# David Wald

David Wald writes about workers’ compensation and risk management, focusing on how employers can keep claims, safety work, and reporting organized and visible.

- Profile: https://b2binfluencer.marketing/creators/david-wald/
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidawald
- LinkedIn followers: 7,694
- Topics: risk-management
- Based on 10 dated posts, latest 2026-10-07

## Summary

David Wald is most useful for explaining workers' comp and risk operations through concrete claims, handoff, and reporting problems.

- Best for: A workers' comp technology company reaching risk and safety leaders at multi-location employers.
- Not for: A national carrier or managed-care brand seeking broad Fortune 500 executive awareness with scripted product-first posts.
- Check first: Confirm follower job function, employer size, seniority, and recent post results before committing budget.

### Takeaways

- Improvised spreadsheets and scattered incident reports make a clear cost picture hard to produce.
- A claim can go quiet when the person tracking it leaves.
- A national average can conceal sharply different state medical-payment trends.

## Main ideas

- **Small fixes can add up to a system no one can see clearly**: Wald argues that operational problems often grow through reasonable, quick workarounds rather than one bad decision. Their combined cost becomes visible later, when a business needs reliable reporting, faces renewal, or loses the person who knows how the pieces fit together.
- **Programs should not depend on one person being constantly available**: Wald draws attention to risk work that depends on an individual’s memory, phone, or spare time. They see that dependence as an operational weakness, especially for smaller organizations without backup or time to build consistent processes.
- **A claim needs active follow-up, especially when roles change**: Wald argues that a handoff memo is not enough if open claims are not visible to the next person responsible. They focus on practical signs of drift: no carrier update, no recent activity, or no check that an injured worker is receiving care.
- **A single national trend can hide meaningful differences between states**: Wald argues that a blended medical-cost figure can mislead employers with operations in several states. They use industry research to make the case for reporting and budgeting by jurisdiction rather than assuming one average describes every part of a program. The figures and research are from WCRI, which Wald cites, not Wald’s own dataset.

## Work to read

- [Nobody decides to build a mountain of band-aids](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/davidawald_nobody-decides-to-build-a-mountain-of-band-aids-activity-7510685648228380672-Rxj5)
- [A claim doesn't need an owner to stay open](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/davidawald_when-the-safety-director-left-workers-comp-activity-7513207691800911872-3j3a)
- [The biggest risk in most risk programs isn't a bad claim. It's one person's phone.](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/davidawald_i-talked-to-a-risk-manager-at-a-small-municipal-activity-7510324764993843200-0IfB)
- [Budget the average and you're wrong in every state](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/davidawald_medical-payments-per-claim-rose-4-to-8-percent-activity-7509996640490024960-MwSj)

## Brand relationships

- **Workers Compensation Research Institute** (mention)

## Partnerships

David Wald's posts do not describe a sponsorship program, media kit, rate card, or partnership inquiry route. The four posts offer practitioner commentary on workers' compensation and risk operations: spreadsheet workarounds that accumulate into unmanageable claims data, medical cost trends that diverge by state, and open claims that drift when the person chasing them leaves. One post closes with "That's why we do what we do," suggesting they write from inside a workers' comp or risk software provider, but the posts do not name the company, describe outreach to creators, or offer sponsored placements. For a buyer planning a LinkedIn collaboration, there is no published format, approval process, disclosure practice, or pricing to plan against. Confirm deliverables, timeline, editing rights, and disclosure before finalizing a collaboration, and ask directly whether they accept sponsorships.

## Alternatives

- Gilberto Rosas: For the same campaign decision—a workers comp technology company reaching risk and safety leaders at multi-location employers on centralizing claims data and program handoffs—choose Gilberto Rosas only if the campaign is reframed for owners of B2B service agencies, with a sales-cycle and account-retention offer. The posts address the same buyer task at the agency-owner level: an agency owner at 34K a month with a seven-week cycle, three calls, and a follow-up problem. The fix is a shorter path to payment—one call, a pre-call form, three pricing options, a proposal walked through on screen, and a deposit link sent while the prospect is still on. Days to close moved from 46 to 11 and close rate rose five points. A second post covers retention: an agency owner at 41K a month lost a 9K client in one email after the client contact left. The rule now is three names on every account by day 30, each hearing monthly; two later departures did not cost the account. For a campaign about shortening a service sale or hardening account relationships, Rosas is the closer match.
- Kris Hutchinson: For the same campaign decision—a workers comp technology company reaching risk and safety leaders at multi-location employers on centralizing claims data and program handoffs—choose Kris Hutchinson only if the campaign is reframed to make B2B marketing and revenue numbers trustworthy. The posts address the same buyer task at the measurement layer: a company was told its conversion rate was 80 to 85 percent, but its own numbers said 35 to 40 percent. Two honest numbers used different denominators (sold versus delivered), and the real constraint turned out to be supply, not sales. The second post reports looking under the hood at hundreds of B2B companies and finding that ad platform and CRM numbers don't match, tracking is built once at launch and breaks with each change, and great companies treat marketing numbers like books—someone owns them, reconciles them on a schedule, and chases disagreements that week. For a campaign about revenue attribution, CRM hygiene, or reconciling conflicting performance reports, Hutchinson is the closer match.
- Andrea Diaz: For the same campaign decision—a workers comp technology company reaching risk and safety leaders at multi-location employers on centralizing claims data and program handoffs—choose Andrea Diaz only if the campaign is reframed for HR compliance and HR systems at multi-location employers. The posts show two sides of that work. One covers converging state rules on AI and background checks in hiring—Illinois HB-3773, amended California FEHA regulations, Washington screening limits starting July 1, and Philadelphia—and the common legal question of disparate impact, whether a human or an algorithm does the filtering. The other is a client story: nearly 200 employees, no HRIS, onboarding in email threads, offer letters and PTO in spreadsheets, I-9s in a folder, and the compliance exposure that follows. The fix is a proper HRIS; Diaz names Rippling as a preferred provider and offers referral pricing. For a campaign aimed at HR leaders, founders, or operators dealing with hiring compliance or HR system sprawl, Diaz is the closer match.

---
AI-assisted summary of public posts. Audience demographics are not available. Engagement appears only where we checked recent posts. Method: https://b2binfluencer.marketing/methodology/