Trent Smyth works in the chief-of-staff field. Smyth writes about how chiefs of staff can help leaders navigate complex decisions and turn strategy into execution, and shares news about The Chief of Staff Association and Vannin Chief of Staff.
26.4K followersBased on 11 posts · latest Oct 2026
Trent Smyth is most useful for explaining how chiefs of staff turn strategy into execution and translate external risk into decisions.
Best for
A management consulting firm fits if it needs executive-function thought leadership for senior leaders.
Not for
Consumer workplace wellbeing, individual productivity habit campaigns, or broad app install campaigns do not fit.
Key takeaways
The chief-of-staff role's legitimacy is settled; the next test is strategic work.
Strategic contribution depends on a clear mandate and a principal treating them as partner.
Geopolitics, trade policy, supply-chain risks and regulation must become decisions that hold under pressure.
Check first: Confirm recent LinkedIn analytics, audience seniority and commercial terms before contacting them.
Main ideas
The role's legitimacy is settled; the next test is whether it is built for strategic work · Chiefs of staff are becoming translators of external risk into decisions that hold · Practitioner experience inside the role is the credential that matters
Trent Smyth works in the chief-of-staff field and writes about how the role can help leaders handle complexity and turn strategy into execution.
In the four LinkedIn posts here, they argue that the role’s value goes beyond calendars and logistics: a chief of staff can shape strategy, interpret external risks such as geopolitics, and help a principal make decisions.
They also share updates about The Chief of Staff Association and Vannin Chief of Staff.
Smyth connects the chief-of-staff role’s purpose to the conditions that make it effective.
One post says strategic contribution depends on a clear mandate and a principal who treats the chief of staff as a partner, not as diary support.
Another applies that decision-support idea to geopolitics: trade policy, supply-chain risks, and shifting regulation must be translated into decisions that hold under pressure.
The posts also show the association’s and Vannin’s work in recruiting, consulting, executive support, and growth advisory.
Read them for this practical framing of the role and for examples of how the organizations describe its application.
Trent Smyth writes about the chief-of-staff role as a strategic partnership rather than administrative support.
Read more
Across four LinkedIn posts, they argue that the legitimacy debate is settled and the remaining problem is whether organisations give the role a clear mandate and scope.
Chiefs of staff, in this account, increasingly translate external complexity—including geopolitics, trade policy and regulation—into decisions that hold under pressure.
Appointment posts show a related priority: promoting people who have held the role or operated inside investment environments, and building The Chief of Staff Association and Vannin Chief of Staff around consulting, recruiting and executive support.
The role's legitimacy is settled; the next test is whether it is built for strategic work
Trent Smyth writes that five years ago, the question was whether the chief-of-staff role was legitimate, and that coverage by Bloomberg, The New York Times and Fortune has settled it.
Read more
The harder question is whether organisations get real value from the role or only the appearance of it.
They argue that too many still define the job around visible tasks such as calendars and logistics.
Its value lies instead in a principal who understands the role and a chief of staff who can shape strategy, absorb complexity and think about what the organisation is becoming.
That requires a clear mandate and scope, and a principal who treats the role as a genuine partnership rather than an extension of their own diary.
The post contrasts task administration with strategic work and invites readers to COS26 at the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C., on 22 and 23 October to discuss how to build the role properly.
Five years ago, the debate was about legitimacy; Trent Smyth now treats that as settled and turns to implementation and value. The post says organisations can get real value from the role; ask for evidence of the results.
Chiefs of staff are becoming translators of external risk into decisions that hold
Trent Smyth argues that most chiefs of staff were not hired to think about geopolitics, but the job increasingly requires it.
Read more
Trade policy is now a boardroom conversation, supply-chain decisions carry political risk, and regulatory frameworks shift faster than strategy cycles.
Organisations navigate this well not by having the best intelligence, they argue, but by having someone who can read what is happening and translate it into decisions that hold under pressure.
Smyth says that describes a chief of staff at their best—and a skill set most organisations are only beginning to take seriously.
The post names trade policy, supply-chain political risk and shifting regulation as external pressures, then invites members and guests to the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C., on 22 to 23 October 2026.
Practitioner experience inside the role is the credential that matters
Trent Smyth's appointment posts justify senior hires by time spent in the role and operating environments, rather than by frameworks or methodology.
Read more
Kaitlin Boileau is described as having lived the chief-of-staff role: they previously served as chief of staff to a global management committee member at Accenture, supported a billion-dollar business unit, and worked as a fractional chief of staff with CEOs of professional services and venture-backed firms.
Susan Scutt is described as bringing more than 25 years across consulting, corporate and private equity environments, with senior chief-of-staff and portfolio-operations roles at Vista Equity Partners, TCV and Partners Group, translating strategy into execution.
Smyth presents those backgrounds as the reason the group can work with investors and portfolio companies where strategy meets execution.
Boileau led executive recruiting and consulting practices at Vannin Chief of Staff, helping CEOs across private equity, family office and scaling businesses find a chief of staff at moments of growth, transformation and succession. Scutt's appointment is framed as adding depth to consulting, recruiting, executive support and growth advisory.
The posts follow Vannin Chief of Staff's acquisition by The Chief of Staff Association and present the combined group as expanding into investor and portfolio-company work.
Convening and professionalising the field is a recurring priority
Two posts promote the same gathering, COS26 at the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C., on 22 and 23 October 2026.
Read more
One frames it as a conversation about building the chief-of-staff role properly so it delivers everything it can; the other invites attendees to examine the geopolitical demands now falling on the role.
The appointment posts extend the same institutional project: they announce senior hires into The Chief of Staff Association and Vannin Chief of Staff and describe a combined offering across consulting, recruiting, executive support and growth advisory.
The focus is both commentary on the role and building an organisation and event cycle around it.
Event invitations appear in the posts on legitimacy and geopolitics, while the appointment posts name Boileau's US-based Managing Director role and Scutt's addition to Vannin.
Explains what has changed in the chief-of-staff market and what still makes the role fail.
Read more
Newcomers can start here for a clear map of its purpose: not calendar support, but strategy, complexity and a principal who treats the chief of staff as a partner.
Trent Smyth says the debate over whether the chief-of-staff role is legitimate is settled, citing coverage by Bloomberg, The New York Times and Fortune.
The harder question is whether organisations are set up to get real value from the role.
They distinguish visible tasks such as calendars and logistics from higher-value work: shaping strategy, absorbing complexity and thinking about what the organisation is becoming.
The post argues that this requires a clear mandate and scope, and a principal who treats the role as a genuine partnership rather than an extension of their diary.
It invites readers to COS26 at the Atlantic Council in Washington D.C. on 22 and 23 October.
For brands planning a campaign
For a management consulting firm assessing executive-function insights, this post makes a direct case for structuring the chief-of-staff role to deliver strategic output. It supports campaign angles on mandate design, executive operating models and the difference between administrative and decision support.
Shows what the chief of staff does when external risk enters the boardroom.
Read more
Start here to see Trent Smyth connect trade policy, supply chains and regulation to everyday executive decision support.
Trent Smyth argues that most chiefs of staff were not hired to think about geopolitics, but the job increasingly requires it.
Trade policy has become a boardroom conversation; supply-chain choices carry political risk; and regulatory frameworks shift faster than strategy cycles.
They say organisations that navigate these pressures need someone who can interpret events and translate them into decisions that hold under pressure—not simply the best intelligence.
The post frames this as a chief-of-staff skill set and invites members and guests to the Atlantic Council in Washington D.C. on 22 to 23 October 2026.
For brands planning a campaign
This post offers evidence for a consulting campaign focused on executive function amid external uncertainty. It suggests angles around decision support, risk translation and the chief of staff as a filter between geopolitical change and executive action.
Shows how The Chief of Staff Association is building its US leadership and recruiting practice.
Read more
Newcomers can see the kind of operating experience the organisation considers credible.
Trent Smyth announces Kaitlin Boileau's appointment as Managing Director at The Chief of Staff Association, based in its US office.
Many will know Boileau from Vannin Chief of Staff, described as the original chief-of-staff consultancy, which the association acquired late the previous year.
As Managing Partner, Boileau led executive recruiting and consulting practices, helping CEOs in private equity, family office and scaling businesses find chiefs of staff during growth, transformation and succession.
They have also held the role: before Vannin, Boileau was chief of staff to a global management committee member at Accenture, supporting a billion-dollar business unit, and worked as a fractional chief of staff with CEOs of professional services and venture-backed firms.
For brands planning a campaign
For campaigns involving executive recruiting, private equity portfolio support or leadership transitions, this post showcases the association's talent bench and the experience it promotes. It supports a campaign angle on recruiting credibility and the value of a chief of staff who has held the role.
Shows which commercial capabilities Vannin and the association are building, with a clear focus on investors, private equity and portfolio operations.
Read more
Trent Smyth welcomes Susan Scutt to Vannin Chief of Staff, a Chief of Staff Association company.
Scutt brings more than 25 years of experience across consulting, corporate and private equity environments.
They built their career at Vista Equity Partners, TCV and Partners Group, where they held senior chief-of-staff and portfolio-operations roles, translating strategy into execution in demanding investment environments.
The appointment reflects where the group is heading, Smyth writes: working closely with investors and their portfolio companies where strategy meets execution and the chief-of-staff role creates measurable value.
The post lists consulting, recruiting, executive support and growth advisory among the capabilities the group is bringing together.
For brands planning a campaign
This post is relevant to campaigns aimed at investors, portfolio companies or professional-services buyers. It shows the group positioning the chief-of-staff function around strategy-to-execution work, not just administrative support.
From "is the role legitimate?" to "is it built to deliver?"
Smyth treats the argument over whether the chief-of-staff role deserves a seat in the executive suite as settled, pointing to Bloomberg, The New York Times and Fortune coverage of why more CEOs are turning to a chief of staff as complexity rises.
Read more
The live question, in their framing, is whether organisations are set up to get real value from the role or only the appearance of it.
Too many still define the job around visible tasks such as calendars and logistics, when its value comes from pairing a principal who understands the role with a chief of staff who can shape strategy, absorb complexity and think about what the organisation is becoming.
Smyth sets out what that takes: a clear mandate, clear scope, and a principal who treats the role as a genuine partnership rather than an extension of their own diary.
For brands planning a campaign
A consulting or advisory brand gets a ready-made diagnosis and prescription from this post: roles defined by task administration fail, while roles built on mandate and scope deliver. It offers a point of view a firm can build a workshop, briefing series or diagnostic offer around, rather than a product endorsement, and speaks directly to a brief about executive function.
Chiefs of staff as translators of the external environment
Most chiefs of staff were not hired to think about geopolitics, Smyth writes, but that is increasingly what the job requires.
Read more
Trade policy has become a boardroom conversation, supply chain decisions carry political risk, and regulatory frameworks shift faster than strategy cycles.
In Smyth's account, the organisations navigating this well are not the ones with the best intelligence but those with someone who can read what is happening and translate it into decisions that hold under pressure.
They describe that as what a chief of staff does at their best, and a skill set most organisations are only beginning to take seriously.
For brands planning a campaign
The claim is about a capability gap in the executive suite, making it a fit for risk, policy and strategy-adjacent brands seeking thought leadership rather than a direct product pitch. It also offers a crisp angle for an event or briefing-series sponsorship aimed at people close to a principal making consequential decisions.
COS26 takes place at the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C. on 22 and 23 October.
One post presents it as the place to discuss how to build the chief-of-staff role properly so it delivers everything it can; the other invites members and guests to examine the geopolitical demands now falling on the role.
Both close with a direct invitation and a link.
The second is addressed to people close to a principal making consequential decisions.
Event promotion and personal invitations, rather than reported analysis of the subject.
For brands planning a campaign
Smyth's publishing rhythm is tied to a live event and a membership organisation, so a brand seeking event association, a speaking slot or on-site content should time its approach to a convening cycle. The proposition is framed around professional development for the field, not product placement.
Building the bench: recruiting, placements and the direction of the business
Two posts announce senior appointments into the group.
Read more
Kaitlin Boileau becomes Managing Director at The Chief of Staff Association in its US office, having come through Vannin Chief of Staff, described as the original chief of staff consultancy and acquired late the previous year.
As Managing Partner there, Boileau led both the executive recruiting and consulting practices, helping CEOs across private equity, family office and scaling businesses find a chief of staff at moments of growth, transformation and succession.
Susan Scutt joins Vannin with more than 25 years across consulting, corporate and private equity environments, including senior chief of staff and portfolio operations roles at Vista Equity Partners, TCV and Partners Group, translating strategy into execution in demanding investment environments.
Smyth says the appointments reflect a direction of travel: working with investors and their portfolio companies where strategy meets execution, and adding depth across consulting, recruiting, executive support and growth advisory.
For brands planning a campaign
These posts show an organisation in a hiring and integration phase, and identify who now carries the client relationships. For a brand selling into professional-services firms, they signal where the group is investing and which capabilities it is presenting as a single offering.
Both appointment posts justify the hires through time spent in the role rather than frameworks or methodology.
Read more
Boileau is described as having lived the chief-of-staff role, previously serving as chief of staff to a global management committee member at Accenture and supporting a billion-dollar business unit, alongside work as a fractional chief of staff to CEOs of professional services and venture-backed firms.
Smyth writes that this experience shows in how Boileau builds and delivers.
Scutt's operational background is presented as the reason the group can work with investors at the point where strategy meets execution.
Smyth describes the group's direction as creating "genuine, measurable value"; ask for evidence of results delivered.
For brands planning a campaign
The credibility argument rests on operators, not a published method. A brand assessing Smyth for executive-function insights should ask whether their writing goes beyond appointment announcements into operational detail.
Smyth’s posts speak from inside The Chief of Staff Association: they refer to “our US office” and “our group,” announce senior appointments, and describe the association’s acquisition of Vannin Chief of Staff.
Read more
They also establish a venue relationship for a conference. Ask directly about any sponsorship, affiliate or client arrangements.
The Chief of Staff Association
Employment
Smyth writes about the association in the first person plural.
Read more
Announcing Kaitlin Boileau's appointment as Managing Director, Smyth says she will be "based in our US office," and describing Susan Scutt's hire Smyth refers to "where our group is heading." Smyth also invites members and guests to an association event rather than commenting as an outsider, which places Smyth inside the organisation rather than alongside it.
One post calls Vannin “a Chief of Staff Association company.”
Read more
In another, Smyth says the group acquired Vannin “late last year” and notes that its managing partner at the time, Kaitlin Boileau, ran both the executive recruiting and consulting practices. The posts attribute the acquisition and ownership to the association, not Smyth personally.
Two posts name the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C. as the venue for COS26 on 22 and 23 October, and invite association members and guests to attend.
Read more
The posts establish a venue relationship, not sponsorship or client work.
Trent Smyth's published work centres on the chief-of-staff role and what it takes for the position to deliver: a clear mandate, clear scope and a principal who treats it as a partnership rather than an extension of their diary.
Read more
Read the post arguing that the legitimacy debate is settled for the core position, then the post on geopolitics to see how they view the job changing under trade policy, supply-chain risk and faster-moving regulation.
Two appointment posts show the wider project: building The Chief of Staff Association and a consultancy bench around people who have held the role or operated inside investment environments.
Start with those four posts.
The writing is institutional, with event invitations and hiring announcements alongside the argument.
For evidence of methods or measured results, ask for examples.
Chief of staff roleExecutive appointmentsGeopolitical and regulatory riskProfessional associations and eventsExecutive advisoryLinkedIn postsExecutives and chiefs of staffPrivate equity and portfolio companies
Warren Beazley (FIRP)
Both write as executive-search insiders, arguing that senior leadership appointments should be run as strategic searches rather than advertised roles.
Read more
Both judge a role by what the person can deliver, not by the title.
Beazley writes about technology leadership — CTO, CIO and Chief AI Officer hires and research on how AI is changing those mandates — while Trent Smyth covers the chief-of-staff function and the working relationship between a principal and their chief of staff.
Both publish practical guidance on how senior roles are filled and argue that access and relationships decide appointments more than open applications do.
Read more
Anderson writes about board seats and women's access to governance roles, with named board directories and readiness steps, while Trent Smyth covers the chief-of-staff operating role and efforts to professionalise it through an association and a convening cycle.
Both address leaders of professional services firms about reducing dependence on a few key people and building capability that survives beyond them.
Read more
Both make the argument concrete with specific figures.
Healy writes about firm valuation, founder discounts and business-development systems across a whole firm, while Trent Smyth covers the chief-of-staff role and external pressures on a principal's decision-making.
Audience data for Trent Smyth is limited to one channel: about 26,400 LinkedIn followers, recorded on 8 October 2026.
Read more
The posts provide no breakdown by geography, age, gender, seniority, employer or occupation, and no post-level data on impressions, reactions, comments or link clicks.
For a management consulting firm weighing Smyth for executive-function work, the follower count alone cannot show whether the audience comprises executives, chiefs of staff or a general business readership.
All four posts address people close to senior decision-making: chiefs of staff working out what the role demands, leaders building the function, and investors and portfolio companies hiring for it.
References to private equity, family offices, succession and a Washington DC conference on the chief-of-staff role point to a readership focused on senior operations and executive support, rather than a broad consumer audience.
Ask Smyth for recent LinkedIn post analytics — impressions, engagement rate and any follower seniority or industry breakdown — for posts comparable to a campaign targeting executive-function decision-makers, plus reader survey results, if available.
No YouTube or other platform audience data was available to corroborate the LinkedIn figure.
LinkedIn followers
26,432
Follower count on the LinkedIn account at linkedin.com/in/trent-smyth; from the account record, not from any individual post · 2026-10-08
The four posts cover the chief-of-staff role, the COS26 conference, and appointments at The Chief of Staff Association and Vannin Chief of Staff.
Read more
None publishes partnership, sponsorship, or commercial engagement formats, sponsorship options, rates, deliverables, or a commercial inquiry process. A management consulting firm considering Smyth for a paid arrangement should ask them directly about terms rather than expect a published menu.
Need: a management consulting firm plans a six-week thought-leadership series on executive function at the top of large organisations.
Read more
The centrepiece is a named practitioner view on how the chief-of-staff role should be set up to produce strategic work rather than diary management.
Success is measured by qualified registrations from the firm's existing client list, not reach.
Decision: yes, with conditions.
Smyth has already published the argument the series would build on.
In the post that begins "Five years ago, the question was whether the chief of staff role was legitimate," they say the legitimacy question is settled and turn to the harder one: whether organisations are set up to get real value from the role.
The post contrasts visible tasks such as calendars and logistics with higher-value work such as shaping strategy, absorbing complexity and thinking about what the organisation is becoming.
It then sets out what that takes: a clear mandate, clear scope and a principal who treats the role as a genuine partnership rather than an extension of their own diary.
That diagnosis and prescription give a consulting firm a foundation for a briefing, workshop or diagnostic offer.
The writing addresses the people the firm wants to reach: chiefs of staff working out what the role demands, leaders building the function, and investors and portfolio companies hiring for it.
Private equity, family offices, succession and growth are named as moments when the role matters most.
A consulting firm selling into that group would be speaking to the readership the posts already assume.
The timing works.
Two of the four posts promote COS26 at the Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C. on 22 and 23 October 2026, giving a natural hook for a joint briefing in the same window.
A second episode could draw on the post arguing that most chiefs of staff were not hired to think about geopolitics, but that trade policy, supply chain risk and faster-moving regulation have made it part of the job.
The value lies in someone who can read what is happening and translate it into decisions that hold under pressure.
Conditions: treat Smyth as a point-of-view contributor, not a source of a taught method.
The posts state positions and promote a convening; none offers a framework, exercise or performance data.
The firm's own method should supply the substance.
Before committing to reach-based targets, ask for recent post analytics: the only available audience figure is a LinkedIn follower count of about 26,400 recorded on 8 October 2026, with no breakdown of follower composition.
Negotiate scope and deliverables directly; the posts give no sponsorship or partnership formats, rates or inquiry route.
When to choose a specialist
Need: a consumer workplace-wellbeing brand wants an always-on content series about individual productivity habits, aimed at a broad working audience and judged on app installs and trial sign-ups.
Read more
The brand wants lifestyle-adjacent posts across several platforms, with the creator's personal routines and tools as the main draw.
Decision: no.
Smyth's posts offer no basis for this campaign, and the mismatch runs in three directions.
First, the subject is a professional function, not personal habit.
Every post is about the chief-of-staff role, the group representing the field, or the people the group is hiring.
The posts do not address individual routines, tools, wellbeing or consumer products.
A habit-and-tools series would have to be built from scratch rather than from an established position.
Second, the audience does not match.
The writing addresses senior operators, executives, investors and portfolio companies—a narrow professional readership.
The only available audience figure is a follower count, with no geography, seniority, industry or engagement breakdown.
Ask for those details before setting install targets; the posts cannot establish whether the audience resembles the brand's install-driving audience.
Third, the posts offer no clear route to a commercial partnership.
The same four posts are appointment news and event invitations.
They include no sponsored or brand-partnered post, format menu, rate card or inquiry process.
A consumer brand would need to negotiate an unproven proposition against a target the posts do not support; ask directly about commercial terms and available formats.
Even a less ambitious campaign would be a poor fit if it needs performance data, a documented package or proof of a general business readership.
The four recent posts are all on one channel.
A worked campaign example
Campaign angle: "Mandate, not diary — what the chief of staff is for." A three-part joint briefing series for a management consulting firm, with Smyth as the framing voice and the firm providing the method and client access.
Episode one, published in the two weeks before COS26 (22–23 October 2026 at the Atlantic Council, Washington D.C.): a short written piece in which Smyth makes the case that the legitimacy debate is over and the live question is whether organisations are built to get value from the role.
Their contribution is the distinction between calendar-and-logistics work and strategic work, plus three conditions: a clear mandate, clear scope and a principal who treats the role as a partnership.
The firm adds the practical layer absent from the posts: a diagnostic checklist readers can use to identify which condition their organisation is missing.
Episode two, three weeks later: a briefing on how the external environment is changing the role.
Draw on the post arguing that trade policy is now a boardroom conversation, supply chain decisions carry political risk, and organisations cope best not by gathering the most intelligence but by having someone who can read change and turn it into decisions that hold under pressure.
Pair it with a firm-hosted session on decision support at the executive level.
The firm's client examples carry the substance; Smyth provides the framing.
Episode three, closing the series: a recorded conversation between Smyth and one of the firm's clients, built around one question: what does an organisation have to change before it hires a chief of staff? Publish it as audio and a written summary so the argument stands without the recording.
What the firm pays for and receives: agree a fixed scope directly with Smyth—three contributions, named authorship on the framing passages, and usage rights for the firm's own channels for an agreed period.
The posts publish no partnership terms, so put deliverables, timing, review rounds and usage rights in writing rather than selecting from a menu.
Negotiate any paid-media element separately.
What to measure: judge the series against the firm's own list—registrations, attendance and follow-up meetings with named accounts—alongside how far each piece is read by the intended audience (scroll depth or completion, not impressions alone). Before setting a reach target from the follower count, ask Smyth for recent post analytics: impressions, engagement rate, and any seniority or industry breakdown for comparable posts.
Before scaling, resolve the audience mix and test the idea against a longer-form example.
The posts do not show how the audience splits between executives, chiefs of staff and a general business readership, or include a transcript, article or other long-form work.
Publication dates are also absent, so the sequence and recency of the four posts cannot be confirmed.
Ask for the dates and one longer-form example, then retest the angle against it.
Pick Rachel Healy instead of Trent Smyth when the same buyer — a management consulting firm — wants its six-week series to speak to consultancy founders and partners about the firm's commercial engine rather than the chief-of-staff role.
Read more
Healy's two posts treat founder dependency as an expensive sales problem: a 10–25% key-person discount, attributed to valuation specialist Shannon Pratt, that removes roughly £3.7m from a potential £21m valuation on a £3m EBITDA firm at a 7x multiple, or £1.5m off a £7.5m firm at a 20% discount.
The posts then set out what to build instead — business development skills at every stage of the sale, a diagnostic that puts a number on the client's problem, proposals that read as the client's own case for change, protected BD time booked weeks ahead, written key-account plans, a CRM partners actually use, and relationships spread so every major client knows more than one person.
They lean on outside evidence (Matt Dixon on consultants resisting the sales label; a RAIN Group study of 397 organisations finding top key-account performers three times more likely to grow existing account revenue by 20% or more).
If registrations from the firm's existing client list are the success measure and those clients are firm owners, Healy addresses them directly, in their own numbers, with a next step to act on.
The subject changes, not just the voice.
Healy writes about how a consultancy wins and keeps work; neither post touches the chief-of-staff role or executive function, leaving the named-practitioner centrepiece of the Smyth series without a counterpart.
The reader is a firm founder or partner weighing the value of their business, not a principal setting up an executive-support function.
Both posts are short and argument-led, carrying other people's research rather than a method of their own, and each closes with an offer of the author's own services.
Ask for partnership terms, rates and an inquiry route; none are published in the posts.
Pick Warren Beazley when the same consulting buyer's series turns to hiring technology leadership — the CTO, CIO or chief AI officer appointment — rather than the chief of staff.
Read more
Beazley's posts argue that AI is raising the standard expected of technology leaders and that a title can conceal a different job: one leader holds a combined CIO and CTO role, reports to the CEO and sits on the executive leadership team, while another wants a Series A or B business with visible, direct impact rather than another executive seat in a 300-person organisation.
The proposed remedy is to run the appointment as a mapped, direct search, on the argument that an advertised post tells you who applied, not who the best person is.
A firm selling assessment or hiring support for technology roles to boards and CEOs making those appointments is speaking to the reader these posts assume.
The topic and reader both move away from the chief-of-staff campaign.
The posts say nothing about the chief-of-staff role or executive-function design, so the series would need to be rebuilt around technology search, with a hiring board as its audience instead of a principal designing an executive function.
The posts also read closer to a search firm's own funnel: one groups third-party findings (applications to technology and media roles up 40% per Workday; a Stack Overflow job-satisfaction figure; Thoughtworks and Karat results) and points readers to the author's own article; the other makes a case for over advertised search.
Neither supplies a diagnostic the consulting firm can hand to a client, so the firm would still need to provide the method.
Pick Jessica Anderson when the series needs a reader-facing angle on access — who gets into the rooms where senior roles are decided — or a plain-language read on an AI product shift.
Read more
Anderson's board post argues that another panel telling women to "take a seat at the table" misses the private rooms where board seats are actually assigned, gives current figures (29.9% of Russell 3000 board seats held by women, under 8% by women of color), and offers practical help: a list of named routes with links — 50/50 Women on Boards Denver, Forté Global Board Ready Women, BoardProspects, Private Directors Association, BoardLead, BoardSource and Denver boards and commissions — plus scripted next steps such as building a board bio and saying plainly, "I am actively pursuing board service."
A second post explains Salesforce and Anthropic's "Claudeforce" launch and argues that AI is becoming the interface to enterprise software rather than an add-on.
If the consulting firm's brief moves to board composition or to how AI changes the way enterprise systems are actually used, Anderson gives the reader something to do.
Neither post bears on the chief-of-staff role or how it should be set up, leaving the campaign's centrepiece without a match.
The board post is a curated directory and an invitation to comment, which suits a resource-and-community task better than a practitioner-view series judged on registrations; the AI post is commentary on a vendor launch, tied to an open beta planned for September 2026.
Adopting Anderson means changing the buyer task itself — from "how should this role be built" to "where do I look and what do I say" — and choosing a generalist commentator over a specialist voice.
Both posts carry the same publication date: 28 August 2026.
Trent Smyth's four LinkedIn posts here include one arguing the chief-of-staff role's legitimacy debate is settled and the real question is how organisations build it, one on geopolitics and regulation becoming part of the role, and two announcing senior appointments at The Chief of Staff Association and Vannin Chief of Staff.
Comparisons with similar creators draw on posts from three other creators.
The posts do not state publication dates, so they can only be ordered by internal references, including an event on 22-23 October 2026 in Washington, D.C.
The posts here include no longer-form work, transcripts or sponsored posts, and they do not mention sponsorship, rates or an inquiry route; the only audience figure stated here is a LinkedIn follower count of about 26,400 on 8 October 2026.
The posts here do not establish whether Smyth has signature books, shows or earlier work relevant to searches for the name.