial AI work and broader automation and CIO audiences.
Voice agents need interruption handling and honest identity
After calls with three customer support teams, Anoop Mohan argues that voice AI has gone mainstream but execution is uneven.
Read more
Two requirements are non-negotiable: barge-in, so an agent can listen while it speaks, and transparency, so it doesn't claim to be human. Broken interruption creates a poor user experience, while a false identity claim destroys customer trust.
Anoop Mohan recalls asking an agent whether it was human; it confidently said yes. The post warns that a cost-reduction play can become an NPS reduction story.
The posts pair enthusiasm for rapid voice AI adoption with frustration at deployments that miss basic interaction and trust standards.
Applied AI value depends on distribution, and the operator/MSP channel is promising but not settled
Anoop Mohan argues that AI's value lies not in building it but in applying it, and that operators and managed service providers have strong go-to-market reach with small and midsize businesses.
Read more
The posts point to SK Telecom and Rakuten as examples of operators packaging AI for business.
One post describes operators as natural distributors of applied AI because they already sell IT tools and services to SMBs. Another asks whether an MSP business in the age of AI agents is more about customer acquisition than the solution itself.
The channel looks promising, but the posts leave the MSP model's merits in question. Buyers considering this route should ask how the model creates value beyond customer acquisition.
Scaling industrial AI is a people-and-demonstration problem
Anoop Mohan's hiring posts identify the roles they see as necessary: forward deployed engineers with industrial or manufacturing, generative AI or agentic, and data engineering backgrounds, preferably in Bangalore, and a US-based product operations manager to bridge strategic partners and internal stakeholders.
Read more
The conference posts make a related point: agents need to be shown running on the plant floor, not just described.
The hiring posts name colleagues to contact and frame the roles as part of scaling industrial AI. The IMTS posts invite readers to the Google Cloud booth to see the Industrial AI Workforce live.
The hiring calls and conference demonstrations frame industrial AI as an operating and staffing challenge, not just a model or product announcement.
This post explains what context industrial AI needs and offers a concrete starting point for readers assessing manufacturing applications.
Read more
Anoop Mohan explains that useful plant-floor AI needs more than model capability: it needs operational knowledge, such as how a line behaves at cold start and what a pressure pattern meant before. They describe an open-source profile that structures operator heuristics, trust rules for incoming readings, and cause-and-effect relationships in reviewable files.
For brands planning a campaign
A talk or demonstration could show how engineers capture and review operational knowledge, then provide it to agents—not just showcase a model.
It shows how Mohan explains AI's industrial applications and helps newcomers understand domain-specific agents.
Read more
Anoop Mohan describes pairing Gemini's reasoning with industrial machine telemetry and operational context to deliver role-based agents to manufacturing teams. They frame domain-specific workflows as the step between general-purpose models and trusted execution.
For brands planning a campaign
For a conference session, use this framing to connect model capability with plant data, roles, and operational workflows. The post does not provide measured outcomes; ask for that evidence.
It explains the reasoning behind Mohan's broader interest in agents beyond manufacturing and gives readers a clear problem-and-response structure.
Read more
Anoop Mohan argues that brittle, fixed automation struggles when real workflows change. They contrast script-driven automation with goal-driven systems, pointing to maintenance costs, an “Automation Iceberg,” and experts coaching AI in plain English.
For brands planning a campaign
This is a useful source for a session comparing agentic automation with traditional RPA. Ask for a specific workflow example and its maintenance trade-offs to make the argument testable.
It answers what Mohan considers a basic quality bar for voice agents and gives newcomers observable behaviors to look for.
Read more
After calls with three support teams, Anoop Mohan identifies two practical requirements: agents should stop speaking when interrupted and should not claim to be human. They link these interaction details to customer trust and warn that cost savings can come at the expense of customer experience.
For brands planning a campaign
For a customer-service AI brief, this offers concrete demo criteria: test interruption handling and clear disclosure, not just speed or cost reduction.
Capturing tribal knowledge with the OKF Industrial Profile3
Conference-led applied AI demonstrations3
Hiring and scaling industrial AI teams2
Applied AI distribution through operators and MSPs2
Agentic AI versus brittle automation1
Voice AI deployment standards1
Industrial AI agents for plant-floor operations
Anoop Mohan's recurring subject is applied AI for manufacturing, especially agents built for reliability, operations, and maintenance.
Read more
The posts describe pairing Gemini reasoning with industrial machine telemetry and operational context so role-based agents can work on the plant floor. The framing is practical: active agents, plant-floor context, and live demonstrations rather than model research.
Explains adoption through use cases and direct questions to operations readers about their biggest hurdles.
For brands planning a campaign
A manufacturing technology brand can use Anoop Mohan to translate agentic AI into plant-floor language for operations and reliability audiences. For a conference talk, ask for concrete deployment evidence beyond the Augury and Google Cloud partnership; the posts center on that partnership.
Capturing tribal knowledge with the OKF Industrial Profile
Anoop Mohan argues the plant-floor AI bottleneck is not only model intelligence but missing human context: operator intuition, past pressure signatures, and cause-and-effect knowledge trapped in email threads and people's heads.
Read more
The OKF Industrial Profile is presented as an open-source extension of Google Cloud Open Knowledge Format that captures operator heuristics with human sign-off, trust rules, and cause-and-effect relationships in files process engineers can review and agents can use.
Problem-solution structure: states the knowledge-loss problem, then lists structured outputs.
Mohan's posts include post summaries, not the full announcement or format documentation.
For brands planning a campaign
This is the clearest signature topic for a knowledge-management or industrial AI campaign.
It suits a conference talk or technical explainer on preserving expert judgment before it retires.
Ask for the full OKF document to verify claims about its contents or adoption.
One post draws on failed automation projects in telecoms, complex IT organizations, and SMBs to argue that teams fail because workflows will not stay still, not because they misunderstand processes.
Read more
Traditional RPA is described as MapQuest in a Waze world, with hidden maintenance costs under an 'automation iceberg.' Agentic AI is framed as goal-driven rather than script-driven, letting experts become AI coaches who teach systems in plain English.
Uses analogies—MapQuest versus Waze and an automation iceberg—to make the argument memorable.
For brands planning a campaign
For automation, CIO, or business-process audiences, Anoop Mohan can explain why agentic AI is a different operating model from RPA. Ask for customer examples and measurable outcomes: the post here is conceptual and analogy-led.
A firsthand post describes calls with three customer support teams and argues voice AI is mainstream but often poorly executed.
Read more
Two requirements are non-negotiable: barge-in, so the agent can listen while it speaks; and transparency, so an agent does not falsely claim to be human. The post ties these to earlier work at Google Applied AI and warns that cost reduction can become an NPS problem.
Starts from direct customer-support call experience, then names two execution rules.
For brands planning a campaign
For voice AI, CX, or contact-center brands, Anoop Mohan can speak to deployment pitfalls and trust. Ask for broader research or a customer case if the campaign needs generalizable proof; the post offers an account-based observation.
Several posts are hiring calls: a US-based Product Operations Manager to bridge strategic partners and internal stakeholders, and forward deployed engineers with industrial or manufacturing, generative AI or agentic, and data engineering backgrounds, preferred in Bangalore.
Read more
The posts name colleagues to contact and frame the roles as part of scaling industrial AI.
Direct call to action with role requirements, location, and referral contacts.
For brands planning a campaign
For employer branding, talent, or AI services campaigns, Anoop Mohan can discuss the mix of product operations and field engineering needed to scale industrial AI. These are recruiting posts, not product endorsements.
Applied AI distribution through operators and MSPs
Two posts consider how AI reaches small and midsize businesses.
Read more
One argues value is not in building AI but applying it, and that operators and managed service providers have strong SMB go-to-market reach; it cites SK Telecom and Rakuten as examples. Another is skeptical about an MSP business in the age of AI agents, questioning whether the move is more about customer acquisition than the solution itself.
Compares market moves and asks skeptical questions rather than presenting a detailed model.
For brands planning a campaign
For telecom, carrier, MSP, or AI platform brands, Anoop Mohan can discuss channel distribution and AI packaging for SMBs. Ask for a longer treatment or data before building a lead asset around this theme; the posts offer brief market commentary.
Multiple posts promote IMTS in Chicago and the Google Cloud booth, where Augury planned to show an Industrial AI Workforce.
Read more
Anoop Mohan emphasizes seeing agents run on the floor, not just reading about them, and links the demos to Google's domain-specialized solutions and Augury's partnership.
Event callouts and invitations to live demonstrations.
For brands planning a campaign
For event marketers and trade-show campaigns, Anoop Mohan is a visible conference voice on industrial AI, suited to booth, panel, or live-demo content. Recheck event names, dates, and booth details before publication.
Mohan represents Augury, the industrial AI company, and describes its partnership with Google Cloud on industrial AI agents.
Read more
A hiring post names AVEVA and Rockwell Automation in an announced Augury partnership, and another refers to a prior role at Google's Applied AI teams.
Augury
Employment
As part of Augury, Mohan describes work the company and team are doing: “At Augury, we're proud to be driving that exact same thesis into the physical world” and “Today, Augury is transforming how AI reasons like a human on the manufacturing floor.”
Read more
They also share Augury hiring calls for forward-deployed engineers and a product operations role.
Augury's announced partnership with Google Cloud features across several posts: pairing Gemini's reasoning with industrial machine telemetry, showing role-based agents at the Google Cloud booth at IMTS, and publishing the OKF Industrial Profile as an open-source extension of Google Cloud's Open Knowledge Format.
Read more
The posts use joint language such as “Partnering with Google” and “our open-source extension of Google Cloud Open Knowledge Format.”
Named in a post about an announced Augury partnership with Google and Rockwell Automation, tied to the Industrial AI Workforce and a hiring push for forward-deployed engineers.
Anoop Mohan's posts offer a practical briefing on applied AI in manufacturing.
Read more
Start with the posts on Augury's OKF Industrial Profile and the Google Cloud partnership, which explain why agent capability alone is not enough without operator knowledge and machine context.
For the automation argument, read the agentic AI post contrasting goal-driven agents with brittle, scripted RPA.
For deployment standards in customer service, read the voice AI post on interruption handling and honest identity.
For a wider market view, the operator and managed-service-provider posts consider who will package and distribute AI to small businesses.
The hiring and IMTS posts follow the team and the live demonstrations behind the work.
For adjacent angles, compare these posts with Rizwan Khan on connected data foundations, Bob Gafvert on materials and additive production for robotics, and Keith Dunnell on safety-security convergence in manufacturing.
Rizwan Khan also writes about IMTS 2026 takeaways: turning shop-floor signals into business action, connecting ERP, MES, planning, inventory, and quality systems, and choosing a small number of operational problems to finish.
Read more
Both focus on practical industrial AI adoption rather than model novelty.
Rizwan Khan frames the problem around a trusted, connected data foundation and integration work, then closes with questions for manufacturing leaders. Anoop Mohan focuses on agent capabilities, operational knowledge capture, and named Augury and Google Cloud deployments.
Bob Gafvert also speaks to engineering and manufacturing audiences from the show floor, arguing that the hard part is moving from concept to production, and that material and tooling choices determine whether a program holds up.
Read more
Both treat manufacturing technology as a production decision, not a demo.
Bob Gafvert's evidence concerns additive manufacturing materials and part performance for robotics and other demanding environments; Anoop Mohan's concerns software agents, plant telemetry, and operational context.
Keith Dunnell writes as a manufacturing industry executive, connecting plant-floor performance to enterprise outcomes and agentic AI.
Read more
The safety-and-security post argues that both need one shared record of the machine—a take on the same theme of preserving context from a different angle.
Keith Dunnell's specific angle is IT/OT convergence and safety-security architecture, written from a ServiceNow go-to-market leadership position. Anoop Mohan focuses on industrial AI agents and knowledge formats from an Augury and Google Cloud vantage.
Placement decision: Anoop Mohan's posts support considering the creator for industrial AI and manufacturing technology campaigns seeking technical, operations-focused reach.
Read more
They do not validate the audience by employer, job function, seniority, geography, age, or gender.
The only measured audience-size figure is 8,517 LinkedIn followers, observed on 2026-10-08.
The ten posts, dated 2024-12-12 to 2026-09-12, focus on applied AI in manufacturing: Augury’s OKF Industrial Profile, Google Cloud and Gemini agent work, IMTS 2026 demonstrations, agentic AI automation, and voice-agent UX.
Selected examples include posts about the OKF Industrial Profile with Augury, the Google Cloud booth at IMTS, and deterministic agentic workflows.
The posts do not publish a per-video or per-post performance summary.
Different accumulated reach on those posts would not by itself prove that a topic or format caused audience response.
Next step: ask the account owner for recent LinkedIn analytics or an audience survey covering job function, seniority, industry, company size, and geography, plus comparable results for recent conference, agentic AI, and industrial AI posts.
LinkedIn followers
8,517
LinkedIn account metadata in the research · 2026-10-08
Anoop Mohan's posts do not publish a sponsorship offer.
Read more
Posts naming companies cover employer and product-partnership announcements: Augury's work with Google Cloud, Google Distributed Cloud, Gemini, Aveva, and Rockwell Automation; the OKF Industrial Profile release; and an IMTS 2026 booth appearance at the Google Cloud stand.
These are commercial relationships between the companies Mohan works with, not creator sponsorship formats available to outside buyers.
The posts give no rates, deliverables, usage rights, exclusivity, disclosure language, or approval steps.
The remaining posts are hiring notices and industry commentary, with no sponsorship terms.
Buyers considering a paid placement should ask whether Mohan accepts sponsored work and, if so, what audience terms and disclosure requirements apply.
The only public contact point is their LinkedIn profile, a general professional channel rather than a documented partnership intake route.
Strong fit for an earned or sponsored conference talk, panel, webinar, or technical explainer. It is not a confirmed paid creator placement because no sponsorship offer, rate card, or deliverable terms are published.
Read more
Brief
A manufacturing technology company wants to understand industrial AI adoption and needs a conference talk on agentic AI in manufacturing.
Reasons
The central evidence matches the brief. The OKF Industrial Profile post argues that plant-floor AI needs more than model intelligence: it needs operator intuition, past pressure signatures, and cause-and-effect knowledge trapped in email threads and people's heads. The framework captures operator heuristics with human sign-off, trust rules for incoming readings, and cause-and-effect relationships in files process engineers can review and agents can use.
Other posts connect model reasoning to industrial machine telemetry, operational context, and role-based agents for reliability, operations, and maintenance. The IMTS and Google Cloud material presents domain-specific workflows as the step between general-purpose models and trusted execution on the plant floor.
A separate post makes a broader operating-model argument: traditional RPA fails when workflows keep changing, while goal-driven agents let experts coach systems in plain English. The argument suits CIO, operations, and automation audiences and could inform a talk.
The audience figures indicate potential reach, not verified buyer composition: 8,517 LinkedIn followers observed 2026-10-08. The posts point to industrial AI, plant operations, and automation followers, but publish no breakdown by job function, seniority, geography, or company size. Request that breakdown before assessing buyer reach.
The posts publish no sponsorship page, rates, deliverables, usage rights, exclusivity, disclosure language, or approval steps. Confirm these terms directly before budgeting.
Open questions
What measured deployment outcomes or customer examples can Augury share for the OKF Industrial Profile or the role-based agents?
Does Anoop Mohan accept paid speaking, sponsored talks, or brand partnerships, and on what terms?
Can the Google Cloud and Augury demonstration assets be used in a third-party conference session, and what would they show versus measure?
When to choose a specialist
Poor fit as framed. Anoop Mohan has relevant firsthand observations about voice agents, but the posts do not support product-specific endorsements or performance claims, and no sponsorship format is published.
Read more
Brief
A voice AI or customer-experience platform wants a paid creator endorsement claiming its voice agent improves customer satisfaction or lowers support cost, with a product demo from the creator.
Reasons
The voice-agent evidence comes from one post about calls with three unnamed customer support teams. It identifies two practical requirements: agents should stop talking when interrupted and should not falsely claim to be human. This is useful deployment commentary, not a vendor product test or benchmark.
The same post warns that a cost-reduction play can become an NPS reduction story. A one-sided claim that a vendor's voice agent improves satisfaction would conflict with that concern.
Ask for sponsorship terms, including rates, deliverables, usage rights, and disclosure requirements, before pricing or contracting a paid endorsement.
The published audience figures do not verify contact-center buyer composition. Request a buyer breakdown before committing to a campaign aimed at decision-makers.
A better fit would be an educational session or sponsored research piece on voice-agent deployment standards, with the brand accepting independent evaluation. The posts do not support using Mohan for a testimonial or guaranteed product-performance claim.
Open questions
Does Anoop Mohan accept paid sponsorship or endorsement work?
Can the platform provide product access for independent testing and accept disclosure language?
Does Anoop Mohan have broader voice AI research, customer cases, or measurable deployment results beyond the three unnamed support teams described in the post?
A worked campaign example
Angle
Open with the bottleneck: model intelligence alone does not run a plant. The missing layer is decades of human context, such as how a line behaves on a cold start or what a pressure signature meant the last three times it spiked. Use the OKF Industrial Profile post as the concrete example. Explain that the framework captures operator heuristics with human sign-off, trust rules for incoming readings, and cause-and-effect relationships in files engineers can review and agents can use. Then connect that context to role-based agents for reliability, operations, and maintenance, pairing Gemini reasoning with industrial machine telemetry. Add the broader agentic automation argument: script-driven RPA struggles when processes change, while goal-driven agents let experts teach the system in plain English. Close with a practical checklist for plant teams: identify one retiring expert process, capture the heuristics, define trust rules, choose one agent task, and decide who signs off before the agent acts. Ask Mohan to bring a live or recorded demonstration only if Augury approves the assets and clearly states what is demonstrated versus measured.
Brief
Conference talk for a manufacturing technology company on agentic AI in manufacturing.
Constraints
Do not claim measured ROI, guaranteed cost reduction, full OKF adoption, or customer results that are not in evidence.
Agree on fees, disclosure, recording rights, and approval steps in writing.
Recheck event names, dates, and booth details before publication; they are time-sensitive.
Deliverables
Talk abstract and session outline
Speaker notes with close readings of the OKF Industrial Profile, the domain-context agent example, and the agentic automation argument
Q&A brief on measured outcomes and adoption barriers
A leave-behind worksheet for plant teams to map an expert process, its trust rules, and a first agent task
Format
A 25-minute conference talk with moderated Q&A for plant operations, reliability, maintenance, and industrial AI leaders.
Next step
Confirm with Mohan whether paid speaking or sponsorship is available. Request Augury-approved deployment outcomes or customer examples, then set the talk scope.
Success measures
Session attendance and room questions about specific plant workflows
Worksheet downloads or scans
Qualified sponsor conversations
Post-session requests for a follow-up technical workshop
Title
Giving agents the plant-floor context they’re missing
Choose Rizwan Khan when the same campaign decision—a manufacturing technology company commissioning an industrial AI adoption talk—turns on where a mid-sized manufacturer should start rather than what a specific agent can do.
Read more
His IMTS takeaways lay out a repeatable path: shop-floor signals become context, then insight, then a recommended action, then execution, then a business result.
That intelligence has to reach ERP, planning, inventory, purchasing, supply chain, cloud, and finance.
He argues for starting with the outcome, using process knowledge, machine history, quality patterns, and operator experience as the competitive advantage, and finishing a small number of use cases instead of trying everything.
For plant and operations leaders who need a selection discipline, a workshop asking them to pick two or three business problems—predictive maintenance, capacity allocation, supply planning, quality, downtime, inventory, margins—is more immediately usable than a product capability demo.
Mohan's material is strong on architecture and problem selection but offers no named knowledge-capture framework or agent demonstrated on a plant floor.
A session built around their work trades the concrete “here is the thing running” moment for a broader argument about integration and prioritization.
The two posts are conference retrospectives from September 18 and 19, 2026, so a talk would draw on lessons from the show floor rather than close documentation of one deployment.
Ask for audience breakdown, follower figures, and speaking terms to assess reach and commercial availability against the alternatives.
Choose Bob Gafvert when the buyer's real bottleneck is hardware iteration rather than agent orchestration.
Read more
He works on robotics and product development at the same show, addressing teams stuck on gripper geometry, durable cushioning, and platforms that survive the field—where a new durometer or redesigned bracket traditionally costs weeks before anyone knows whether the part performs.
His posts describe going from CAD to a testable, engineering-grade part in the same day with Carbon's materials and latticing software.
They list the environments driving the requirement: defense programs pushing parts to the limit, construction robotics, drone delivery, robot dogs patrolling data centers with their sensor loads, and underwater drones that need material stability across pH swings and constant saltwater exposure.
If tooling lead times are slowing a robotics program, this directly answers the buyer's question.
The posts do not address industrial AI agents or operational AI adoption, so a session titled around agentic AI in manufacturing would need framing the material does not provide.
The decision shifts from which workflow an agent should take over to which material and part will hold up.
Both posts read as commercial product messaging for one additive manufacturing company, with a narrower scope than the plant-wide operations picture the other alternatives offer.
Ask for audience data and speaking terms before assessing fit and commercial availability; the posts date from September 10 and 23, 2026.
Choose Keith Dunnell when the talk targets CIOs and enterprise IT leadership rather than plant operations, and the question is how the plant floor connects to enterprise outcomes.
Read more
He frames manufacturing around the largest operational shift in a generation—AI, IT/OT convergence, supply chain resilience, and the pressure to connect plant-floor performance to enterprise results—and positions a platform as the orchestration layer across the full manufacturing value chain rather than a point solution.
His strongest concrete material is a safety and security argument: a replacement CNC controller two firmware versions behind carries a flaw already used against other plants; the work order and vulnerability list live in different systems; six weeks later, a scan flags the exposure and a line running at full output has to stop to fix it.
He supports that argument with manufacturing being the most-attacked industry five years running and a Siemens figure of $2.3 million per hour for an idle automotive line.
For a session on securing and governing production systems while automating them, that is a sharper argument than a knowledge-capture walkthrough.
The material is positioned around one platform's go-to-market motion, so a session may read as enterprise-platform positioning rather than a vendor-neutral discussion of industrial AI adoption.
The audience fit is stronger for IT and executive leadership than for reliability and maintenance teams.
One post is a role announcement; the other is a security-architecture argument.
That leaves less agent-deployment example material than Mohan's open-format profile and role-based agent posts for a talk on agentic AI.
Ask for an audience breakdown and speaking terms; the posts date from July 9 and September 22, 2026.
LinkedIn showed Anoop Mohan had 8,517 followers on 8 October 2026.
Mohan's posts cover industrial AI agents, the OKF Industrial Profile, agentic automation, voice-agent usability, hiring, and AI distribution through carriers and managed service providers.
The posts here do not show publication dates.
Linked articles, video transcripts, full OKF documentation, sponsorship terms, audience breakdowns, and per-post analytics are not included in the posts here, so claims about measured results or commercial terms cannot be made.
Event names, dates, and booth details are time-sensitive and should be rechecked before publication.
