# Liat Shetret

Liat Shetret is a compliance leader at Block, focused on building banking compliance and BSA/AML controls for digital-asset services. Shetret’s posts also explain crypto risks and compliance considerations for banks.

- Profile: https://b2binfluencer.marketing/creators/liat-shetret/
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/liat-shetret-1437a96
- LinkedIn followers: 14,701
- Topics: leadership
- Based on 12 dated posts, latest 2026-10-06

## Summary

Liat Shetret is most useful for bank-facing crypto compliance education and practical risk controls.

- Best for: A digital asset compliance software company planning a bank crypto risk webinar.
- Not for: A consumer crypto exchange or retail trading app promoting a retail feature.
- Check first: Ask for audience composition data and results from comparable bank crypto-risk sessions.

### Takeaways

- Banks should hold crypto only for narrow, provable business purposes.
- Crypto risk calls for extending bank controls, not replacing them.
- Building compliance for a digital-asset bank is a hands-on program build.

## Main ideas

- **Banks should hold crypto only for narrow, provable business purposes**: Shetret reads the OCC's Interpretive Letter 1186 as permission for national banks to hold assets such as BTC, ETH, SOL, and XRP only when the holdings serve a foreseeable operational need, such as paying blockchain network fees or running platform tests. The reasoning: tightly bounded permission lets banks experiment and learn within guardrails, without open-ended market exposure. They set out three conditions: holdings must be purpose-driven; they must be backed by robust risk and compliance assessments covering technology, operations, liquidity, cybersecurity, and illicit finance; and the total amount must remain de minimis relative to bank capital. Speculation is explicitly off the table.
- **Crypto risk calls for extending bank controls, not replacing them**: Shetret's bank education sessions start from the idea that digital assets create new failure modes that familiar risk and compliance work can address. The sessions pair crypto-specific structures, such as centralized versus decentralized exchanges and custodial versus non-custodial custody, with an attack taxonomy organized by layer — people, network, ledger, and supply chain. They then match each layer to defenses banks already understand, including risk assessment, technical literacy, clear accountability, and training against human error. The conclusion: controls should draw on traditional finance, with crypto-specific nuance.
- **Building compliance for a digital-asset bank is a hands-on program build**: Rather than casting compliance as oversight from a distance, Shetret frames building a digital-asset trust bank as construction work: designing and executing a compliance management system, supporting BSA/AML and OFAC controls, and partnering across risk, legal, operations, security, and business teams. The emphasis is on a builder-minded leader who can maintain a high regulatory bar while keeping the organization's operating tempo — a tension they treat as a design problem, not a reason to slow down.
- **Education should help banks set their own risk appetite and boundaries**: Shetret describes bank knowledge-sharing as more than explaining crypto terms. The post's goal is to help banks identify their own crypto risk exposure and appetite, then establish compliance boundaries through policies and procedures. That framing puts each bank's judgment at the center of the session: the educator draws parallels between crypto concepts and existing banking practices rather than prescribing a single answer.
- **A shift in vantage point: from vendor-led bank education to in-house bank building**: The posts approach the same subject — bank crypto compliance — from two positions. The OCC and education posts present an outside partner teaching banks, with an explicit invitation to use a vendor's training programs and certifications. The role posts take an insider's view: announcing a chief compliance officer and BSA officer position and recruiting a deputy to build the foundation for a proposed trust bank. The through line is that banks can engage with digital assets when limits, documentation, and controls are in place.

## Work to read

- [Explaining OCC Interpretive Letter 1186 on bank crypto holdings](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/liat-shetret-1437a96_blockchain-risk-web3-activity-7397030764510412800-wK_t)
- [Inside a bank crypto risk education session](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/liat-shetret-1437a96_dorkalert-cyber-crypto-activity-7361129862788485122-Osvd)
- [Hiring a deputy compliance leader for a proposed digital-asset bank](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/liat-shetret-1437a96_careers-deputy-chief-compliance-officer-activity-7511138483948695552-Q76U)
- [Taking on a CCO and BSA Officer role at Builders Bank & Trust (proposed)](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/liat-shetret-1437a96_im-happy-to-share-that-in-addition-to-my-activity-7503957005905346560-ppg8)

## Brand relationships

- **Block, Inc.** (employment)
- **Builders Bank & Trust (Proposed)** (employment)
- **Elliptic** (affiliate)

## Partnerships

Across four LinkedIn posts dated August 2025 to September 2026, Shetret writes about crypto compliance rules for banks, a bank education session run with Elliptic, their compliance leadership roles at Block, and a job posting for a deputy compliance hire. The posts do not describe a partnership, sponsorship, or paid-collaboration format, nor do they address commercial terms, audience commitments, content specifications, or availability as a promotional partner. Two business relationships are visible but not defined as paid formats: Shetret works at Block, and the bank education post points readers to Elliptic Learn programs and certifications without stating whether that work is a sponsorship or in-kind partnership. Before engaging, a buyer should ask about promotional availability, terms, audience commitments, and content specifications; no official inquiry route is described.

## Alternatives

- Sam Wellalage BSC MA: Choose Sam Wellalage when the webinar goal is talent and leadership movement between crypto and traditional finance, rather than bank crypto risk controls. Their posts analyze how crypto-native leaders and TradFi institutions hire differently. One example: a Head of Risk candidate was told a firm loved how fast they moved but worried about how fast they moved. Another is a market-infrastructure CFO appointment outside the sector. That makes Wellalage a fit for a webinar for bank and crypto executives on building crossover teams, governance expectations, and hiring processes.
- Aashiesh Chopra: Choose Aashiesh Chopra when the campaign calls for an executive-level narrative on where banking, digital assets, stablecoins, and agentic AI are heading, framed around the future of finance rather than operational bank compliance. Their posts cover a Berkeley finance summit with panels on stablecoins, AI-native finance, and agentic commerce. They also include a piece arguing that banking is separating from the bank through fintechs, digital-asset infrastructure, and platforms, with concepts such as License to Delegate and Mandate Share. That suits a webinar for CEOs, CIOs, CROs, and CFOs on strategic direction and the autonomous economy.
- Lance Morginn: Choose Lance Morginn when the campaign calls for a blockchain forensics and illicit-finance webinar for investigators, exchanges, or law-enforcement-adjacent teams. Their posts explain how blockchain data and analytics support real-time incident response, attribution, seizures, asset recovery, and policy. They also lay out compliance costs, including enforcement-driven drawdowns and reputational damage. That suits a session on tracing criminal activity, blockchain intelligence, and regulatory risk rather than a bank crypto risk framework.

---
AI-assisted summary of public posts. Audience demographics are not available. Engagement appears only where we checked recent posts. Method: https://b2binfluencer.marketing/methodology/