Katie Colledge-Price works on cybersecurity for electric-vehicle charging infrastructure. In Colledge-Price's LinkedIn posts, they describe leading the REA Cyber Security Working Group and helping develop guidance for local authorities, fleet operators, chargepoint operators and installers.
2.7K followersCyber resilienceBased on 11 posts · latest Oct 2026
Most useful for explaining EV charging cybersecurity to professional audiences and convening industry guidance.
Best for
Cybersecurity consultancy or EV charging infrastructure campaign needing co-authored thought leadership.
Not for
Consumer-facing EV awareness campaigns seeking mass reach or lifestyle content.
Key takeaways
Cyber security for EV charging is a present-day risk, not a future one.
Technical standards should be explained to people who have to apply them.
Treat charging networks as untrusted by default.
Check first: Ask for LinkedIn follower demographics and any event attendance or registration data.
Main ideas
Cyber security for EV charging is a present-day risk, not a future one · Technical standards should be explained to the people who have to apply them · Treat charging networks as untrusted by default
Katie Colledge-Price works on cybersecurity for electric-vehicle charging infrastructure.
In LinkedIn posts, they describe leading the REA Cyber Security Working Group and helping develop its EV Charging Cyber Security Report for local authorities, fleets, chargepoint operators and installers.
The posts connect risks in charging networks with practical guidance for those who procure, install and operate them.
Katie Colledge-Price makes infrastructure cybersecurity relevant to EV charging decisions.
In the report launch post, they point readers to guidance on threat response, secure-by-design chargepoints, standards, supply chains and payment security.
Their earlier announcement emphasizes building resilience from procurement through operation and making technical standards clearer to non-specialists.
In a post on network security, they advocate a “No Trust” approach and name encrypted SIMs, end-to-end protection, dynamic connections and honeypots as defenses.
Together, the posts offer a practical guide and a clear case for treating charging infrastructure as connected critical infrastructure.
Katie Colledge-Price’s recurring argument is that cyber security belongs in electric-vehicle charging rollout now, not in future planning.
Read more
Their posts build the case on national threat warnings, making technical standards usable for non-specialists, treating charging networks as untrusted by default, and convening industry experts to produce shared guidance.
Cyber security for EV charging is a present-day risk, not a future one
The case for acting now rests on official threat warnings.
Read more
Katie Colledge-Price points to urgent alerts from the National Cyber Security Centre and the National Crime Agency about state-backed and organised criminal threats to chargepoint infrastructure and critical national infrastructure. Charging networks are already in the threat landscape, so security belongs in current rollout plans, not later phases.
In the pre-launch post for the REA cyber security guidance, they write that cyber security in EV infrastructure “is no longer a future concern — it's a present-day priority,” setting that claim against NCSC and NCA warnings about attacks on chargepoint infrastructure and critical national infrastructure.
Technical standards should be explained to the people who have to apply them
The guidance aims to demystify technical standards for non-specialists, recognising that people responsible for local authority, fleet and chargepoint operations are not security specialists.
Read more
Rather than argue for new rules, the posts organise existing obligations into practical guidance for operators, explaining where requirements come from and what each one demands.
The launch post lists the report’s coverage: threat monitoring and response readiness, secure-by-design principles for chargepoints, ETSI EN 303 645, RED compliance and secure communications, Cyber Essentials Plus in the supply chain, PCI/DSS for payments, and the role of CAF and licensing from 2028.
The list also looks ahead: CAF and licensing from 2028 are described as upcoming, framing the guidance as a moving compliance picture rather than a fixed checklist.
This is the clearest technical position in their posts: data and communications infrastructure connected to EV charging should be treated as untrusted by default, shifting effort from reactive defence to controlling every connection.
Read more
The argument is tied to ISO 15118 and Plug and Charge connectivity: as that capability spreads, chargepoint operators, e-mobility service providers and installers will have to meet National Cyber Security Centre requirements that already exist.
Katie Colledge-Price names encrypted SIMs, end-to-endpoint protection, dynamic connections and honeypots as practical ways to protect a charging network.
Security has to run from procurement through day-to-day operation
The work spans the whole lifecycle of charging infrastructure, not just the software layer.
Read more
It frames resilience as something built in when equipment is bought and installed, secured through the supply chain, and maintained through operation and payments.
The three aims in the pre-launch post are to build cyber resilience from procurement through operation, demystify technical standards for non-specialists, and encourage collaboration between public and private sector stakeholders. The report links this lifecycle view to specific controls, including secure-by-design principles for chargepoints and Cyber Essentials Plus supply chain requirements.
Progress comes from convened industry work, not solo commentary
The posts present collective work as the method, not a side detail.
Read more
Katie Colledge-Price describes leading the REA Cyber Security Working Group, assembling named experts from across the sector and launching the output at an industry event. Public and private sector collaboration is a stated goal, pointing to organisations that need to agree on a baseline together.
The launch post thanks working group members individually, including Tony Shorthouse, Richard Earl, Duncan Valentine, Jon Lyons, Peter Simm, Drew Huddart, Dr David Fell, Matthew Dear and Adriana Fricke. It also describes sharing a panel with Richard Earl, Jon Lyons, Matt Adams and Christian Hahn, CEO at Hubject, at the REA | Recharge UK event at the Victory Services Club.
Answers “What has this person actually shipped, and what is in it?”
Read more
Start here to see the finished output before reading the posts that led up to it.
The launch post for the REA EV Charging Cyber Security Report lists the guidance’s coverage: threat monitoring and response readiness, secure-by-design principles for chargepoints, ETSI EN 303 645 and RED compliance, Cyber Essentials Plus supply chain requirements, PCI/DSS compliance for payments, and the role of CAF and licensing from 2028.
Katie Colledge-Price says the document is aimed at local authorities, fleet operators, chargepoint operators and installers, and describes leading the REA Cyber Security Working Group that produced it.
The post names the working group members and the panel that launched the report at the Victory Services Club.
For brands planning a campaign
This is the published artifact a partner could build a campaign around. A co-authored piece or webinar could take one item—payment security under PCI/DSS or secure-by-design for chargepoints—and expand on it for readers who have the report but need help applying it.
Answers “Why does this guidance exist, and who is it for?”
Read more
Read it before the launch post to understand the report’s intent.
Katie Colledge-Price introduces the forthcoming Cyber Security Guidance Document and says data, online and infrastructure security have been a large part of a 15-year career in EV and charging infrastructure.
The document aims to build cyber resilience from procurement through operation, demystify technical standards for non-specialists, and encourage collaboration between public and private sector stakeholders.
The post cites National Cyber Security Centre and National Crime Agency warnings about state-backed and organised criminal threats to chargepoint infrastructure and critical national infrastructure.
For brands planning a campaign
Those three aims make a ready-made content brief. A consultancy could pitch a plain-language explainer series to demystify technical standards for non-specialists, with Katie Colledge-Price as co-author or reviewer.
Answers “What does this person argue, beyond producing a document?”
Read more
Start here for the point of view that runs through the other posts.
A short post arguing for a no-trust approach to the data and communications infrastructure connected to EV charging. It names specific measures—encrypted SIMs, end-to-endpoint protection, dynamic connections and honey pots—and links the argument to ISO 15118 and Plug and Charge, which it says will require chargepoint operators, e-mobility service providers and installers to meet existing National Cyber Security Centre requirements.
For brands planning a campaign
This is the clearest statement of technical position in these posts, and the shortest. It gives a partner a specific argument to agree with, contest or extend—for example, in a webinar contrasting a no-trust posture with the compliance-led approach set out in the report.
Katie Colledge-Price focuses on protecting electric-vehicle charging infrastructure from cyber attack.
Read more
They cover guidance for local authorities, fleet operators, chargepoint operators and installers, from procurement through day-to-day operation. They describe heading the REA Cyber Security Working Group and helping produce its guidance document.
For brands planning a campaign
A cybersecurity consultancy can build on a clearly segmented audience—local authorities, fleets, CPOs and installers—with a co-authored piece or webinar tailored to each group rather than a general introduction to cyber awareness.
The case for acting now rests on warnings from the National Cyber Security Centre and the National Crime Agency about state-backed and organised criminal threats to chargepoint infrastructure and critical national infrastructure.
Read more
The posts frame cyber security in EV infrastructure as a present-day priority, with rollout risk already live.
For brands planning a campaign
The official warnings offer a timely hook for a piece or session on what operators should do first, rather than a generic threat-landscape overview.
Standards and compliance, explained for non-specialists
The guidance translates technical requirements into practical advice for non-specialists.
Read more
It covers threat monitoring and response readiness, secure-by-design principles for chargepoints, ETSI EN 303 645 and RED compliance with secure communications, Cyber Essentials Plus in the supply chain, PCI/DSS for payments, and the role of CAF and licensing from 2028.
For brands planning a campaign
The stated goal of demystifying standards suits an explainer: a co-authored article or webinar that walks through a compliance checklist from procurement to operation, tying each standard to an operator decision.
A 'no trust' approach to networks and connectivity
One post sets out a technical method rather than a policy message: treating data and communications infrastructure connected to EV charging as untrusted by default.
Read more
The measures include encrypted SIMs, end-to-endpoint protection, dynamic connections and honeypots. The post links this approach to ISO 15118 and Plug and Charge connectivity, arguing that CPOs, EMSPs and installers need to meet National Cyber Security Centre requirements as the capability spreads.
For brands planning a campaign
A consultancy could build on this technical depth with a joint session on securing chargepoint connectivity for Plug and Charge, using the named controls as agenda points.
Working groups, panels and launch events as a format
Katie Colledge-Price's posts centre on collaborative industry work: assembling a working group of named experts, crediting contributors individually and announcing the document's launch at a REA | Recharge UK event.
Read more
They describe appearing on a panel alongside other industry figures. The posts combine project milestones, thanks to collaborators and calls to keep the conversation going.
The available posts cover launch-period announcements and technical commentary. Ask for publication dates to assess how current the programme is.
For brands planning a campaign
The posts point to a convening format: a webinar or panel with named co-speakers, backed by a launch-style announcement.
The main brand relationship in the posts is with REA: Katie Colledge-Price says they head the Cyber Security Working Group and helped produce the EV Charging Cyber Security Report, launched at an REA | Recharge UK event.
Read more
Two other companies appear only as hashtags, with no stated relationship, so they are listed as mentions rather than work, sponsorship or ownership.
REA
Disclosed partnership
Katie Colledge-Price says they are Head of the Cyber Security Working Group at REA and credits the group with the REA EV Charging Cyber Security Report, launched at an REA | Recharge UK event at the Victory Services Club.
Read more
The guidance is for local authorities, fleet operators, chargepoint operators and installers.
It covers threat monitoring, secure-by-design principles, ETSI EN 303 645, RED compliance, Cyber Essentials Plus supply chain requirements, PCI/DSS payments compliance, and the role of CAF and licensing from 2028.
Ask whether the working-group role is a staff or voluntary position.
Explore Katie Colledge-Price's work through the two REA cyber security guidance posts and the shorter no-trust post on chargepoint connectivity.
Read more
The guidance posts show the working-group method, intended audiences and standards covered; the connectivity post makes the technical case for encrypted SIMs, endpoint protection and ISO 15118. For comparison, look at cyber resilience in other critical-infrastructure sectors and commercial EV fleet transition, and assess whether the focus is EV charging security, enterprise incident response or telecommunications compliance.
EV charging cyber securityCritical national infrastructureSecure-by-designCyber resilienceTechnical standards and complianceLocal authorities and fleetsChargepoint operators and installersIndustry working groups
Both write about the shift to electric vehicles and the infrastructure needed to support it.
Read more
Nash Fayyad discusses commercial EV adoption by Royal Mail, BT Group, Amazon and The AA, linking it to ChargePoint's charging and energy-management solutions. Another post reflects on fleet electrification at the Commercial Vehicle Show.
Nash Fayyad's posts cover commercial EV adoption and fleet transition for ChargePoint, rather than cyber security guidance for chargepoints or critical-infrastructure threat warnings.
Both frame cyber security as a leadership and resilience issue, not just a technical one.
Read more
Frank Policastro discusses Pondurance's MDR and warranty partnership, and argues that cyber incidents can become financial, operational, legal, reputational and board-level concerns.
Frank Policastro's posts cover enterprise MDR, incident response and warranty-backed recovery, rather than EV charging infrastructure, chargepoint standards or the REA working group.
Both connect cyber security to critical infrastructure and sector-wide collaboration.
Read more
Shawn Edwards describes Zayo as a founding member of C2 ISAC, a communications-sector information-sharing body, and discusses compliance and government security roles across CMMC, NIST, FedRAMP and related frameworks.
Shawn Edwards' posts focus on telecommunications and government security compliance, rather than EV charging cyber security or chargepoint operators and installers.
Katie Colledge-Price's LinkedIn profile shows 2,669 followers as of 11 October 2026—a specialist audience rather than a mass-market one.
Read more
That scale suits a co-authored thought leadership piece or webinar for EV charging and cybersecurity professionals better than a broad awareness campaign.
Across three posts about the REA EV charging cyber security guidance, they write directly to local authorities, fleet operators, chargepoint operators and installers, and credit a named working group of industry specialists.
The posts focus on a 2025 report launch, offering a clear view of the professional readership they aim to reach.
Before committing budget, ask for LinkedIn follower demographics by location, industry and seniority, plus any delegate, attendance or registration list from the REA report launch event at the Victory Services Club.
If those data are unavailable, ask whether Katie holds audience survey results or newsletter subscriber data recording job function or employer type.
Colledge-Price's posts describe collaborative work on a shared industry document, not a commercial sponsorship or partnership offer.
Read more
They say they lead the REA Cyber Security Working Group, worked with named industry experts and helped produce and launch the REA EV Charging Cyber Security Report, including a launch panel at the Victory Services Club alongside others such as Hubject's chief executive.
The posts point to co-authored industry guidance, contributor credits and an event launch with several organisations as the closest examples of partnership.
They give no terms for working with Colledge-Price personally: no sponsorship policy, media kit, rate card, audience data, editorial conditions or partnership contact route.
The REA publishes the report, and the posts do not explain how outside organisations can join the working group or contribute.
Before budgeting for a co-authored piece or webinar, ask directly about scope, credit, approvals and the terms for working together.
A cybersecurity consultancy seeking to establish itself in EV charging infrastructure is a strong match for Katie Colledge-Price on subject, audience and format.
Read more
The posts show three things a buyer can build on.
First, they address buyers concerned with EV charging cybersecurity: protecting chargepoint infrastructure from cyber attack, and reaching local authorities, fleet operators, chargepoint operators and installers.
Second, there is published work to anchor a campaign.
Colledge-Price describes leading the REA Cyber Security Working Group and helping produce and launch the REA EV Charging Cyber Security Report.
The launch post offers a usable content spine: threat monitoring and response readiness, secure-by-design for chargepoints, ETSI EN 303 645 and RED compliance with secure communications, Cyber Essentials Plus in the supply chain, PCI/DSS for payments, and the role of CAF and licensing from 2028.
Third, the format matches how they work: collaborative and convening, with a working group, named contributors and a launch panel.
That suits a co-authored article or joint webinar better than solo commentary.
The technical angle is specific enough to carry a session rather than a general threat overview.
One post argues that data and communications infrastructure connected to EV charging should be treated as untrusted by default, naming encrypted SIMs, end-to-endpoint protection, dynamic connections and honeypots.
It ties this to ISO 15118 and Plug and Charge, arguing that chargepoint operators, e-mobility service providers and installers will need to meet existing National Cyber Security Centre requirements.
A consultancy can take a position on that argument or supply the implementation depth behind it.
The only measured audience number in the posts is 2,669 LinkedIn followers, with no industry, seniority or employer breakdown.
Ask for audience demographic data before setting reach targets.
The posts also do not state personal working terms, such as a rate card, media kit, editorial conditions or partnership contact route; ask directly.
The work described is REA work, so co-branding and reuse of the report will need REA's agreement.
Before committing budget, confirm whether the REA working group role is current; who owns the guidance document and what can be quoted or repurposed; whether launch event registration data exists; and how credit and approval would work on a co-authored piece.
When to choose a specialist
A consumer-facing EV brand running a broad awareness campaign is a poor fit based on the posts.
Read more
If the campaign aims for mass reach — putting a charging app, home charger or consumer vehicle in front of general car buyers through lifestyle, review or personality-led content — the posts do not support it.
All three are written for professionals: policy and standards material aimed at local authorities, fleets, chargepoint operators and installers.
The tone is technical and programme-level, not consumer-facing.
The posts include no consumer review, product demonstration, driving content or human-interest work.
The reach numbers point the same way.
The profile shows 2,669 followers, with no breakdown by industry, seniority or geography.
That indicates a specialist professional audience, not a mass-market one.
A campaign judged on impressions or broad consumer awareness would be working against the audience indicated by the posts.
A second mismatch is the need for documented commercial terms up front, such as paid promotion, sponsored posts, a rate card or guaranteed placements.
The posts do not describe a sponsorship or partnership offer, pricing or inquiry route.
Confirm terms directly before building a campaign around a paid-placement package; the posts alone do not provide enough information to cost or promise one.
A worked campaign example
A worked angle for a campaign seeking to apply the REA guidance: a co-authored explainer series built around applying the guidance, comprising one 45–60 minute webinar and one companion article.
Why this shape.
Katie Colledge-Price's posts are milestone-and-collaboration in style: a working group, credited contributors and a launch panel.
A joint session with a named co-speaker fits that pattern.
The consultancy supplies the implementation depth the guidance deliberately avoids; they supply working group context and industry framing.
The angle in one line: the report tells operators what they need to meet; the series shows them how to choose and sequence it. That is a concrete, defensible pitch: the launch post lists the standards and obligations, and the no-trust post stakes out a technical position on network security.
How the session runs.
Open with the present-day framing in the posts — National Cyber Security Centre and National Crime Agency warnings about threats to chargepoint infrastructure and critical national infrastructure — and state plainly that this is a live rollout problem, not a future one.
Then walk through the report's checklist, each item tied to an operator decision: threat monitoring and response readiness as a staffing and process choice; secure-by-design principles as a procurement clause; ETSI EN 303 645, RED compliance and secure communications as requirements to specify; Cyber Essentials Plus as a supply chain filter; PCI/DSS as the payment layer; and CAF and licensing from 2028 as forward planning.
Close the technical half with the no-trust argument: encrypted SIMs, end-to-endpoint protection, dynamic connections and honeypots, framed around ISO 15118 and Plug and Charge and what they mean for chargepoint operators, e-mobility service providers and installers meeting National Cyber Security Centre requirements.
Finish by addressing local authorities, fleets, chargepoint operators and installers in turn, as the posts already segment the audience, with one next step for each.
Roles and deliverables.
Colledge-Price as co-host and co-author, credited equally, opening with the working group context and closing with the industry call to action; the consultancy handles standards detail and implementation answers.
Outputs: the live session, a recorded version, a companion article expanding one checklist item, and a short downloadable checklist drawn from the session structure.
Confirm that the REA working group role is current and whether the guidance document can be referenced, excerpted or co-branded; the work is REA's, so permission matters.
Ask whether audience data exists, including a follower demographic breakdown or launch event registrations, to set realistic registration targets.
Agree in advance who approves the finished article and how credit is worded.
If guaranteed reach figures or paid-placement terms are required, confirm them before starting; the posts do not state them.
Consider Frank Policastro if the campaign should lead with executive cyber resilience rather than EV charging.
Read more
In a September 2026 post, Policastro frames incident readiness as a leadership issue, asking whether organizations can understand risk, detect attacks, respond, and keep operating. That gives a consultancy a strong basis for a board-focused webinar, but the post does not address chargepoint infrastructure or EV-sector standards.
The post supports a resilience-and-leadership angle; the consultancy would need to make the EV-charging connection. That makes this a less sector-specific alternative to Katie Colledge-Price.
Consider Shawn Edwards for a campaign about cyber resilience across telecommunications and critical infrastructure.
Read more
A June 2026 post describes sector-wide information sharing through C2 ISAC and explains how sharing indicators, vulnerabilities, tactics, and operational lessons can strengthen collective defense. That could support a webinar about infrastructure coordination and threat information sharing.
The post focuses on communications infrastructure, not EV charging, and offers none of the EV-specific guidance, standards, or chargepoint context in Colledge-Price's work. The consultancy would need to build that bridge.
Consider Nash Fayyad if the campaign needs a broader commercial-fleet electrification frame alongside its cyber message.
Read more
A May 2025 post connects fleet transition with operational experience and innovation, while naming fleet operators and logistics leaders as part of the change. That could help introduce an EV infrastructure webinar to a wider fleet audience.
Shawn Edwards's post does not discuss cybersecurity, chargepoint security, or technical controls. The consultancy would need to supply nearly all the cyber substance, making this a less direct choice for a cyber-resilience campaign.
Katie Colledge-Price's LinkedIn posts discuss cyber security for electric-vehicle charging: an announcement ahead of the REA cyber security guidance document, the launch post for the REA EV Charging Cyber Security Report setting out what it covers, and a shorter post arguing for a no-trust approach to chargepoint data and communications networks.
The posts describe the REA working group role, the report's contents and the launch event.
As of 11 October 2026, the LinkedIn profile shows 2,669 followers.
The posts state or describe these points, and no employer or credential is verified beyond what the posts say.
The posts have no publication dates, so nothing here is dated.
Katie Colledge-Price's launch post describes the guidance report, but the report itself is not discussed here.
The posts do not state audience demographics, engagement data, a rate card or partnership terms.
The posts here discuss the EV charging cyber security programme; they do not establish whether Katie Colledge-Price has other lines of work.
Names appearing as hashtags or as panel participants in the posts are mentions, not evidence of sponsors, clients or employers.
