Mads Porsborg works with CleanQuote, a maritime procurement platform, and writes about shipping technology, procurement, and how shipping companies adopt software.
Useful for grounded commentary on shipping software consolidation, procurement, and adoption in bulk and tanker shipping.
Best for
A shipping software or maritime procurement vendor planning thought leadership on consolidation and adoption.
Not for
Consumer or broad reach campaigns needing paid distribution, media kits, or verified access to named roles.
Key takeaways
Consolidation post names Veson, Sedna, Marcura, and Complexio and asks about customer overlap.
Most common stack they see is IMOS plus Sedna, raising migration questions.
Pangaea adoption story: ten ideas, eight rejected, two built.
Check first: Confirm whether they accept sponsorships and can document audience profession, employer, and seniority.
Main ideas
Integrated platforms compete for overlapping customers · Good procurement software balances operator needs with supplier fairness · Adoption depends on choosing useful changes, not implementing every idea
Mads Porsborg works with CleanQuote, a maritime procurement platform, and writes about shipping technology, procurement, and the relationships behind software adoption.
Their posts map how shipping software companies are assembling broader platforms and ask what those moves mean for customers already using products from competing providers.
A post on Veson, Sedna, Marcura, and Complexio makes that approach concrete, focusing on customer overlap and the difficulty of switching systems rather than treating consolidation as a simple race to build the biggest suite.
Other posts examine the work behind adoption: balancing operator and supplier needs in a procurement marketplace, and how a customer team turns a long list of ideas into a few changes it can implement.
Porsborg also writes about learning the culture of dry bulk and tanker shipping as an industry outsider.
Follow their work for grounded commentary on how maritime technology is bought, combined, and adopted, with occasional personal stories that show the close-knit industry around it.
Porsborg connects software-market shifts to the people and operating choices that determine whether new tools take hold.
Their consolidation post names the competing platforms and asks a specific customer question: which system is more likely to change when a buyer already uses IMOS with Sedna?
Their supplier-marketplace post offers another perspective, outlining principles for serving ship operators while addressing suppliers’ concerns about direct customer relationships and price competition.
Porsborg writes about work with CleanQuote customers, so the Pangaea account is explicitly positive.
The range is part of the appeal: readers get market questions, practical adoption stories, and candid accounts of building relationships in a specialized shipping community.
Across these five posts, Mads Porsborg returns to a practical question: how do shipping companies make technology work in a tightly connected, relationship-driven industry?
Read more
They favor joining up software where it helps customers, choosing improvements over adding features for their own sake, and balancing operator needs with fair treatment of suppliers. The posts mix market analysis with personal and customer examples.
Integrated platforms compete for overlapping customers
Porsborg sees shipping software moving from separate products toward connected platforms.
Read more
The key question is not just which company offers more features, but which part of a customer’s existing setup is hardest to replace. They leave the winner open, noting that customers may continue using products from several competitors.
Porsborg compares Veson Nautical’s Veson Platform with Sedna’s “Trade OS” positioning and Marcura’s “One Marcura” language.
They say IMOS plus Sedna is a common setup, then ask whether a Sedna customer is more likely to change vessel management system or an IMOS customer to change email.
DA-Desk, they suggest, may remain in use either way.
Good procurement software balances operator needs with supplier fairness
Porsborg describes a marketplace as a relationship between parties with different interests.
Read more
Smaller suppliers may value the exposure, while established suppliers may prefer direct customer relationships and see a platform as competition.
The priority, they say, is helping operators make good decisions without favoring suppliers or imposing unnecessary work on them.
Price matters, but it is not necessarily the deciding factor; mistakes should be acknowledged and addressed.
In a post about CleanQuote’s marketplace for hold-cleaning supplies, shore gangs, and underwater services, Porsborg sets out three principles: help the operator, show no preference among suppliers, and recognize that the platform is one of many demands on a supplier. They also recount a supplier pointing out a mistake.
Adoption depends on choosing useful changes, not implementing every idea
Porsborg’s customer example values pragmatism over novelty: generate options, reject most of them, and quickly put the worthwhile changes into practice.
Read more
They credit the customer’s culture and working relationship, rather than software alone, for adoption.
Porsborg says meetings with Pangaea Logistics Solutions produce about ten ideas, of which eight are set aside—“Just because we can do it doesn't mean we should”—and two are put into action. Examples include new procurement practices for hold-cleaning supplies, automated inventory management, and collecting hold photos into Sedna.
Credibility in bulk and tanker shipping takes time and relationships
Porsborg challenges the assumption that experience in one part of logistics transfers smoothly to another.
Read more
They portray dry bulk and tanker shipping as a close-knit community, where curiosity, time, and meeting people help newcomers become part of the industry.
A customer tells Porsborg that “Container shipping is closer to bus transportation than to dry bulk.” They say it took roughly 12 to 18 months to feel part of the industry, and recall joining a long-running Thursday football tradition and meeting industry contacts socially.
Shipping relationships extend beyond scheduled business meetings
Porsborg presents shipping as a small, connected world where chance encounters and in-person contact add to relationships built through work.
Read more
They illustrate the point with a trip.
During two days in Copenhagen meeting CleanQuote users, Porsborg describes running into industry contacts and finally meeting face to face someone they had known from many video calls. They close by referring to a partnership with Vessel Performance Solutions.
Answers the question: who are the main players in shipping software, and why is the market consolidating?
Read more
Newcomers should start here for a compact map of platform competition and buyer overlap.
Mads Porsborg argues that consolidation is the big theme in shipping software.
The post points to Veson Nautical's Veson Platform pulling together IMOS, CoCaptain AI, and Mail, formerly Shipfix; Sedna's "Trade OS" positioning around email, VMS, and AI; and Marcura's "One Marcura" language after years of M&A.
It also names Complexio as a smaller example aiming to connect everything in one place.
Porsborg compares this with an earlier wave in logistics technology and highlights a practical wrinkle: Veson and Sedna are rivals, but many customers use IMOS with Sedna.
The open question is whether a Sedna customer changes their VMS, or an IMOS customer changes their email system.
Porsborg notes that either way, customers likely still use DA-Desk, so Marcura may be well placed.
For brands planning a campaign
For a maritime technology firm assessing Porsborg on shipping software market dynamics, this post is the strongest starting point.
It names recognizable players, sets out a clear consolidation thesis and raises a buyer-overlap question that can anchor a campaign about suite consolidation, point solutions or switching costs.
If you need independent market evidence, ask for supporting research.
Answers the question: what tensions arise when a procurement platform sits between ship operators and suppliers?
Read more
Newcomers should start here for the supplier-side view of maritime marketplaces.
Porsborg describes CleanQuote as a procurement tool with a marketplace for hold cleaning supplies, shore gangs and underwater services.
The recurring challenge is keeping suppliers happy.
Small suppliers tend to value the exposure a marketplace provides; big established players often prefer direct customer relationships and may feel the platform erodes their business.
They set out three principles: help the operator do their job effectively, show no preference among suppliers and respect that the platform is only one of many tasks a supplier has.
Price matters, but it is not the only or even the top parameter.
Mistakes still happen; the response is to own up and improve.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful for marketplace operators, procurement technology firms and supplier-facing campaigns. It offers a concrete framework for trust and adoption on a multi-sided platform, and can support a campaign about supplier resistance, marketplace neutrality or operator decision-making.
Answers the question: how does an outsider build credibility in dry bulk and tanker shipping?
Read more
Newcomers should start here for the industry's social and cultural texture.
Porsborg describes starting with CleanQuote from a supply chain and logistics technology background, assuming the transition to shipping would be easy.
A customer corrected that assumption with a line they still use: "Container shipping is closer to bus transportation than to dry bulk."
The post explains that the bulk and tanker shipping community is tight-knit, with people who studied or trained together.
They say it took roughly 12 to 18 months to feel part of the industry, through time, curiosity and meeting people.
The signs of belonging are specific: joining a more than 35-year-old indoor football tradition in Svanemøllehallen on a Thursday morning, then meeting Peter Schau for wine at Nebbiolo with Oscar Sand Lyhne.
For brands planning a campaign
Best used for founder-profile, employer-brand or community-led campaigns. It shows a credible outsider-to-insider narrative and the relationship-building that underpins access in shipping.
Answers the question: what does a working vendor-customer relationship look like in maritime procurement?
Read more
Newcomers should start here for a concrete adoption story rather than a general claim.
Porsborg calls Pangaea Logistics Solutions one of their favourite customers and names Jesper Hjorth, Heidi Kørner, Sara Tangemann and the wider team as collaborators over the past year.
The team is described as full of ideas, urgent about improvement and pragmatic: meetings generate ten ideas, eight get shot down with the line "Just because we can do it doesn't mean we should," and the remaining two are brought to life soon after.
The post says Pangaea adopted new ways to procure hold cleaning supplies, automated inventory management and collected hold photos into Sedna, despite operating across multiple offices in a change-cautious industry.
For brands planning a campaign
A strong case-study seed for CleanQuote, Sedna or maritime procurement campaigns that need proof of adoption and customer collaboration.
It can support messaging about pragmatism, implementation speed and cross-office rollout.
Before using it as a neutral reference, ask for independent validation.
Answers the question: what does the day-to-day network of shipping feel like?
Read more
Newcomers should start here for the density of relationships behind the industry.
Porsborg describes two days in Copenhagen meeting CleanQuote users.
The post recounts chance encounters: coffee with Christian Nicolas Treu, who had bumped into Sasja Ihn Christensen at an event; later, near a meeting with Pangaea Logistics Solutions in Hellerup, Adeline appeared unexpectedly.
They had met Adeline dozens of times on screen but never face to face, and end by cheering a partnership with Vessel Performance Solutions.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful for event, community, and relationship-led marketing.
It shows how informal encounters and existing networks shape business in shipping.
It is not a detailed product or market post, so it works best as supporting color rather than a primary campaign proof point.
Porsborg reads the shipping software market as shifting from point solutions toward integrated platforms.
Read more
One post follows Veson Nautical's launch of the Veson Platform, which brings IMOS, CoCaptain AI and Mail (formerly Shipfix) closer together, and reads it as a strategic response to Sedna's "Trade OS" pitch built on the same pillars of email, vessel management and AI.
Marcura, after years of buying companies, is cited for repositioning as "One Marcura" rather than a collection of point solutions, with Complexio named as a smaller example of the same pattern.
The sharpest observation is customer overlap: the configuration Porsborg sees most often is IMOS plus Sedna, so the medium-term question is whether a Sedna customer changes vessel management system or an IMOS customer changes email system.
Either way, DA-Desk likely stays in the stack, which is why Marcura may be well placed.
For brands planning a campaign
A strong fit for briefs on competitive positioning in maritime software. Porsborg can frame a launch or message around platform consolidation, overlapping customer bases and switching costs rather than feature-by-feature comparisons.
Supplier relationships on a maritime procurement marketplace
Drawing on CleanQuote's work with hold cleaning supplies, shore gangs and underwater services, Porsborg describes the challenge of keeping suppliers on board.
Read more
Smaller suppliers value the exposure a marketplace gives them; large, established suppliers prefer direct customer relationships and may see the platform as eroding their business.
CleanQuote's principles are to help the operator do the job, show no preference among suppliers and respect that the platform is only one of a supplier's many tasks.
Price is one factor in a decision, not automatically the top one, though some suppliers assume otherwise.
Porsborg acknowledges that the team still makes mistakes, as one supplier pointed out, and says they respond by owning up and improving.
Sets out a handful of operating principles, then shows how each plays out amid competing supplier interests, including a recent failure.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful for campaigns addressing supplier-side objections to a marketplace or procurement platform, or explaining how supply and demand are balanced. The stated principles give vendors a concrete way to discuss neutrality and operator focus.
Moving from logistics technology into shipping culture
Porsborg describes joining CleanQuote from supply chain and container shipping technology, expecting the move into dry bulk and tankers to be straightforward.
Read more
It wasn't.
A customer's line, quoted with evident affection, sets the tone: "Container shipping is closer to bus transportation than to dry bulk."
Bulk and tanker shipping is a tight-knit community where people studied or trained together, making entry from outside a matter of time, curiosity and meeting as many people as possible.
Porsborg puts the adjustment at roughly 12 to 18 months and describes belonging through small signals, such as a longstanding Thursday football game and informal drinks with industry peers.
The 12-to-18-month figure and the sense of belonging are Porsborg's own account of one person's experience, not a measured industry norm.
For brands planning a campaign
Gives vendors a credible voice on why outside-in software pitches can misfire in bulk and tanker shipping, and what it takes to be accepted. Suits content about entering the industry, building trust and navigating long sales cycles.
How a shipping company adopts new procurement technology
A post about Pangaea Logistics Solutions describes a year of working with a named team on procurement and inventory changes.
Read more
Meetings generate around ten ideas, eight of which are rejected with the reasoning, "just because we can do it doesn't mean we should," leaving two to implement quickly.
Porsborg credits the team with adopting a new way to procure hold cleaning supplies, automating inventory management and collecting hold photos into Sedna.
The changes came in a traditionally change-cautious industry, and the pace is attributed to the customer's culture rather than the software alone.
Generates a broad set of candidate improvements with the customer, discards most and implements the few that remain right away.
For brands planning a campaign
A ready reference for change-management and pilot-to-adoption stories. It shows a repeatable way to prioritise what a customer actually needs and grounds adoption claims in a named account.
Porsborg describes a two-day trip to Copenhagen to meet CleanQuote users and chance encounters with industry contacts, including a counterpart known from dozens of video calls but never met in person.
Read more
The post frames shipping as a small world where informal, unplanned contact carries weight, and links those encounters to an ongoing partnership with Vessel Performance Solutions. The tone is personal rather than promotional, and specific people are named and thanked.
For brands planning a campaign
Suggests that influence in this sector runs through relationships and in-person presence. Community, event and partner-led formats are likely to work better than purely product-led messaging.
Mads Porsborg’s posts describe work with CleanQuote, a year-long customer relationship with Pangaea Logistics Solutions and a partnership involving Vessel Performance Solutions.
Read more
Ask for confirmation of Mads’s formal role at CleanQuote and whether these relationships are paid.
CleanQuote
Disclosed partnership
Mads discusses CleanQuote’s maritime procurement platform and its work with shipping operators and suppliers.
Read more
Their posts describe product principles, customer adoption and supplier relationships, but do not state their formal role at the business.
Mads calls Pangaea one of their favorite customers and describes working with its team over the previous year on procurement, inventory management and collecting hold photos in Sedna.
Mads Porsborg’s posts offer a view of how technology is bought and adopted in shipping.
Read more
Start with their analysis of platform consolidation around vessel management, email and AI; their account of running a maritime procurement marketplace where suppliers and operators want different things; and first-person notes on what it takes to belong in bulk and tanker shipping.
The market posts cover vendor positioning and switching costs; the customer and supplier posts show how adoption and fairness work in practice.
For adjacent perspectives, three creators write about AI and procurement decisions in construction, client proof and AI-built storefronts in ecommerce agency work, and LPG trading with storage as a hedge.
Shipping software consolidationMaritime procurement marketplacesTechnology adoption in shippingMaritime softwareShipping industry cultureMarket commentary postsFirst-person field notesMaritime software and procurement professionals
Stola writes first-person posts about running a technology services business, using concrete client work and direct arguments to explain what wins work in a crowded market.
Read more
That approach is close to Porsborg’s, which draws on named customers and specific platform decisions rather than abstract positioning.
Stola focuses on ecommerce and Shopify Plus agency work, including a test store built largely by prompting Claude and ChatGPT.
Porsborg focuses on maritime shipping software and procurement.
Stola makes the commercial case through agency proof and brand experience; Porsborg through platform consolidation, switching costs and supplier relationships.
Hill and Porsborg both examine how AI and software are changing procurement, framing the shift as a change in the buying decision, not just the arrival of a new tool.
Read more
Both write argument-led posts that draw a distinction and explain why it matters.
Hill’s work centres on construction procurement, supplier intelligence and training for procurement teams.
Porsborg’s centres on maritime procurement software and marketplace dynamics between suppliers and buyers.
Hill teaches through strategic framing of roles and decisions; Porsborg through customer and supplier stories from shipping.
Afzal and Porsborg offer practitioner commentary on shipping, drawing on long first-hand experience to explain commercial consequences in direct language.
Read more
Both treat relationships, timing and physical constraints as central to the market.
Afzal covers LPG cargo trading and storage in Pakistan, making the case through price spreads, CP, freight and vessel discharges. Porsborg covers software and procurement technology for bulk and tanker shipping, focusing on platform competition and customer adoption.
Consider Mads Porsborg for a campaign about shipping software market dynamics aimed at people already engaging with maritime and shipping technology content.
Read more
Their posts discuss software consolidation, procurement, and technology adoption. The LinkedIn account had 5,662 followers on October 11, 2026; ask for recent audience survey results or another documented source covering followers’ profession, employer, and seniority.
Mads Porsborg's five posts do not set out a partnership, sponsorship or advertising offer.
Read more
They write from an operator's seat, describing CleanQuote's procurement work with shipping customers such as Pangaea Logistics Solutions, explaining supplier-relationship principles and commenting on shipping-software consolidation.
The posts do not say whether they accept sponsorships.
Buyers should ask directly through the LinkedIn profile listed in the identity section: there is no media kit, rate card, audience breakdown, stated collaboration format or official inquiry page to plan around, so confirm budget, timeline and deliverables.
They speak credibly about named vendors (Veson Nautical, Sedna, Marcura, Complexio) and buyer-side software choices, expertise a campaign aimed at maritime-technology readers could draw on.
Take the brief. Porsborg writes from an operator’s seat at CleanQuote, not a vendor marketing team, so commentary on rival products reads as practitioner judgment. The consolidation post names Veson Nautical, Sedna, Marcura and Complexio, sets out the “Trade OS” versus Veson Platform positions, and offers a candid observation: the most common stack they see is IMOS plus Sedna. That raises a specific question for a campaign about suites, point solutions and migration risk: does a Sedna customer change vessel management system, or does an IMOS customer change email? Supporting material broadens the fit. The supplier post lays out three stated principles for a two-sided procurement marketplace and concedes a recent mistake, useful for a campaign that must answer supplier objections. The Pangaea post offers a named adoption story and a working method (ten ideas, eight rejected, two built). The industry-culture post provides an outsider-to-insider frame for founder or employer-brand content.
Read more
Brief
A shipping-software or maritime procurement vendor preparing a launch or thought-leadership push on platform consolidation, switching costs and adoption among bulk and tanker operators.
Limits
Use the material as informed commentary, not independent or quantified market research. Expect opinion-led rather than data-led formats.
When to choose a specialist
Decline, or reset expectations first. Mads Porsborg’s posts do not set out a sponsorship format, rate card, media kit or inquiry route, leaving no packaged product to plan around. The account shows 5,662 followers as of 11 October 2026, but offers no audience survey or employer or seniority breakdown, so access to a specific function cannot be promised. The posts address shipping-software buyers and operators in general, not a measured segment. A campaign about container and liner operations would also misfire: the current expertise is in dry bulk and tankers, while container shipping is treated as a different industry. One customer’s line: “container shipping is closer to bus transportation than to dry bulk”. Confirm budget, deliverables and audience reach directly before planning.
Read more
Brief
A consumer or broad-reach brand campaign that depends on paid distribution, a documented sponsorship package and verified access to a named job function, such as chief technology officers at large shipowners.
A worked campaign example
Angle
The switching-cost question: when an operator runs one vendor’s vessel management system alongside another’s email platform, what would actually make them move either system—and which side of the stack is stickier?
Handoff
Give Porsborg the named competitor set, the product being launched and the two or three operator segments in scope. Ask for the counter-argument to be included, not smoothed over, and confirm contact details and commercial terms before planning.
Proof points
The IMOS plus Sedna overlap and the DA-Desk point that survives either switch; the three stated marketplace principles to show how a vendor answers supplier resistance; and the Pangaea example as evidence that adoption pace depends as much on customer culture as on software.
Shape
A single argued piece of roughly 700–900 words, opening with the customer-overlap claim, working through the Veson and Sedna positions and Marcura’s “One Marcura” repositioning, then narrowing to what a switch costs an operator in retraining, data and disruption. Close by asking operators to name their own stack.
Why
This turns Porsborg’s observation into a campaign, not just a summary. It gives the vendor a reason to enter a conversation they usually lose and invites operators to describe their real configuration.
Choose Stola when the campaign concerns platform and AI adoption in merchant-facing commerce, rather than maritime software.
Read more
The posts offer two usable arguments.
First, client conversations have shaped a positioning claim: buyers choose an agency for the brands it has served, not its services, because migrations, builds and conversion work are repeatable and hard to differentiate by value proposition.
Second, a first-person build experiment follows an AI assistant, working through a store connector, as it named, designed and rebuilt a storefront, with the author’s role reduced to moving files between tools.
A vendor selling adoption tools to merchants, or a firm debating how AI changes delivery work, gets a concrete walkthrough that a maritime platform brief cannot supply.
Nothing in Mads Porsborg’s posts addresses shipping, vessel management, procurement platforms or vendor consolidation.
Their audience is direct-to-consumer brands and agency clients, so a maritime software campaign would need translating into commerce terms and would lose the operator-side credibility they bring as a platform user.
The AI build is not presented as top-tier work, so it supports a discussion of capability, not a quality benchmark.
Choose Hill when the campaign is about procurement as a strategic function, not software market structure.
Read more
The two posts form a connected argument: estimating, procurement and commercial teams sit at the boundary between contractor and supply chain, where they see market shifts first.
But without an established place to record those observations, the signal dies in someone’s memory or a chat message.
AI now makes it feasible to join those scattered qualitative observations.
The second post distinguishes AI for procurement—tools that execute existing tasks—from procurement for the AI era, when the buying decision itself changes to choices such as buying technology, outsourcing a capability or procuring an outcome.
A vendor selling into contractor supply chains, or a training provider, gets a closer domain match and a ready-made distinction to build on.
The posts concern construction procurement, not shipping.
They offer no named software-vendor landscape, platform-consolidation analysis or switching-cost material, so the overlap with a maritime software campaign is in the argument, not the subject matter.
Treat the parallel as an angle to adapt, not as evidence about shipowners or operators.
Choose Afzal when the buying decision concerns physical commodity movement, storage and price risk, rather than software selection.
Read more
The two posts offer a 25-year first-person frame, a named market and a clear thesis.
The market detail is specific: a butane-heavy Pakistan market, a propane-to-butane spread of minus $35, receiving capacity around 13,000 metric tonnes against demand over a million tonnes a year.
The thesis: price risk in LPG is really timing risk, and paper hedges fail without somewhere to put the cargo.
Physical storage is the dependable hedge, turning volatility into a buying window.
A logistics or infrastructure vendor speaking to cargo owners about risk and capacity would find the actual buying logic described here.
The posts offer no software-market or vendor-landscape commentary, or discussion of platforms, integration or migration. Their argument concerns physical assets and trading posture, so a campaign about platform consolidation or switching costs needs a different contributor or a much narrower infrastructure angle.
Mads Porsborg's posts here cover consolidation across shipping software vendors (including Veson Nautical, Sedna, Marcura and Complexio), the supplier side of a maritime procurement marketplace, a named customer's adoption of new procurement and inventory practices, and two personal notes on entering and moving through the bulk and tanker shipping community.
All five were written by Porsborg.
The account had 5,662 followers on 11 October 2026.
The posts here have no publication dates, so no date range or change over time is claimed for them, and the examples are treated as current commentary rather than a chronological record.
The posts here do not document several things a name search might expect: no signature book, show or earlier career history, no transcript, longer-form writing or media kit, and no audience demographics, sponsor policy or rate card.
These details are not available in the posts here, so commercial terms and audience reach should be confirmed directly.
Similar creators named here are compared based on their recent posts and are offered as adjacent reading, not as rankings.