# Carl Patten II

Carl Patten II shares work on youth cybersecurity education and workforce pathways in Atlanta, including hands-on camps built with Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta and Georgia State University.

- Profile: https://b2binfluencer.marketing/creators/carl-patten-ii/
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/cepattenii
- LinkedIn followers: 6,773
- Topics: cybersecurity
- Based on 10 dated posts, latest 2026-07-28

## Summary

Carl Patten II is useful for grounded details on youth cybersecurity camps, access steps, partners and measured participation in Atlanta.

- Best for: Youth workforce nonprofits, schools or Atlanta tech employers planning local cybersecurity pathway programs.
- Not for: Commercial cybersecurity firms seeking paid endorsements, buyer-focused posts, guaranteed reach or national audience targeting.
- Check first: Confirm their role, availability, commercial terms and verified LinkedIn audience data before contacting them.

### Takeaways

- Participation was free but required Club membership and summer-program enrollment, with two-step sign-up.
- Five-day CyberPatriot camp had 37 youth, 22 attended all five days, about 1,410 learning hours.
- Camp hosted by Georgia State University; first day had 35 of 40 registered teens.

## Main ideas

- **Build a pathway, not a one-off camp**: Patten presents the cybersecurity camp as an early step on a longer path connecting Club members with college opportunities and experienced professionals. The partnership brings a community organization’s reach to a university setting, with a role model who was once a Club member.
- **Make access practical and local**: For Patten, access means more than offering instruction: families need a clear way to join, and programs should reach communities where opportunity and resources are unevenly distributed. They connect the camp to Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta’s broader work in Clayton County and communities south of I-20.
- **Show reach and participation with numbers**: Patten uses attendance, persistence, learning hours, and participant demographics to make the program’s reach visible. The figures describe participation and exposure; they do not, by themselves, establish long-term learning or career outcomes.

## Work to read

- [Cyber Camp Day 1: 35 Atlanta teens start hands-on cybersecurity at Georgia State](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cepattenii_cybersecurity-claytoncounty-atlanta-activity-7474983090411532290-JP14)
- [Five-day CyberPatriot camp results: attendance, hours and who was reached](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cepattenii_cybercamp-highlights-activity-7483568682930110464-3XR2)
- [Countdown to CyberPatriot camp: free enrollment, ages 13–17, two-step sign-up](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cepattenii_cybersecurity-technology-atlanta-activity-7472328777574830080-cTKm)

## Brand relationships

- **Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta** (employment)
- **Georgia State University** (disclosed_partnership)
- **Boys & Girls Clubs of America** (mention)

## Partnerships

Carl Patten II describes an institutional partnership from the inside: a free cybersecurity camp run by Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta, hosted by Georgia State University. The posts spell out operational requirements useful for planning, though these are program requirements, not sponsorship terms. The camp was free to participants, but teens had to join a Club and enroll in summer programming; the advertised age range was 13 to 17. Both sides had named roles: Whitfield Samuel, Georgia State University's CISO and a former Club kid, represented the university; Brandon Farmer was the internal champion and handled transporting members; and Danielle Hall of the organization's Technology Committee supported the final day. The posts also cite Libby Saylor Wright for leadership support. Attendance and outcome figures were reported after the fact, not promised in advance. The partnership was measured through participation counts, retention across the week, hours of instruction, and participants' communities. No sponsorship or commercial partnership offer, rate card, media kit, audience specification, or brand inquiry route appears in the posts. Buyers considering a similar partnership can use the model and measurement practice as a reference, but should ask directly about sponsorship terms.

## Alternatives

- Frederick Douglas Lumpkin, MIS: For a nonprofit campaign aimed at proving long-term outcomes, Frederick Douglas Lumpkin is the stronger alternative. Their posts focus on whether young people who enter work-based learning return to work for the employer that first invested in them. That lens suits a funder or employer looking beyond attendance and placement counts to durable pipeline results. Lumpkin writes from experience working with hundreds of young people and employers, bringing a practical perspective on outcome measures and employer engagement questions.
- Peter Hancock: For a nonprofit campaign aimed at convening employers, educators, and workforce boards around a regional talent pipeline, Peter Hancock is the stronger alternative. Hancock’s posts document board leadership at Arapahoe/Douglas Works! and participation in aerospace workforce conversations with employers such as Blue Origin, Boeing, and United Airlines. That experience is useful when the main challenge is building a coalition and aligning workforce investment with regional industry demand, rather than designing cybersecurity lessons.
- Heather Jackson: For a nonprofit campaign focused on early career exploration and employer-led talent development across a state or regional ecosystem, Heather Jackson is the stronger alternative. Jackson’s posts describe board work with TechIndiana and iXplore, support for INCAP and the Build the Pipeline Summit, and a planned discussion at the Indiana Manufacturers Association Workforce Summit about career discovery, CTE, and connected pathways. Jackson is a useful comparator when the nonprofit wants to connect cybersecurity exposure to broader career exploration and employer engagement rather than run a stand-alone cyber camp.

---
AI-assisted summary of public posts. Audience demographics are not available. Engagement appears only where we checked recent posts. Method: https://b2binfluencer.marketing/methodology/