Search creators⌘K
  1. Home
  2. Creators
  3. Malte Karstan

Malte Karstan

Malte Karstan writes LinkedIn explainers about business, migration and consumer markets, using data and visual maps to show what headline comparisons can miss.

Based on 13 posts · latest Oct 2026
LinkedIn

At a glance

Most useful for explainers that turn headline figures and maps into better questions for business, migration and consumer markets.

Best for

A European grocery or CPG brand seeking executive explainers on retail models and store-count interpretation.

Not for

Launch announcements or direct-response footwear posts needing fixed dates, purchase clicks, no data caveats and light approval.

Key takeaways

  • A store count is not a measure of retail power.
  • A percentage change says nothing until you know the scale behind it.
  • A company's home country is not where its value is created.

Check first: Confirm audience geography, job function, comparable post engagement and written terms.

Main ideas
A store count is not a measure of retail power · A percentage change says nothing until you know the scale behind it · A company's home country is not where its value is created
Read first
Europe's Grocery Map: Thousands of Stores, Very Different Kinds of Power
Sources for this section

What they are known for

Malte Karstan writes LinkedIn explainers that use data and visual maps to make business and social trends easier to interpret.

  • Across posts on European grocery retailers, migration, Danish companies and sneaker history, they look beyond a striking map or headline figure to ask what it actually measures—and what it leaves out.
  • Follow their work for clear examples of how store counts, growth rates, corporate origins and brand heritage can mislead when definitions and context are missing.

Karstan’s recurring strength is turning comparisons into more useful questions.

  • In the grocery post, a store count can combine independent cooperative merchants, franchises and centrally managed stores, despite differences in ownership and purchasing power; they point readers to measures such as sales per square metre and basket value.
  • In the migration post, they check rising percentages against the starting scale and the definition of an inflow.
  • The sneaker history and Danish-company map apply the same scrutiny to cultural value and corporate geography: a familiar product or national label does not, by itself, explain where value comes from or who captures it.
  • The result pairs accessible visuals with practical cautions about interpreting numbers.
Sources for this section

Ideas and priorities

Malte Karstan writes short, chart-led explainers that take a striking number or map and show what it cannot support.

Read more

The recurring position is that comparisons go wrong at the definition, not the decimal: what counts as a store, whether a figure is a flow or a stock, and whether a company's nationality describes its operations today.

  • Their priorities are scale and base before direction, ownership and risk-bearing before brand, and productivity or unit economics before size.
  • Each post credits its data sources and carries the caveat inside the argument rather than in a closing disclaimer.
  • The four posts cover migration statistics, European grocery retail, Denmark's corporate landscape and a century of sneakers.

A store count is not a measure of retail power

Karstan's central retail argument is that a location is not a comparable unit.

Read more

An independent merchant inside a cooperative, a franchised shop and a centrally managed discounter each count as one store, yet differ sharply in ownership, pricing authority, purchasing arrangements and exposure to operating risk.

  • They then name the metrics the map cannot display — sales per square metre, average basket value, private-label penetration, stock turnover and logistics costs — and argue that a smaller network can carry greater turnover or stronger purchasing leverage than a larger one.
  • Banner logos also flatten group-level weight, hiding the economic size of groups behind several chains.

Using 2025 figures, Żabka's group reported 12,339 stores, including 173 in Romania; Carrefour reported 6,766 French stores; and EDEKA counted 6,438 supermarkets under its core banner, against 10,871 food retail locations across the wider group with Netto Marken-Discount. Whether the comparison is valid, they argue, depends on the reporting year, consistent store definitions and a clear distinction between brands, groups and affiliated retailers.

Read original

A percentage change says nothing until you know the scale behind it

Karstan treats base and definition as prior questions to direction.

Read more

Percentage changes in annual migration inflows are not migrant populations, net migration or citizenship grants, they point out, so a country starting from a small base can double its intake while receiving far fewer people than a larger destination whose inflows fell.

  • They also question the baseline choice: 2019 precedes pandemic disruption and later humanitarian movements.
  • People under temporary protection should not simply be counted as permanent migrants under OECD definitions.
  • For employers, their closing argument is that arrival is only the first chapter: qualifications, housing, language and administrative processing decide whether labour supply becomes work.

Between 2019 and 2024, annual permanent migration inflows rose 129% in Poland, 97% in Lithuania and 79% in Mexico, while Germany fell 9% and Colombia 73%.

  • Germany nevertheless received roughly 586,000 new long-term or permanent immigrants in 2024, against around 177,000 for Japan, so the growth rates say nothing about which system is larger.
  • Poland is presented as a tension rather than a clean trend: rising inflows alongside tighter policy controls.

Read original

A company's home country is not where its value is created

Karstan groups Denmark's best-known companies by what they actually do, then separates corporate heritage from current economic reality.

Read more

A brand can be Danish by origin while manufacturing in Asia, employing thousands elsewhere and carrying investors around the world.

  • A graphic that maps regions of origin is not a map of headquarters, ownership or factory locations.
  • They also stress visibility: some of the most consequential companies are almost invisible to consumers because their products are designed into other companies' buildings and supply chains.
  • The post names concentration and cyclical risks rather than treating international scale as a guarantee.

Novo Nordisk develops medicines, Maersk operates container shipping networks, DSV arranges freight, Vestas makes wind turbines and Ørsted develops energy projects, while LEGO, JYSK, BESTSELLER and Pandora sit closer to consumers.

  • Grundfos pumps move water, Danfoss technology regulates heating and industrial systems, and ROCKWOOL insulation is installed inside buildings most people would not associate with Denmark.
  • The post also flags pharmaceutical concentration, wind-power financing pressure, freight-rate swings, and fashion, furniture and jewellery exposed to consumer demand.

Read original

Nostalgia is an asset with a running cost

Karstan's argument about consumer heritage is that reissues carry a real economic trade-off.

Read more

Reusing a known silhouette lowers the cost of introducing a product because customers already recognise it, but it can erode the discovery that made the design desirable in the first place.

  • Limited supply may inflate resale prices without delivering better margins to the manufacturer.
  • Their conclusion is deliberately unromantic: a celebrated product is not automatically a profitable one, and an anniversary release risks turning memory into inventory.
  • They apply the same reading to brands, noting that some preserve an unchanged icon while others continually reinterpret their own archives, and that neither approach guarantees relevance.

Keds Champion, Converse Chuck Taylor All Star and Superga 2750 established the canvas silhouette; Adidas Samba, Gazelle, Stan Smith and Superstar moved from sport into street culture; Puma Suede found audiences through music and Vans through skateboarding.

  • They mark the 1980s as the moment commercial logic grew more sophisticated, with New Balance 990, Reebok Classic Leather and Air Jordan 1, and call visible technology theatre in Nike Air Max 1 and Reebok The Pump.
  • They also correct the source graphic: Adidas Stan Smith traces to an earlier tennis shoe, and Nike Dunk debuted in 1985, ahead of Air Max 1 in 1987.

Read original

The habit across all of it: give the figure, then name the metric that would answer the question

The same four moves recur in every post.

Read more

A striking chart, list or statistic is presented fairly and without strawmanning; Karstan then supplies the definitional, ownership or scale detail that changes the reading; they explain who controls the business or carries the risk; and they close on the gap between the visible figure and the underlying economics. Sources are credited at the end of each post.

A store count leads to questions about purchasing power and sales per square metre; a migration growth rate leads to base size, definition and what happens after arrival; a national company map leads to where production and ownership actually sit; a sneaker timeline leads to who earns the resale premium. The subjects vary widely, but the correction is consistent.

Read original · Original 2 · Original 3 · Original 4

Sources for this section

Start with their work

Europe's Grocery Map: Thousands of Stores, Very Different Kinds of Power

A starting point for comparing European grocery retailers.

Read more

It asks what a location actually represents and which numbers reveal purchasing power — questions a store-count map alone cannot answer.

Karstan takes a familiar map of European grocery logos — EDEKA, Carrefour, Tesco, Żabka, ICA, Conad, Albert Heijn, Delhaize, SPAR, Coop, PENNY, Dia, Mercator and more — and breaks it open.

  • A single dot can represent an independent merchant inside a cooperative, a franchised shop or a centrally managed discounter, each with different pricing authority, purchasing arrangements and exposure to operating risk.
  • The post grounds the distinction in reported figures: Żabka's group counted 12,339 stores at the end of 2025, including 173 in Romania, with strength in proximity and frequent visits; Carrefour reported 6,766 French stores in 2025 across hypermarkets and neighbourhood formats; EDEKA counted 6,438 supermarkets under its core banner and 10,871 food retail locations across the wider group, including Netto Marken-Discount.
  • The central point is that the map cannot show productivity.
  • Sales per square metre, average basket value, private label penetration, stock turnover and logistics costs say more about commercial strength than the number of doors; a smaller network can generate greater turnover or purchasing leverage than a larger one.
  • The map also flattens group-level weight: banner logos do not reveal the economic size of Schwarz, which owns Lidl and Kaufland, or the breadth of Aldi and REWE.
  • Comparisons need a common reporting year, consistent store definitions and a clear distinction between brands, groups and affiliated retailers.

For brands planning a campaign

For executives assessing a European grocery or CPG opportunity, this is the piece to anchor a cautious discussion. Cite a store count only with its banner-or-group scope and reporting year, then turn to a productivity metric the count cannot capture.

Denmark's Corporate Map Is More Complicated Than It Looks

A clear example of separating a company's country of origin from where its value is actually created — the same distinction buyers need to make when a brand's provenance is used as a selling point.

Read more

Working through a map of Danish companies, Karstan separates businesses that are routinely grouped together.

  • Novo Nordisk develops medicines, Maersk operates container shipping networks, DSV arranges freight transport, Vestas manufactures wind turbines, Ørsted develops energy projects, JYSK sells home furnishings, BESTSELLER runs fashion brands, Pandora sells jewellery, and LEGO combines physical products with stories, licensing and a durable creative universe.
  • Geography is part of the argument: LEGO grew in Billund, Danfoss in Nordborg, and Grundfos in Bjerringbro — small towns that built capabilities reaching factories, households and retailers across continents.
  • The post highlights companies consumers rarely notice: Grundfos pumps move water, Danfoss technology regulates heating and industrial systems, and ROCKWOOL insulation sits inside buildings most people would not associate with Denmark.
  • It also makes a methodological correction: the graphic maps regions of origin, not current headquarters, ownership or the location of every factory.
  • Treating those categories as interchangeable produces a misleading economic portrait.
  • The logos also mask vulnerabilities: a small economy exposed to a narrow set of pharmaceutical products, wind power facing financing pressure and difficult project economics, freight rates that fluctuate with global trade, and fashion, furniture and jewellery exposed to consumer demand.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful when a brief leans on heritage or country of origin as evidence of supply chain, ownership or investment. Ask where a brand's production, ownership and employment actually sit today rather than assuming origin still describes the business.

25 Sneakers, 100 Years: When a Shoe Becomes Cultural Capital

A clear demonstration of how heritage value accumulates in consumer categories — and when a brand's own archive starts working against it.

Read more

Karstan traces a century of footwear through named models rather than generalities.

  • Keds Champion, Converse Chuck Taylor All Star and Superga 2750 established the simple canvas silhouette; Adidas Samba, Gazelle, Stan Smith and Superstar moved from sport into street culture; Puma Suede found audiences through music; Vans Authentic, Old Skool and Classic Slip On became inseparable from skateboarding; Nike Cortez moved beyond running.
  • The 1980s get a separate reading: New Balance 990 and Reebok Classic Leather emphasised comfort, quality and technical credibility; Air Force 1 became a durable basketball design; Air Jordan 1 connected performance with personality and product narrative; and Nike Dunk later gained a second identity in skate culture.
  • Karstan treats visible technology as theatre: Air Max 1 made cushioning visible, Reebok The Pump turned fit adjustment into a ritual, and ASICS GEL-LYTE III gave technical running footwear a memorable shape.
  • Adidas Ultraboost and Yeezy Boost 350, both from 2015, mark a moment when performance materials, lifestyle demand and celebrity influence met in one category.
  • The post then turns cautionary: reissues lower the cost of introducing a product because customers already know the silhouette, but they can erode the discovery that made it desirable, while limited supply may inflate resale prices without improving manufacturer margins.
  • It also corrects the source graphic's timeline: Stan Smith traces to an earlier tennis shoe, and Nike Dunk debuted in 1985, ahead of Air Max 1 in 1987, despite their placement.

For brands planning a campaign

A useful lens for consumer or fashion brand work involving nostalgia and reissues. It poses a concrete question: is the archive being used to avoid the cost of discovery, and does the resale premium reach the brand at all?

Migration's New Geography: Poland Surges, Germany Slips, Japan Adapts

A direct illustration of Karstan's recurring method: present a striking percentage, then test it against the scale behind it — here, in the context of labour supply rather than retail.

Read more

The post opens with percentage changes in annual permanent migration inflows between 2019 and 2024: Poland up 129%, Lithuania up 97%, Mexico up 79%, Spain up 50%, Ireland up 48%, Canada up 42%, Japan up 29% and Portugal the same, while Germany fell 9%, Sweden 24%, Greece 32%, Czechia 36% and Colombia 73%.

  • Karstan tests those figures against scale.
  • They describe changes in annual inflows, not migrant populations, net migration or citizenship grants, so a country starting from a small base can double its intake while receiving far fewer people than a larger destination.
  • Germany, despite its decline, received roughly 586,000 new long-term or permanent immigrants in 2024; Japan received around 177,000.
  • Poland illustrates the tension rather than a clean trend: labour demand, industrial expansion and regional integration coincided with rising inflows even as policymakers pursued tighter controls.
  • Japan shows institutions changing quietly, with labour migrants accounting for around 63% of new long-term or permanent arrivals in 2024.
  • The baseline also matters: 2019 predates pandemic disruption and exceptional humanitarian movements, and Ukrainians receiving temporary protection should not simply be counted as permanent migrants under OECD definitions.
  • Across the OECD, permanent migration in 2024 stood around 15% above 2019 despite declining from 2023, so five-year growth and a recent slowdown coexist.
  • The post closes on what employers need after arrival: recognised qualifications, available housing, language skills and routes into work.

For brands planning a campaign

Relevant when a brief involves market entry, workforce supply or a claim based on a growth rate. Check the base, definition and reference year before a percentage informs a decision.

Sources for this section

Topics and approach

Posts cited for each topic
Recurring approach: the number, then what it cannot show4
Grocery retail: store counts hide different kinds of power1
Migration: percentage change is not scale1
Denmark: a corporate map is not a value-creation map1
Sneakers: cultural capital can become inventory1

Grocery retail: store counts hide different kinds of power

Karstan takes a widely shared map of Europe's grocery chains and shows why it is not a ranking.

Read more

After naming EDEKA, Carrefour, Tesco, Żabka, ICA and Conad, they line up actual counts: Żabka's group reported 12,339 stores at the end of 2025, including 173 in Romania; Carrefour reported 6,766 French stores; EDEKA counted 6,438 supermarkets under its core banner, or 10,871 food retail locations across the wider group with Netto Marken Discount.

  • Their argument: one location can mean very different things, because an independent merchant inside a cooperative, a franchisee and a centrally managed discounter differ in ownership, pricing authority, purchasing arrangements and exposure to operating risk.
  • They then turn to metrics the map cannot show: sales per square metre, average basket value, private-label penetration, stock turnover and logistics costs.
  • They also flag how banner logos obscure group weight, such as Schwarz with Lidl and Kaufland, or the reach of Aldi and REWE, and note that comparisons break down without a common reporting year and consistent store definitions.

Starts with a familiar visual, then tests it against individual company disclosures and published group figures rather than accepting the graphic's framing.

Karstan calls the map a conversation starter, not a definitive ranking, and names the gaps—reporting year, store definitions, brand versus group versus affiliate—that make comparisons fragile.

For brands planning a campaign

For a European grocery retailer or CPG company, this is the strongest piece for a campaign aimed at executives: the caveat is the value, not the decoration. A campaign could ask Karstan to explain the distinction between store count and sales per square metre: which comparisons a board can safely use, which flatter a cooperative or franchise network, and how to present market structure without implying that more doors mean more purchasing power.

Examples: Source 1

Migration: percentage change is not scale

OECD International Migration Outlook 2025 data show annual permanent migration inflows rising 129% in Poland, 97% in Lithuania and 79% in Mexico between 2019 and 2024, while Germany fell 9%, Sweden 24% and Colombia 73%.

Read more

Karstan then qualifies the headline: Germany still received roughly 586,000 new long-term or permanent immigrants in 2024 against around 177,000 for Japan, so growth rates say nothing about which system is larger.

  • They distinguish inflows from migrant populations, net migration and citizenship grants, question the choice of 2019 as a baseline because it precedes the pandemic and the humanitarian movements after it, and note that Ukrainians under temporary protection should not simply be counted as permanent migrants under OECD definitions.
  • Their closing point: arrival is only the first chapter; qualifications, housing, language and administrative processing determine whether labour supply becomes work.

Pairs a chart of growth rates with named 2024 totals for large destinations, then lists the definitional choices that change the reading.

For brands planning a campaign

Useful for an employer, relocation service or policy-adjacent brand that needs a clear, measured explanation.

  • The campaign angle is a corrective explainer: what these numbers can and cannot support, and why an economy can depend more on foreign workers while political debate moves toward restriction.
  • It suits content aimed at HR, workforce planning or public-affairs audiences rather than consumers.

Examples: Source 1

Denmark: a corporate map is not a value-creation map

Karstan uses Denmark's roster of companies to separate origin from current economic reality.

Read more

They group companies by what they do rather than by logo: Novo Nordisk develops medicines, Maersk runs container shipping, DSV arranges freight, Vestas builds wind turbines, Ørsted develops energy projects, while LEGO, JYSK, BESTSELLER and Pandora sit closer to consumers.

  • They highlight companies that are economically important but nearly invisible to the public, such as Grundfos pumps, Danfoss heating and industrial controls, and ROCKWOOL insulation.
  • Their central caution is that corporate heritage is a poor proxy for where value is created today: a brand can be Danish by origin while manufacturing in Asia and employing thousands elsewhere.
  • They also name concentration risk, including pharmaceutical exposure and wind-power financing pressures, and point to institutional factors such as technical education, specialist suppliers and ownership structures that permit patient investment.

Classifies companies by business model first, then asks which are visible to consumers, treating corporate origins as a starting point rather than an answer.

Karstan closes on a deliberate irony: some of Denmark's most consequential exports are designed to disappear into other companies' products, buildings and supply chains.

For brands planning a campaign

Suited to a company, investment audience or national trade body that wants its home-market story told honestly rather than as a logo parade. A campaign about what a country's corporate map does and does not prove, or the difference between consumer-facing fame and industrial importance, offers a less crowded angle than standard market-entry content.

Examples: Source 1

Sneakers: cultural capital can become inventory

A hundred-year timeline of 25 sneaker models becomes an argument about how brands sustain value after the original performance reason has faded.

Read more

Karstan traces Keds Champion, Converse Chuck Taylor and Superga 2750 through Adidas Samba, Gazelle, Stan Smith and Superstar, Puma Suede's move into music, Vans into skateboarding, and Nike Cortez out of running.

  • They mark the 1980s as the moment commercial logic grew more sophisticated, with New Balance 990, Reebok Classic Leather and Air Jordan 1 tying performance to personality and aspiration.
  • They call out technology as theatre in Nike Air Max 1, Reebok The Pump and ASICS GEL-Lyte III, before Adidas Ultraboost and Yeezy Boost 350 converged performance materials, lifestyle demand and celebrity influence in 2015.
  • The economic warning: reissues lower the cost of introducing a product because customers already know the silhouette, but can erode the discovery that made it desirable; limited supply can inflate resale prices without improving manufacturer margins.

Moves chronologically, then reverses the timeline to correct a mismatch in the source graphic between Nike Dunk (1985) and Air Max 1 (1987), and notes that Adidas Stan Smith traces to an earlier tennis shoe.

Karstan says brand flags on the graphic indicate heritage, not manufacturing origin, and that a celebrated sneaker is not automatically profitable.

For brands planning a campaign

The most direct fit for a footwear, apparel or heritage-brand brief. A campaign could ask for an archive-strategy piece aimed at product and brand teams: when reissuing an icon protects value, when an anniversary release turns nostalgia into inventory, and how to keep a silhouette relevant without exhausting it.

Examples: Source 1

Recurring approach: the number, then what it cannot show

Across all four posts, the structure repeats.

Read more

A striking chart, list or data point is presented fairly, then tested.

  • Karstan supplies the definitional or ownership detail that changes the reading and finishes with the gap between the visible figure and the underlying economics.
  • The topics range from migration statistics and national corporate maps to grocery ownership and sneaker history, but the method is consistent: state the number, identify what it counts, explain who controls or bears the risk, and name the metric that would answer the question.
  • Sources are credited at the end of each post, and caveats sit in the body rather than in a detached disclaimer.

The same four-move pattern runs through each post: present the visual, question the metric, attribute ownership or risk, then name the missing measure.

For brands planning a campaign

Brands can expect a chart-led explainer with a corrective spine, not a promotional post.

  • It suits briefs for audiences already suspicious of bold headline numbers who want a defensible reading they can repeat in a meeting.
  • It fits less well when the goal is a simple celebratory announcement.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2 · Source 3 · Source 4

Sources for this section

Brands and businesses

Malte Karstan's posts carry no sponsorship disclosure, employment statement, ownership claim, client relationship, affiliate link or investment.

Read more

The only named connections are credits to graphic collaborators who produced or adapted the visuals, and citations to public data sources. The posts do not state the terms of the graphic arrangements; ask for them if they matter.

World Visualized

Mention

Credited as the graphic source for the migration post's chart.

Read more

The post does not say whether this was a paid arrangement, licensing deal or shared project; ask for the terms if they matter.

View example

vgraphsinsta

Mention

Credited as the graphic source for the sneaker timeline.

Read more

The post does not state the nature of the working relationship; ask for details if they matter.

View example

Stefan Schwab

Mention

Credited for the graphic adaptation of the European grocery retailer map.

Read more

The post names the adaptation but gives no further detail on the arrangement; ask for the terms if they matter.

View example

International Relations Illustrated

Mention

Credited as the graphic source for the map of Danish company origins.

Read more

The post gives no detail beyond the credit; ask for the terms if they matter.

View example

Sources for this section

Topics and similar creators

Malte Karstan writes short, chart-led posts that take one striking figure or visual and show what it cannot support.

Read more

Read them as a small set rather than a feed.

  • If retail structure is your interest, start with the European grocery post, then the Danish corporate map: the first separates store counts from purchasing power, the second separates corporate origin from where value is created.
  • The migration post is the clearest demonstration of the method: a table of growth rates, followed by the 2024 totals that make the headline direction misleading.
  • The sneaker history applies the same move to culture: nostalgia lowers the cost of a relaunch and can also wear out the thing that made the product desirable.
  • Across all four, the pattern holds: state the number, identify what it counts, explain who controls the business or carries the risk, then name the metric that would actually answer the question.
  • Every post credits its sources at the end, with caveats built into the argument.
Retail market structure Cooperative and franchise retail Migration statistics Corporate geography Brand heritage and reissues Sneaker culture Data literacy Retail analysis Chart-led explainers Short-form LinkedIn posts Retail executives Brand strategists Market analysts

LUKE HODSON

Both write short LinkedIn analyses of retail and youth footwear, reading store networks and brand names against the forces moving underneath them.

Read more

Hodson takes a merger or a chain's lost identity and asks what it means for power and cultural relevance; Karstan takes a chart and asks what the number really counts.

Hodson argues from deal and culture news in the US and UK, asking who gains leverage and which brands hold cultural edge.

  • They draw conclusions about positioning.
  • Karstan argues from published figures and named company disclosures, drawing conclusions about definitions, ownership and measurement.
  • Hodson does not run the numerical correctives that define Karstan's posts, while they do not cover merger strategy or youth-brand positioning.

Read original · Original 2

Andrew Lolk

Both take a number-heavy commercial claim and reveal the decision behind it, each with a specific corrective in mind.

Read more

Karstan shows why a store count or migration growth rate cannot be read as power or scale; Lolk shows how a single shared ROAS target quietly moved spend away from one product category for months.

Lolk writes first-person accounts of ecommerce and paid-search work on named accounts, with campaign settings, dates and profit outcomes.

  • Karstan analyses published data and graphics for a general business reader.
  • For evidence of client work, campaign detail or performance figures, ask for examples.

Read original · Original 2

Christian Peter Sandvei

Both publish short LinkedIn posts that translate a technical or data-heavy subject for a business audience, centering each on one clear takeaway and ending with a forward-looking question rather than a product pitch.

Read more

Sandvei's argument that AI is only as valuable as the foundation underneath it follows the same shape as Karstan's argument that a store count is only as useful as the definition behind it.

Sandvei builds posts from interviews with named Nordic executives and writes about AI adoption, data governance and CIO priorities.

  • Karstan works from charts and corporate disclosures on migration, grocery retail and brands.
  • For executive interviews or quoted perspectives, ask for examples.

Read original · Original 2

Sources for this section

Audience

Malte Karstan's posts include content for buyers interested in European retail structure: a grocery-market post distinguishes store counts from ownership, control and productivity.

Read more

Before a campaign aimed at retail or CPG buyers, ask for recent LinkedIn audience analytics on geography and job function, plus results—impressions and engagement—for comparable retail or CPG posts.

Sources for this section

Partnership options

The four posts are analytical business writing about migration, sneaker history, European grocery retail and Danish companies, published on LinkedIn on 10 October 2026.

Read more

None includes a sponsorship disclosure, “#ad” or “partner” label, promotional insert, partnership format, sponsorship rate, contractual requirement or media kit.

  • They consistently credit data sources and graphics—for example, EDEKA, Carrefour and Żabka disclosures with graphic adaptation by Stefan Schwab; OECD's International Migration Outlook 2025 with a World Visualized graphic; and the Danish company register, Forbes, Crunchbase, Glassdoor and local newspapers with an International Relations Illustrated graphic.
  • A buyer should expect sources and graphic creators to be credited on a sponsored post.
  • Ask for the format, deliverables, pricing, approval steps, usage rights, exclusivity, lead times and disclosure wording in writing before committing budget.
Sources for this section

Campaign fit

A campaign to shortlist

Strong fit. The grocery post is the closest match to this brief, and its method is the deliverable the brief asks for.

Read more

Brief

A European grocery retailer or CPG company wants an executive-facing explainer on how cooperative, franchise and discounter models differ in purchasing power and productivity, and how to present store-count figures without overstating market strength.

Watch outs

Malte Karstan's posts do not identify the account's followers. Before promising reach to a European grocery or CPG audience, ask for audience geography and job function, plus impressions and engagement on comparable retail or CPG posts.

The posts do not state paid formats, pricing, approval steps, usage rights, exclusivity or lead times, and include no media kit, rate card or inquiry route. Confirm terms in writing before booking.

Why it works

The subject is already covered. The post names EDEKA, Carrefour, Tesco, Żabka, ICA, Conad and others, then works from reported numbers rather than the map: Żabka's group at 12,339 stores at the end of 2025, including 173 in Romania; Carrefour at 6,766 French stores in 2025; and EDEKA at 6,438 supermarkets under its core banner and 10,871 food retail locations across the wider group with Netto Marken-Discount. A retailer or CPG brand does not have to teach the audience from scratch or supply the raw material.

For a piece about this argument, the caveat is central, not a disclaimer. Karstan's point is that a location can be an independent merchant inside a cooperative, a franchisee or a centrally managed discounter, each with different pricing authority, purchasing arrangements and exposure to operating risk. They then turn to what a store count cannot show: sales per square metre, average basket value, private-label penetration, stock turnover and logistics costs. A smaller network can carry greater turnover or purchasing leverage than a larger one.

The posts show a format suited to campaigns needing editorial analysis with credited sources. Each names its underlying sources and graphics at the end and includes caveats in the body. Buyers should expect sources and graphic creators to be credited on a sponsored post, not a promotional insert.

The brief's executive framing is a natural extension. Karstan closes the grocery post by calling the map a conversation starter rather than a definitive ranking, and names what a defensible comparison requires: a common reporting year, consistent store definitions, and a clear line between brands, groups and affiliated retailers.

When to choose a specialist

Poor fit for a grocery campaign. This is materially different from a campaign needing grocery content: it is a short-turnaround, promotional, direct-response piece, while every post is a credited analytical explainer written to correct a headline number.

Read more

Brief

A consumer footwear brand wants an announcement post for a reissued sneaker model, timed to a fixed launch date and aimed at driving direct purchase clicks, with no data caveats and a light approval process.

Improvement path

This could work if the brief were reframed as archive strategy for product and brand teams rather than a launch announcement. That version asks when reissuing an icon protects value and when an anniversary release turns nostalgia into inventory — a question the reviewed sneaker post already answers with named models and a clear economic point. Before committing, the brand should confirm paid terms, audience composition and past sponsored-post performance directly.

Why it fails

The format is the opposite of what the brief needs. The sneaker post argues that reissues lower the cost of introducing a product because customers already know the silhouette, but can erode the discovery that made it desirable; limited supply may inflate resale prices without improving manufacturer margins. A launch announcement would have to strip out exactly the argument this creator builds.

The posts state no paid format, rate, approval step or usage term, and none of the four includes a sponsorship disclosure. Confirm these details before booking a fixed-date promotional campaign.

The observed format is long-form text built around a chart or list; the posts show no video, short-form, product photography or direct-response creative.

The posts provide no audience or performance figures tied to the account. Request click volume, purchase intent and launch-reach data before relying on those outcomes.

A worked campaign example
Angle

What a store count can and cannot tell a board: lead with the familiar European grocery map, show how ownership changes the meaning of each number, then finish with the productivity measures a board should steer by.

Brief

A European grocery retailer or CPG company needs a board-ready explanation of why store counts across markets cannot be compared directly, and what to use instead.

Deliverable

One chart-led explainer for an executive audience, plus a one-page caveat checklist the client's presenters can reuse when quoting store counts in internal decks. The checklist turns the caveat into a working tool rather than a paragraph of hedging.

Next step

Before booking, request account audience geography and job function, impressions and engagement on comparable retail or CPG posts, and written partner terms covering format, deliverables, disclosure wording, usage rights and lead time. The grocery post demonstrates the capability; commercial terms and audience data remain to be confirmed.

Structure

Open with the map and names the audience already recognises: EDEKA, Carrefour, Tesco, Żabka, ICA, Conad, Albert Heijn, Delhaize, SPAR, Coop, PENNY and others.

Test the counts against reported figures rather than the graphic: Żabka's group at 12,339 stores at the end of 2025, including 173 in Romania; Carrefour at 6,766 French stores in 2025; and EDEKA at 6,438 supermarkets under its core banner and 10,871 locations across the wider group, including Netto Marken-Discount.

Explain what a single location represents. An independent merchant inside a cooperative, a franchisee and a centrally managed discounter differ in who sets prices, who buys and who carries operating risk. A logo alone does not show who controls the business behind the counter.

Move the discussion to productivity: sales per square metre, average basket value, private-label penetration, stock turnover and logistics costs. A smaller network can carry greater turnover or stronger purchasing leverage than a larger one.

Flag the group weight that banner logos hide, such as Schwarz with Lidl and Kaufland, and the breadth of Aldi and REWE.

Close with the conditions a board should insist on before quoting any number: a common reporting year, consistent store definitions, and a clear distinction between brands, groups and affiliated retailers.

Sources for this section

Who else to consider

Andrew Lolk

Choose Andrew Lolk when the decision sits below the market-structure question—in the product feed, listing title or bidding target.

Read more

Their two posts work through concrete ecommerce problems.

  • One challenges the default that a known brand belongs first in a product title, then sets out three tests for moving it back: category-focused search terms, unknown brands, or other benefits more likely to lift click-through.
  • The post also notes that removing the brand entirely was tested and did not work.
  • The other describes one product category quietly losing share of spend inside a shared tROAS portfolio for six months, the split into two category targets on 16 September, and the reported result: dog food spend up about 88% in Denmark and Swedish weekly net profit moving from negative to positive.
  • For a CPG company looking to compete better in retail media, marketplaces or product listings, this is the same operational task Lolk demonstrates with numbers attached.

The tradeoff is scope, not quality.

  • Lolk's posts cover product-level media and feed tactics for ecommerce accounts, largely with Danish and Swedish examples.
  • They do not cover cooperative, franchise and discounter ownership, store counts, sales per square metre or how to caveat a market comparison for a board.
  • Grocery or CPG executives would get a practical optimisation method, but not the market-structure explanation they need.
  • Lolk's figures come from a few weeks of one account's data, not published company disclosures.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Luke Hodson

Choose Luke Hodson when the question is about retail power and cultural position rather than store economics—for instance, when a footwear, sportswear or youth-facing brand is tracking shifts in shelf space and influence.

Read more

Hodson's two posts analyse the DICK'S Sporting Goods acquisition of Foot Locker for $2.4 billion and what combined buying power over brands may mean, as well as why Size? lost its role as the place streetwear dropped before reaching the wider market. Both argue from retailer positioning, brand relationships and consumer culture, and close by asking the audience what they are seeing.

The tradeoff is the unit of analysis.

  • Hodson reasons about credibility, exclusivity and cultural relevance, with examples from US and UK sneaker and streetwear retail in April and May 2025.
  • A European grocery or CPG explainer needs ownership and productivity detail these posts do not provide.
  • Use Hodson when the deliverable is a positioning argument drawn from retail culture, not a comparable-numbers explainer.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Christian Peter Sandvei

Choose Christian Peter Sandvei for technology leadership inside retail and wholesale organisations, rather than grocery market structure.

Read more

Sandvei's two posts introduce the interview series Nordic CIO Pulse 2026 and share named practitioners' views: Steen Villsen at XL-BYG on putting trusted data, unified infrastructure and governance before AI, and Nicolas Skovmand at BESTSELLER on teams owning what they build.

  • XL-BYG is a decentralised wholesale and retail cooperative, making the pairing relevant to grocery's ownership question.
  • Sandvei is the better choice when the audience is CIOs and the decision is where to invest in data and AI, rather than how to read a store count.

These posts promote a series and thank contributors; they convey other people's views rather than Sandvei's own market analysis.

  • They contain no store figures, market comparisons or productivity metrics, so they cannot carry an executive grocery explainer on their own.
  • Ask for audience data and commercial terms before comparing reach or availability.

Examples: Source 1 · Source 2

Sources for this section

Build your campaign brief

Editable Markdown templates for planning a campaign with this creator.

Campaign brief — blank template

Completed brief — board-ready explainer on European grocery store counts

Completed brief — archive strategy explainer for a footwear brand

Sources for this section

Research methodology

  • This profile rests on the full text of four LinkedIn posts by Malte Karstan, covering migration statistics, a century of sneakers, European grocery retail and Denmark's corporate map.
  • The posts carry no publication dates, so they are described by subject and approach rather than timeframe; the figures they discuss refer to 2024 and late 2025.
  • The material contains no interviews, longer-form writing or other channels, and no audience analytics, media kit, rate card or sponsorship terms.
  • Where those gaps change a decision — who follows the account, what paid formats exist and on what terms — they are recorded as open questions rather than filled in.
  • Comparisons with other creators draw on two LinkedIn posts each from three named writers.
  • No numerical score is used, and nothing here should be read as editorial approval of the posts reviewed.

Brands they talk about