# Sam Curry

Sam Curry discusses cybersecurity, workload identity, and the security and leadership challenges raised by agentic AI. Sam shares these ideas through professional posts, interviews, and conference talks.

- Profile: https://b2binfluencer.marketing/creators/sam-curry/
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/currysam
- LinkedIn followers: 24,791
- Topics: artificial-intelligence, leadership, cybersecurity, ai-governance, agentic-ai, ai-security, zero-trust
- Based on 11 dated posts, latest 2026-10-03

## Summary

Sam Curry is most useful for practitioner commentary on agentic AI security, workload identity, and accountability.

- Best for: An enterprise identity-security vendor wanting long-form conversation, not a scripted product pitch.
- Not for: A brand wanting scripted endorsement, code-level tutorial, or sponsored post based on follower count.
- Check first: Confirm commercial terms, deliverables, and audience reach before committing spend.

### Takeaways

- Agentic AI is first a governance and accountability problem.
- Securing agentic AI means getting the basics right, not chasing novelty.
- Non-human identity is the concrete problem beneath the agentic AI conversation.

## Main ideas

- **Agentic AI is first a governance and accountability problem**: Sam Curry argues that as autonomous agents enter workflows, the hard questions concern accountability and predictability, not which new capability to adopt. When decisions come from a network of agents, old management rules no longer apply: how do you maintain accountability and predictability with non-deterministic technology? They ask the audience to name the leadership challenges they see in AI-powered teams, leaving the question open.
- **Securing agentic AI means getting the basics right, not chasing novelty**: Curry emphasizes fundamentals as agents multiply. The key question is not what new capabilities offer, but whether basic security is done properly and what happens as agentic tools spread. They call out "sprawl," pointing to a hygiene and control problem rather than a purely technical breakthrough.
- **Non-human identity is the concrete problem beneath the agentic AI conversation**: Curry connects agentic AI to workload identity: as machines increasingly talk to machines, organizations must authenticate and authorize "silicon identities." They frame this as a core zero trust problem, not a side detail, making it the most operational position in the posts.
- **Ask whether a feature is actually used—and whether data can be used without being known**: Curry highlights two practical tests for AI: how to tell whether a feature is actually used, and how to use information without knowing it to build better systems. Both are verification and privacy-engineering questions, not adoption cheerleading. They connect these questions to the societal and cybersecurity impact of agentic AI.
- **Working through ideas in public—and handing judgment to the audience**: Curry's public material favors dialogue over one-way commentary: podcast interviews, a live recording, and conference-floor conversations. They invite listeners and readers to assess the discussion—what was right, what was missed, and what challenges they see—making the audience part of the argument, not just its recipient.

## Work to read

- [Talk with Richard Stiennon on the rise of agentic AI](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/currysam_what-does-the-rise-of-agentic-ai-mean-for-activity-7378767686576787456-ULuV)
- [RSAC conversation with Sander Almekinders on securing agentic AI](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/currysam_securing-agentic-ai-is-still-about-getting-activity-7444804209725788160-YTxK)
- [Dark Reading interview on authenticating workloads and machine identities](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/currysam_ai-overload-how-to-solve-the-workload-identity-activity-7437213556908949505-CueR)
- [Article on leadership in the age of agentic AI](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/currysam_ai-leadership-futureofwork-activity-7510382118456369153-61vZ)
- [CISO Series podcast live recording in Boston](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/currysam_ciso-series-podcast-live-in-boston-activity-7325880321839611907-SPbZ)

## Brand relationships

- **Zscaler** (mention)
- **National Security Institute** (mention)
- **CISO Series** (mention)
- **RSAC Conference** (mention)
- **Dark Reading** (mention)
- **Cybersecurity Coalition** (mention)

## Partnerships

Sam Curry’s posts feature conference sessions, podcast and interview appearances, and links to articles. They read as their own commentary and promotion of those appearances, rather than placements a brand could buy. Organizations named alongside the posts, including Zscaler, the National Security Institute, and the Cybersecurity Coalition, appear as affiliations and audience tags; the posts don’t indicate payment or a purchasable format. Ask Sam directly about rates and availability for sponsored posts, talks, or written placements.

## Alternatives

- Deepen Desai: When the campaign's buyer task is security operations rather than identity. Desai's public work is a closer fit for a vendor selling detection, investigation, and automated remediation to SOC leaders. One post describes an agentic security operations launch that unifies exposure and threat management, feeds agents inline telemetry across network, identity, endpoint, cloud, and AI, and closes the loop from detection to enforcement through a zero trust platform. Another describes testing frontier models against real attack and defense scenarios and reports how multi-step reasoning changed the way exploit paths get built. For a campaign showing security leaders how defenders find and contain attacks faster, this is the closer match. Curry's public framing focuses on authenticating and authorizing non-human identities, so a buyer whose product is the identity layer itself is making a different argument.
- Jay Chaudhry: When the decision is a keynote-stage architecture argument delivered at chief executive level, with named enterprise customers as proof. One post describes Gartner CIO and CISO Summit keynotes built around 'build for the secure agentic future,' including a CISO describing a legacy network dismantled and a CIO consolidating more than 20 legacy systems onto one platform. It also delivers a direct message to CEOs, CIOs, and CISOs: reduce inertia instead of bolting security onto legacy architecture. Another post argues that AI agents inherit massive privileges, that firewalls and VPNs will not secure them, and that every user and agent should be treated as untrusted. For a campaign aimed at executives buying a strategic zero trust direction, this voice fits better than a practitioner conversation, with the vendor positioned as the architect rather than the guest.
- Cole Grolmus: When the buyer task is competitive and financial context rather than practitioner argument. The posts walk through a quarter and a product launch in numbers: revenue and ARR growth, emerging-product share of new business, disclosure gaps the company had not updated, and the acquisitions assembled behind a SecOps launch. The second post benchmarks a smaller platform's quarter against a larger rival on ARR, growth rate, and net-new ARR, then assesses the strategy against that peer group. For a vendor preparing investor or board conversations, or a campaign that needs an outside analyst to frame a company's position against competitors, this is the work the task requires.

---
AI-assisted summary of public posts. Audience demographics are not available. Engagement appears only where we checked recent posts. Method: https://b2binfluencer.marketing/methodology/