Bryce Goehring writes about geomembrane containment projects, including how site conditions should guide liner material selection. Goehring's posts also discuss supply-chain support and Titan Environmental’s North American growth.
Useful for technical posts on geomembrane liner selection tied to site conditions and supply support.
Best for
A geomembrane liner maker targeting civil and environmental engineers who specify containment systems.
Not for
Consumer home improvement or landscaping liner campaigns aimed at homeowners.
Key takeaways
Liner selection should follow site investigation, not precede it.
HDPE, LLDPE and RPP suit different site conditions and are not interchangeable.
They discuss customer support during resin and freight cost increases.
Check first: Ask for recent results and audience analytics on comparable technical topics and formats.
Main ideas
Let site evidence lead the liner specification · Meet supply volatility with customer collaboration · Treat logistics and capacity as part of supporting growth
Bryce Goehring writes about geomembrane containment, supply-chain challenges, and Titan Environmental’s growth.
Their technical perspective is that liner selection should follow a clear understanding of site conditions—not precede it.
They also write about helping customers navigate cost volatility and expanding Titan’s North American operations.
Goehring connects material choice to the conditions a containment system must withstand.
In their post on choosing geomembrane materials, they explain how chemical exposure, temperature, UV, subgrade, installation method, and service life affect whether HDPE, LLDPE, or RPP is suitable.
A specification made before the site investigation is complete can build risk into a project.
Across the posts, Bryce Goehring emphasizes decisions grounded in practical conditions: matching containment materials to site conditions and responding to market pressure by working closely with customers.
Read more
A company-growth announcement adds logistics and operating capacity as another priority.
Let site evidence lead the liner specification
Goehring argues that choosing a geomembrane before clarifying the site investigation and chemical exposure profile can build risk into a project specification.
Read more
Temperature, UV exposure, chemical composition, subgrade conditions, and installation method all matter; no one material suits every set of conditions. They acknowledge that procurement timelines and budgets can limit investigation, but warn that the resulting specification may carry risks it was not designed for.
In a post about containment projects, Goehring contrasts HDPE, LLDPE, and RPP, noting that each performs well under particular conditions. They argue that site data should guide the choice, rather than selecting a material first and asking the investigation to catch up.
Meet supply volatility with customer collaboration
When resin and freight costs rise, Goehring focuses on what a company can do: stay close to customers, understand their immediate constraints, and use supply networks to help keep projects moving.
Read more
They present collaboration and adaptability as a practical response to forces a company cannot control.
Goehring describes helping teams secure materials ahead of cost increases, comparing the situation with earlier disruptions in 2008 and during COVID-19. They argue that companies that collaborate and adapt can emerge stronger.
Treat logistics and capacity as part of supporting growth
In a company announcement, Goehring links expansion to practical operating needs: supporting North American teams and improving logistics between the US and Canada.
Read more
Goehring describes Titan Environmental's new North American headquarters as the result of about two years of planning, with space for corporate support teams and infrastructure to support continued production-capacity expansion.
See how Goehring reasons about a containment spec.
Read more
This piece shows a working point of view rather than general industry commentary.
Goehring walks through the real order of a containment project: site investigation, chemical exposure profile and a 20- or 30-year service-life picture should come before the liner material is fixed.
When specification runs ahead of site data, the risk is baked in at that stage rather than during installation.
The post names HDPE, LLDPE and RPP and notes that each performs well within a particular range; temperature, UV exposure, chemical composition of the contained material, subgrade conditions and installation method all affect which one is right.
The closing line sets the hard conversation about specification against a harder one about failure.
For brands planning a campaign
A technical article or webinar on investigation-led specification can use this as its spine. The named variables provide a ready-made talking track, and the “risk is built at specification” framing positions Goehring alongside civil and environmental engineers as a peer rather than a supplier pitching a product.
See how Goehring speaks to customers when commercial conditions tighten.
Read more
The post shows the operating style behind the technical work.
Goehring describes recent increases in resin and freight costs driven by global pressures and their effects on supply chains and project timelines.
The response includes closer customer contact, helping teams secure materials ahead of increases and leaning on supply networks.
They reference having been through similar cycles in 2008 and during COVID-19, and argue that companies that collaborate and adapt come out stronger.
The post ends with an open invitation to connect.
For brands planning a campaign
Useful as a secondary example for brands looking to cover procurement under volatility: Goehring addresses cost pressure in public. It is corporate messaging rather than technical instruction, so it supports the material-selection piece rather than replacing it.
Read this for context on the organisation Goehring represents and where it is growing.
Read more
Goehring announces a new North American headquarters after roughly two years of planning, intended to support North American operations and improve logistics between US and Canadian markets.
The facility is described as fully operational and housing corporate support teams, with continued expansion of production capacity also mentioned.
They thank those who attended the grand opening.
For brands planning a campaign
Helps a brand assess the company's footprint, market reach and growth posture when framing an approach. On its own, it is a weak anchor for technical content; use it as background.
The liner decision should follow the site investigation, not the procurement calendar1
Membrane families have a range of conditions, not a ranking1
Supply volatility met with customer proximity1
Public communication of company growth and logistics1
The liner decision should follow the site investigation, not the procurement calendar
Goehring’s central argument is about sequencing.
Read more
In containment projects, material selection often happens before the full site investigation, before the chemical exposure profile is confirmed, and before anyone has a clear picture of what a liner will face over a 20- or 30-year service life. In their framing, that builds risk into the specification rather than the installation.
Goehring names the variables that should drive a specification: temperature range, UV exposure, chemical composition of the contained material, subgrade conditions, and installation method.
They treat these as a set that must be answered together, not as interchangeable checkboxes.
They also describe a pattern observed through field experience: projects have the fewest problems when site data drives the spec rather than following it.
Goehring notes that procurement timelines and budget pressure do not always allow time for investigation-led selection. In those cases, the spec carries risks it was not designed to carry.
For brands planning a campaign
This is the strongest hook for a campaign by a liner manufacturer.
The manufacturer could build a technical article or webinar around Goehring’s sequence—site data first, then material—with their variables as the agenda.
Their closing line (“The upfront conversation is harder to have.
The failure conversation is much harder.”) gives engineers language to justify the slower specification path internally and gives the brand a concrete, non-promotional angle for a co-presented session.
Membrane families have a range of conditions, not a ranking
Goehring writes that HDPE performs exceptionally in many conditions, as do LLDPE and RPP, but each excels within a specific range and will not hold up outside it as the design assumes.
Read more
The piece focuses on matching material to a defined exposure rather than selecting a default or a best-in-class product.
For brands planning a campaign
This is useful for comparison-style content.
A manufacturer could support a decision aid mapping membrane types to condition profiles, with Goehring’s variables as the axes, and let engineers reach their own conclusions.
That format suits a specification audience better than a product-first message and fits the way Goehring already discusses tradeoffs.
In a separate post on rising resin and freight costs, Goehring treats market volatility as something to respond to rather than control.
Read more
They describe a customer-facing response: staying close to buyers in real time, helping teams secure materials ahead of increases, and using supply networks to keep projects moving. They reference 2008 and COVID-19 as earlier cycles and argue that companies leaning into collaboration and adaptability come out stronger.
For brands planning a campaign
This shows a commercial register alongside the technical one.
Goehring is comfortable discussing procurement pressure, cost timing, and continuity of supply—not only specification detail.
For a manufacturer, that broadens potential collaboration beyond engineering audiences to include supply and project-planning conversations.
Public communication of company growth and logistics
Goehring has posted about the opening of a North American headquarters for Titan Environmental, describing roughly two years of planning, the goal of better supporting North American operations, and improved logistics between US and Canadian markets.
Read more
The post also notes the facility’s role in supporting production capacity.
The post is framed as a milestone update for a professional audience: what was built, why, what it now enables, and a thank-you to attendees.
For brands planning a campaign
This shows a willingness to publish company news, not just technical arguments—a relevant signal if a partnership includes launch or expansion announcements. It also shows operations and logistics as topics Goehring will discuss publicly, opening an angle beyond engineering-focused campaigns.
The posts are short LinkedIn notes: a problem stated, relevant variables or context named, and a closing line.
Read more
Two present technical or industry arguments about containment and supply pressure; one covers a company milestone.
No post dates or longer-form work such as articles or transcripts appear in the available posts. Ask for writing samples before commissioning a lengthy bylined article.
For brands planning a campaign
Set expectations accordingly.
For a technical article or webinar, plan on an interview or a drafted piece reviewed by Goehring rather than expecting unprompted long-form publication.
For social distribution, short co-authored posts or contributed commentary match the observed pattern.
Bryce Goehring's posts name one business: Titan Environmental.
Read more
The post announcing the company's new North American headquarters refers to "our new North American HQ" and "our corporate support teams" and carries the #TitanEnvironmental hashtag, showing they are part of the company.
The other posts—one on geomembrane material selection and one on resin and freight cost pressures—describe industry conditions and how their side helps customers without naming a brand.
Ask what their role is at Titan Environmental.
Titan Environmental
Disclosed partnership
Announced the opening of the company's new North American headquarters, describing it as "our new North American HQ" and "the home for our corporate support teams," with the #TitanEnvironmental and #corporategrowth hashtags.
Read more
The post shows Bryce Goehring is affiliated with Titan Environmental. Ask what their role is at the company.
Bryce Goehring's work in this set is a short group of LinkedIn posts for people who plan, specify, or supply construction and containment projects.
Read more
Start with the geomembrane post: it argues that liner material selection should follow site investigation, not precede it, and names the variables that matter: temperature range, UV exposure, chemical exposure, subgrade conditions, and installation method.
Then read the supply-cost post for their commercial register, where resin and freight cost pressure is met with customer proximity and supply-network help.
The headquarters post shows a company-growth and logistics side.
Follow Goehring for concise arguments about material specification and supply conditions.
For adjacent perspectives, Anthony Jasso is closest on consultative business development, Brenda Soucy on international logistics and trade compliance, and Tom Conzelman on construction project risk and early planning.
Both turn a service conversation into a broader business problem.
Read more
Jasso's transportation posts argue that understanding a customer's growth, pressures, and supply chain should come before pitching freight.
That echoes Goehring's argument that liner selection should follow site conditions rather than procurement timing.
Both teach through first-person lessons from past meetings or projects.
Jasso focuses on sales and business development in transportation; Goehring focuses on containment material specification and supply conditions. Jasso tells a personal story, draws a lesson, and asks readers a question; Goehring's technical post makes a compact argument about project sequencing.
Both write about supply chains as coordinated systems where planning, communication, and execution decide outcomes.
Read more
Soucy's Air Force Day post draws a direct parallel between military operations and international logistics, while the canned-vegetable post explains a regulatory change and sets out compliance points for importers.
Soucy's recent material centers on customs, trade compliance, and community reflection, while Goehring's centers on geomembrane materials and site investigation. Soucy's regulatory post is a structured advisory notice; Goehring's posts are shorter arguments or company updates.
Both explain how early project decisions carry downstream cost, schedule, and risk.
Read more
Conzelman's Trader Joe's facility post stresses tight sequencing, coordination, and engaging project developers early.
The California legislation post warns that regulatory changes can become change orders or delays.
That echoes Goehring's warning that a specification decided before site data carries risks it was not designed for.
Conzelman writes about commercial construction, project management, and regulatory risk; Goehring writes about containment liners, material selection, and supply conditions. Conzelman uses construction-project case details and numbered impacts; Goehring's technical post makes a compact argument.
Bryce Goehring reaches a LinkedIn following of about 2,859 people, and the subjects in the posts here — geomembrane material selection, the cost of specifying a liner before site investigation is complete, resin and freight cost pressure, and Titan Environmental's North American expansion — sit close to the subject matter of a geomembrane manufacturer's campaign.
Read more
That is enough to justify testing a technical material-selection placement with this audience, and not enough to promise it lands with specifying engineers.
No demographic data, survey, engagement breakdown, or per-post performance data is published in the posts here.
Age, country, job function, employer, and seniority are therefore unmeasured here, and a follower count is a scale signal rather than a fit signal.
What the posts do show is content appeal: the writing is peer-to-peer and technical — service-life conditions, chemical exposure profiles, why HDPE, LLDPE, and RPP are not interchangeable — rather than promotional.
That points to an audience that follows containment and civil works topics, but it is a judgment from the posts' subject matter, not a measurement of who read them.
For a technical material-selection placement, treat this as an audience-relevance test rather than a proven match.
Ask Goehring for recent results on comparable technical topics and formats, and for any audience survey or platform analytics that breaks down follower job function and industry.
If those exist, they answer the question a technical material-selection placement actually needs answered; if they do not, plan the first placement as a small test with its own success measure.
Bryce Goehring's three posts do not document a partnership or sponsorship offer.
Read more
They are operational and commercial rather than promotional: one explains why geomembrane material selection should follow site investigation rather than procurement timelines, one describes how a supplier can help customers manage resin and freight cost increases, and one announces Titan Environmental's new North American headquarters.
The supply-chain post invites people facing similar challenges to connect, but does not provide a sponsorship route, rate card, or media kit.
Brands should ask directly about partnership availability, formats, and terms, and confirm any agreement in writing.
A good fit for the technical premise, provided the first placement is treated as a measured test, not a proven audience match.
Read more
Brief
A geomembrane liner manufacturer wants to reach civil and environmental engineers who specify containment systems. It proposes a short technical article or webinar on selecting materials based on site investigations, with outreach highlighting Bryce Goehring’s practical specification expertise.
Reasons
The geomembrane post is directly on brief. Bryce Goehring argues that material selection often happens too early—before the site investigation, chemical exposure profile and service-life picture are clear. In that framing, the risk is built into the specification, not the installation. A manufacturer can use that sequence to anchor an article or webinar without leading with a product.
The same post offers a ready agenda: temperature range, UV exposure, chemical composition of the contained material, subgrade conditions and installation method. Goehring also says HDPE, LLDPE and RPP each perform well in particular conditions; they are not interchangeable or rankable by default. That gives engineers a useful basis for comparing options.
The writing is practical and peer-to-peer, not promotional—a better fit for a specification audience than a general brand-awareness message.
The subjects Goehring comments on include supply and procurement pressures, giving a manufacturer room to address cost timing and continuity of supply alongside technical selection.
Goehring’s posts do not describe a commercial route; there is no rate card, media kit or published sponsorship format. Ask directly about terms and confirm them in writing rather than assuming an advertised offer.
Risks
The audience record shows about 2,859 LinkedIn followers, but provides no breakdown by job function, industry, seniority or engagement. The posts suggest appeal to containment and civil works readers, but do not measure it. Ask for audience and engagement data before committing.
The reviewed work consists of short LinkedIn posts. No long-form article, webinar or transcript is available, so plan on an interview or a drafted piece for Goehring to review rather than assuming they will produce long-form content without prompting.
There is no per-post or video performance data. Set a simple success measure for the first collaboration and ask for comparable past results.
When to choose a specialist
Poor fit based on the available posts.
Read more
Brief
A direct-to-consumer home-improvement brand wants a construction-industry name to host a short-form video series on backyard pond and landscaping liners for homeowners.
Reasons
The posts are business-to-business and technical or corporate, covering liner specification, resin and freight cost pressures, and a North American headquarters opening. They show no homeowner project content, retail buying advice, landscaping aesthetics or consumer-facing explanations.
The available work consists of LinkedIn text posts. No video samples, on-camera work or consumer short-form formats are available, so a hosted video campaign would rely on an unverified format assumption.
The audience record gives a professional follower count but no homeowner or consumer share. The content points toward containment and civil works readers, not a demonstrated consumer audience.
There is no documented sponsorship or partnership route. A consumer campaign would require negotiating terms, deliverables and disclosure from scratch.
What would change it
Ask for representative consumer-facing work, video samples and an audience breakdown showing meaningful homeowner reach. Request documented partnership terms before treating this as an executable campaign fit.
A worked campaign example
Angle
Use Goehring’s sequence as the agenda. Open with the practical cost of specifying before the site data is complete: risk is fixed at specification, not installation. Then cover the variables that should drive the decision—temperature range, UV exposure, chemical composition of the contained material, subgrade conditions and installation method—and explain why HDPE, LLDPE and RPP are matched to conditions rather than ranked. Address the procurement-pressure exception: timelines and budgets do not always allow a fuller investigation, and that is when a specification carries risk it was not designed to bear. Close with a short decision checklist and Goehring’s line about the upfront conversation being harder than the failure conversation.
Audience
Civil and environmental engineers who write or influence containment liner specifications.
Campaign
Specify from the site, not the calendar: a technical article or webinar on investigation-led liner selection.
Format
A roughly 1,200-word co-bylined technical article or a 30-minute webinar with a short written companion. Produce it from an interview with Goehring, draft it internally and send the draft for review. Distribute it through a LinkedIn co-post and the manufacturer’s engineer newsletter.
Outreach draft
Bryce — your post on liner material selection made a practical point our engineers keep running into: the risk is often fixed at specification, before the site data is complete. We’d like to co-produce a short technical article or webinar that follows your sequence—site investigation, chemical exposure, service life, then material—and turns it into a decision checklist for specifying engineers. We can draft it from a 20-minute interview, keep it technical and non-promotional, and send it to you for review before publication. Would you be open to a short call? If it’s a fit, we’ll confirm the scope and any commercial terms in writing.
Success measures
Engineer registrations or article reads from a named specification audience.
Checklist downloads or replies from people who specify containment systems.
Goehring’s review completed and a clear decision on a second placement.
Choose Tom Conzelman when the manufacturer wants to reach the people who decide whether a containment project happens at all—owners, developers and construction managers—rather than only the engineers writing the liner spec.
Read more
They make the same “decide early” case from the delivery side.
A 125,000-square-foot, $47 million manufacturing facility in Franklin County, Rocky Mount, Virginia, was announced in January 2020, then sat on hold for five years.
The stated lesson: engaging experienced project developers before ground-up design can prevent design defects, costly change orders, rework and schedule delays.
A second post argues that regulatory changes can quietly reshape cost, schedule, risk and procurement strategy long before anyone breaks ground.
It echoes Goehring’s “risk built in at specification, not installation” argument, moved one stage earlier—from liner spec to project definition.
This suits a campaign that wants the manufacturer in the room as containment scope is framed, or outreach to owners and developers who hire the engineers.
Conzelman moves the campaign up a level, from liner specification to project-delivery risk.
Their credibility in the posts is grounded in project-management credentials and large manufacturing build-outs, not civil or environmental engineering.
The shortlist shifts from “who engineers trust on liner choice” to “who owners trust on delivery risk”; keep a separate technical spokesperson for material science.
Choose Anthony Jasso when the hard part is the outreach conversation, not the technical content.
Read more
Their posts describe asking a prospect where the business wants to be in three years, what keeps them up at night and what breaks first if the company doubles—and letting transportation barely come up for the next hour.
Another post describes driving past a facility, counting trailers and researching the business before making contact.
For a liner manufacturer, that offers a model for the first meeting with an engineering or procurement contact: understand the site and project pressures before presenting membrane options.
It fits the outreach email, sales-call opening and campaign coaching material better than the article or webinar itself.
Jasso focuses on freight and business development.
Their posts offer a well-told discovery-conversation narrative, not containment or material-selection expertise.
Consider Jasso as a supporting voice on how to open a conversation with a prospect, not as a substitute for the technical premise that made Bryce a match.
Brenda Soucy, Grad. Cert. IB, CIFFA Advanced, CPSM, P.Log
Choose Brenda Soucy when the campaign needs to reach the import and trade-compliance staff inside the same organizations — buyers moving membrane, resin, or equipment across the Canada–US border — or when regulatory currency is the hook.
Read more
The posts here cover a CBSA notice on a temporary 10% surtax on certain canned vegetable imports, effective June 29, 2026 for up to 200 days while the CITT investigates, including affected tariff lines, country-of-origin implications, and the warning that importers should review classifications and supporting documentation and that entries may be reassessed.
The other post summarizes more than 20 years in international logistics and global trade.
The framing is close to Goehring's: a change made well before the work starts that compounds into cost and documentation problems if the team doesn't see it early.
It suits a second track aimed at the trade and procurement side of the same containment supply chain, or a webinar pairing liner selection with importing the material.
There is no containment or material-science content, and the audience shown is import/export and supply-chain compliance rather than civil or environmental engineering.
Substituting Soucy changes the campaign subject from liner specification to trade compliance, which reaches a different buyer inside a similar account.
The compliance post is also written as a formatted announcement with tariff lists rather than as a peer-to-peer technical argument, so a co-produced article would need a different editorial treatment than the one drafted for Goehring.
Bryce Goehring, C.E.T., has three LinkedIn posts: one on geomembrane material selection and specification timing, one on resin and freight cost pressure, and one on Titan Environmental's North American headquarters opening.
The LinkedIn profile showed about 2,859 followers on 8 October 2026.
The posts do not show publication dates, so this profile does not claim a chronology or a full record of Goehring's work.
The posts do not provide audience job function and seniority, per-post dates, engagement or reach data, longer-form or video work, or sponsorship or rate information.
The title and description cover overview, ideas, relationships, discovery, and fit.